Re: Great article on all the post format war doomsaying...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Paul_Scott
I don't see it as a matter of time so much as it is similarity of form and feature. DVD offered a much different experience over tape based formats...of which its better a/v quality was but one element...and probably not the most significant or outstanding difference to the vast majority of people graduating to the format after a decade + of tapes. I would bet things like the more compact form factor along with random access and the 'does't need rewinding' aspect were more significant attributes to significantly more people than merely higher quality a/v. In that light, Bd is merely a better looking DVD, offering pretty much the same ergonomic experience while costing significantly more- in terms of higher sw and an initially much higher hw buy-in cost.And even when saying that HDMs offer a higher quality A/V experience, what is really the truth is (as I see it everytime I watch one) these are merely just really, really, great looking dvds. Any statement of these exhibiting significant, easily percieved higher quality then has to be followed by an asterix and a litany of clauses why this may not be everyones result : i.e. screen sizes + viewing distance, display resolution, condition of individual fim elements or masters, dirctorial intent per visuals etc etc etc.
I'm happy and grateful to own and be able to watch some of my favorite films in such high quality. I am not however optimistic that I will ever be able to amass a collection of favorites anywhere near the scope of the one I enjoy on DVD.
|
I agree with you wholeheartedly, Paul, and posted a similar POV on another thread here at HTF about HDM being a niche product. I won't repeat that post here, but suffice to say that we are of like mind on this subject. I share the same doubts about this
improvement to an existing format ever being embraced as a genuinely new format would be.
I work as a film historian, writer and teacher and my specialty is films of the 1920's-early 1930's, most of which will
never even make it to SD DVD, let alone Blu-Ray. The best I can hope for is if TCM goes HD someday. Even the films from the late 30's to the mid-70's that I am most interested in will probably not emerge on any hard disc format the same way that some of my favorite LPs vanished from any potential CD release.
I realize that I am in the minority on these boards with regards to having little interest in many of the films from the past 20 years, all those which would, at least in theory, maximize the home theater experience in picture and sound, but I also think it gives me a unique vantage point. I feel that I am a film purist in every sense of the word and have been professionally interested and invested in film for over thirty years. So while I want to support the best approximation of a theater experience at home, I can't help but think that an extension of an already existing format, which ultimately Blu-Ray is, will prove to be a tough sell at our current pace of technology.
There were many, many doom and gloom predictions over the idea of downloading music and particularly vocal were the audio "purists" who complained about the inherent lack of quality in the presentation. Yet for all of that, nothing could stem the tide for everyone wanting iPODS, a trend that increases in popularity all the time. So I don't believe the idea of one day being able to download films by the same means as we can music is all that far fetched. True, it may be awhile before it can be done properly, but don't think that quality alone will ever decide the success or failure of any technology. It is easy to stop seeing the forest for the trees, especially in enthusiast forums like HTF.
Speaking as something of an insider/outsider, for me the idea of being able to download virtually
any existing film from the history of commercial filmmaking, something that may indeed become possible at some point, excites me more than all the "greatest hits" of films on SD DVD or Blu. The trouble with all hard media is that we will always be at the mercy of a corporate bottom line. I would love to see a much wider spectrum of film history be reflected in DVD releases. I admit that I have been pleasantly surprised by the variety that has come out in SD DVD over the past 11 years, but to expect that same diversity in Blu-Ray seems rather foolish at the moment. Downloading, in theory anyway, will level the playing field a little more as the studios will only have to release the film
once and from then on individual technology takes over. The sad part will be compromising quality, but who's to say that will even be an issue a few years from now with the incredible rate that technology keeps surpassing itself?