Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › *** Official CLOVERFIELD Review Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

*** Official CLOVERFIELD Review Thread

post #1 of 18
Thread Starter 
I saw Cloverfield at a sneak preview last night. I'm not going to spoil the movie, but I will say that if you're the LEAST BIT sensitive to shakycam, you're going to hate this movie with the passion of a million suns. It's nothing BUT! I have no sensitivity to shakycam whatsoever. I loved Breaking the Waves, Blair Witch, and Roger Dodger, and never had a second's problem (ok, maybe a bit with Roger Dodger) but this one I was constantly feeling like I was going to barf. It probably didn't help that I was in the very front row, but I actually had to close my eyes a few times to equalize.

It's pretty scary. There were several jump-in-my-seat moments. I wouldn't say it's the best monster movie ever (I'm REALLY partial to giving that title to Alien/s), but it's always nice to have new monster movies. I'm glad they're still making them. It's a good monster too, no matter if it could actually live in the "real" world or not.
post #2 of 18

*** Official CLOVERFIELD Review Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by RickER
sounds like a solid rental from NetFlix to me.

Such a shame you feel that way, you'll be missing one of the biggest and baddest monster flicks in years.

That was one heeelllluuvvaaa movie!!

From the moment the monster shows up it's nothing but a tear-your-nuts off assault on just about every nerve in your body, your heart, your mind, your eyes and ears are consumed with imagry and sound.

I want to see this film again like NOW!

It also contains much that one wouldn't expect from such a film...character development and one's we actually care about because they're established very well in the short few minutes that there's peace in the film before all hell breaks loose.

What is the creature? We don't know but it doesn't matter in the least, that isn't the point here, the film presents itself in such a way to where we only know what the characters we're following know, we see what they see and hear what they hear and in the confusion of explosions, smashing buildings and mayhem we get insights into their lives and relationships that are at times funny, tragic and deeply moving.

But it's the monster that most will go to this film to see and it doesn't dissapoint, it just shows up and proceeds to treat NYC like a drunken rock star treats a hotel room, I don't know where it came from or what it is but make no mistake it's VERY angry!

Man, i'm still jazzed about it, it's only January and this will probably be the best film I see this year. It's the best monster flick i've personally ever seen, from one film fan to many here do not mis Cloverfield where it was soooo meant to be seen...on the big screen where it will do the most damage and achieve maximum impact.

5 's out of 5 's for Cloverfield.
post #3 of 18

*** Official CLOVERFIELD Review Thread

I thought it was pretty well done. I was highly skeptical going in, and I am not a fan of Blair Witch.

The monster is OK looking. But, his destruction is more of the point than him. There are 2 or 3 big time WOW scenes that make the movie, and it does a pretty good job giving you something to care about (their 'quest').

Yes, it's a gimmick. But, it's also a different and unique take on Godzilla/King Kong. If you can stand the shaky cam, see it on the big screen with LOTS of nasty bass. I don't think there is enough meat here to bother watching a second time, but I enjoyed the ride!
post #4 of 18

*** Official CLOVERFIELD Review Thread

It's definitely the Blair Witch of Godzilla-monster movies, but that's not a bad thing. The shaky-cam is used when the situation dictates it (when the gang is running for their lives) with gripping action and chaos, but you get some time to compose yourself within the film as the gang gets a few spots to catch their collective breaths, so it won't make you totally saddled with motion sickness if that's a concern. The realism in seeing and feeling the devastation brought upon by the monster in NYC was well-done and looked pretty believable, given the "tape" source for the footage. I did have a hard time not thinking of Hud (the main videographer for the footage we are shown) as "Marmaduke" from the TV show "Carpoolers", but that's my quibble.

All in all, it delivers what the trailer hinted to for the most part, but just remember you are getting a single point of view for the entire length of the film.

I give it 3 stars, or a grade of B.
post #5 of 18

*** Official CLOVERFIELD Review Thread

Saw it at the midnight movie last night and had a great time. For once, a movie with a lot of viral marketing and hype lived up to what I wanted. It didn't exceed the expectations, but certainly met them.

For a movie with one point of view, they really work that angle. You still get moments from underground to on the ground to above the ground to way above the ground without ever losing the "single camera" look of it. NYC is an amazing city with highs and lows and they exploit them so we still get a feel of different angles on the action. I have to say, of Shakycam movies, this was king. To me, anyway. Well, Duke. BSG on tv has the King title as they use it without being obnoxious. I was queasy during Blair Witch and also during the second Bourne but not as much during the last Bourne. I half wonder if preparing for this type of movie (sit in the middle at the most) was what helped me with this and Ultimatum? Hmm...will have to ponder. Anyway, on a scale of locked in to Blair witch, this was about halfway between.

The rest was neat. The viral marketing continues to deliver, too. I looked up a ton of stuff after the movie that hint at the creature's origin, path, the surrounding world, etc. It isn't necessary but really fleshes out the story. I hope some of it appears on the DVD.

Anyway, I hope people enjoy this. It is a novel take on the monster movie genre and one that really couldn't be repeated in the same way. But it does go back to the idea that less really is more with horror movies and my desire and/or dread to see the monster created a nice tension throughout the whole thing. While not nearly as scary as ALIEN, it had that same feel of dread and hopelessness about it that makes for a good horror movie. You like the shallow, self-interested characters enough to wish them well which is just enough for me.

It is bold in presentational style, too. No fancy starting or ending credits. It just makes it look like you happened upon a found tape that has obviously been used a couple other times (as noted by earlier poster, the camera starts and stops here and there and we get glimpses of other footage from happier times). Just nifty, nifty storytelling. A great break from the worn-out torture porn.

A couple things I found funny. One was Hud. He was fun as a character but were they using the name Hud like HUD, as in Head's Up Display, a military term co-oped by the video game First Person Shooters? Totally would fit, if you ask me. Second was that we aren't seeing some deconstructionist's vision of monster movies. It was like early zombie or slasher movies. Apparently in a lot of early genre movies, no character IN the movie ever heard or saw a story about such things. So you get things like "what do we call these walking...dead...people?" Really, until SCREAM we didn't have people recognize slasher movie conventions from within slasher movies. Now it happens all the time.

So with this movie, we have a young man heading off to Japan for a job and a monster rumbling around the city with not a single reference to Godzilla! Too funny! To me, anyway. At some point, if the monster movie genre takes off here in the US again (crossing fingers) we might see someone say, "hey, this is like a Godzilla movie or something..." but not now. It was fun to see the WTF looks and reactions of the players as they stumbled through, shell shocked and scared to death. Neat.

Maybe we should mix the popular superhero genre with the growing monster movie movement and have a Hulk Vs. Fing Fang Foom movie (as in a recent comic book). Hmmm...monsters...

Rambling aside, I hope folks get to see this movie as it really needs to be seen. I know that is cliche but seriously, though small in scale from the single-perspective camera, this is a big movie. There are some vistas of NYC that are just wonderful to behold and the sound...damn. Best use of sub woofer in a long time. Have fun!
post #6 of 18

*** Official CLOVERFIELD Review Thread

Okay, I'm going to hit on a few points, and I don't feel like spoilerizing everything, so don't read if for whatever reason you're here without seeing the film yet.
>
>
>

To expand on my previous post, oh yes, I loved this film. The marketing intrigued the hell out of me, and I'm happy to say that, just like Blair Witch before it, it lived up to the hype for me and then some. I just love when a film comes along and makes me feel this giddy! I feel bad for those who are prone to motion sickness. I'd hate to miss out on Cloverfield.

This is the second time in the last six months that I've seen a film with such masterful visuals and sound design. It's a total assault on the senses, a tension-packed nightmare from the eyes of those right in the middle of hell on earth. Everything in this film feels so real, and it all looks real too. The effects are astounding. The one thing that worried me was the possibility of bad CGI, but that fear wound up being completely unfounded. I loved the scene in the electronics store. Seeing glimpses of the creature on TV from news helicopters... such a creepy feeling. It's made even moreso since it's happening just down the street.

I love the whole handheld approach. I loved it in Blair Witch, and I loved it here. Not only does it make for a more intimate viewing experience, where you see things from the characters' perspectives, but it also gives you the feel of being trapped in your own nightmare. Like the camera is your point of view as you travel through a surreal dreamland of panic and toppled skyscrapers, all the while an unseen menace lurking just beyond your realm of understanding.

I wasn't so sure how I'd feel about the characters. They were more likable than I thought they'd be, and there's just enough character development to make me care about them. Frankly, I remember the names of the characters, and for me, that means they did something right. This is a good thing, as the love story and the things one will do for friendship are at the heart of the film. The monster attack is a means to get to the meat of these characters' relationships.

The monster itself is a wicked creature. Very eerie looking. The scene with the stealth bomber bombarding it was just WOW. And then, bam, out of the smoke it come to attack the chopper. Very nerve-wracking stuff. The parasites it brings with it are more downright vicious looking. Great sound design with these little buggers, too. Frankly, I don't know which one I'd want to encounter less. Perhaps the parasites, as they have one mean bite. I felt so bad for Marlena when her abdomen burst like a bubble.

As far as monster films go, Cloverfield is on par with such greats as Carpenter's The Thing. Really though, there's no need to compare it to anything else. It is it's own entity, and an impeccable one at that. It accomplishes such incredible things on less than half the budget of all those souless blockbusters which plague cinemas every year.

No doubt, I will be seeing this a few more times theatrically, and soon at that. Luckily, the local theater is only $2.25 for afternoon shows, so it'll be easily affordable. Perhaps I can get a better look at that splash next time, too. But yeah, talk about setting the bar high for '08. I doubt anything betters it, but time will tell.
post #7 of 18

*** Official CLOVERFIELD Review Thread

This movie rocked from start to finish. The first person perspective was great.
post #8 of 18

*** Official CLOVERFIELD Review Thread

It wasn't a bad movie but I don't really care to see a feature length youtube video on the big screen again. Personally I'll watch Godzilla 98 a lot more than I will Cloverfield.

It is a shame because it could have been an awesome movie. The audio was top notch. Who knew a camcorder could capture such good bass and surround sound elements even.

The special effects were great as well, at least the ones you could actually see.

The acting wasn't bad overall but there were some really bad laughable scenes but nothing compared to Blair Witch.

My audience was quite vocal in their dislike for the movie or at least the people that truly didn't like it. No applause so didn't seem like anyone really liked it. Instead I heard a couple 'that sucked' and one very loud woman go as far as to call up a friend on her phone and yell "don't see it."

This film could have been amazing, instead it will be remembered as that shakycam godzilla movie or just flat out forgotten.
post #9 of 18

*** Official CLOVERFIELD Review Thread

Saw it last night and all I can say is that it felt like an exercise in tedious frustration.
post #10 of 18

*** Official CLOVERFIELD Review Thread

Attended the 7:40 show last night at the Times Square E-Walk theater with some online friends. We all enjoyed the movie and were surprised that the actor that played Hud stood up as the credits rolled to introduce the other cast members that were sitting amongst us the whole time. That was pretty cool.
post #11 of 18

*** Official CLOVERFIELD Review Thread

This thread is now the Official Review Thread for "Cloverfield". Please post all HTF member reviews in this thread.

Any other comments, links to other reviews, or discussion items will be deleted from this thread without warning!

If you need to discuss those type of issues then I have designated an Official Discussion Thread.



Crawdaddy
post #12 of 18

Re: *** Official CLOVERFIELD Review Thread

Mine is going to be short and sweet. Loved it, the wife loved it. Great freaking film and the fact they showed it from a first person perspective really worked for us. We were not distracted by the eratic movement etc.

5 out 5 stars from us! Hopefully going to see it again!
post #13 of 18

Re: *** Official CLOVERFIELD Review Thread

I saw it this morning at a matinee. Knew to sit further away from the screen to cut down on motion sickness...:-)

That being said, I feel the movie was good for what it was intended to be, the POV of those running from, then back into, a monster attack on NY. Would have liked to have seen a bit more of the monster, though I realize that the average person running for their life would be avoiding the mayhem in general. REALLY stupid people in this movie, although I supposed it's a Gen-Y thing...

Not sure I will buy it when it comes out on Blu-ray, but it sure put me in the mood for some good latter-day Godzilla stuff...
post #14 of 18

Re: *** Official CLOVERFIELD Review Thread

Plays better than expected. You either adjust to the POV or not. As for the money shot at the end, interesting or NoFignWay depending on your ability to go with the story to begin with

I struggle to call this SciFi - more of a disaster doc with a twist. Since we get nothing more than what our small group knows (which is nothing) there's no background to work with. What the hell was that indeed! I think any more info than what we learn during the film would spoil the whole thing. The street skirmish with army guys is well done.

Is it up to the hype? No, but it's certainly worth a look. Have Fun!
post #15 of 18

Re: *** Official CLOVERFIELD Review Thread

Lots of fun! Scary too (those aren't mutually exclusive emotions!) This movie has some totally kick-ass LFE and I can't wait until this comes out on DVD! If you liked "War of the Worlds" for its "first person point of view" storytelling style, then this is a must-see. The characters were realistic and funny as well.

ONE CAVEAT: If you are at all susceptible to MOTION SICKNESS, then take some Dramamine before watching this movie. Also bring some Lifesavers or other hard candy to suck on. I am not kidding, either. I have Meniere's disease (I'm susceptible to debilitating dizzy spells) and I knew this would be an issue when I saw the commercials, so I took my motion-sickness meds before going to the movie. Wise decision on my part! I still was queasy a few times and had to look away from the screen once or twice, but I was able to watch and enjoy the movie.
post #16 of 18

Re: *** Official CLOVERFIELD Review Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by ErichH
Plays better than expected. You either adjust to the POV or not...Is it up to the hype? No, but it's certainly worth a look. Have Fun!
I also was pleasantly surprised how much I enjoyed this movie. I grew up in the 50's and I'm quite used to the monster movie that explains itself. That's not this movie. The POV or 'found footage' idea was not something I was looking forward too. I sat in the last row of the theater and really liked it. I had hardly any trouble with the camera shakes and I'm one who had trouble watching the last Bourne movie.

I found the effects and the acting to be always convincing, there was never a "roll your eyes moment." Apart from believing in a monster, you have to accept the idea the Hud would keep his camera going, no matter what. A good photographer will do just that. Hud was born to be a cameraman.

Cloverfield lived up to it's hype, at least for me.
post #17 of 18

Re: *** Official CLOVERFIELD Review Thread

Quote:
Cloverfield lived up to it's hype, at least for me.

It did for me too!
post #18 of 18

Re: *** Official CLOVERFIELD Review Thread

Good flick! Surprisingly good. Even if you hate it, it's only 75 minutes long.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movies (Theatrical)
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › *** Official CLOVERFIELD Review Thread