Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › Track the Films You Watch (2008)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Track the Films You Watch (2008) - Page 4

post #91 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tarkin The Ewok
1/5: Blade Runner: Theatrical Cut (1982) 1/2 out of
1/6: Blade Runner: Internation Theatrical Cut (1982) 1/2 out of
1/6: Blade Runner: Director's Cut (1992) out of
1/6: Blade Runner: Workprint (1990) out of

Going to start to watch my 5 disc set tomorrow.
Only seen the Theatrical version, and that as on VHS years ago! I had no problem with the Theatrical cut myself.

Any thoughts on the 'Final Cut'. Most like it best but say it would be better without the whole 'he's a replicant/unicorn' scenes.
post #92 of 1907
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Karlosi
Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ (1925)

It's nice to see you finally watched this and enjoyed it so much. I'm not sure if you can get around comparing the two versions but I'd say the race scenes are about equal but I'd give the ship battle a nod to this version. This is certainly one of the crowning achievements in the silent era because of the technical quality, which to me was the most ground breaking American film since TBOAN.
post #93 of 1907
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

01/05/08

Planet of the Apes (2001) Tim Burton

Lackluster remake of the 1968 film has an astronaut (Mark Wahlberg) crash landing on a planet where apes are kings and humans are slaves. Even though I had heard nothing but negative things about this film I went in with an open mind because most of the bad reviews I heard were from die-hard fans of the original but the film turned out to be a major dud. The most shocking thing is that Burton didn't bring any energy or excitement to the film. The first hour drags by so bad that I was having a hard time staying awake. The film picks up during it's final act but even then the battle scenes aren't as good as they should have been. I did like the ending though. Wahlberg sleepwalks through his role but I enjoyed the supporting cast. I thought Tim Roth and Helena Bonham Carter were very good in their roles and I also enjoyed Michael Clarke Duncan. Kris Kristofferson and Charlton Heston also come off good in their small roles. The screenplay is rather weak and the reworked lines from the original film come off very lame. Burton tries a lot of things in the film but I think he's held back by the PG-13 rating. I think the director should have delivered an R-rated movie and went all out on the various messages that are hinted out throughout the film and made the battle scenes real battle scenes.

Coffins on Wheels (1941) Joe Newman

Entry in MGM's 'Crime Does Not Pay' series talks about used car salesmen who sell lemons to buyer who don't know any better. The ending here is predictable but that doesn't take away from the entertainment level. I think this is one of the best short series out there and this is another winning film. The movie certainly holds your interest from start to finish with some nice drama and serving justice.

Whistler, The (1944) William Castle

First film in Columbia's series has Richard Dix playing a man wanting to commit suicide due to the death of his wife but he doesn't have the courage to do so. Wanting to die, Dix hires a killer (J. Carrol Naish) to do the job but then he learns that his wife is still alive so he too must try and stay alive. Based on a radio show, this first film is actually pretty entertaining due to some nice direction by Castle and the two leads turning in fine performances. The story itself is pretty interesting and the B-budget gets all out of it that it can. Dix makes for a very good leading man and his performance is very good especially during his depression scenes. Naish is a great character actor and makes for a very good killer. Gloria Stuart plays Dix secretary and does nice work, although she has the weakest character.

Crowd Roars, The (1932) Howard Hawks

Standard Warner drama about a cocky race car driver (James Cagney) who brings his younger brother (Eric Linden) into the sport and soon the two have a falling out. Cagney eventually loses his nerve and falls from grace and must try to works his way back up. Hawks is credited with the story but it's somewhat hard to believe that he would come up with such a standard and typical story. The movie is entertaining due in large part to Cagney who once again turns in a good performance. He's his usual cocky self and the screenplay allows him to do things we've seen from him in the past including one scene where he gets tough with Ann Dvorak. Cagney shines the best during his breakdown scene, which comes off very well. Joan Blondell co-stars as Cagney's girl and she does a nice job as well. The story is very predictable and really doesn't have one original idea but there's some very good racing scenes. The screenplay is also quite hard on racing fans and the claim that all they want to see is blood. There's one violent death scene that happens during a race that is very memorable.

Four Flies on Grey Velvet (1971) Dario Argento

Final film in Argento's animal trilogy has a musician (Michael Brandon) accidentally killing a stalker but then the real trouble starts when another stalker shows up trying to kill him. I guess since this isn't on DVD certain fans talk it up as if it's a lost masterpiece but it really isn't. That's not to say this isn't a decent little film but it's certainly no way near the director's best. Argento brings his usual nice style to the film and has some great murder sequences, which are full of suspense. The murder on the stairs is certainly one of the film's highlights. The director also manages to get some good performances from the cast with Brandon making a good leading man. Mimsy Farmer is good as the wife but it's Jean-Pierre Marielle who steals the show as a gay detective. I think the film's biggest problem is the story, which isn't that special. The idea of a guilty man being stalked is an interesting one but Argento does very little with it and I picked up on who the killer was very early in the film. Ennio Morricone's score also adds a lot of tension to the film and fits the movie nicely.

01/06/08

Burning, The (1981) Tony Maylam

Review posted in 2006

Notorious 80’s slasher was the first film by Miramax and was written and produced by the Weinstein boys and also features small roles by Jason Alexander (with hair), Holly Hunter and Fisher Stevens. A camping prank goes terribly wrong and a gardener is burned all over his body. Six years later he escapes and heads back to camp to slaughter some teens. I can’t believe it took me so long to see this somewhat legendary film but I kept putting it off because horror fans seem to hype up a lot of bad films. Over the years no other film had gotten so much hype but the movie certainly lived up to every bit of it. The special gore effects by Tom Savini are all wonderful and in this uncut version they go way beyond any other film of its era. The movie is incredibly mean spirited with its violence including one scene where five kids on a raft run into the killer. This segment is probably the greatest I’ve seen from any slasher. This film also contains more nudity than any other film of its type. Put all this together and I see why the film has become notorious over the years. There’s no doubt this was influenced by the previous year’s Friday the 13th but I’d say this here is just as good, if not better than all of those films.

Added comments: Revisited this one since IFC just showed it a few days ago. I enjoyed it just as much this time and I'd probably say it is better than any of the F13 films. The effects by Savini are terrific and probably the best of his career.

Becoming John Ford (2007) Nick Redman

Very good documentary that covers John Ford's years at Fox. Considering we just had a Ford documentary last year I really wasn't expecting this to offer anything new but it actually does. The one negative thing about the film is that I wish it would have spent more time discussing his silent films and talking about some of the ones that are now lost. Outside of that, this film centers on the Fox years and makes some very interesting comments about Ford the person and how this person leaked into his movies. It was somewhat sad to hear how Henry Fonda and Ford had their falling out with the director punching the actor but I guess that's just Ford. There's a lot of style on display here that seems out of place at times but this is still a good introduction to the Fox years.

Battle of Midway, The (1942) John Ford

Henry Fonda and Donald Crisp add narration to the battle scenes shot by John Ford where the director was even wounded by enemy fire. There's really no story being told in this documentary but instead we just see a part of history in beautiful Technicolor. God knows everyone has seen countless war films but there's something unique seeing real ones here. They certainly look a lot different than what we've seen in countless fake movies.

Judge Priest (1934) John Ford

Wonderful film has Will Rogers playing the title role who has his own way of making justice prevail. Set in a small Kentucky town, the judge must battle a wide range of subjects but all of them seem to center around a mysterious man who is charged with assault. I wasn't too thrilled with the previous Rogers/Ford film that I watched but this one here hits all the right marks. Ford's love of Southern loyalty is certainly on full display from start to finish but he also paints a film that isn't really about anything yet it's about everything. Ford paints a terrific and authentic view of the South and even manages to work other items in like patriotic war battles and moving on in time. I think some of the best moments happen between Rogers and a black man named Jeff (Stepin Fetchit) who the judge saved from being hung. The two share several scenes together and their relationship comes off very sweet and human. The performances are all extremely good with Rogers leading the way as the soft spoken judge. Tom Brown and Anita Louise are also very good as Rogers' nephew and his girlfriend. The scene stealer comes from Henry B. Walthall who plays a Reverend with a secret past that comes out during the final courtroom scene. It's forgotten today that at one time Walthall was considered one of the greatest actors out there and his performance here is very thrilling and certainly grabs ones attention.

Power of the Whistler, The (1945) Lew Landers

Third film in the series has Richard Dix being hit by a car and losing his memory. A card reader (Janis Carter) befriends the man as the two search for his real identity but who he turns out to be is the real shock. Based on a radio show episode, this film manages to be somewhat entertaining, although it seems long even at just 66-minutes. It takes a while for the story to get going but the twist in the man's identity comes out of no where and is handled very well. This is when the film really picks up and leads to a very good final act. Dix is very good in his role and Carter comes off good as well. Landers steps in to direct this one after William Castle handled the first two. I was a little letdown that he didn't keep the action moving better because he usually handles these B films a lot better. There's some nice humor scattered throughout and also a rather mean spirited side, which includes killing of a lot of animals.

Skidoo (1968) Otto Preminger

Extremely bizarre comedy has gangster battling hippies in the lovin' 60's. A retired gangster (Jackie Gleason) is asked by the top gangster, God (Groucho Marx) to break into prison and kill a rat (Mickey Rooney). On the outside Gleason's daughter has started dating a hippie and its up to them to try and save her dad. This was a notorious flop when originally released but it has gained a cult following over the years and in the end the film really isn't all that bad. I think the biggest problem is that Preminger simply wasn't the right guy to direct the material. He's got some great comic actors yet he gets very little from them. Most of the comedy comes from politically incorrect stuff or things that weren't meant to be funny but they come off that way. The highlight of the film is when Gleason is in prison and accidentally takes some LSD and has a wild trip afterwards. Marx also smokes some pot, which is somewhat funny but Rooney comes off rather lame. The supporting cast includes Carol Channing, Frankie Avalon, Peter Lawford, Burgess Meredith, George Raft and Cesar Romero. The film eventually runs out of steam in the final act, which again deals with an LSD trip but the jokes plays itself out way before the end.

Miracle Money (1938) Leslie Fenton

Another winning entry in MGM's "Crime Does Not Pay" series. This time out we take a look at doctors who tell people they have cancer just so that they can scam them for money on a fake cure. Like others in the series, I guess you could say this is overly dramatic but to me that just leads to plenty of entertainment. There's plenty of drama throughout the short and one can't help but want to see the bad guys punished in the end.

Fort Knox: Secrets Revealed (2007) Unknown

History Channel documentary about the secret history of Fort Knox, Kentucky and all the gold there. It's funny but I grew up fifteen-minutes from Ft. Knox and never really payed too much attention to its history. We all knew what was there and so on but this is actually the first time I've watched or read anything about the history. The film is okay in its early parts as it talks about why it was built in a rundown part of Kentucky and what the main purpose was. The rumors of what all goes on there also made for an interesting segment but the film starts to go off track in its second part when it deals with Gen. Patton and his building the area up for armour combat.

01/07/08

Larceny, Inc. (1942) Lloyd Bacon

Three convicts (Edward G. Robinson, Broderick Crawford, Edward Brophy) plan to rob a bank by buying the luggage store next door and digging through the wall. Everything is going as planned until the store becomes a huge hit and the men decide to go straight but another con (Anthony Quinn) shows up and wants the bank robbed. This is a pretty pleasant little comedy that has plenty of funny moments but also a lot of heart. Robinson is perfect in his role and brings a real cuteness to the film. Perhaps it's seeing this tough guy trying to wrap up some luggage but he comes off like a teddy bear and makes for a very loveable character. Crawford and Brophy add terrific support and their coming timing adds a great many laughs. The supporting cast is just as great with Jane Wyman, Jack Carson and Quinn doing nice work. I almost didn't recognize him but Jackie Gleason has a couple great scenes as a soda clerk. Highlights include a great scene where Crawford walks out in front of a car to get some money and a prison baseball game early in the film. Woody Allen's Small Time Crooks borrows very heavily from this film that there's really no question that Allen's film is a remake.

Movies, The (1925) Roscoe 'Fatty' Arbuckle

Lloyd Hamilton plays a country boy who goes to NYC and gets mixed up with a hot-head before landing a spot in the movies as a stand-in. This film was made a couple years after Arbuckle's infamous rape/murder case so he was working under his fake name of William Goodrich. This film also served as a comeback for star Hamilton who had also been blacklisted over a stabbing incident, which he wasn't involved with but it still ruined his career. Hamilton was a big silent star but today he just comes off as a mix between Chaplin and Harold Lloyd. He had a couple funny bits here but nothing that would make me go out and search for more of his film.
post #94 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

The Gay Divorcee

This film is, in everyway, a prototype for the following year's Top Hat, down to the mistaken-identity motif and almost all of the main actors. Top Hat is however, vastly superior, in terms of music, dancing and story, but this one is OK if you don't compare it too much to Top Hat.
post #95 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

Demons From Her Past (2007)

A woman returns to her hometown 25 years after a crime she went to prison for but which she never committed.
Allison was accused of vehicular manslaugher as a teenager. A group of friends had been out driving and had been drinking. Allison was the only sober one of the group. Casey her boyfriend at the time drunkenly held her foot to the gas pedal and a young ten year old boy died as a result. Everyone fled the scene except for Allison who was accused of manslaugher due to the fact that her friends lied and said she was alone in the vehicle. She was sentenced to 5 years in jail and served 3. 25 years later she returns and tries to get justice by obtaining confessions from the others that were in the car.

This is a made for tv movie and is pretty standard fare for tv. Surprisingly, I found myself enjoying this movie. What ruined it for me is: why do co-conspirators have to confess to the person they strongly suspect of murder, that they are going to the police? Idiots. This happens too much in movies, and this particular one was ruined as a result.
post #96 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Crawford
Kazan had a lot of enemies due to his testimony in the Un-American hearings which probably adversely affected his directing career to a certain degree. Also, he was considered one of the greatest stage directors which decreased his availability to direct films in Hollywood. This is a short list of some of those original Broadway plays he directed and all of them were later made into films. Some of those films he directed and some he didn't.

Without a doubt, I think he was one of the greatest directors, but issues with the Red Scare has overshadowed his wonderful career.
  • Death of a Salesman
  • A Streetcar Named Desire
  • Cat on a Hot Tin Roof
  • All My Sons
  • Sweet Bird of Youth

An impressive list indeed. I remembered the incident at the Academy Awards but wasn't too familiar with him back then so I forgot about the incident and who was involved. It's too bad that directors and any artist can't be judged on their work without all the baggage that shadows them from their personal life.
post #97 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

It's too bad that directors and any artist can't be judged on their work without all the baggage that shadows them from their personal life.
Well considering that what Kazan did was part of blacklisting writers and actors and preventing them from working in Hollywood and doing their work, it's not just something in his "personal life" but something he did that very much adversely affected Hollywood product as well as people's lives.
post #98 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

Variety Time

A rather long (about an hour) version of what usually showed up as a short in theaters, with Jack Paar introducing a variety of acts. Hard to believe people would have paid to see this as a feature, but it's certainly too long to be a short. Forgettable.
post #99 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

Quote:
Originally Posted by george kaplan
It's too bad that directors and any artist can't be judged on their work without all the baggage that shadows them from their personal life.
Well considering that what Kazan did was part of blacklisting writers and actors and preventing them from working in Hollywood and doing their work, it's not just something in his "personal life" but something he did that very much adversely affected Hollywood product as well as people's lives.
Actually, the people Kazan named were already known by the committee and were either already blacklisted or would've been in the near future. IMO, I think it was a regretable and unfortunate situation for all of those film artists as well as a dark time for our country. Furthermore, I think we as film lovers suffered a great loss too because we will never know how many great films we were denied from those artists that were blacklisted. Some of those talented and creative people were just hitting their stride during that time.
post #100 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

Quote:
Originally Posted by george kaplan
It's too bad that directors and any artist can't be judged on their work without all the baggage that shadows them from their personal life.
Well considering that what Kazan did was part of blacklisting writers and actors and preventing them from working in Hollywood and doing their work, it's not just something in his "personal life" but something he did that very much adversely affected Hollywood product as well as people's lives.

Don't get me wrong. I'm not condoning what he did, but it certainly won't stop me from enjoying any of his movies.
post #101 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

Sunshine (2007)

A very cerebral film that has more in common with The Fountain and 2001 then other "save the earth" films like Day After Tomorrow or Armageddon.

The sun is dying and the earth is as a result. A group of scientists are sent to detonate a bomb to right the ills of the sun. This takes place over 50 years in the future and this is the second group, the first having failed.

Parts of the plot seemed alittle silly, but the acting was superb and the special effects were excellent. Kudos goes to Cillian Murphy. With that wide-eyed look of his, he did look insane.
This was an entertaining movie but since I was tired and I probably didn't absorb very much, I'll have to watch it again.
post #102 of 1907
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatW
Don't get me wrong. I'm not condoning what he did, but it certainly won't stop me from enjoying any of his movies.

Which is the aspect I agree with. I don't like what Woody Allen did but that's not going to stop me from enjoying his films. I'm certainly against what Polanski did but I can still watch his movies. Chaplin, Griffith, Garbo and various other of my favorites did "wrong" things but I'm not going to hold it against them when it comes to watching their movies. Heck, when I watched that Ford documentary the other night it kind of pissed me off that he (apparently) punched Henry Fonda, one of my favorites, but that's not going to stop me from finishing my Ford at Fox set.

I hope this doesn't cross the line of the rules here but for the most part I can't stand to see celebrities get involved with anything political. Perhaps it's just me but I don't care who they're sleeping with, if they are gay or straight or what they believe in politically. I just care about the product they're putting across and that's how I judge them in the end. We could sit here and name a thousand different actors/directors/singers or whoever that have done something "wrong" so I really don't look at it and instead just watch the movies and judge them.

I'm not overly familiar with the Kazan case but I am curious how it was looked at at the time it happened. I'm not sure if it's true but I've always heard ON THE WATERFRONT was his way of trying to show why he did what he did. I'm not sure if his case and Brando's case in the film should be looked at as the same but it feels as if the film is more powerful because the director wanted to get a point across.
post #103 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

Quote:
Originally Posted by george kaplan
It's too bad that directors and any artist can't be judged on their work without all the baggage that shadows them from their personal life.
Well considering that what Kazan did was part of blacklisting writers and actors and preventing them from working in Hollywood and doing their work, it's not just something in his "personal life" but something he did that very much adversely affected Hollywood product as well as people's lives.


It doesn't matter. His work is still what should be evaluated, and nothing else.


Quote:
I don't like what Woody Allen did but that's not going to stop me from enjoying his films.

What did Allen 'do', exactly? At the time, was Soon Yi of legal age? If she was, and if she wasn't Allen's blood-related daughter, then as awkward as the situation was for all involved, technically there's nothing wrong about it. That's the way relationships go, sometimes.
post #104 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

La Jetee (1962)

A sci-fi short that tells its story through a collection of stills and voice-overs. Terry Gilliam apparently based his movie 12 Monkeys on this film.

This story takes place in Paris after WW3. People are living underground because the surface is uninhabitable. A volunteer agrees to an experiment involving time travel and he travels back and forth in time and meets the woman that has haunted his dreams.

This is a stunning piece of work. At 30 minutes it seems too short. I wanted more. The black and white photography is exquisite. This film will stay with me for a long time. I now have to go watch 12 Monkeys.
post #105 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

Plan 9 From Outer Space (1959)

I watched this one several times as a kid and I loved ever crazy minute of it. Nowadays I just shake my head in disbelief, disbelief at myself for still loving it. I'm sure I'll get flak for this but I give it 3.5 out of 5 stars. I would have liked to give it a higher rating but common sense prevailed.
So, plot, story, acting, special effects, directing, etc. - zero stars.
Comedy and enjoyment - 5 stars.
It get an extra point for the sheer nerve of Ed Wood.
post #106 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

Nice summation of "Plan 9".



"The Bourne Ultimatum" - (out of 5)

A fine ending to a fine trilogy with some nice links to the other films, and a very clever 'what happened in-between the last two scenes of #2' idea for the main bulk of the narrative. Which means only the last 30 minutes is actually a sequel to #2.
Fine modern action/spy film-making where even the liberal whining was kept ultimately to a minimum despite the plot.

Get them all!



"Blade Runner" - Final Cut. 1/2 (out of 5)

Due to the vast improvement in picture and the essential CGI repairs to two crucial scenes (the clever replacement of Joanna Cassidy's laughably bad stunt double and her comedy wig with the real actress's head, and the proper background for the dove flying off) this is indeed the best version of Scott's famous, infamous, sci-fi classic.

I never had a problem with the narration or the ending in the original version when I first saw it. But after watching this version the narration really becomes obtrusive now (and very badly read by a bored and annoyed Ford) and the 'happy' ending a mess.
I UTTERLY disagree that Deckard is a Replicant (he never was in the original novel or the original screenplay) and despite Ridley's pointless insistence that he is and the needless Unicorn Dream (the only negative point about the 'Final Version') I see no evidence, even in this version, that he is one. One daydream image aside there's nothing here.

Most people state the man fact against it is his very human strength and fatigue and this seems air-tight to me.
Even if (as some people say when clutching at straws to defend the 'Deckard is a Replicant' idea) they wanted to make him very human in his powers so as to keep him (like Rachel) in the dark about not being Human...why would anyone make such a Replicant into a damn 'Blade Runner'?!?
Rachel is just a P.A., who would have a human weakness afflicted Replicant as a hunter of super-strong, super-athletic, super-fast Replicants?
As it is Deckard nearly dies at least 3 times at their hands.

Anyway..this aside this is a superb looking version (the superlative model and matte FX still stands up today better then most modern CGI efforts), nicely fixed of a few of it's visual problems, and is really the only way to go.
The added violence (still missing from even the 'Director's Cut as they used the less violent American theatrical version) also makes certain scenes far more powerful and even today it's still (despite great work from all) Rutger Hauer's film. His final scene is an absolute classic.



"Dangerous Days"
- Excellent feature length documentary on the making and history of "Blade Runner". Exhaustive and fascinating.
post #107 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

Dave et al,

I decided not to watch the Final Cut of Blade Runner after watching the featurette and commentary that explain the differences. Since not much changed from the 1992 DC that I care about, I would probably give the Final Cut three stars as well.

I made the choice yesterday that I will not keep the briefcase set. The movie is just not entertaining enough for me to justify watching the extras, and I can live without seeing any version of the movie again.
post #108 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

01/05/08: ALICE'S ADVENTURES IN WONDERLAND (William Sterling, 1972)

This is the fourth film version I’ve watched of Lewis Carroll’s classic – the 1903 Silent, the 1951 Walt Disney animated version, and the 1966 British TV adaptation; there are at least three more adaptations I’m interested in – Paramount’s 1933 all-star feature, the 1949 Franco-British version mixing live-action with puppet figures, and Jan Svankmajer’s 1988 film. This musicalized version was made in a time when setting literary classics (everything from Miguel Cervantes to George Bernard Shaw, Charles Dickens to James Hilton) to music was quite fashionable. Still, despite the engagement of a tremendous cast – Michael Jayston, Hywel Bennett, Michael Crawford, Ralph Richardson, Peter Bull, Roy Kinnear, Robert Helpmann, Peter Sellers, Dudley Moore, Dennis Price, Flora Robson, Spike Milligan, Michael Hordern – they are mostly ineffective and even unrecognizable under all the heavy make-up! Alice herself – Fiona Fullerton – isn’t very sympathetic either.

The highlight is perhaps the tea party sequence with Helpmann (as The Mad Hatter), Sellers (as The March Hare) and Moore (as The Dormouse) – after which the slow-moving film starts slipping into boredom. The music by John Barry and lyrics by Don Black are decent at best, but distinctly unmemorable. Writer-director William Sterling’s adaptation – whose only film in that capacity this was – is disappointingly uninspired, then, turning Carroll’s surrealistic original into a dullish kiddie film! Apart from the opportunity of star-spotting, the film’s main virtues, therefore, are Geoffrey Unsworth’s cinematography and Anthony Mendelsohn’s colorful costume designs – qualities which were also recognized by the BAFTA. Admittedly, I rewatched this via a budget DVD release of a public domain, panned-and-scanned and extremely hazy print – which certainly didn’t aid my appreciation of it in any way!


01/05/08: THE BRONX EXECUTIONER (Vanio Amici and, uncredited, Romolo Guerrieri, 1989) BOMB

This is another film I happened upon at my local DVD rental outlet of which I had no prior knowledge; having watched a spate of belated Euro-Cult sci-fi outings over the last couple of years, I suspected I’d be in for a ‘so bad it’s good’ ride – but the end result, though certainly unintentionally hilarious, is a wretched piece of junk.

To begin with the plot doesn’t make a lick of sense: little wonder, since it lifted a good deal of footage – including Woody Strode’s entire performance – from THE FINAL EXECUTIONER (1983), a film directed by Romolo Guerrieri (hence his unofficial credit above)! Anyway, here we get a rookie sheriff in a futuristic New York – replacing Strode (dubbed, what else, “The Black Man”) – who has to quell an ongoing conflict between a colony of androids and one comprised of renegade humanoids (the script even makes some dumb comparisons between the latter’s fate and that endured by Native Americans over the years!); incidentally, don’t ask me to explain the difference between each faction of robots, because I sure as hell couldn’t tell them apart!!

As is usual for this kind of film, we’re treated to a crappy electronic score and characters who could best be described as scum; ironically, the would-be hero doesn’t do much of anything throughout (even if he’s relentlessly undermined by martinet Strode during his period of training). As a matter of fact, the lead is actually...er…the leader of the humanoids – a short-tempered beefcake wearing a ridiculously undersized sleeveless shirt and who’s supposedly fallen in love with a human; when she’s raped and murdered by rival androids, he sets out to infiltrate the latter’s castle base (having by this time befriended the cop). Margie Newton (from Bruno Mattei’s equally lamentable HELL OF THE LIVING DEAD [1980]) is the bimbo leader of the villainous robots – who, amusingly, gets an itch for lovemaking just as the final onslaught is about to begin!

While there are some undeniable howlers throughout – particularly the humanoid leader’s dumb monologues – the film is simply too poorly handled (in all departments) to be easily enjoyed; in fact, even if less than 90 minutes in length, I found it virtually unbearable…


01/06/08:DIAL: HELP (Ruggero Deodato, 1988)

This is only the fourth effort I’ve watched from this director (whom I met and found quite genial at the 2004 Venice Film Festival Italian B-movie retrospective) and also, possibly, the worst. As was the case with THE BRONX EXECUTIONER (1989), which preceded it, this is a prime example from the tail end of the Euro-Cult era – prime because it shows the depths to which the previously invigorating style had fallen by this time!

Here, in fact, we get a plot revolving around – I’m not kidding, folks – a killer phone! Pretty but bland Charlotte Lewis – in her third film after PIRATES (1986) and THE GOLDEN CHILD (1986) – is a model who, apparently, has just ended an affair; she keeps expecting her architect lover to call her back but, every time the phone rings, all she gets is static accompanied by voices from the beyond (or some such crap). She befriends a new tenant at her apartment block who, conveniently, knows of an authority on paranormal activity (William Berger) – who, hilariously, explains that the negative energy which is unleashed, say, during family arguments can manifest itself via home appliances into a deadly force (I swear I ain’t making this up)!

Among the highlights…er…lowpoints of the film are: the grumpy bartender from whose dingy place the heroine calls a couple of times (it seems that the chain-of-events can only be broken by having Lewis go through her paces again, EXTERMINATING ANGEL (1962)-style!), the sheer variety of preposterous-looking phones on display, the apparatus of the heroine’s photographer friend sneaking up on her before the kill, the sarcastic cop who greets Lewis on reporting the strange occurrences (“And what’s the toaster up to, I wonder?”), the would-be rapist killed by a barrage of coins shooting out from a telephone booth, and Berger’s own bloody demise (with the phone affecting the pacemaker he’s fitted with and causing the doctor’s heart to explode)!

The film’s climax is rather confusing and, apparently, finally sees all the ‘lost souls’ inhabiting a flock of doves and flying out the window of the ‘possessed’ office (a lonelyhearts service!). For what it’s worth, the score – by ex-Goblin Claudio Simonetti no less – is effective enough, despite the inclusion of dated heavy-metal numbers on the soundtrack.
post #109 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mario Gauci
01/08/08:PUNCH DRUNKS(Lou Breslow, 1934) -DVD-R [Short]{First Viewing}

01/09/08:MEN IN BLACK(Raymond McCarey, 1934) -DVD-R [Short]{First Viewing}


Mario, I don't recall you discussing The Three Stooges before. Are they generally new to you? I thought PUNCH DRUNKS was one of their very best early shorts with Curly, and while I'm not much of a fan of MEN IN BLACK myself (a little too chaotic, even for them) I know this is generally a well-regarded one (it was their only Oscar nomination). Will you be giving your reviews on these?
post #110 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 42nd Street Freak
Nice summation of "Plan 9".

"Blade Runner" - Final Cut. 1/2 (out of 5)

Due to the vast improvement in picture and the essential CGI repairs to two crucial scenes (the clever replacement of Joanna Cassidy's laughably bad stunt double and her comedy wig with the real actress's head, and the proper background for the dove flying off) this is indeed the best version of Scott's famous, infamous, sci-fi classic.

..this aside this is a superb looking version (the superlative model and matte FX still stands up today better then most modern CGI efforts), nicely fixed of a few of it's visual problems, and is really the only way to go.
The added violence (still missing from even the 'Director's Cut as they used the less violent American theatrical version) also makes certain scenes far more powerful and even today it's still (despite great work from all) Rutger Hauer's film. His final scene is an absolute classic.

I've been debating with myself whether to double dip on this title. For alot of people it's a no-brainer. I'm a big lover of Sci-fi but I've been extending myself on dvd purchases lately but I think I just might bite the bullet and go ahead and get it. It sounds vastly superior to what I have.
post #111 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Karlosi
Mario, I don't recall you discussing The Three Stooges before. Are they generally new to you? I thought PUNCH DRUNKS was one of their very best early shorts with Curly, and while I'm not much of a fan of MEN IN BLACK myself (a little too chaotic, even for them) I know this is generally a well-regarded one (it was their only Oscar nomination). Will you be giving your reviews on these?


Hi Joe.

First of all, I meant to comment on your viewing of the Silent BEN-HUR which, needless to say, I was pleasantly surprised by since the rating was so high and the fact that your viewing of it virtually came out of nowhere. Your reasoning behind the rating was a little strange coming from you but it's fine by me! I agree with you that Charlton Heston makes a better Judah and that the sea battle/chariot race are the Silent's most remarkable sequences. I can't really say I prefer the Silent version to the William Wyler version but, at least, it's shorter and less reverent than the solemn remake - what with the nudity, the presence of a Pagan temptress (a character which is in Lew Wallace's novel but not the Charlton Heston film version) and a campy Messala!

With regards to The Three Stooges - yes, I decided to watch one short per day for that very reason but my reviews are still in point form. I have several others still in that state but I'll try to finish them all off during the weekend.
post #112 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

"FLyboys"

Shockingly ignored epic about a group of Americans who join a French/English fighter squadron during WW1.

Some truly stunning CGI means the best dogfights ever committed to the screen can take place in-between the cliche filled, melodrama on the ground. Scenes that still work well though, and show the growing comradeship between the flyers to great effect.

Amazingly there are basically no images anywhere that look like GI graphics, the only reason you know it's CGI is that it HAS to be CGI to be showing what they do. Exciting, massed dogfights are the order of the day as planes whizz past each other almost close enough to touch. Great stuff.

The score is rather cookie-cutter and overpowering but that really is the only negative thing to say here. It's a stunningly made exercise in simple heroics, bravery, fear, tragedy and honour that does nothing new, but does what it does very well.
Should have been massive.
post #113 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

Sunshine (2007)

Had my brother over and he wanted to watch this one. He felt it was hokier than hell and this from a guy who loves Armegeddon.

The Hidden Hand (1942)

Odd little movie about an escaped mental patient who helps his sister bump off members of their family.

I can't say that I'm familiar with any of the actors/actresses in this movie though 1 or 2 of them look familiar. I can't say any of them are good actors at least in this movie but the movie is quite funny. I watched this alone and I found myself laughing out loud at some of the scenes. A worthwhile watch.


3: 10 To Yuma (2007)

My brother chose this one to watch as well, but he sits there and nitpicks every single detail that it's not enjoyable to watch with him. I'll have to rewatch it but this is a very good movie.

A rancher played by Christian Bale is robbed at gunpoint of his horses by Ben Wade a notorious outlaw who just robbed a stagecoach with his gang. Russell Crowe is played by Ben Wade who is captured with plans to bring him to justice by putting him on the train to Yuma where he would be hung. Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
One by one members of the posse are picked off either by hostile Indians or gang members until only one member is left standing to escort the prisoner to the train.


This is a well-done remake. The acting was top-notch especially from Crowe and Bale. I wanted to shake some sense into Bale's character for his stubborness and principles that seemed illogical as the movie progressed, but he played the character extremely well. Crowe was excellent as the outlaw who was a cold-blooded killer but perhaps had alittle decency left. The rancher's son played by Logan Lerman also gave a fantastic performance. The director is James Margold who did Walk the Line most recently. I think this is my favourite of his so far. The cinematography is also superb in this movie.

This is a very good Western, a genre I haven't watched alot of in the past but have been rectifying with some recent viewings. I haven't seen the original but I can't imagine it better than this. This is one movie I'm glad I added to my collection.
post #114 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

I've since read the review thread of 3:10 to Yuma. I'll have to take back my comment about the original not being as good as the remake until I've watched it myself. I guess alot of people do prefer the original.


Survivor (1999)

This made for tv sci-fi movie has elements of The Thing, Alien and the Alien being looked like the creature from Predator.

Apparently a billion or so years ago when the earth was mostly molten lava the alien crash landed on earth and became caught in a lava flow.
Oil drillers in the Arctic happen to uncover this creature while drilling for oil and well you can guess what happens.

Actually not too bad for a sci-fi tv movie though certainly not original and very predicable. The cast was okay and overall it was watchable if you had nothing else to do.
post #115 of 1907
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

01/08/08

I Want to Be a Pilot (2006) Diego Quemada-Diez

A young African boy dealing with AIDS tells his hopes for the future in this award-winning short. The very look of the boy is enough to break your heart but his little song on the future is incredibly touching especially for someone his age. On a side point, I'm always curious about these documentaries that look at poor people like the kid here. At one point he says he hasn't eaten in four days and I'm always curious why the director or people behind the short, who obviously have money if they're making a film, don't actually feed him.

01/09/08

Curses (1925) Roscoe 'Fatty' Arbuckle

Unique short that spoofs the cliffhanger serials of the silent era. The villain (Al St. John) kidnaps a beauty and the hero must try to save her without getting killed himself. This is actually a very smart little film that does a great job at making fun of serials with everything from overdramatic endings to outrageous and impossible stunts. The comedy in the film really doesn't work but the brains in each scene makes this worth watching at least once. The "death by a sneeze" sequence is certainly the best.

My Stars (1926) Roscoe 'Fatty' Arbuckle

A woman (Virginia Vance) is impressed by various silent movie stars that she pays very little attention to her own boyfriend (Johnny Arthur) so he decides to impersonate the actors to win her attention. Douglas Fairbanks and Harold Lloyd are both spoofed here and Arthur actually does a very good job at mocking them. There's not too much comedy here but the film moves by just fine and it's certainly amusing in its own way.

Fool's Luck (1926) Roscoe 'Fatty' Arbuckle

A spoiled man (Lupino Lane) gets kicked out of his fancy apartment after his uncle stops sending him money. This comes at a bad time because the girl of his dreams and her father are on their way there to have dinner. There are a few nice laughs and some great stunts here including one scene where they try to lower a piano out a ten-story window, which is clearly influenced by Harold Lloyd. There's also another very nice sequence where Lane is riding on top of a moving truck when the driver falls out.

White Heat (1949) Raoul Walsh

Terrific film with James Cagney returning to the crime/gangster genre after ten years off. In the film Cagney plays Cody Jarrett, a psychopath gangster who has a thing for his old ma (Virginia Mayo). Today this film remains one of the greatest gangster pictures but it must have been even more fun for people back in 1949 when it was released due to the fact that Cagney hadn't played this type of role for so long. There are many flaws in this film but in the end it really plays out as a greatest hits package for its star. We see countless of the famous Cagney notes from the hot temper to the woman abuse to the violent gunplay. The opening robbery throws Cagney right back into the heat with some terrific action and rather cold blooding murders. I think Cagney was a tad bit too old for the part but he overcomes this with one of the greatest performances in his career. His breakdown in the prison cafeteria is brilliantly done as is his relationship with his mother. Mayo is just as great in her role but I've always felt Edmond O'Brien has been overlooked by fans and critics. I think the work between he and Cagney is just as strong as the relationship Cagney has with the mother. The ending is one of the greatest and most memorable in film history.

Night of the Living Dead (1968) George A. Romero

The first of Romero's on going series has the dead returning to life looking for human flesh and find their victims in a small farm house. For my money this is the third greatest horror film ever made and I'd probably add that it's the greatest "B" movie ever made. I think the film is pretty damn near flawless and contains some of the greatest natural chills from any movie made. The soundtrack is great as is the sound effects but everything else is just as great. I think the cinematography really stands out and packs one hell of a punch by creating some wonderful claustrophobic scenes. The cinematography really narrows everything down and shows how small this farm house is and in my opinion it really puts you inside the house and you can feel yourself choking as their world gets smaller and smaller as the zombies get closer. The performances have taken a beating over the years but I think they're great as well. I think all the characters have a reason or purpose for the film and I think the actors really bring it out in them. Duane Jones really stands out as Ben as he brings a certain safe nature to the movie. When all hell starts to break loose and Ben first shows up on the scene, he does so in a way that you can feel protected. Judith O'Dea is also great at showing the paranoia of her character. I also think the film remains quite creepy even after all the viewings I've had throughout the years. When the zombies finally crash threw the door you can help but feel threatened by them. The screaming of Barbara, Ben trying to board the place back up and the frantic editing really packs a punch. I also think the little girl stabbing her mother is one of the most haunting shots in film history. The use of shadows and the way the scene is edited makes it unforgettable.

01/10/07

Mayor of Hell, The (1933) Archie Mayo

James Cagney plays a crime boss who uses his power to get a "real" job working in a boys reformatory school. At first he doesn't take the job too serious but then he sees how the boys are mistreated so he takes over running the school and tries to turn it into something good. This film was remade twice in the next six years with Crime School and Hell's Kitchen and while both of those films were very entertaining there's no question this is the best of the three versions. One thing that helps is the fact that this one was made before the code came into play so it has a lot more of a raw feel to it whereas the remakes were toned down in content. Another added bonus is seeing Cagney who once again delivers a strong performance. He doesn't show up until the twenty-five minute mark and it speaks well of the young actors who hold the film up before the star gets on screen. The supporting players all do fine work with Madge Evans as the love interest, Allen Jenkins as Cagney's sidekick and Dudley Digges as the bad guy running the school. I think one fatal flaw is the ending and the aftermath. The ending turns into a Frankenstein type setting, which might have worked but the aftermath is so rushed and faked that it really ends the film on a sour note. Outside of that this is a pretty good drama with its heart in the right place and the toughness you'd expect from a Warner/Cagney film.
post #116 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

Things to Come

What's worse than bad silent acting? Bad silent acting in a talking picture with wooden dialogue. The film is interesting on many levels, but the overacting and .8-dimensional characters does it in.

Royal Wedding

The thing that delegates this to the second-tier of Astaire films is the music. A couple of great songs, with a bunch of mediocre ones. But the dancing, story, etc. are top-notch, so this is still well worthwhile, just not top tier.

Elevator to the Gallows

Rewatched Malle's best film. Even better the second time around.
post #117 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

G-Men (1935)

Entertaining gangster movie with James Cagney on the right side of the law this time.

Brick Davis (Cagney) has recently opened up a law practice which is unsuccessful. A college buddy of his, tries to recuit him for the FBI.
When his buddy is murdered by local gangster Danny Leggett, Davis decides to join the bureau. A this time there were alot of restrictions including not being able to carry firearms, but an increase in crime prompts the legislation to pass new laws that will make them better able to carry out their job of ridding the states of crime.

Well-done movie with an excellent performance from Cagney. Having never been exposed to much Cagney film material until recently, he is fast becoming one of my favourites. Granted I've seen very few movies so far of his, but I can say that I haven't seen a bad performance yet. Margaret Lindsay was also great as his boss's sister, Kay McCord. She did quite well with the small amount of screen time. The only thing I thought was tacky was the introduction at the beginning of the movie. It looked like they were showing this film to a class of FBI students. Pretty lame.
I enjoyed this movie a great deal.
post #118 of 1907

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
Mayor of Hell, The (1933) Archie Mayo

James Cagney plays a crime boss who uses his power to get a "real" job working in a boys reformatory school. At first he doesn't take the job too serious but then he sees how the boys are mistreated so he takes over running the school and tries to turn it into something good. This film was remade twice in the next six years with Crime School and Hell's Kitchen and while both of those films were very entertaining there's no question this is the best of the three versions. One thing that helps is the fact that this one was made before the code came into play so it has a lot more of a raw feel to it whereas the remakes were toned down in content. Another added bonus is seeing Cagney who once again delivers a strong performance. He doesn't show up until the twenty-five minute mark and it speaks well of the young actors who hold the film up before the star gets on screen. The supporting players all do fine work with Madge Evans as the love interest, Allen Jenkins as Cagney's sidekick and Dudley Digges as the bad guy running the school. I think one fatal flaw is the ending and the aftermath. The ending turns into a Frankenstein type setting, which might have worked but the aftermath is so rushed and faked that it really ends the film on a sour note. Outside of that this is a pretty good drama with its heart in the right place and the toughness you'd expect from a Warner/Cagney film.

Mike, I was going to write my own thoughts on The Mayor of Hell (only from me) but I figured I'd just bounce it off your review here. I agree with you that Cagney is strong in the film, though for me the real standout was Dudley Digges as the very mean and despicable head of the reform school. I thought the movie was pretty good overall, but I had a problem with really caring all that much about most of the kids, particularly the young punk running the gang (played by Frankie Darro) who was a real wiseguy who actually deserved more than a good kick in the ass. So while old man Digges was properly hateful as the strict disciplinarian, I couldn't completely disagree with him wanting to straighten that urchin out. At the end of the film, in the "FRANKENSTEIN-like" climax you mention, that mob of murderous children didn't really gain my support all that much. They were still basically hateful killers themselves, and that's not exactly the way to go about righting those wrongs they were angry about. But I'd like to give the movie another viewing, as I think it could hit me better the next time. I'd also like to check out the later remakes.
post #119 of 1907
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

Both of the remakes, CRIME SCHOOL with Bogart and HELL'S KITCHEN with Reagan, are worth watching and are pretty entertaining on their own level. I watched both last year and The Dead End Kids make for better victims but MAYOR does have Cagney and a raw, meaner edge to it. I watched the movie sometime around midnight and the next day noticed you had watched it and saw your rating. I thought you'd have problem with the children but I guess I was expecting it since they were the same way in the remakes. TCM show the remakes each year so you shouldn't have much trouble catching them.
post #120 of 1907
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2008)

Double.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movies (Theatrical)
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › Track the Films You Watch (2008)