Re: Colorization: a possible solution to unreleased B/W shows?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JohnMor
I don't support colorization of motion pictures, but will in some specific cases of television series: those that are not dependent on the B&W photography for mood & effect and those that were done in B&W for budgetary reasons. Sidney Sheldon stated that he wanted the first season of I Dream of Jeannie to be in color, but NBC wouldn't pony up the bucks. Not a problem for me if it's colorized then. Same with early Hazel, or The Andy Griffith Show for example. I wouldn't support colorizing The Untouchables, however, since much of its mood comes from the photography. Hazel doesn't need to be "noir."
|
The fact remains that a decision was made, be it by the network or studio, that a project would be done in black & white. Don't you think that the craftsmen of the day did their best to make those shows look their best in that black & white medium? Even moreso because they might be competing in the marketplace with color material?
No, neither HAZEL nor ANDY GRIFFITH were "film-noir", but the cameramen, lighting techs, and cinematographers of the day who worked on them weren't just giving up because someday someone would alter their work with crayons. They worked just as hard doing their jobs to make those black & white films shine, and it's a shame that anyone would want to throw their hard work away just because "it's prettier and more modern" in color.
Again, it's fine with me (but a shame) if someone wants to do that to THEIR filmed material - just leave mine alone and in its original form.
I feel the same way about original soundtracks. Do all you want to the soundtrack to provide stereo, surround, gimmicks, whatever - just provide the original soundtrack in its cleanest form for me to enjoy. The technology of DVD (heck, even VHS!) allows that, so provide multiple soundtracks if it's felt that an enhanced version is warrented. I promise you that I'll opt for the original every time.
Harry