Re: "Dark City: Director's Cut" coming to Blu-ray on July 29
i'm with you ron, that's why i ought it so i can decide for myself on a film that ithink is great.
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Originally Posted by JonZ
"Hopefully in 2-3 years time (if not sooner) we can look back on the early days of HD discs and see the same pattern."
The thing is I double and even in a couple cases triple dipped on alot of those titles that were rereleased, which is something I really dont want to do with BR. |
|
Originally Posted by TonyD
mine is on its way from waner but that shot looks the way Patton screen shots looked.
|
|
Originally Posted by Ron-P
I just spun parts of this disc to check it out, it looks outstanding on my 87" screen via a Z3. If you're in doubt about the purchase because of comments in this thread, don't be, go get it.
|
|
Originally Posted by Jim_K
I have to say if anyone's display looks anything near as bad as that jpg shot then their equipment is in serious need of calibration.
|
|
Originally Posted by Jim_K
Cropped and zoomed 400% on a compressed jpg? Nope not the same as 1080P in full motion on a calibrated display.
Why didn't I pause the movie? Not my thing, I'll leave that to others. If the only way one can notice a flaw is to pause the screen to study the picture then it's a very minor flaw to me. YMMV of course and to each their own. |
|
Originally Posted by Dave Mack
and with these shots you can actually see how much more detail and better looking the trailer for "The golden compass" on the BD disc is than the film itself. Full size versions here at AVS. The Golden Compass *PIX* + Reviews - Page 5 - AVS Forum |
|
Originally Posted by OliverK
I think it is not a good idea not to enjoy a movie due to this or pause it when watching it for the first time. But as the discussion centers around artefacts like this why not revisit the scene later to verify how it looks ? As you choose not to it seems you are not really annoyed by this flaw - you will be much happier with the Blu-Ray format and its releases than others.
|
|
Originally Posted by Robert Crawford
Something tells me, he will be a part of the majority and not the very vocal minority regarding these issues.
Crawdaddy |
|
Originally Posted by Jim_K
Cropped and zoomed 400% on a compressed jpg? Nope not the same as 1080P in full motion on a calibrated display.
. |
|
Originally Posted by Jari K
"Dark City: Director's Cut" has some minor "issues"
|
|
Originally Posted by Jari K
Generally, it´s still a pretty good transfer
|
|
Originally Posted by Jari K
... and these issues might have effect on the A/V purists.
... most people are pleased. It´s not "perfect", but it´s not as "bad" as titles like "Patton", when it comes to DNR. |
|
Originally Posted by Jari K
Can we now go to sleep.
|
|
Originally Posted by Carlo Medina
While this is in no way an excuse, I'm just trying to relay the possibility that this may have been "in the can" (or is it "in the hard drive" now?) for over a year. They probably didn't want to go back and do the work over for a title that, quite frankly, isn't going to sell a whole lot of copies.
|
|
Originally Posted by Walter Kittel
Viewed the director's cut version of Dark City on a 102" screen (with a 720P LCD FP) yesterday evening and was pleased with the overall experience. While it did look a little processed (and to be frank I'm not certain how much the entire DNR discusion influenced my perception) there was still good detail in the image and I did not see objectionable EE.
I am fully cognizant of my signature and how it relates to discussions such as this one, but on the whole I can recommend the disc. If your choices for viewing Dark City are this Bd disc, or the original DVD, then that is no choice at all. - Walter. |
|
Originally Posted by Michel_Hafner
What is this even supposed to mean, zoomed 400%? You make it sound like zooming adds waxyness or haloes that are not there or makes them suddenly look much worse than they really are. I see the issues clear as day looking at 'unzoomed' 1080p 1:1 stills on my > 1080p computer monitor. I can see them as easily when projected on my screen in 1080p. When you watch your stuff cinema style and not TV style you have a built in zoom factor compared to people that watch on monitors sitting more screen widths or heights away than you are. Fact is when you sit close enough to resolve 1080p detail with your eyes you see the issues clearly if you know what EE and DNR artifacts are. With 1:1 pixel mapping and no extra zooming in at all.
|
|
Originally Posted by OliverK
I think it is not a good idea not to enjoy a movie due to this or pause it when watching it for the first time. But as the discussion centers around artefacts like this why not revisit the scene later to verify how it looks ? As you choose not to it seems you are not really annoyed by this flaw - you will be much happier with the Blu-Ray format and its releases than others.
|
|
Originally Posted by Felix Martinez
About the new Director's Cut, which I don't think I've heard enough discussion about: I think it's fantastic. I found the theatrical cut awkward and oddly paced and edited. Things flow much better now, and there's some breathing room from scene-to-scene it seems. |
|
Originally Posted by Jim_K
I watched the DC last night and it gets passing grades on my meager "70 display. Keep in mind I did no still frame analysis, looking for flaws but I watched it as a normal person would, engrossed in the film and I concur with Ron P.
I did take a mental note of looking for EE based on the infamous 400% zoomed and cropped jpg |
|
Originally Posted by Jim_K
What is this even supposed to mean? Have you seen this disc on your display? and are you saying your diplay looks exactly like that cropped, zoomed in and compressed jpg image?
|
| Let me put it this way, if something takes me out of the HT movie experience then it's an issue for me. |
| Some other people appear intent on looking for flaws, which seems to me another hobby in and of itself. |
