Re: Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Brian Borst
I thought that was already known. I have never read any of the books... but a simple adaptation sounds a bit boring.
|
Hard to say since it hasn't been done. The main things to know about the books are:
1) The books were meant to be read one chapter at a time, with each one being it's own self-contained mini-encounter for Alice. This aspect does not work well on film and most versions have tried (most unsuccessfully) to create a cohesive story.
2) The first book attempts to unify the chapters with an overall theme of playing cards throughout the book. This theme is done throughout, but not consistently and doesn't really come to the forefront until the climax at the end with the Queen of Hearts.
3) The second book uses a Chess theme which is (IMO) much more successful. Each chapter represents one specific move on a particular game of chess (the entire game and all moves are detailed in the appendix). Alice is not aware of this fact at first, but hints are given by the characters she encounters and the fact that the entire landscape looks like a chessboard (each square is about a half mile across or so). Alice starts out as a pawn and is eventually promoted to a queen. Since every chapter is part of the same chess game, the book feels much more unified, while maintaining the same set-up of individual mini-encounters. You can see why I was much more interested in a focus on the second book's theme.
I could envision a chess themed movie with favorite encounters from the first book added on without hurting the narrative. Unfortunately, as soon as you have any card-themed characters, it pretty much ruins that idea. I am worried that it will (once again) feel like a bunch of disconnected individual encounters.