post #1561 of 1635
1/25/08 at 8:40pm
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Originally Posted by RickER
And Disney has Sleeping Beauty coming to Blu, this fall? That would be big.
|
|
Originally Posted by jpcos
If the consensus is that most of the public does not care about the 1.1 and 2.0 features, I'd be glad to see Blu-ray drop them all together. My biggest concern in purchasing a standalone player right now is whether or not advanced features will be a problem for older players such as the problems being seen with the Samsung players.
Blu-ray should just announce that the consumer has spoken and they see no reason for advanced features. There's plenty of bandwidth and space to do some neat things without the secondary video decoder and nothing about internet connectivity on HD DVD has been all that compelling. They'd get some of us off the fence with an announcement like that. |
|
Originally Posted by RobertSiegel
Here is an interesting note. Amazon has posted this on every page of a Warner title for hd-dvd :
"Warner Bros. has announced plans to discontinue its support of the HD DVD format after May 31, 2008." |
|
Originally Posted by jpcos
Blu-ray should just announce that the consumer has spoken and they see no reason for advanced features. There's plenty of bandwidth and space to do some neat things without the secondary video decoder and nothing about internet connectivity on HD DVD has been all that compelling.
|
|
Originally Posted by Jason Seaver
There aren't enough HD consumers to say that the consumer has spoken. A vocal group on a message board more concerned about how the capacity of a disc is used than the general public has, but that's not exactly a mandate.
Besides, we're still seeing the first attempts at using it. These are powerful enough tools that it's worth seeing what develops. |
|
Originally Posted by Patrick_S
The "consensus" is only amongst the Blu-ray supporters who had to dismiss the features since Blu has been unable to live up to their four year old promises.
As for hardware standards, I really don't know anyone who doesn't think mandated Ethernet would be a good thing if for nothing more than making firmware upgrades easy. As for interactivity on Blu, my opinion is that the biggest technical issue that Blu is having has to do with Java. It was an extremely poor choice to go with Java since it is a resource hog that is inherently unstable the more it is used. A few years ago HP urged the Blu people to drop Java in favor of HDi but they went with the pig and now they have to live with it. |
|
Originally Posted by jpcos
Over time, I had come to believe that HD DVD really was in better shape due to replication cost, finalized specs, HDi v. BD-J, hardware costs, and advanced features, which are basically the HD DVD talking points. When Paramount switched,
I purchased Blood Diamond, Transformers, Shrek the 3rd, and Evan Almighty (for the kids). After checking out the online experience, I don't see it as being very useful. Navigation is hard and it's not very intuitive or informative. My current feeling is that it does not add a whole lot to the experience. Since it does not seem that many new discs are expanding their online features, I fail to see how it will take off. If Blu-ray doesn't standardize squarely on 2.0, I fail to see a reason for studios to pursue it very strongly. A realistic view of the landscape tells me that what I thought was important in this format war really might not be. Until I see studios act otherwise, I have to assume that advanced features are not as exciting to studios as their potential was when these formats launched. |
|
Originally Posted by RobertSiegel
As I stated in my prior post, working at Best Buy 6 days a week, I have found very few customers who find these features (1.1 and 2.0) on either format very important. First off, most customers didn't know they were available, and when we tell them, there usually isn't anything but "oh really." Rarely do I see someone say "well then since Blu-ray doesn't have them finalized, I am going with hd-dvd." The player prices are more of an attraction with hd-dvd and consumers than those extra features (only judging this from my everyday selling experience). But that price attraction becomes less attractive when they learn the studio support situation come June.
You mentioned the advantage of lower replication costs. I used to tell this to customers when selling hd-dvd but I stopped many months ago when I saw that releases ended up the same price at many blu-ray titles. I figured that this would surely be an advantage because the software prices would come down fast, but they are still in the same dollar range as blu-rays, so obviously no one is passing the lowered replication cost to the consumer. This was, in my opinion, a huge mistake. Movie prices for hd media are not attractive at all to the mainstream right now, where they can but dvd's on sales from $5.99 and up. You might say the consumer is spoiled. Oh, I know the quality is very different, but many of them do not see the 15.00 to 20.00 increase value for one movie, especially of the catalog titles. They can lower the player prices to $10.00, but if the media stays at suggested retail prices of $25-40.00, it doesn't help much (did you hear that Fox?). |
|
Originally Posted by Sanjay Gupta
I have never understood why from a consumer point of view, the lower cost of manufacturing HD-DVD discs is even brought up. After all pricing of software is never based on the manufacturing costs of the media. Any manufacturing cost advantage that HD-DVD has, is only for the benefit of the studios and not something that would ever be passed onto the consumer. More importantly, the cost of manufacturing of the disks is relatively small and thus even if the studios were to pass on the difference between manufacturing of Blu-Ray & HD-DVD discs, it would be no more than a dollar or two at the very most. Ofcourse, with time this difference will also diminish greatly if not dissapear altogether.
|
|
Originally Posted by jpcos
I purchased Blood Diamond, Transformers, Shrek the 3rd, and Evan Almighty (for the kids). After checking out the online experience, I don't see it as being very useful. Navigation is hard and it's not very intuitive or informative. My current feeling is that it does not add a whole lot to the experience..
|
|
Originally Posted by Jari K
I do like PiP-video commentaries and such, but these "web based"-extras doesn´t interest me. It literally took an hour (give or take, since I gave up the first time) for me to gain access to these web based-extras in Shrek 3 HD DVD and the only reason I was being so stubborn with them was that I made a review of that title.
So, usually I´ll probably skip them. Never cared for them in SD DVD either.. These "web based extras" are more like a PR-hype from the companies (they sound great and "new" in the press releases) to me than anything that great for the fans. Don´t get me wrong, I´m open for a new things and I really like good extras, but include them to the actual disc, thank you very much. |
|
Originally Posted by jpcos
Blu-ray should just announce that the consumer has spoken and they see no reason for advanced features. There's plenty of bandwidth and space to do some neat things without the secondary video decoder and nothing about internet connectivity on HD DVD has been all that compelling. They'd get some of us off the fence with an announcement like that. |
|
Originally Posted by Dave Moritz
My local Best Buy in North Phoenix went from 50/50, Blu-ray/HD-DVD ratio. To about 75/25 or maybe even 80/20 in favor of Blu-ray. My local Fry's still has around a 50/50 ratio but I am exspecting them to start dropping HD-DVD titles sometime soon.
Speaking of SACD and DVD-A I think my Fry's still has a small selection of both. I can not wait to see the release schedule for the rest of 2008 from WB. I just really want to see Lethal Weapon 3 & 4 on Blu-ray. |
|
Originally Posted by Douglas Monce
Speak for yourself. Personally I want the advanced features because I have used them on HD DVD and I find them interesting and in some cases very compelling.
|
| Dave have you noticed that Fry's has increased the base price of blu-ray from $19.95 to $22.95? I was there last night and bought Blazing Saddles. It was marked $19.95 but rang up as $22.95. The guy went and check on it and the manager told him that they are raising the price of all their blu-rays to $22.95 and up. It looks like HD DVDs will stay at $19.95. |
|
Originally Posted by Dave Moritz
I did notice the Blu-rays where now going for $22.95 but I did not look through the HD-DVD's that day. I actually am not buying very many HD titles for the next few months. Just because I am trying to save as much money as possible to buy a new receiver. There are still a bunch of Blu-ray's I want to buy but not many HD-DVD's. The Blu-ray's being a few more dollars will not affect my buying media anytime soon.
|
|
Originally Posted by Douglas Monce
No the few extra dollars isn't a big deal. I just thought it was interesting. I wonder if they have decided that they have won and can start the price of the discs creeping back up now.
Doug |
| Of course I am speaking for myself, and I don't believe Blu-ray's special features will progress successfully without competition for HD DVD. There will be players with 3 different profiles, and backwards compatibility may be rough going, as we have seen with Samsung players. Since most studios have chosen Blu-ray even though it's lacking in these features, I wonder what the motivation will be to pursue them. I threw my hat in with HD DVD largely because of the finalized specs and partially because of the advanced features. Based on the market to date, these issues don't seem to be that important. If stable 2.0 players don't become the norm, I'm skeptical that many releases will be authored to take advantage of them. |
|
Originally Posted by DaViD Boulet
The BDA created this problem by allowing the manufacturers to drag-out implimentation of each profile this long. With pressure, we could have had profile 1.1 (PIP) standard much longer ago, and IMO 2.0, which adds on only minimal cost compared to the now-required 1.1, should have been mandated and not left optional.
Part of the problem that the BDA created for blu was your very post: that now consumers have a myriad of products to buy with sporadic spec implimentation which then makes content providers axious about providing certain features. However, as another poster already mentioned, those features you can't access on your old player will work on your future player. Let's not dumb-down BD to reflect the poor requirements of the BDA for early hardware. Full-spec was something that HD DVD did right and Blu-ray needs to learn the lesson. |
|
Originally Posted by DaViD Boulet
Let's not dumb-down BD to reflect the poor requirements of the BDA for early hardware. Full-spec was something that HD DVD did right and Blu-ray needs to learn the lesson.
|
| Woolworths, one of the biggest retailers of DVDs in the UK, has become the first major retailer to solely back one of the new high definition DVD formats. The high street firm has announced that it will only stock Blu-Ray high definition DVDs from March, with HD-DVDs being dropped from stores to be sold online. ... |
| Circuit City in a not so surprising move has discontinued the HD-DVD format in favor of expanding it's Blu-Ray lineup. ... |