Re: Toshiba Deploys New HD DVD Marketing Initiatives Based on Strong Fourth Quarter Unit
Quote:
| Can you point me to the rumors about PS3 dropping to $300? I'm curious. |
Said rumorage:
VG Rumors
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Originally Posted by Paul Arnette
|
|
Originally Posted by BrettB
Okay... so the latest hardware sales data from market research firm NPD Group is in, and it reveals that - as one would expect - HD-DVD player sales have also been impacted by the news of Warner's decision to drop the format later this year. One quick note: The data that follows does NOT include sales of Sony's PlayStation 3 or the HD-DVD add-on drive for Microsoft's Xbox 360. These are stand-alone, set-top players only.
These numbers are after the Warner news but before the latest Toshiba price cuts. Looks pretty grim. |


|
Originally Posted by Paul Arnette
|
| Their game plan as of right now is to move as many Playstation 3 units by March, 31, 2008 as possible, this has to do something with Warner's exclusivity deal |
| Reason 2: Time Warner. In exchange for Time Warner's exclusitivity (and an end to the format war), Sony has promised to reduce the price of the Playstation 3. |
| (which seems to have been a contributing factor in the WB decision) |
| While the Warner annoucement hurt hd-dvd sales it was not the biggest contributor. Rumours abounded, no doubt started by blu-ray, that Universal and Paramount were dropping hd-dvd entirely. That was what probably killed sales. |
|
Originally Posted by Adam Gregorich
It was not a factor in the WB decision. Sony's offer expired on the 4th which is when WB made their decision and the monthly December data was not available.
|
| "One of the things you see in the NPD data for this fourth quarter was that even with a $100 premium, BD set-tops outsold HD set-tops in December," said Sanders. "Even with Toshiba having the lower-cost player in the marekt, software sales remained 2-to-1 in favor of Blu-ray. Our titles were running roughly 60/40 Blu-ray and that didn't change in the fourth quarter even with the price advantage HD had on the hardware side." |
|
Originally Posted by Fozziwig
I hope you won't be offended if I choose to believe Ron Sanders.
|
| Strange. According to you he can't have seen the NPD data. But he says he had seen the NPD data. |
| I hope you won't be offended if I choose to believe Ron Sanders. |
| If the NPD data for December was not available then how could Ron Sanders (Warner Home Video president) say this on January 4th 2008: |
|
Originally Posted by Adam Gregorich
Speaking of numbers, I just noticed how Bill Hunt excluded XBOX add on drives from the NPD numbers that are shown on his site and a few posts earlier. That would NOT have changed the final outcome (Blu having a large hardware lead), but it would have made the numbers look a lot better for HD DVD. I am not wanting to rehash the age old argument "should a PS3 be counteed as a standalone player", but since inception the XBOX add on has been counted as a standalone player when sales are reported since it can only play HD DVDs. Bill chose to exclude them from the charts he created which make them inaccurate compared to how NPD sales data has always been reported.
|
| Notaking anything away from BD, but here is an interesting article where NPD comments on the numbers: |
| Not true. The 360 add-on is counted as a dedicated player, not a standalone. You can't just plug it in to a TV and watch movies, so it can not stand alone and play HD DVDs. It needs a 360 or a PC to operate. Toshiba is very tricky with this. |
|
Originally Posted by Adam Gregorich
Notaking anything away from BD, but here is an interesting article where NPD comments on the numbers:
From Greg Tarr of TWICE: http://www.twice.com/article/CA6524995.html?desc=topstory NPD attributed the results largely to promotions run by several Blu-ray supporting manufacturers, and said they were not necessarily the result of reaction to the news that Warner Bros. would be dropping support of HD DVD to go exclusively with HD DVD in May.
|
| But it's different if the numbers of The Bits suddenly left out (Bill subtracted) the 360 add-on sales that were previously present. |
| NPD, which broke from policy to comment on its weekly share data, confirmed that dedicated HD DVD player share dropped suddenly compared to dedicated Blu-ray models the week ending Jan. 12, after being only slightly ahead of HD DVD the week ending Jan. 5. Video game consoles were not part of the study. |
|
Originally Posted by DaViD Boulet
I also find it hard to believe that the shift *away* from HD DVD was entirely due to BD promotions given how significant the drop was (from the bits):
Week before Warner's Annoucment: Blu-ray Disc - 15,257 units HD-DVD - 14,558 units The week AFTER Warner's announcement: Blu-ray Disc - 21,770 units HD-DVD - 1,758 units Since when in the whole history of the war have *promotions* of one format caused the sales of the other format's hardware to drop by a factor of 8.28? (!) Promotions would naturally help increase sales for the designated format, but not cause the other format's hardware sales to drop so dramatically. However, this neither proves nor disproves that it was Warner's announcement that kicked off the trend nor does it prove what the long-term sales curve will look like. We'll have to wait and see on that one. |
| But it's different if the numbers of The Bits suddenly left out (Bill subtracted) the 360 add-on sales that were previously present. No matter the discussion of whether or not they belonged there: it makes the numbers incomparable along the time axis. And that part of the discussions moot. |
| I thought that no gaming machines were included in the original numbers: |
|
Originally Posted by Patrick.C
How do returns factor into this? For example, say 20,000 HD-DVD players were sold, but 19,000 (purchased over the last 30 days and prior to Christmas) were returned after the Warner announcement - would that net out at 1,000?
I know the numbers in my example are unlikely, but there were reports of large numbers of returns (from people that were still eligible) after the Warner announcement... |
| avid, I agree with what you said about the unique challenges of how to count certain devices, my point (which Cees said beter than I did) was that they have been counted a certain way for the last year plus, and it shouldn't be changed by one person to meet their definition (unless they work for NPD ). I know there are a lot of opinions for how different devices should be counted and I don't want to get into that discussion. (I actually have no idea what the right answer is...It's somewhere in the middle but I'm not sure where). |
| Of course, as long as Bill treated the two weeks before and after the Warner annoucement, the same, then his comparison of those two points in time is valid (though not comparing to other weeks). |
| Is it possible that Bill just assumed the numbers excluded the Xbox add on and that he didn't actually subtract the number? |
|
Originally Posted by nolesrule
Is it possible that Bill just assumed the numbers excluded the Xbox add on and that he didn't actually subtract the number?
|
| "It reflects what was going on during that week," Baker said, adding that it wasn't smart to "extrapolate that out for six months." So what went on the week ending January 12 that led to such high numbers in Blu-ray standalone player sales? Bundling deals with HDTVs, explained Baker. Sharp Blu-ray players accounted for over 30% of sales, as they were offered free to buyers of the company's LCD televisions. Sony -- also accounting for one-third of sales -- had a similar $400-off deal for Blu-ray players when buying a Sony HDTV. Panasonic, like Sharp, offered a free Blu-ray player and made up for the remaining third of units sold. Samsung Blu-ray sales were almost non-existent, as the company did not offer any special deals to TV buyers. |
| The NPD figures did not include Sony's PlayStation 3 or Microsoft's HD DVD add-on for the Xbox 360 -- only standalone players. |