New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Monster Cable at it again. - Page 2

post #31 of 36
3/23/08 at 11:16pm
Thread Starter 

Re: Monster Cable at it again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertR
Just for the record, I don't consider Blue Jeans or Parts Express to be in the "ridiculously overpriced" category.
I feel this way as well. Blue Jeans are awesome for the money.
Reply
post #32 of 36
3/24/08 at 7:04am

Re: Monster Cable at it again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by troy evans
I feel this way as well. Blue Jeans are awesome for the money.

Make that three.
Reply
post #33 of 36
3/24/08 at 7:51am

Re: Monster Cable at it again.

CNET Quick Guide: HDMI and HDMI cables: What HDMI cable should I buy? - CNET reviews

Just 0's and 1's. It's there or it ain't.
Reply
post #34 of 36
3/24/08 at 4:53pm

Re: Monster Cable at it again.

Quote:
Just for the record, I don't consider Blue Jeans or Parts Express to be in the "ridiculously overpriced" category
But I would put them into the "nice" category that Mark referred to. The Blue Jeans in particular. Certainly better (quality, and yes, even looks) than coat hangers. Even if they apparently don't perform any better. I said "apparently" because I, as yet, have never tried coat hangers! .
Reply
post #35 of 36
3/24/08 at 7:33pm

Re: Monster Cable at it again.

Quote:
Just for the record, I don't consider Blue Jeans or Parts Express to be in the "ridiculously overpriced" category

But I would put them into the "nice" category that Mark referred to.
Nice is, well, nice. But when I made the remark about 'audio jewelry" that Mark objected to, I had in mind MIT and Transparent cables that he also referred to.
Reply
post #36 of 36
3/25/08 at 4:14am

Re: Monster Cable at it again.

Quote:
I had in mind MIT and Transparent cables that he also referred to.
And tha's why I thought you were reading more into it than what was meant because it was the nice ones that he bought. And so did I.
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home