Re: Warner Brothers is now Blu-ray Exclusive
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Paul_Scott
Jan 4 will now be known as Black Friday.
|
Make that Blu Friday!
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Originally Posted by Paul_Scott
Jan 4 will now be known as Black Friday.
|
|
Originally Posted by Ric Easton
I'm just wondering for folks that have both formats... Will you continue to buy HD-DVD if it is an exclusive title (Especially big sets like Star Trek or Battlestar Galactica), or will you wait until it some day comes out in Blu?
|
|
Originally Posted by ChrisCook
Okay...did a quick check on the new Panasonic and noticed when I went on Amazon and Best Buy that there's a "K" after it. Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but is that anything significant?
|
|
Originally Posted by ChrisCook
Okay...did a quick check on the new Panasonic and noticed when I went on Amazon and Best Buy that there's a "K" after it. Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but is that anything significant?
|
|
Originally Posted by ChrisCook
Okay...did a quick check on the new Panasonic and noticed when I went on Amazon and Best Buy that there's a "K" after it. Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but is that anything significant?
|
| I really wish that Warner had made this decision two months ago, though. Turning newly opened Christmas presents into door stops isn't very classy. |
|
Originally Posted by Bryan X
I must admit I'm disapointed with the WB announcement. HD-DVD cannot survive this.
I bought an A3 for $149 w/ 10 free HD-DVDs back in November. Fortunately I've only bought 7 additional titles on top of that, and I only averaged $17.00 per title. So I'm only out about $270. The movies I did buy I can still watch, and I'll still have a great upconverting player. Still it's a little frustrating. I'm done with HDM in the near future. Blu-ray players will have to drop below $200 and most likely below $150 before I jump in again. It's not so much the money, but the whole thing has just left a sour taste in my mouth. Congrats Blu-ray. RIP HD-DVD. I can understand one being happy about Warner's decision. I sure would be if I owned a Blu-ray player or was neutral. But to say it was good timing? How is it good timing? Good timing would have been BEFORE the Christmas shopping season when many people bought into HD-DVD due to the dropping player prices. Even if Warner had gone HD-DVD exclusive, I would never say that days after Christmas was 'good timing'. |
|
Originally Posted by Paul_Scott
I'm dual format- but I'm not going to lay down my animosity until I see a multi page rant from Bill Hunt on why the Bd 'buying' Warners exclusive support was terrible for the consumer.
The worst thing about this news? People like Bill Hunt are vindicated. |
| The worst thing about this news? People like Bill Hunt are vindicated. |
| There have been a lot of intellectually dishonest- or at the very least, irrational and emotional- arguments bandied about the last 18 months. |
|
Originally Posted by DaViD Boulet
Of course it's monitary gain. My point is that this decision is not comparable to Paramount's "blind" decision to just follow the cash of an exclusive contract (where the BDA weren't even involved until after it was signed). WB's decision, and how they handled it, was quite different.
The two choices were payoff with a future market for HD sales, and a payoff with a future market of stagnating HD sales. |
|
Originally Posted by DaViD Boulet
Nothing was final until the last minute. Of course. But this outcome and many of the details surrounding it have been known to others outside of this forum as well.
My point about Warner's decision not being merely a decision based on pay-off is that their decision is NOT like Paramount. Paramount made a decision based purely on pay-off which contrasted with their own sales statistics and long-term market strategy. On the other hand, because they could have had virtually the same "pay off" for exclusivity with either camp, Warner wanted to make the decision that makes the most long-term market sense, which is Blu-ray Disc given the way that the market trends have been going over the past year. They also wanted to make the most profit in a deal for exclusivity... a win win. What company wouldn't take advantage of such a great opportunity: getting paid vast sums to make a decision they would have wanted to make anyway to end the war and start to help ramp-up mass adoption as the format-confusion dust settles. |
|
Originally Posted by Ronald Epstein
Time to put away any animosities and be thankful we have
one format to move forward with. |
| David, Based on your initial comments I doubt many were privy to the details of the Warner deal. For you to say that Warner made their decision a long time ago is totally false. Totally. Without going into specifics, BOTH formats came awfully close to being chosen over the past few days. While I agree that Warner was holding out for the best offer, there was no preconceived notion of which format they were going to choose until the very end. |
|
Originally Posted by Ronald Epstein
If Jack Nicholson were here right now he would say, You want the truth?! You can't handle the truth!
|
| I think you are assuming way too much here. You don't have any idea what Paramounts sales figures told them. |
| My notion that they "knew" which way they wanted to go is my own inference based on the obvious choice to secure the format with the highest sales and best long-term growth potential based on wider industry support. |
|
Originally Posted by Cees Alons
Bill hunt must be very angry at them.
Only a few months ago, he said that a studio going neutral is one thing, but a studio going from neutral to exclusive is a terrible sin. Also he must strongly disagree with the >$620,000,000 Sony is paying them for this decision (which I think is a normal business deal). |
|
Originally Posted by DaViD Boulet
You're right. We only know what Neilson's sales figures indicated, along with first-hand information from their mastering/authoring department about how excited they were to start to take advantage of BD potential.
In any case... we need not debate studio decisions of the past. More energy could be put into seeing what happens with Paramount and Universal moving forward. |
| He doesn't deserve them. |