Re: The AFI 100 Years List for 2008...
Quote:
| I can't agree with that. I think lots of critics would call Psycho a good film, just to name one example. |
This is one example where I might be a hypocrite and bash myself like I was bashing the critics in my statement above. I personally don't consider PSYCHO a horror film as I see it more of a mystery or thriller.
If I were to consider this a horror film then I'd let other Hitchcock movies in like ROPE, VERTIGO, REAR WINDOW and even FRENZY. A lot of horror fans have told me I'm wrong on this issue and I'm sure many here will think I am but I've just never counted PSYCHO as horror. I really don't see it any different than a Holmes, Moto or film noir.
Don't tell anyone but I don't consider THE EXORCIST a "horror" movie either.
Quote:
| Very few of the semingly endless schlocky film variety are films anyone but a fanboy have any desire to see, most are mainly useful for mocking and nothing else--in most people's minds. |
Which is my whole point in regards to critics and "fanboys" as you put it or "normal people" as I put it. You claim most are used for "mocking and nothing else" but I'm fairly certain you've seen very little of them and what you have seen are probably from MST3K (or something like it).
I don't have any problem with this because I'll be the first to tell you that the genre has turned over a lot of shit over the years and continues to do so. I made my "bottom 10" of 2007 list earlier today and seven of them were horror films. You've seen my reviews in the Track thread and you probably noticed that the majority of BOMB and one-star ratings come from horror movies.
The main issue I have is that your comments "mocking and nothing else" have been true since 1910 and Edison's version of FRANKENSTEIN. I think today most people would agree that BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN is a great movie and Karloff is brilliant as the monster but in 1935 critics would throw the "mocking and nothing else" comment at it. Critics hated ISLAND OF LOST SOULS, DRACULA, FRANKENSTEIN and pretty much any horror film that today is considered a classic. The Val Lewton's of the 1940's were booed by critics but today they are held as classics. The Hammer and Universal films of the 1950's were hated by critics but today are considered classics. Heck, even PSYCHO got some very bad reviews when originally released. Let's not even go into the subject of John Carpenter and stuff like THE THING.
The point is that the genre has always been looked down on by critics and movie fans yet years later people come around and call the film a masterpiece. These critics and movie fans should probably take notice when the films are released and not wait ten years to praise them.