Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming Video and Digital Downloads › Blu-ray › Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit - Page 4

post #91 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

Quote:
Can you point me to the rumors about PS3 dropping to $300? I'm curious.

Said rumorage:

VG Rumors
post #92 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Arnette
Said rumorage:

VG Rumors

Hmmm... Very interesting indeed. And looks like we will find out for sure next week. I wonder if the $15 DVD Guys got a leg up on this considering the timing of their price cut.

_Man_
post #93 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit


The change in market share is very dramatic. The charts from NPD illustrate what happened in December (which seems to have been a contributing factor in the WB decision) and then what happened following the Warner announcement:

The first set shows whole of December 2007 (left) and first 2 weeks of January 2008 (right):



The second set shows the dramatic change that occured following the Warner announcement. Wk.1 January 2008 (left) and wk.2 (right):



That's a pretty stunning move by any standards.

Of course the new Toshiba price cuts came into effect on Monday January 14th, so the effect of those cuts won't be seen until we get the next set of NPD numbers.

Although the new Toshiba price cuts are dramatic it's worth remembering that there already were many great deals on HD DVD players through December and in the weeks leading up to the new pricing strategy.

For example, Amazon in December:

A3 + 10 free HD DVDs = $178.52
A30 + 10 free HD DVDs = $246.34
A35 + 10 free HD DVDs = $345.51

Amazon prices on these players today:

A3 = $125.00 (3rd party seller)
A30 = $165.81
A35 = $263.66

I'm assuming the mail-in offer for the 5 movies + 2 free in the box still applies on these players, although Amazon doesn't say that there are any movies with the player.

The best prices on Amazon today for Blu-ray players are:

Samsung BD-P1000 - $259.99 (3rd party)
Samsung BD-P1400 - $329.98
Sony BDP-S300 - $346.65

It's going to be interesting to see how the next few weeks play out with the reduced price Toshiba players in the market.
post #94 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Arnette
Said rumorage:

VG Rumors

Interesting. Especially these parts:

Quote:
Their game plan as of right now is to move as many Playstation 3 units by March, 31, 2008 as possible, this has to do something with Warner's exclusivity deal

Quote:
Reason 2: Time Warner. In exchange for Time Warner's exclusitivity (and an end to the format war), Sony has promised to reduce the price of the Playstation 3.

Has anyone heard if the 5 free offer will be extended beyond Jan 31? If not, the 28th - 31st of January will be the prime time to buy a PS3 and take advantage of both the price cut and the 5 free offer. On the other hand, it might be worth the gamble to wait and see if the 5 free offer is renewed, in hopes that the selection will get better.
post #95 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

This is all based on the premise that PS3 owners want to play movies on their video gaming systems. When you look at the sales figures for blu-ray, it doesn't support that. Also X-Box has been purchased by millions but only around 200,000 hd movie adapters have been purchased. Also the number 1 selling game system does not play hd movies at all.

It's also clear that the gap between hd-dvd and blu-ray has decreased. The sales on HP 5 was 1.2-1 for bluray and hd-dvd. Bladerunner sales on hd-dvd and blu-ray was essentially even. I would also point out hd-dvd sold around 120,000 players in a pre-Black Friday sale so December sales were probably slower. Even then, I know nothing about this group and how they derive their numbers. Generally someone creates a model and uses some data. If the model is flawed then the numbers are flawed.

While the Warner annoucement hurt hd-dvd sales it was not the biggest contributor. Rumours abounded, no doubt started by blu-ray, that Universal and Paramount were dropping hd-dvd entirely. That was what probably killed
sales.

Bottom line is that Warner did not switch to blu-ray because of sales. It was Sony's checkbook. Apparently Warner and Fox was very close to switching to hd-dvd before Sony pulled out their checkbook. If blu-ray sales were so good, they wouldn't have had to do this.
post #96 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

Quote:
(which seems to have been a contributing factor in the WB decision)

It was not a factor in the WB decision. Sony's offer expired on the 4th which is when WB made their decision and the monthly December data was not available.
post #97 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

Quote:
While the Warner annoucement hurt hd-dvd sales it was not the biggest contributor. Rumours abounded, no doubt started by blu-ray, that Universal and Paramount were dropping hd-dvd entirely. That was what probably killed sales.

I'm sure, as usual, the truth lies somewhere in the middle. However, it should be a relatively simple matter to determine how big an impact the rumors of Paramount and Universal dropping HD DVD affected sales by looking at the next few weeks sales figures. That said, I'm sure the next rationale will be Paramount and Universal didn't sell any new HD DVD titles during those weeks, right?
post #98 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam Gregorich
It was not a factor in the WB decision. Sony's offer expired on the 4th which is when WB made their decision and the monthly December data was not available.

If the NPD data for December was not available then how could Ron Sanders (Warner Home Video president) say this on January 4th 2008:

Quote:
"One of the things you see in the NPD data for this fourth quarter was that even with a $100 premium, BD set-tops outsold HD set-tops in December," said Sanders. "Even with Toshiba having the lower-cost player in the marekt, software sales remained 2-to-1 in favor of Blu-ray. Our titles were running roughly 60/40 Blu-ray and that didn't change in the fourth quarter even with the price advantage HD had on the hardware side."
Warner backs Blu-ray exclusively - 1/4/2008 - Video Business

Strange. According to you he can't have seen the NPD data. But he says he had seen the NPD data. Furthermore he raises the matter of sales of set-top players unprompted indicating he feels it is significant. I agree it can be debated whether the player sales numbers informed the Warner decision, not that it really matters anymore.

I hope you won't be offended if I choose to believe Ron Sanders.
post #99 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fozziwig
I hope you won't be offended if I choose to believe Ron Sanders.
You can believe whomever you like as those of us that know the details aren't in the mood to debate what happen any further.
post #100 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

Quote:
Strange. According to you he can't have seen the NPD data. But he says he had seen the NPD data.

Warner said the "fourth Quarter". That doesn't necessarily mean they had the last 2 weeks of December sales data in full.

Adam's comments are not disproven by that article.
post #101 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

Quote:
I hope you won't be offended if I choose to believe Ron Sanders.

Not at all.

Quote:
If the NPD data for December was not available then how could Ron Sanders (Warner Home Video president) say this on January 4th 2008:

Weekly data was available for the first three weeks of December, but the monthly numbers that are the most accurate and include all sales would not have been available until mid January. As David pointed out he [Ron Sanders] never says he saw NPD data for December, but he would have seen it for October and November.

Speaking of numbers, I just noticed how Bill Hunt excluded XBOX add on drives from the NPD numbers that are shown on his site and a few posts earlier. That would NOT have changed the final outcome (Blu having a large hardware lead), but it would have made the numbers look a lot better for HD DVD. I am not wanting to rehash the age old argument "should a PS3 be counteed as a standalone player", but since inception the XBOX add on has been counted as a standalone player when sales are reported since it can only play HD DVDs. Bill chose to exclude them from the charts he created which make them inaccurate compared to how NPD sales data has always been reported.
post #102 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

Notaking anything away from BD, but here is an interesting article where NPD comments on the numbers:



From Greg Tarr of TWICE: http://www.twice.com/article/CA6524995.html?desc=topstory

NPD attributed the results largely to promotions run by several Blu-ray supporting manufacturers, and said they were not necessarily the result of reaction to the news that Warner Bros. would be dropping support of HD DVD to go exclusively with HD DVD in May.
  • “We’ve been doing weekly data for a long time, and we often times will see big shifts in sales for one week that doesn’t necessarily determine a trend,” said Stephen Baker, NPD Group industry analysis VP, told TWICE. “There were some promotions in the marketplace during that week with Sharp and Sony bundling Blu-ray players with televisions — it seems to me unlikely that consumers would have made that kind of a choice that quickly based on new reports of Warner Bros. shifting from Blu-ray and HD DVD to Blu-ray exclusively.”
Typically, Baker emphasized, big swings in market share are the result of major promotions

post #103 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter U

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam Gregorich
Speaking of numbers, I just noticed how Bill Hunt excluded XBOX add on drives from the NPD numbers that are shown on his site and a few posts earlier. That would NOT have changed the final outcome (Blu having a large hardware lead), but it would have made the numbers look a lot better for HD DVD. I am not wanting to rehash the age old argument "should a PS3 be counteed as a standalone player", but since inception the XBOX add on has been counted as a standalone player when sales are reported since it can only play HD DVDs. Bill chose to exclude them from the charts he created which make them inaccurate compared to how NPD sales data has always been reported.
Not true. The 360 add-on is counted as a dedicated player, not a standalone. You can't just plug it in to a TV and watch movies, so it can not stand alone and play HD DVDs. It needs a 360 or a PC to operate. Toshiba is very tricky with this.
post #104 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

Quote:
Notaking anything away from BD, but here is an interesting article where NPD comments on the numbers:

That would explain the rise in BD sales, but would it also explain the dramatic decrease in HD DVD sales? has there been any other week when such a dramatic differential has occured?


Quote:
Not true. The 360 add-on is counted as a dedicated player, not a standalone. You can't just plug it in to a TV and watch movies, so it can not stand alone and play HD DVDs. It needs a 360 or a PC to operate. Toshiba is very tricky with this.

True.

The PS3 and the 360 present unique challenges in terms of hardware counts which is problematic no matter which side of the fence one is on. On the one hand, every 360 "add on" owner purchased the device with the explicit intent to watch HD DVD movies. On the other hand, it's a device hooked up to a gaming machine and is not a true stand-alone player, and the attach-rate for the add-on may or may not coincide with that of HD DVD stand alones (though it's reasonable to assume that they would be close). In the case of the PS3 it's certain that some percentage of players are used for extensive BD-movie playback, but this exact number cannot be determined. To further complicate semantics, the PS3 is technically-speaking a "stand-alone" player because it doesn't need to be plugged into any other device to play BD movies (that's head-spinner for lots of folks). Then again, the PS3 isn't a *dedicated* player because it's also a gaming console. And while the 360 add-on itself is a dedicated player, in tandem with the console it needs to run it creates a similar PS3-delimma semantically.

For these reasons, some times each side may include or leave out "gaming" HD devices to suit their statistical desire, and justify those arguments on semantic-grounds.

The fact is that all sides are "right", it's just hard to be consistent with both the 360 add-on and PS3 since attach-rates and semantics apply to each product differently. And because of the differences, there's no way to really be accurate with the picture... including the 360 but not including the PS3 isn't fair bcs obviously a great many PS3 owners are indeed buying movies. But it's not fair to include all PS3 consoles either... because obviously not all (or even most) PS3 owners are Blu-ray movie customers. There's simply no way to accurately represent the hardware base for Blu-ray Disc...

But it doesn't matter because...

At the end of the day all that really matters to the studios is software sales. If the PS3 (and 360 add-on) is used in significant numbers to motivate software purchases, then it's affecting the studio's desired result whether or not it affects a particular pie-chart statistic for hardware sales.

However, hardware sales figures and attach-rates will always have the caveat of the "game console issue" no matter what side of the debate one is trying to advance.
post #105 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter U

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam Gregorich
Notaking anything away from BD, but here is an interesting article where NPD comments on the numbers:



From Greg Tarr of TWICE: http://www.twice.com/article/CA6524995.html?desc=topstory

NPD attributed the results largely to promotions run by several Blu-ray supporting manufacturers, and said they were not necessarily the result of reaction to the news that Warner Bros. would be dropping support of HD DVD to go exclusively with HD DVD in May.
  • “We’ve been doing weekly data for a long time, and we often times will see big shifts in sales for one week that doesn’t necessarily determine a trend,” said Stephen Baker, NPD Group industry analysis VP, told TWICE. “There were some promotions in the marketplace during that week with Sharp and Sony bundling Blu-ray players with televisions — it seems to me unlikely that consumers would have made that kind of a choice that quickly based on new reports of Warner Bros. shifting from Blu-ray and HD DVD to Blu-ray exclusively.”
Typically, Baker emphasized, big swings in market share are the result of major promotions

And here are some other things a reader might take away from that article:
  • Toshiba is near the bottom in HD revenue in spite of having the biggest sales share
  • Even Combo players outsold HD DVD players that week
Edited to add:

It would appear that last bullet is not the case. Sorry. Combo players accounted for a 3% unit share to HD DVDs 7% for the week ending 1/12. The unit share difference between the was frighteningly small that week. I imagine it will get better with the price cuts however.
post #106 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

I also find it hard to believe that the shift *away* from HD DVD was entirely due to BD promotions given how significant the drop was (from the bits):

Week before Warner's Annoucment:

Blu-ray Disc - 15,257 units
HD-DVD - 14,558 units

The week AFTER Warner's announcement:

Blu-ray Disc - 21,770 units
HD-DVD - 1,758 units

Since when in the whole history of the war have *promotions* of one format caused the sales of the other format's hardware to drop by a factor of 8.28? (!)

Promotions would naturally help increase sales for the designated format, but not cause the other format's hardware sales to drop so dramatically. However, this neither proves nor disproves that it was Warner's announcement that kicked off the trend nor does it prove what the long-term sales curve will look like. We'll have to wait and see on that one.
post #107 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

But it's different if the numbers of The Bits suddenly left out (Bill subtracted) the 360 add-on sales that were previously present.

No matter the discussion of whether or not they belonged there: it makes the numbers incomparable along the time axis. And that part of the discussions moot.


Cees
post #108 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

Quote:
But it's different if the numbers of The Bits suddenly left out (Bill subtracted) the 360 add-on sales that were previously present.

I thought that no gaming machines were included in the original numbers:

NPD Confirms Huge Blu-ray Share Jump - 1/23/2008 9:40:00 AM - TWICE

Quote:
NPD, which broke from policy to comment on its weekly share data, confirmed that dedicated HD DVD player share dropped suddenly compared to dedicated Blu-ray models the week ending Jan. 12, after being only slightly ahead of HD DVD the week ending Jan. 5. Video game consoles were not part of the study.

That would seem to imply that both the PS3 and the 360/add-on were not included in the NPD's figures ("video game console" is term that could apply equally to both).
post #109 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaViD Boulet
I also find it hard to believe that the shift *away* from HD DVD was entirely due to BD promotions given how significant the drop was (from the bits):

Week before Warner's Annoucment:

Blu-ray Disc - 15,257 units
HD-DVD - 14,558 units

The week AFTER Warner's announcement:

Blu-ray Disc - 21,770 units
HD-DVD - 1,758 units

Since when in the whole history of the war have *promotions* of one format caused the sales of the other format's hardware to drop by a factor of 8.28? (!)

Promotions would naturally help increase sales for the designated format, but not cause the other format's hardware sales to drop so dramatically. However, this neither proves nor disproves that it was Warner's announcement that kicked off the trend nor does it prove what the long-term sales curve will look like. We'll have to wait and see on that one.
I think it's quite obvious what happened in December. Blu-ray players spiked simply because HDM aficianados, myself included, determined it was the best time to buy in on an expensive format before prices would go up again in January.
HD-DVD sales lagged because buyers were waiting for $98 specials that never came. A "fall out" from those sales in November. My theory.
post #110 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

How do returns factor into this? For example, say 20,000 HD-DVD players were sold, but 19,000 (purchased over the last 30 days and prior to Christmas) were returned after the Warner announcement - would that net out at 1,000?

I know the numbers in my example are unlikely, but there were reports of large numbers of returns (from people that were still eligible) after the Warner announcement...
post #111 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

Quote:
But it's different if the numbers of The Bits suddenly left out (Bill subtracted) the 360 add-on sales that were previously present.

No matter the discussion of whether or not they belonged there: it makes the numbers incomparable along the time axis. And that part of the discussions moot.

Thanks Cees, that it was I was trying to say.

Quote:
I thought that no gaming machines were included in the original numbers:

NPD doesn't consider the add-on a gaming machine when the numbers are reported (even though it does require one). If MS decided to release a HD DVD XBOX 360 tomorrow (which they are NOT) that would be considered a gaming console by NPD and would not be tracked with HD players since its primary purpose in the majority of homes would be to play games. Since the HD DVD player can only be used for HD DVD playback (and there is no other reason to purchase one) it gets counted as a stand alone and is factored into the attach rate.

David, I agree with what you said about the unique challenges of how to count certain devices, my point (which Cees said beter than I did) was that they have been counted a certain way for the last year plus, and it shouldn't be changed by one person to meet their definition (unless they work for NPD ). I know there are a lot of opinions for how different devices should be counted and I don't want to get into that discussion. (I actually have no idea what the right answer is...It's somewhere in the middle but I'm not sure where).
post #112 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter U

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick.C
How do returns factor into this? For example, say 20,000 HD-DVD players were sold, but 19,000 (purchased over the last 30 days and prior to Christmas) were returned after the Warner announcement - would that net out at 1,000?

I know the numbers in my example are unlikely, but there were reports of large numbers of returns (from people that were still eligible) after the Warner announcement...

Returns are not considered in NPD figures, just units sold through POS systems.

And so far, there's been absolutely nothing reliable to suggest the PS3 is going to suddenly drop to $299 on Monday.
post #113 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

Quote:
avid, I agree with what you said about the unique challenges of how to count certain devices, my point (which Cees said beter than I did) was that they have been counted a certain way for the last year plus, and it shouldn't be changed by one person to meet their definition (unless they work for NPD ). I know there are a lot of opinions for how different devices should be counted and I don't want to get into that discussion. (I actually have no idea what the right answer is...It's somewhere in the middle but I'm not sure where).

Thanks for clarifying. I wasn't aware that Bill had gone the additional step of factoring out the 360 add-on after the numbers were provided. Question... how does one get the actual 360-add-on sales figures by themselves? Does NDP provide that as well or was that via another source?

Cees and Adam, I agree it makes sense to keep the way that the numbers are derived consistent over time to compare apples-to-apples. Of course, as long as Bill treated the two weeks before and after the Warner annoucement, the same, then his comparison of those two points in time is valid (though not comparing to other weeks).
post #114 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

Is it possible that Bill just assumed the numbers excluded the Xbox add on and that he didn't actually subtract the number?

I ask because since they do exclude PS3s, you could make the logical leap through a simple misunderstanding.
post #115 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

David,

Quote:
Of course, as long as Bill treated the two weeks before and after the Warner annoucement, the same, then his comparison of those two points in time is valid (though not comparing to other weeks).
Yes and no.

Once the new publisher tampered with the data, they're no longer NPD data. It's as simple as that: you either use the data or you don't. You cannot label them "NPD figures accent", 'accent' meaning: changed by TNP, on his decision alone.

(a) A question that immediately arises in matters like these is: why were they changed?
Again, I'm not going into the reasoning itself behind it, but apparently they were changed to suit the new publisher one way or another. You don't have to agree or disagree with the way it suited him, but those are new numbers now, with a new underlying goal. Which ought to make them suspicious immediately.

BTW: this is exactly why there are official bookkeeping rules, prescribing how businesses need to present their financial results.

(b) Assuming the new publisher's maths are correctly done on his own figures, there's another problem: they lack any authority.
The NPD figures are well-known numbers used over years and months by the industry, with confidence that they are assembled as best as can be done, as well as having a composition determined by meticulous decision processes made by a competent group of people and watched over the years. Meetings have been dedicated to the exact composition of those numbers. That all is designed to give them the authority of being "the NPD numbers".

If the new publisher, or anyone else, challenges that authority: he certainly has the right to do so. But we are entitled to a thorough scientific explanation at least. And it won't transfer that authority automatically to new own statistics presented by himself.



Joe,

That might be possible, and if this new publisher didn't do the above, then he's of course not guilty of that. But then we have another problem: he doesn't know, nor do we, what exactly he's talking about. And he stated the exclusion of the 360 add-ons several times!


Cees


Edit: I have since learned that the use of the name of a sister site of this forum and its Editor can give rise to misunderstandings about the nature of this post. It was never meant in an accusatory way, so out of respect for both, I removed those names from my text.
C.
post #116 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

Cees,

if Bill really did alter the figures I agree with your assemssment, including not being able to describe them as "NPD" after the fact.


Quote:
Is it possible that Bill just assumed the numbers excluded the Xbox add on and that he didn't actually subtract the number?

Good question. Has anyone actually compared the "original" NPD numbers against what Bill posted? Unless the NPD also supplied Bill with the figures pertaining to 360 add-on sales only, I can't see how he would have even had the number to do the subtraction.

I wonder if it's all a miscommunication/interpretation: I read the NPD statement to exclude the 360 when it read "no gaming machines" because I didn't realize they had a different categorization for the 360-add on. What if Bill just made the same mistake and is just assuming that the 360 isn't in the numbers when in fact it is? If that were the case, no harm no foul.

I'll try to get in touch will Bill to confirm, and if anyone has access to the NPD numbers outside of Bill's post, let us know how they compare.
post #117 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter U

Quote:
Originally Posted by nolesrule
Is it possible that Bill just assumed the numbers excluded the Xbox add on and that he didn't actually subtract the number?

I suppose it is possible. I would be interested in knowing definitively one way or the other. However, if the 1,758 HD DVD units reported on the Bits for the week ending 1/12 included the XBOX 360 Add-on, then those numbers are astoundingly pathetic.
post #118 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

The last time I saw numbers for the add-on was November. Here are "ballpark" numbers (rounded down to nearest 1k)
Sept: 15k
Oct: 38k
Nov: 19k
I have no idea what they were for Dec and so far this January, and it is probably safe to assume that they decreased. When it comes to hardware and the NPD numbers is is best to look at the monthly numbers. The January numbers won't be out until mid-February.

Speaking of numbers...There were some quotes from Philips at CES saying they were very pleased with the sales of their BD player and had sold out the entire run. I had to laugh when I heard that. I can't say the exact number without getting into trouble, but lets just say that if I had a dollar for every player that they sold from the time they released it (I think Jan 07) through this past November, I would maybe have enough to take my wife to an OK dinner (Chili's, Applebees, Outback, etc) a movie with a jumbo popcorn and have enough for the babysitter. If my wife wanted candy with the popcorn I would probably have to dip into my own funds. Compare that to if a had a dollar for every Sony or Samsung, I'd be on a 5 star African safari right now....
post #119 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter U

This adds an interesting new wrinkle to all of this.

BetaNews | NPD: Free Blu-ray player deals led to boosted sales this month

Doug
post #120 of 125

Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit

Good find Doug.

Two very interesting things.

The first has to do with the rise in BD sales (not necessarily the drop in HD DVD sales):

Quote:
"It reflects what was going on during that week," Baker said, adding that it wasn't smart to "extrapolate that out for six months."

So what went on the week ending January 12 that led to such high numbers in Blu-ray standalone player sales? Bundling deals with HDTVs, explained Baker. Sharp Blu-ray players accounted for over 30% of sales, as they were offered free to buyers of the company's LCD televisions.

Sony -- also accounting for one-third of sales -- had a similar $400-off deal for Blu-ray players when buying a Sony HDTV.

Panasonic, like Sharp, offered a free Blu-ray player and made up for the remaining third of units sold. Samsung Blu-ray sales were almost non-existent, as the company did not offer any special deals to TV buyers.

And most curious was this bit:

Quote:
The NPD figures did not include Sony's PlayStation 3 or Microsoft's HD DVD add-on for the Xbox 360 -- only standalone players.

Maybe Bill didn't manipulate the numbers after all?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Blu-ray
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming Video and Digital Downloads › Blu-ray › Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit