New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

My Second DIY Sub

post #1 of 2
Thread Starter 
I'm designing the enclosure for my second diy sub and I'm wondering about enclosure shape. I read about volume and port size/length as the most important aspects of an enclosure but never do I read about shape.

So let's say, at the extreme, that you have a driver with 2" clearance behind the magnet but 3 ft^3 above it. Will that really function the same as a down-firing sub with the same volume directly behind the driver?

My current design for a dual 12" sub requires 7.5 ft^3, tuned to 21.14 Hz with four 5.5" x 6.1' ports; so I thought I'd make it a triangular pillar that fits into a corner (since it's gonna be a beast). I'm wondering if I can mount the drivers to the front with lots of volume above and below them or if I should make it basically a triangular cylinder sub, with drivers mounted at top and bottom.

Also the help file for WinISD says that rear port velocity of 23 ft/sec is high. My current design peaks at 21 ft/sec at 19Hz. Does that seem acceptable and can ports with greater diameter handle greater air port velocities without noticeable chuffing?
post #2 of 2

Re: My Second DIY Sub

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingiswayo
I read about volume and port size/length as the most important aspects of an enclosure but never do I read about shape.
Because shape doesn't matter. At least not audibly (sp?). You may get a slight change in response or output but it will not be noticable. You could only detect it with measuring equipment. Build a solid box and brace accordingly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingiswayo
My current design for a dual 12" sub requires 7.5 ft^3, tuned to 21.14 Hz with four 5.5" x 6.1' ports;
Where are you getting 5.5" ports? PVC pipe is much more popular in the 4" and 6" sizes. Also, is that 6.1 feet? Your port resonance will be in the audible range. That's the advantage of using Unibox over WinISD. Unibox factors in port resonances into the frequency response. Unibox also factors in voice coil inductance. That makes it much more accurate than WinISD.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingiswayo
Also the help file for WinISD says that rear port velocity of 23 ft/sec is high. My current design peaks at 21 ft/sec at 19Hz. Does that seem acceptable and can ports with greater diameter handle greater air port velocities without noticeable chuffing?
Flared ports are best for keeping noise down. You can go with a larger diameter but the ports will be even longer. To compare real world "chuffing" experiments, check out this site.

-Robert
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav: