Re: Breaking News!! Warner is soon to be Blu-Ray Exclusive!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cees Alons
Have any new and hard evidence to support that statement?
|
I don't understand why the burden of proof seems to rest solely on those who
don't believe Fox seriously entertained offers to go HD-DVD exclusive. Where is the hard evidence from those who claim otherwise? All I'm seeing is Don Lindich's opinion piece in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and the assurances of several highly placed members of this forum that Fox in reality acted in a down-'n-dirty way (by "playing" Toshiba, the BDA, Warner, etc., for the fattest paycheck).
Who are the sources of this information? No one wants to say. Unfortunately, by stating that these sources are "insiders" deeply embedded within the various entities familiar with the Warner deal, all criticism of the trustworthiness of these reports is completely deflected. The subtext I see in a lot of this is: "To question the authenticity of these reports is to question the integrity of Ron and the other administrators of this forum."
I don't buy any of that. I think Ron and the other admins here are great people. I've been following this forum since 2001 and have read and enjoyed much of what they have had to say. But I think it's entirely fair for me to question the integrity of the information (and yes, even the agendas, if there are any) coming from these "inside sources."
As someone who wants and places a very high value on truth, it's very hard for me to make a decision on who to believe when on the one side you've got The Wall Street Journal and Home Media Magazine saying Fox is extremely bullish about Blu-ray and
could not be swayed to HD-DVD, and on the other you've got, well, personal assurances from unnamed sources that things went down in quite a different way altogether. And what's this with Fox being upset about Blu-ray's "lack of manufacturing infrastructure"? That entire argument just seems to come from way out in left field to me. Does anyone else feel that way? I'd love to see a link to a source, if one exists.
I won't repost my previous replies re: WSJ and HMM's coverage of the Warner deal and Mike Dunn's representation of Fox (which, by the way, were mostly met with complete silence), but they can be read
here,
here, and
here.
I'm not trying to brag about myself by making people read my posts. I'm just tired of the spin that this issue continues to get, long after people should have gotten past it and moved on.