Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

*** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

post #1 of 30
Thread Starter 
I think the days of everyone loathing movie musicals are gone, or at least are on vacation for a while - so long as the material and score are of a certain style.

Hairspray has that nice 60's sound, with enough of a hint of modern pop, and is an overall feel-good enough show that it was a decent hit. It got away being unabashedly a musical without having to make the musical numbers overtly "fantasies" in someone's head.

I can't see Sweeney Todd being a hit or bringing in huge box office, unless the teenage girl contingent just can't get enough of Depp looking all emo goth. It's a dark, violent musical that's rated R. The material certainly doesn't have any of the cheese associated with movie musicals (or what the public that doesn't frequent live theater associates with musicals in general). As I've said before, it's certainly an acquired Sondheim taste.

The musical numbers you can hear on the website don't sound bad, but some of the behind-the-scenes stuff I've seen of Depp in the studio recording the songs seemed kind of lifeless. Leaving me wonder who the music director was giving him some feedback. I'm reminded of one of the extras on the Hairspray Blu-Ray (I guess it's on the DVD too), where Marc Shaiman was telling one of the actors they were being too reticent in the studio and that when it came time to act the scene they'd hate to feel restrained by the track that was recorded in the studio. Perhaps that is the characterization Depp was going for from the beginning, but this seemingly less manic Sweeney is certainly something I'm going to have to see to judge properly. If it's a nice gradual progression from reserved to manic it can work, as I do sometimes feel people that play him start him out far too crazy and insane right at the beginning of the piece.

In any event, we'll see. I'm glad the material is getting the respect it deserves and isn't being toned down for a PG-13 rating. Anyone producing this piece should know what they were getting into from the get-go.

For future Sondheim movies though, maybe the success of "Enchanted" will get someone to do "Into the Woods" next.
post #2 of 30

Re: "Sweeney Todd" with Tim Burton and Johnny Depp

Well, I watched the clips on the website and my fear seems to be coming true. Depp can't sing at all, this will kill the movie for me. I just don't like the style of his singing in the vids and think it will hurt the movie.
post #3 of 30

Re: "Sweeney Todd" with Tim Burton and Johnny Depp

I guess I see it completely differently. I think Depp sounds great! I LOVE the raspy in his voice, the hurt, the anger. This is in my opinion what has been missing from the stage show for so many years. From what I've seen so far, Depp is better than any Sweeney Todd performed I've seen.
post #4 of 30
Thread Starter 

Re: "Sweeney Todd" with Tim Burton and Johnny Depp

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Will
Well, I watched the clips on the website and my fear seems to be coming true. Depp can't sing at all, this will kill the movie for me. I just don't like the style of his singing in the vids and think it will hurt the movie.

Sweeney can be sung in many different styles, IMO. In a very disciplined manner or not. If it's not going to be sung in a disciplined or trained voice though, it had better have some really good acting carrying the context of the songs though to make it work.

Alot of this is personal opinion I suppose, because I really have never liked George Hearn in the role, vocally anyway, but many people seem to swear by him.

Depp seems alot closer to Michael Cerveris in style, though Cerveris seems to be more overtly emotional and angry vocally than Depp seems to be. My fear is that, from what I've heard so far, Sweeney just sounds indifferent in Depp's interpretation.
post #5 of 30

*** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

This thread is now designated the Official Discussion Thread for "Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street". Please, post all comments, links to outside reviews, film and box office discussion items to this thread.

All HTF member film reviews of "Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street" should be posted to the http://www.hometheaterforum.com/htf/...ew-thread.html.

Thank you for your consideration in this matter.


Crawdaddy
post #6 of 30

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

I saw it yesterday. Not being a huge Tim Burton fan, I was not surprised by my reaction to the movie. Overall, I five it a 7.5.

Why not more? Well, for one, I found it rather static for a musical. Some scenes, for example the NOTHING'S GONNA HURT YOU scene, reminded me of THE WIZ in how static they are, the camera and the editing never dancing with the music as they should in a musical, and the overall effect never quite becoming visceral enough.

Depp and Bonham Carter are, as I expected, adequate but not spectacular. Then again, I'm one of those people who found Angela Lansbury's tragic-comic turn as Mrs. Lovett unforgettable, and it was hard to adjust to Bonham Carter's underplayed, icy Mrs. Lovett. I thought she brought her character down way too much, if that makes any sense.

The rest of the cast is very good and the production design, as one would expect from Burton, is impeccable.
post #7 of 30

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by GerardoHP
never dancing with the music as they should in a musical
Not trying to be rude but, from this comment, I guess you haven't scene many dramatic musicals (on stage or screen). Dancing is not required IMO. Les Mis, Phantom Of The Opera and Miss Saigon are great examples of musicals with very little to no dancing in them.

I haven't seen Sweeney Todd yet but, after listening to the soundtrack a few times I have warmed up to Depp's singing and am looking forward to see this.
post #8 of 30

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Will
Not trying to be rude but, from this comment, I guess you haven't scene many dramatic musicals (on stage or screen). Dancing is not required IMO. Les Mis, Phantom Of The Opera and Miss Saigon are great examples of musicals with very little to no dancing in them.
Seems like you misinterpreted my intended metaphor that a STATIC (i.e. stationary) camera does not work well, in my opinion, with screen musicals, where the camera should "dance" and the editing "punctuate" that "dance", even when there's no dance on the screen. I'm not trying to speak in riddles. While ST has some moments where the camera work seems to resonate to the music, on many occasions it doesn't.

And for the record, I see as many musicals on stage and screen as I can get to, and I'm a huge fan of the genre.
post #9 of 30

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by GerardoHP
Well, for one, I found it rather static for a musical. Some scenes, for example the NOTHING'S GONNA HURT YOU scene, reminded me of THE WIZ in how static they are, the camera and the editing never dancing with the music as they should in a musical, and the overall effect never quite becoming visceral enough.

What's odd about the example you chose is that "Nothing's Gonna Harm You" is a lulaby so to have the camera moving around defeats the purpose of the scene. It's supposed to be soft, caring, slow and soft so that when it is later sung in the sewers it counters being dark and scary. For a scene that dances with the music look no further than the "Epiphany" scene or the Perelli scene.
post #10 of 30
Thread Starter 

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by GerardoHP
Then again, I'm one of those people who found Angela Lansbury's tragic-comic turn as Mrs. Lovett unforgettable, and it was hard to adjust to Bonham Carter's underplayed, icy Mrs. Lovett. I thought she brought her character down way too much, if that makes any sense.

The rest of the cast is very good and the production design, as one would expect from Burton, is impeccable.

The basic characterization Carter used is what most people playing the part nowadays go for. Understated, dark, and nefarious when appropriate. I think it has lot to do with the production design (the movie included) many modern productions tend to go with.

I saw the movie last night, and enjoyed it, though I feel it has some problems. As I feared, Depp seemed a little flat in his characterization, only getting really animated during certain killings. I'm guessing that was a deliberate choice, but I felt it sucked alot of energy out of the character.

As I said above, I sort of guessed what Carter's portrayal of Mrs. Lovett was going to be. Even given that though, I felt she didn't milk some of the classic comedic quips the characters gets. I really felt this in "A Little Priest". When performed on stage the two actors have quite a few between-verse asides and little jokes, not to mention I think the song was truncated from the original version. None of those little quips and joking were in the song at all. It just seemed to be another example of how alot of the humor of the piece didn't make it into the film.

As a very macabre film I might say it's brilliant, and seeing an extremely graphic portrayal of the murders (something not usually done on stage) really drives home the psychosis of these characters, but I felt it was missing even the most obvious humor bits that even the darkest and most serious live staging of the piece will retain.

I also felt it odd that "The Ballad of Sweeney Todd" was never heard in the film, but musically it was everywhere in the score. If any "overture" piece was ever perfectly written to accompany opening credits than the Ballad was it, a shame it wasn't used, IMO.
post #11 of 30

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

I agree with most of the complaints above. I think Depp tends to be too flat in most of the movie and better in the murder scenes. I think both lead performances lack the operatic vibrancy the roles call for and, while I realize you could never put a performance like Angela Lansbury's on the screen without making it feel way too big, I still think a few pitches above what it is now would have helped enormously.

All of that said, I don't think it's a bad film. I just think it could have been a lot better.
post #12 of 30

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Laughter
I also felt it odd that "The Ballad of Sweeney Todd" was never heard in the film, but musically it was everywhere in the score. If any "overture" piece was ever perfectly written to accompany opening credits than the Ballad was it, a shame it wasn't used, IMO.
Not only did Sondheim have the contractual right to approve every change, but in fact he did the musical revisions personally. He had some interesting observations in a recent NYTimes features about the process of translating Sweeney to the screen:

Quote:
“The only kind of movie I didn’t like as a kid were musicals,” he said. Everyone who has attempted to translate a stage musical to film, he added, “has underestimated the distance between the languages.” The movie musicals he enjoys — ”Love Me Tonight,” “Under the Roofs of Paris,” “The Smiling Lieutenant” and a couple of the MGMs — are those that were originally conceived for the screen. The rest, he said, are “either stodgy or rely on flash.”

He understood, then, that remaking “Sweeney” would be risky and involve major surgery. Still, he eagerly wielded the razor on perhaps his greatest work. “I’m hoping people will just forget what they know,” he said, “and enjoy the movie or not. But if they go in counting the things that are missing, they’re going to be very distracted.
"Sondheim Dismembers 'Sweeney'", 12/16/2007 (emphasis added)
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/16/theater/16gree.html

From later in the article:

Quote:
After 20 years of directors and deals falling by the wayside, Mr. Burton and the screenwriter John Logan came along with an idea for retelling the story in more cinematic terms. First, there would be no chorus commenting on the action in song; the singing would be done entirely by the principals. This meant cutting or truncating all ensemble numbers, a major element of the stage production, which had a chorus of 18. Out went “The Letter,” “City on Fire” and two-thirds of “God, That’s Good!” Even the show’s opening number and recurrent theme, “The Ballad of Sweeney Todd,” which was to be sung by the ghosts of Sweeney’s victims as the movie progressed, was dropped just before filming. Happily, the song’s “Dies Irae” climax and creepy, buzzing string figures — Mr. Sondheim’s tribute to the film composer Bernard Herrmann — remain as underscoring.
So that's why parts of The Ballad of Sweeney Todd remain as underscoring -- it was inspired by film music!

Quote:
Though he was at first shocked by the suggested elimination of “The Ballad of Sweeney Todd,” Mr. Sondheim said that when he put on his “movie-buff hat,” he “completely agreed,” because it would keep holding up the action. . . . “Come on, you’ve got to be ruthless. I learned that from Oscar Hammerstein. He and Richard Rodgers cut their big hit song out of ‘Oklahoma!’ because it interfered with the storytelling."

As for the interpretations of the main characters, I saw the original Broadway production, have watched the PBS taping of it many times, saw the 2005 revival with Michael Cerveris and Patti Lupone (twice) and can recite large portions of the score from memory (I say "recite" because I can't sing a note). To me the film is remarkable for what it includes, not for what it left out, and I think both Depp and Bonham Carter have produced remarkable and original takes on two of the iconic characters of contemporary drama. I wouldn't want to see them on stage, but they've made a bloody good film, IMO.

M.
post #13 of 30
Thread Starter 

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

I have to take issue with this quote from the quoted article:

Quote:
Though he was at first shocked by the suggested elimination of “The Ballad of Sweeney Todd,” Mr. Sondheim said that when he put on his “movie-buff hat,” he “completely agreed,” because it would keep holding up the action. . . . “Come on, you’ve got to be ruthless. I learned that from Oscar Hammerstein. He and Richard Rodgers cut their big hit song out of ‘Oklahoma!’ because it interfered with the storytelling."

My suggestion was to use it during an opening credit sequence that progressed the story. The thing "holding up the action" at that point is an, IMO, worthless opening credit sequence that is basically just some bad CGI. I often don't mind "segregated" opening credits that are standalone and essentially an overture, but when I feel it could have been used as some productive story-building time I take issue with it.

I also don't feel the differences are really distracting, the film is much more like the musical than it is different. In fact, one change I do like is the moving of the second act "Joanna" so that it happens before "God, that's Good." It works in either order. I mainly just don't like the exclusion of pretty much any bit of humor from the piece outside of the Perelli character. I could sense the tone and mood really wearing down the audience I was seeing it with by the time it came time for the Judge's return.
post #14 of 30

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Laughter
. I mainly just don't like the exclusion of pretty much any bit of humor from the piece outside of the Perelli character. I could sense the tone and mood really wearing down the audience I was seeing it with by the time it came time for the Judge's return.

I'm only familiar with the film, but I found it to be quite funny. It wasn't hilarious but some of it was so ridiculous you had to laugh. I think the whole beach fantasy sequence had the biggest laughs. And Mrs. Lovett was mostly a comedic personality.
post #15 of 30

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew_Def
I'm only familiar with the film, but I found it to be quite funny. It wasn't hilarious but some of it was so ridiculous you had to laugh. I think the whole beach fantasy sequence had the biggest laughs. And Mrs. Lovett was mostly a comedic personality.
I agree -- the film had plenty of dark humor. I think it's the best presentation of "By the Sea" I've ever seen, and you have to laugh, not just at the absurdity the settings and costumes in Mrs. Lovett's imagination, but also at the contrast between her ever-more-vivacious manner and Sweeney's brooding. Even when she imagines their wedding, she can barely imagine him kissing her at the altar.

I also think what Bonham Carter does with "The Worst Pies in London" is hilarious.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Laughter
My suggestion was to use it during an opening credit sequence that progressed the story. The thing "holding up the action" at that point is an, IMO, worthless opening credit sequence that is basically just some bad CGI. I often don't mind "segregated" opening credits that are standalone and essentially an overture, but when I feel it could have been used as some productive story-building time I take issue with it.
I don't view the opening credits as "bad CGI"; I consider them to be animation and, as such, an excellent introduction to the film. It's a visual medium; you want to get the audience looking, not straining to hear and decipher complex lyrics like these:

Quote:
Inconspicuous Sweeney was
Quick and quiet and clean he 'e was.
Back of his smile, under his word,
Sweeney heard music that nobody heard.

Sweeney pondered and Sweeney planned,
Like a perfect machine 'e planned.
Sweeney was smooth, Sweeney was subtle,
Sweeney would blink and rats would scuttle.

I also disagree that "The Ballad of Sweeney Todd" would have worked with opening credits. In its initial version, it builds to the introduction of Sweeney himself rising out of a grave -- an entrance that's pure theater and would make no sense in film. Subsequent verses comment on the action, and the final verse give us a moral that Burton's film gives us with the very compelling final image of Sweeney and his late wife.

Please don't misunderstand me; I love "The Ballad of Sweeney Todd", and it's one of my favorite numbers from the show. But once it's separated from the "greek chorus" of cast members singing it, I just don't think it works as a disembodied refrain.

M.
post #16 of 30

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

'The Ballad of Sweeney Todd' was underused as a musical theme in the film, and its one of my few but niggling gripes about it. I agree that its lyrics are somewhat out of place in the context of film, but the orchestration omits the entire melodic line. I'm sitting there humming 'Attend the tale of Sweeney Todd,' and people are staring at me like I'm the one wielding the razor.

My other gripe is the omission of 'God, That's Good!,' but that omission can be better argued by somebody else.
post #17 of 30
Thread Starter 

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

Well, "God, That's Good" was there, in the form it was morphed into anyway. I didn't really have any issue with it. As a matter of fact, since we see him building the chair and using it and the Act 2 Johanna was moved to be before "God, That's Good," the last half of the song wouldn't make any sense logistically since it is them testing the chair and chute.

After reading parts of the article that Michael posted I can see how the cuts were made - since they basically were designing it so that only the principles ever did any singing. That explains certain decisions, though I'll argue whether that angle was even necessary to take. Ask me a year or two years ago and I'd say, yeah, do something to make it "less musical" to make it appeal to people better, but I think audiences have once again grown somewhat accustomed to musical conventions and wouldn't have begrudged the film a chorus.
post #18 of 30

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

I think that was indeed the filmmakers' thinking behind the lack of lyrics to 'God That's Good' (and that would also explain why 'The Ballad of Sweeney Todd' was left unsung).
post #19 of 30

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

In response to a post from the 2007 Film List Thread:
Quote:
should Sweeney Todd be tedious to someone who doesn't know the story or characters, doesn't know how it ends and pretty much all he's heard is the opening number from the play and seen the trailer? because my overall experience consistently throughou the film was 'this is very tedious.' and there were few standout moments that I thought were really good, Depp and Carter calling the ointment piss was one of the highlights.
I think it's geared toward, first, a very specific sense of humor: the type of person that finds a man slitting throats as he sings a lament to his long lost daughter hilarious. But that person must find the humor in the juxisposition and not simply find grotesque murder itself funny, because he or she is expected to feel something serious when all of the obsessive schemes come down on their planners' heads. The characters, with the exception of Antony and Toby, cannot be sympathetic and do the things they do. Benjamin Barker is extraordinarily sympathetic, but by the time comes for he and Mrs. Lovett to search for Toby in the bakehouse, it cannot be argued that Sweeney is. In fact, it's hard to argue that Sweeney or Mrs. Lovett can be considered sympathetic after they write off humanity in "A Little Priest." It does feel like the turing point it is, though, because — contrary to Sean's opinion — I still feel it's such a hilarious number, keen as it is with its barbs of a number of prominent professions. So in absense of a sympathic protagonist, you have a compelling protagonist, who ultimately gets his just rewards for an obsessive campaign of revenge launched by events he had no control over. It's certainly not a musical I know back to front — which probably helped me accept the movie more readily — but it is one that I find compelling. The way the cast of characters move toward their inevitable ends fascinates me, and the bleak nightmarish world they inhabit only seems natural to me. I couldn't imagine this story playing on in a conventionally lit and photographed movie.
post #20 of 30

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

I just saw this tonight and I thought it was brilliant. I was not expecting it to be so dark and serious. I thought Depp was spot-on. Todd is dead inside because he has let the thoughts of revenge consume him, so the only time that he should come alive is when he is about to seek that revenge. And by playing it the way he did, Depp came off as completely psychotic. You sensed that he could snap at any moment and kill children or even Mrs. Lovett. I was relived that Burton didn't camp this up with any more humor that would have taken the sting out what is supposed to be a morbid, horrific, and nightmarish tale. Oh, and Depp sounded like David Bowie. A LOT like David Bowie.
post #21 of 30

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bradley Newton
Oh, and Depp sounded like David Bowie. A LOT like David Bowie.

I agree with that, though I defer to those who think he sounds like Anthony Newley for one reason: Depp sounds like Bowie did when Bowie sounded like Anthony Newley!

Dunno if Depp was impersonating Bowie as Newley or impersonating Newley...
post #22 of 30

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

I saw this last night with my dad, who is a big fan of the classic Hollywood musicals, and has been on stage a few times as a chorus member in some local theater productions.
I really enjoyed the show (4.5 out of 5). My only previous exposure to the story was the taped stage production with Hearn and Lansbury, and the concert version with Hearn and LuPone. I thought that Depp and Carter did a fine job as Todd and Lovett. Even though they definitely aren't singers, I thought they did Toby. He was EASILY the best singer of any of the case, and I thought that if they ever get around to making a film version of Les Mis, he's be great as Gavroche (sp?).

I wanted to ask if anyone here was put off by the level of spurting blood? It didn't bother me, but I've seen plenty of slasher horror films so that sort of stuff doesn't turn me off. My dad, however, had some problems getting past it, and the idea that someone would bake murdered people into pie. He loved the music and performances and all that, but I think the level of blood and some of the story's basic concept turned him off to actually liking it. I wonder if the story wouldn't have been just as strong if they downplayed the blood and gore factor... thoughts?
post #23 of 30

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

I'm in the exact same situation. I loved the movie and it was exactly as bloody as I expected given the subject matter and the R rating.

However, my Mom is a 60-year-old fan of the stage show and I told her not to see it because of the gore. (Trust me, she'd hate it.)
post #24 of 30

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianShort
I wanted to ask if anyone here was put off by the level of spurting blood?

I wasn't put off by it but I did find it to be repetitive, particularly during the number that basically consists of throat after throat being slashed, followed by geyser of spurting blood and a fall down the chute to the basement. I wish Burton could have put a bit more variety into that sequence in particular as each repetition made the effect less...well, effective.

Other than that one small quibble, I found it to be a pretty good movie. I do, however, wish it would have been longer as some of the subplots got short-changed. Okay, so that's two small quibbles. Still a pretty good movie though.
post #25 of 30

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianShort
My dad, however, had some problems getting past it, and the idea that someone would bake murdered people into pie. He loved the music and performances and all that, but I think the level of blood and some of the story's basic concept turned him off to actually liking it. I wonder if the story wouldn't have been just as strong if they downplayed the blood and gore factor... thoughts?
There's no getting around the subject matter. One of the times I attended the Broadway revival with Michael Cerveris and Patty Lupone (which was less overtly bloody than the original staging), a woman several rows behind me kept muttering to her companions, "That's disgusting! That's disgusting!"

If she'd been closer, I would have shushed her, but I was actually kind of amused. What show did she think she was coming to see? And I rather enjoyed the (you'll pardon the expression) visceral reaction that the show prompted in someone who was obviously new to it.

I think the movie did what was necessary for the medium. Stage violence requires a lot less to get a reaction from an audience. There's something about sharing a physical space with the actors that makes even simulated violence feel more "real". Film is more distancing, and audience expectations have been amped up by slasher films and torture porn. I also think Burton and Depp used the gore creatively, as part of the storytelling. Most of Sweeney's murders are impersonal, and the victims are dispatched with cool precision. But there are three murders that are deeply personal to Sweeney, and those murders are passionate, messy and even clumsy. (Any viewer of the film will know which ones I mean; they're the first, the last and the one he spends the longest time thinking about.) That's something that wasn't really in the play and that could only be done on film, and that alone was enough, I thought, to justify the level of gore.

(As an aside, the Irish playwright Martin McDonagh, whose first feature-length film, In Bruges, is supposed to be released this year, demonstrated exactly what happens when you do explicit gore on stage. In his brutally funny play, The Lieutenant of Inishmore, you get as much blood flying as you do in Sweeney -- it's a minor miracle of stage-craft -- and the result is hysterical laughter from the audience. In the flesh, so to speak, it's so extreme that the only possible responses are to go into shock or to laugh at the absurdity.)

M.
post #26 of 30

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

I will admit that meat pie thing is seriously impeding my interest as well. Gore is fine. But the idea that someone is serving human meat pies to unsuspecting customers is a big turn off. I will probably see thing thing, but it's definitely on the chores pile (typical of catch up season).

But not just yet. After Atonement last night, I need some happiness in my life

--
H
post #27 of 30
Thread Starter 

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by SD_Brian
I wasn't put off by it but I did find it to be repetitive, particularly during the number that basically consists of throat after throat being slashed, followed by geyser of spurting blood and a fall down the chute to the basement. I wish Burton could have put a bit more variety into that sequence in particular as each repetition made the effect less...well, effective.

Of course, that is somewhat the point of that number. Here's Sweeney singing about wanting and loving the daughter he lost while he mindlessly does these acts that take him further and further away from the man he was, and the man that Johanna could possibly have any memory of.

Michael's post is spot on with regard to the violence. I may complain about the graphicness of the violence, but I also completely despise the current trend of slashers and cannot bring myself to watch torture porn, so I'm far from one of these movie goers that is desensitized to film violence and need it amped up to a certain level to be effective.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Reuben
Most of Sweeney's murders are impersonal, and the victims are dispatched with cool precision. But there are three murders that are deeply personal to Sweeney, and those murders are passionate, messy and even clumsy.

Then, of course, a fourth murder SHOULD have been very personal to Sweeney, but that's the one that completes the tragedy of the story.
post #28 of 30

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Holadem
But the idea that someone is serving human meat pies to unsuspecting customers is a big turn off.
--
H

That's exactly why I liked it!!!!!
post #29 of 30

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Holadem
But the idea that someone is serving human meat pies to unsuspecting customers is a big turn off.
That's the same reason I stopped eating at Burger King.
post #30 of 30

Re: *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by SD_Brian
That's the same reason I stopped eating at Burger King.

LOL!!!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movies (Theatrical)
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › *** Official SWEENEY TODD: THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET Discussion Thread