Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge*** - Page 17

post #481 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

(25) Transformers - /
I know there's "Suspension of disbelief", but this movie creates the concept of "Suspension of Consciousness". This almost feels like Michael Bay lampooning himself, and maybe it is. I was constantly finding myself stating, out loud, what was going to happen next. "Ok, she's going to get out of the car and start working on it." "Sugar Rush". It's also just a really weird movie, but also kind of fun in the end, and has lots of nice cleavage on display.

(26) Petrified (2006) - bomb
The RedBox synopsis for this direct to video masterpiece includes the line "After an undercover antique deal gets ruined by an idiot pair of low-lifes, a mummified alien comes back to life and is let loose on a psych ward filled with unsuspecting, stunning nymphomaniacs" so it sounded promising at least as some amusing trash. Of course, the imdb page lists a complete cast of 15, and 210 producers. It's really just a pile of trash.

(27) The Devil's Rejects - /
This is an extremely well made film, if sick, sadistic stories are your type of thing. The "Wrath of God" aspect was interesting to me, on my second viewing. Sherrie Moon sure is interesting too. I can't imagine how much they must have spent on music rights for this one, or how they even got the rights to some of it for this kind of movie. I actually found myself "enjoying" it a lot of the time.

I know QT and Robert Rodriguez got a lot of ink and attention for their lame-ass, simple minded "homage" cheap rip-offs of "Grindhouse" films, but unlike the similarly ham-fisted "homages" they have done recently (particularly the thoroughly successful attempts to show how little they understand Sergio Leone, in Kill Bill 2 and Once Upon a Time in Mexico) Rob Zombie did a far more skilled and creative homage here, minus all the hype. Scratched film and abrupt "reel changes" don't make for creativity, or even a good movie. This is the true homage, and a significantly better result, in my opinion. Apologies to all the QT (and RR) worshippers out there.
post #482 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

Yes, THE DEVIL'S REJECTS is an excellent homage to grindhouse exploitation films (****).


UPDATE:


SCARY MOVIE CHALLENGE 2007
01) The Phantom of the Opera (1925) ***
02) The Black Cat (1941) **1/2
03) Horror Island (1941) *1/2
04) Man Made Monster (1941) ***
05) Dracula (1931) ***
06) The Monster and the Girl (1941) *
07) The Lodger (1944) ***1/2
08) Hangover Square (1945) ***
09) The Undying Monster (1942) **1/2
10) Cat People (1942) ***
11) Cry of the Werewolf (1944) **
12) Night Monster (1942) **1/2
13) Captive Wild Woman (1943) **1/2
14) The Invisible Man Returns (1940) ***
15) The Invisible Man's Revenge (1944) **1/2
16) The Return of the Vampire (1943) ***
17) The Werewolf (1956) **1/2
18) Creature with the Atom Brain (1955) **1/2
19) The Giant Claw (1957) **
20) The Mummy (1932) **1/2
21) The Mummy's Hand (1940) ***
22) The Mummy's Tomb (1942) **1/2
23) The Mummy's Ghost (1944) ***
24) The Mummy's Curse (1944) **
25) Count Dracula (BBC 1977) ***
26) Frankenstein (1931) ****
27) The Old Dark House (1932) ***1/2
28) Bride of Frankenstein (1935) ****
29) 28 Weeks Later (2007) ***1/2
post #483 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

Re: DR. JEKYLL AND MR. HYDE (1931)


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mario Gauci
I'm not sure what rating you'd give to the Victor Fleming/Spencer Tracy 1941 remake but, it's safe to say that it's nobody's favorite...least of all, Tracy's!

Not all that safe... I have a book of horror movie reviews that's pretty good called TERROR ON TAPE (compiled 1994 by James O'Neill, before DVDs came out) and he says that the Spencer Tracy JEKYLL AND HYDE is his personal favorite of all the versions.

But regarding the 1931 Fredric March JEKYLL -- I think it's a truly great classic horror film which still holds up strongly today and had some sexual elements well in advance of its time. I think March fully deserved his award, in that he really makes a great schizophrenic turnaround and is excellent as Hyde. I do agree that March is too theatrical as Jekyll at times - especially the scenes when he is spouting romantic gibberish - but it's not really anything that weakens the movie for me. The direction is also masterful. Even though I am a Universal nut, I just might pick this JEKYLL AND HYDE as the best horror film of 1931.... or at the very least, right up there with FRANKENSTEIN.

As for Michael Elliott's claim that nobody ever gives the 1931 movie a great critical rating or four stars, or whatever... there are so many hundreds of reference books out there that I don't know how he can be so positive about that. I have been plugging an excellent book for years now, called GOLDEN HORRORS: AN ILLUSTRATED CRITICAL FILMOGRAPHY, 1931-1939 (by Bryan Senn). This is a complete necessity for fans of 30s horror films, and it's very throrough and informative, and a perfect companion to UNIVERSAL HORRORS by Weaver and Brunas (both books are distributed by McFarland). Anyway .... Senn praises this film, though he writes his entries as a series of "assets" and "liabilities". Under the liabilities he also lists March's performance as Jekyll to be overdone, and I agree... but it doesn't really affect the film.

Also in Senn's book, he lists some actual segments of reviews of the day for every movie. For JEKYLL, here are some snippets Senn offers:

VARIETY (Jan 5 1932) despite lavishly praising the artistic merits of this "over-elaborated" version and considering it "assured of good returns", expressed some misgivings as to the palatability to the public: " The picture is infinitely better art than the old stage play - indeed, in many passages it is an astonishingly fine bit of interpreting a classic, but as popular fare it loses in vital reaction.... As a literary artistic interpretation, the picture is the last word in artistic interpretation, done by understanding adaptors and an extremely skillful director..."

Mordaunt Hall, of THE NEW YORK TIMES (Jan 2, 1932) called this version "a far more tense and shuddering affair than it was as John Barrymore's silent picture. True, the producers are not a little too zealous in their desire to spread terror among audiences, but while there are pardonable roamings from the original, there is in most instances a good excuse for making the scenes as they are in this current study. Mr. March's portrayal is something to arouse admiration... as Dr. Jekyll he is a charming man, as the fiend he is alert and sensual".


Whatever the case, this version is held up highly as a classic horror film. At the end of the GOLDEN HORRORS book there is a section where many writers are asked to vote on which films they consider to be the greatest of the entire decade from 1931 through 1939 (45 films are reviewed in the book). At the end of the voting, the results are tallied up and the Top Ten results average out to this:

01) BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN
02) KING KONG
03) FRANKENSTEIN
04) DR JEKYLL AND MR HYDE*
05) THE INVISIBLE MAN
06) THE MUMMY
07) THE BLACK CAT
08) ISLAND OF LOST SOULS
09) THE OLD DARK HOUSE
10) FREAKS

11) SON OF FRANKENSTEIN
12) DRACULA
13) THE MOST DANGEROUS GAME
14) THE BLACK ROOM
15) MAD LOVE

*What's interesting about the results, is that even though JEKYLL is at #4, it's still an amazing accomplishment, because the first 3 movies on the list are all the usual established cinematic greats (BRIDE, KONG, FRANKENSTEIN)... and JEKYLL is the first one to follow on their heels. (also interesting is how low DRACULA scores!).
post #484 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Karlosi
Re: DR. JEKYLL AND MR. HYDE (1931)




Not all that safe... I have a book of horror movie reviews that's pretty good called TERROR ON TAPE (compiled 1994 by James O'Neill, before DVDs came out) and he says that the Spencer Tracy JEKYLL AND HYDE is his personal favorite of all the versions.

But regarding the 1931 Fredric March JEKYLL -- I think it's a truly great classic horror film which still holds up strongly today and had some sexual elements well in advance of its time. I think March fully deserved his award, in that he really makes a great schizophrenic turnaround and is excellent as Hyde. I do agree that March is too theatrical as Jekyll at times - especially the scenes when he is spouting romantic gibberish - but it's not really anything that weakens the movie for me. The direction is also masterful. Even though I am a Universal nut, I just might pick this JEKYLL AND HYDE as the best horror film of 1931.... or at the very least, right up there with FRANKENSTEIN.

As for Michael Elliott's claim that nobody ever gives the 1931 movie a great critical rating or four stars, or whatever... there are so many hundreds of reference books out there that I don't know how he can be so positive about that. I have been plugging an excellent book for years now, called GOLDEN HORRORS: AN ILLUSTRATED CRITICAL FILMOGRAPHY, 1931-1939 (by Bryan Senn). This is a complete necessity for fans of 30s horror films, and it's very throrough and informative, and a perfect companion to UNIVERSAL HORRORS by Weaver and Brunas (both books are distributed by McFarland). Anyway .... Senn praises this film, though he writes his entries as a series of "assets" and "liabilities". Under the liabilities he also lists March's performance as Jekyll to be overdone, and I agree... but it doesn't really affect the film.

Also in Senn's book, he lists some actual segments of reviews of the day for every movie. For JEKYLL, here are some snippets Senn offers:

VARIETY (Jan 5 1932) despite lavishly praising the artistic merits of this "over-elaborated" version and considering it "assured of good returns", expressed some misgivings as to the palatability to the public: " The picture is infinitely better art than the old stage play - indeed, in many passages it is an astonishingly fine bit of interpreting a classic, but as popular fare it loses in vital reaction.... As a literary artistic interpretation, the picture is the last word in artistic interpretation, done by understanding adaptors and an extremely skillful director..."

Mordaunt Hall, of THE NEW YORK TIMES (Jan 2, 1932) called this version "a far more tense and shuddering affair than it was as John Barrymore's silent picture. True, the producers are not a little too zealous in their desire to spread terror among audiences, but while there are pardonable roamings from the original, there is in most instances a good excuse for making the scenes as they are in this current study. Mr. March's portrayal is something to arouse admiration... as Dr. Jekyll he is a charming man, as the fiend he is alert and sensual".


Whatever the case, this version is held up highly as a classic horror film. At the end of the GOLDEN HORRORS book there is a section where many writers are asked to vote on which films they consider to be the greatest of the entire decade from 1931 through 1939 (45 films are reviewed in the book). At the end of the voting, the results are tallied up and the Top Ten results average out to this:

01) BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN
02) KING KONG
03) FRANKENSTEIN
04) DR JEKYLL AND MR HYDE*
05) THE INVISIBLE MAN
06) THE MUMMY
07) THE BLACK CAT
08) ISLAND OF LOST SOULS
09) THE OLD DARK HOUSE
10) FREAKS

11) SON OF FRANKENSTEIN
12) DRACULA
13) THE MOST DANGEROUS GAME
14) THE BLACK ROOM
15) MAD LOVE

*What's interesting about the results, is that even though JEKYLL is at #4, it's still an amazing accomplishment, because the first 3 movies on the list are all the usual established cinematic greats (BRIDE, KONG, FRANKENSTEIN)... and JEKYLL is the first one to follow on their heels. (also interesting is how low DRACULA scores!).

Hey Joe,

I thought you didn't give much creedence to what film critics say...and yet you're quoting them now!

All joking aside, thanks for taking the time to look through your sources again and posting these quotes here. I always enjoy reading what contemporary critics had to say about films which are nowadays acknowledged as classics. I'm sure I mentioned this before but, personally, I have only 3 Horror/Sci-Fi sources - Carlos Clarens, Alan Frank and the late Philip Strick - so, for me, the by-now popular names of Forrest Ackerman, Paul Jensen, David Skal, Tom Weaver, etc. were totally unknown before I "met" them via DVD supplements.

As for the 1941 Spencer Tracy version, I have to admit that it does improve on subsequent viewings...but, there's no denying that Tracy is miscast in the central role and his reluctance to don excessive make-up when impersonating Hyde really hampers the film.


P.S. I should be watching 2 more versions of the old chestnut before this Halloween challenge is out!
post #485 of 639
Thread Starter 

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

Those listing are pretty interesting from that Golden Horror book for many reasons:

1. There's no shock that BRIDE is #1 as I'm sure all three of us will agree with that. Heck, I think the overall opinion everywhere is that this is the greatest horror film of this period and perhaps of all time.

2. THE MUMMY is rated way too high and I'm curious as to when this book was written as it seems THE BLACK ROOM, THE BLACK CAT, THE OLD DARK HOUSE and perhaps SON OF FRANKENSTEIN are now considered a lot better than that film. Heck, ISLAND and DANGEROUS GAME would probably rank higher if you took a pole.

3. I'm also shocked to see that DRACULA'S DAUGHTER didn't make the list. It's not a great movie but I'd rank it over DRACULA, THE MUMMY and even KING KONG but then again, I'm not overly fond of the ape.

4. THE RAVEN is one that I'd put on that list but I guess the writers share one of the low opinions of the film.

As for me saying no one gives JEKYLL & HYDE "great" reviews, let me rewrite what I was saying. Of course there are fans, horror experts and so on who give it great reviews but these are personal opinions. If you get a book that lists a films general reputation (Maltin, VideoHound, any other movie book in Borders) then I've never seen it get over a three-star rating. We know people who hate BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN but I've never seen one of these books give it under four-stars. The "general reputation" is what I was talking about.

As for March's performance, it's overdone and I'd pick at least two other performances from that year, which are better. I'd start with Colin Clive in FRANKENSTEIN or even Van Sloan or Karloff. All three were much better and even with Clive went over the top he didn't go to the extreme as March. After that film there are maybe one or two I've seen from 1931 that I'd rank higher and I certainly wouldn't rank March's performance anywhere near the Top 10 for the actor himself.

As for 1941, it's the worst version I've seen and I will go on record saying it's the worst performance EVER by Tracy. It's common knowledge that he hated the film, the director, the screenplay, doing the film and I think it shows on film.
post #486 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

I was blown away from the March version of Jeckel when I saw it. I'll have to revisit it some time.

FROM HELL 2.5/5 : The stylish look can't save this one. This was a second viewing and it still left me flat. I guess I'm like the book too much. I don't mind minor changes, but when the change is making a detective a opium den inhabiting hippie who sees visions? What's the point in that? This could of been something special.

THE GRUESOME TWOSOME 1.5/5 : The plot about a old lady who runs a wig shop by having her retarded nephew kill and scalp unsuspecting girls is odd enough, but nothing can explain the 4 minutes of talking styrofoam heads that open this. Not a particularly great Hershel Gordan Lewis film, it suffers a bit from having a huge Nancy Drew like subplot that drags the film down when it should have more gore. That said, it does have the trademark of the villain playing with the gore for no real good reason. I don't think anyone else made more movies where once someone is stabbed, the murderer just HAS to stick his hands in the wound for a feel.

SOMETHING WEIRD 2.5/5 : The gonzo plot of LSD, psychics, secret agents and witches help you to overlook the crap story and acting. Fun in a train wreck sort of way.

tallies :
http://www.hometheaterforum.com/htf/...70&postcount=7
post #487 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

Scale: 1=awful 2=bad 3=average 4=good 5=excellent. 1st viewings in red.

Panic In Year Zero! (1962) Pretty good WW3 survivalist flick.

The Last Man On Earth (1964) This was OK, I was kind of expecting more of a movie remade several times.

Poltergeist 2: The Other Side (1986) This was just a dumb sequel. I especially loved the subliminal message that Craig T. Nelson is worthless... it takes an Indian with a magic spear to beat the demon and a dead grandma to save the little girl..... You suck Craig!

Poltergeist 3 (1988) Yet another terrible sequel. Most of the cast was smart enough to not bother returning for part 3, and Heather O'Rouke died so at least we were spared part 4.

The Terminator (1984) Had to watch something good to wash the Poltergeist sequels out of my eyes.

the butcher's bill...
1. Monster Squad
2. Call of the Cthulhu
3. Mimic
4. The Omen
5. The Descent
6. Manos: The Hands Of Fate
7. Isolation
8. Insatiable
9. The Changeling
10. Perfect Creature
11. The Ninth Gate
12. The Nightmare Before Christmas
13. Nekromantik
14. Nekromantik 2
15. Bride Of The Monster
16. Saw 3
17. Plan 9 From Outer Space
18. Primeval
19. Slither
20. Bug
21. 28 Weeks Later
22. Fright Night
23. Feast
24. Dead Silence
25. C.H.U.D.
26. The Abandoned
27. Unrest
28. The Gravedancers
29. The Hamiltons
30. The Tripper
31. Penny Dreadful
32. The Fly
33. The Fly 2
34. Panic In Year Zero!
35. The Last Man On Earth
36. Poltergeist 2
37. Poltergeist 3
38. The Terminator
post #488 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garrett Lundy
... and Heather O'Rouke died so at least we were spared part 4.
Before last weekend I'd be laughing at that.
post #489 of 639
Thread Starter 

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

Horror Island (1941)

Shockingly effective “B” thriller from Universal perfectly blends the mystery, horror and comedy genres. A con man (Dick Foran) takes a group of people to an island for a treasure hunt but soon a crazed madman starts killing them one by one. I was really shocked at how much I enjoyed this film considering how many of these types of films I’ve seen. The movie runs at lightening speed, which isn’t the norm and all the jokes work wonderfully well. Foran makes for a good and charming leading man and the supporting cast does fine work as well. Unlike others in its genre, I didn’t catch onto who the killer was either.

Living Coffin, The (1959)

Mexican film that mixes the Western and Horror genres while at the same time connects the main villain to The Crying Woman character of various other Mexican films. Two cowboys show up to help some ranchers rid their curse, which appears to be the work of the ghost The Crying Woman. I was shocked to see how fast this 71-minute film flew by. A lot of these Mexican movies move rather slowly but that wasn't the case here. The look of The Crying Woman is very cheap but effective and the performances aren't as bad as you'd think and in fact they manage to be pretty good. The horror elements work very nicely but the Western stuff never really takes off too well. The ending is also a major disappointment and comes over very badly but overall this isn't too bad of a film but I'd recommend starting with a different Mexican film. Original title: Grito de la muerte, El.

Man and the Monster, The (1958)

Mexican film about a concert pianist who sells his soul to Satan in exchange for him to become a great musician. The only downside is that he also turns into a hairy, murderous monster. I was somewhat letdown by this film but overall it was a pretty good movie but it takes way too long for the story to get started and the monster isn't used nearly enough. The screenplay does allow time for the relationship between the man and his mother to grow and this here is actually the best thing about the movie. I'm not sure if this film was meant to be a version of Jekyll and Hyde because it does share some of the same ideas even though the monster appears to be more of a werewolf with a rat's face. The monster make up is cheap but effective. Original title: Hombre y el monstruo, El.

Last Warning, The (1929)

Paul Leni (The Cat and the Canary, The Man Who Laughs) directs this Universal horror film, which has been forgotten over the years but if you've seen some of the studios bigger pictures then you've can tell what all this film has influenced. A popular show on Broadway, inside a creepy theatre, is closed down after the mysterious murder of one of the actors. Years later the police reassemble the original cast and bring them back to the theater to see if they can trap the murderer but it might be a ghost they're dealing with. This film mixes elements of The Phantom of the Opera with the old dark house themes of films like The Bat and delivers a terrific entertainment. This film has never been officially released so I had to view it via what appears to be a 16mm print and the quality was pretty bad throughout so if I get a chance to see a pristine print then I'll probably bump my review up. The technical eye of Leni, who died after this film, is untouched by nearly everyone as he's constantly trying new and different things with the camera. I love how he'll have a medium shot and then move the camera in to show some evidence before moving it back out to let the action role. The film runs just under 80-minutes and goes by very fast with some exciting action but also a great story to work with. The actors, including John Boles who would later appear in Frankenstein, all do nice work as well. There are a few twists and turns along the way that actually work well within the story. This film works on a technical level as well as the story level and that makes this a wonderful little gem that needs to be rediscovered. The only thing people know about this movie nowdays is that it was a huge influence on James Whale and this is easy to see. There's a woman here, used as comic relief, which is later a carbon copy in Una O'Connor. The Old Dark House also lifts some shots here but I won't say which ones since it'll ruin scenes in both movies. The score here was also later reused in Dracula and this film was shot on the same sets as The Phantom of the Opera so there's a lot of connections here.

House of Fear, The (1939)

Lazy, routine and by the numbers remake of The Last Warning from Universal. The story is pretty much the same as an actor gets murdered during a performance and then years later the cast is brought back together to try and trap the killer. This certainly sinks to the "C" level in Universal's library and it comes off very lazy compared to the original film. Several scenes are redone here but they don't come off nearly as good as the original film. The cast is also rather boring and bland but the 67-minute running time does go by fast.
post #490 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mario Gauci
Hey Joe,

I thought you didn't give much creedence to what film critics say...and yet you're quoting them now!

There are times when I agree with a critic, and there are times I don't. It's really that simple.

Quote:
All joking aside, thanks for taking the time to look through your sources again and posting these quotes here.

No problem. Glad you enjoyed reading them.
post #491 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
1. There's no shock that BRIDE is #1 as I'm sure all three of us will agree with that. Heck, I think the overall opinion everywhere is that this is the greatest horror film of this period and perhaps of all time.

I'd agree, but KING KONG is also very highly acclaimed (I know you like SON OF KONG better). We might quibble though with how much of a "horror" film KONG is, as opposed to fantasy... but as I say, this is quibbling anyway.

Quote:
2. THE MUMMY is rated way too high and I'm curious as to when this book was written as it seems THE BLACK ROOM, THE BLACK CAT, THE OLD DARK HOUSE and perhaps SON OF FRANKENSTEIN are now considered a lot better than that film.

I just checked, and the book was written in 1996. I've never much cared for THE MUMMY myself, but I believe it's generally considered very good.

Quote:
3. I'm also shocked to see that DRACULA'S DAUGHTER didn't make the list.

If I were listing my TOP TEN it would surely be on there. There were a bunch of writers and "film experts" at the end of the book who each compiled his own "Top Ten", and then the average I posted was taken from all of them. There were about 10-20 people polled, without going back again looking at the book. I think some of them put DD on their list.

Quote:
4. THE RAVEN is one that I'd put on that list but I guess the writers share one of the low opinions of the film.

Actually, the writer - Bryan Senn - does a very good chapter on THE RAVEN, giving it praise and restoring the balance to it because so many have put it down over the years. He makes a good case for it. The reason it's not on the Top Ten List is because the people polled at the end of the book didn't rate it very highly.

Quote:
If you get a book that lists a films general reputation (Maltin, VideoHound, any other movie book in Borders) then I've never seen it [JEKYLL] get over a three-star rating. We know people who hate BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN but I've never seen one of these books give it under four-stars. The "general reputation" is what I was talking about.

I see. I have nothing to compare with here and now, but I've always thought the general rep was pretty good.

Quote:
As for March's performance, it's overdone and I'd pick at least two other performances from that year, which are better. I'd start with Colin Clive in FRANKENSTEIN or even Van Sloan or Karloff. All three were much better and even with Clive went over the top he didn't go to the extreme as March. After that film there are maybe one or two I've seen from 1931 that I'd rank higher and I certainly wouldn't rank March's performance anywhere near the Top 10 for the actor himself.

Well, the reason I love March's performance in the film is because he seems so different, as he is supposed to be... I mean besides the heavy makeup... even the makeup aside, he is completely believeable as two extremely separate entities. His theatrical style as Jekyll does seem old fashioned at times and heavy-handed.

Quote:
As for 1941, it's the worst version I've seen and I will go on record saying it's the worst performance EVER by Tracy. It's common knowledge that he hated the film, the director, the screenplay, doing the film and I think it shows on film.

I gave it *** but it's been awhile since I saw it. It was good, I thought, but not exceptional.

And the silent Barrymore version was only average for me; if you want to talk about over-acting and coming off as unintentionally hilarious, it's when Barrymore distorts his facial features to "turn into Hyde"! I seldom laugh out loud unintentionally, but I did at that!
post #492 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

DARKNESS FALLS

One should expect that when the movie blurb describes the film as a terrifying take on the legend of the Tooth Fairy, that you shouldn't expect great art. And it certainly wasn't. But there were some effective scare scenes and some great sound design, but the plot was rather thin and ridiculous and the film violated its own rules so often that it really degenerated into a farce by the end. It's also a bad rip-off of A Nightmare on Elm Street. The Tooth Fairy is essentially the female Freddy Krueger. She was burned alive after the villagers thought she'd murdered two children and pledged eternal vengeance on the town. Instead of in their dreams, she haunts the dark which also seemingly makes the children terrified of sleeping.

Young Kyle was terrorized by the Tooth Fairy as a child and now harbors a near paralyzing fear of the dark. Twelve years later, a childhood friend tracks him down and describes her brother's "sickness" which sounds very much like a haunting by the Tooth Fairy. So adult Kyle returns to town, has a run-in with some old redneck acquaintances and law enforcement, and faces down the Tooth Fairy once and for all.

There are a number of instances where this film violates its own logic such as the elevator that somehow manages to function despite a power failure, and a Tooth Fairy that flees from the beam of the weakest flashlight or flickering flame, but has no problems flying around the sky during a continually flashing lightning storm. The filmmakers seem to have got caught up more in what they thought looked "cool" rather than sticking to the logic of their story.

ROSEMARY'S BABY

Another horror classic that, despite all the raves I've heard over the years, ends up being a disappointment to me. Many praise the film for its subtlety, but I think there is such a thing as being too subtle and boring the audience out of its mind. This film is a yawn-inducing 136 minutes of really nothing that would frighten anyone born within the past 30 years. How this continues to rank high on lists of "most scary" films is baffling to me. Even the big climax is a huge letdown.

Mia Farrow gives a decent, if overly naive, performance as Rosemary. Ruth Gordon was interesting as Minnie Castevet, the buttinsky neighbor who is more sinister than she appears. The rest of the cast was adequate, if unexceptional.

A couple of things that made no sense, IMO:

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
After coming to her conclusions about the Castevets, Rosemary still seems to have complete faith and trust in Dr. Sapirstein despite the fact that it was the Castevets who practially forced her to see him in the first place. She spills her guts to him about her entire theory of the Castevets without seemingly a single thought that he might be part of the problem. Even after he has spoken so highly of the Castevets and even prescribed Minnie's "vitamin drink" for Rosemary to take everyday. At this point, I really thought Rosemary was hopelessy stupid.

Also, the door in the closet between the apartments. It's pretty obvious that this is how Guy and Dr. Sapirstein enter the apartment after Rosemary has locked them out. Yet, when Rosemary decides to check for the door, she has to remove all the towels and shelves to even get to the door. Guy and the Dr. certaily didn't have time to remove all the shelves when they used the door earlier.


THE CARNAGE SO FAR...
post #493 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

#20 It Came From Beneath The Sea: Kind of a low-budget version of Beast from 20,000 Fathoms. Pretty typical and predictable storyline, but Harryhousen's effects still shine through. 2/5

#21 Creature from the Black Lagoon: I listened to the commentary track on the Legacy Collection this time since I've seen it so many times. About an hour into it I switched to the movie soundtrack. For every interesting fact on the commentary track you have to hear three or four snoozers. The Times Cinema in Milwaukee is showing this in 3-D next month and I already have the weekend off to see it! The only other 3-D movies I've seen were House of Wax, Coming at Ya!, a cheesy spaghetti western released during the 80's 3-D resurgence, Jaws 3-D and Friday the 13th 3-D. Commentary Track rating: 1.5/5 Movie: 3/5
post #494 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

#22 The Fog (2005): I haven't seen the original in years, but I do believe that it's a hell of a lot better than this. NO thrills or suspense in this boring retread. The location shots of the island are stunning, and it gets a point for Tom Welling running around with no shirt on. 1.5/5

#23 The Mummy (1955): At least the Universal original version had great atmosphere... Hated Christopher Lee's make-up (even the worst Universal sequels had good mummies!) and his agility/movements. They did follow the Universal storylines a bit with the Steve Banning and Isobel characters, but pretty much a let-down. 1.5/5
post #495 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malcolm R
ROSEMARY'S BABY

Another horror classic that, despite all the raves I've heard over the years, ends up being a disappointment to me. Many praise the film for its subtlety, but I think there is such a thing as being too subtle and boring the audience out of its mind. This film is a yawn-inducing 136 minutes of really nothing that would frighten anyone born within the past 30 years. How this continues to rank high on lists of "most scary" films is baffling to me. Even the big climax is a huge letdown.


It's daring reviews which break the usual conventions like this one that I admire, even though I completely disagree with it! ROSEMARY'S BABY is one of the few films I could actually call "perfect," and that's something that's nearly impossible for a film of any genre to be. I've seen hundreds (or thousands?) of horror-themed movies in my life, and none of them ever really felt scary or unsettling to me, except for this one and a couple of others.

It's interesting to me that you weren't bored by, say, the Karloff MUMMY and yet you were by ROSEMARY'S BABY? I know that the 1932 film is much shorter, but...

I love the ending of RB... very foretelling of what will now come to be. I know many fans wish the climax was a little more "spectacular", but ....

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
I love the way Rosemary winds up caring for her baby even though it's satan's son too.... it's the fact that a mother's inherent love for her own baby winds up taking precedence even over all the hellish-ness around her. It is now presumed that the devil has won, and the antichrist will thrive after all
post #496 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

#24. The Mummy's Ghost: Pretty boring and formulaic entry. John Carradine doesn't make the most convincing Egyptian, either. 1.5/5

#25. Going To Pieces: The Rise and Fall of the Slasher Film: Pretty entertaining, above-average compilation documentary. It scores points for including more than just the 'usual suspects' and takes a good look at the backlash the genre has received. 3/5
post #497 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

As always, I'm not a critic- I just know what I like but I'm not very good at articulating it.

10/27/07
95. Saw IV
Obviously, this was a first time viewing. I like this one more than the original but not as much as the other sequels. The movie's timeline is pretty confusing (see Saw IV thread for details) and the Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
obligatory twist ending is reminiscent of the first movie where you barely even know who the killer is when he's revealed.

They finally get kill off Donnie Wahlberg's character by having his head crushed by two huge blocks of ice.
Given that it's already made its budget back, you can bet that Saw V will be out on October 24 next year.

96. Friday The 13th
This is the movie you can blame (or thank) for the slasher subgenre. Needless to say, Friday The 13th copied Halloween but the slasher movie took off when they all started copying Friday The 13th's violence and completely tossed aside Halloween's style and suspense. All that being said, I love Friday The 13th despite its obvious drawbacks. If nothing else, there's some excellent special effects from Tom Savini.

97. Friday The 13th Part 2
I've always enjoyed this sequel. I think it's the potato sack that does it for me.

98. Friday The 13th Part III
Alot of stuff in this movie is just copied from the original (stabbing from under a bed, tossing a body through a window, a dead character rising from the lake to grab the surviving girl) and tons of the score is just music from the original. I wish I had seen it 3-D though since I've always heard it looks pretty cool and covers alot of the sins of the special effects.

99. Friday The 13th- The Final Chapter
A very brutal entry for this series and my favorite of the sequels. More excellent special effects work from Tom Savini and Jason is actually threatening in this entry. The best part is that Corey Feldman is in it.

100. Friday The 13th- A New Beginning
Crap. Everything wrong with horror movies and teen movies from 1980's is on display here. There's gotta be 20 people killed in this movie and most of them are characters that are introduced just to be killed, there's a ton of profanity for no reason and there's a ton of nudity for no reason. Usually, I'd be all for those things but this movie just sucks. EDIT: I will say that the Reggie character is the one good thing in this movie.

I've accomplished my goal of 100 movies (but I'll keep going). Let this be a lesson for the kids, aim high and you'll always win... although it may be better to have loftier goals than watching 100 movies in one month.

My full list is in post #389.
post #498 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

Since Steve wussed out on starting a Sci-Fi challenge earlier this year, I was thinking of starting a few (3 actually) different challenges over the new few months, probably starting in January, so the holidays can pass first. I was thinking of "Sci-Fi", "Historical Drama" (as in, anything significantly in the past) and "Gangster". Each separated by a couple months. I think the goal would be more moderate then this one, Probably 13 for each, and like this one, the "winner" could start it again next year?

Anyone interested?
post #499 of 639
Thread Starter 

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

I'd certainly be interested in a Sci-Fi one. Even if only a few people jump in it'll be nice to break up what I try to cram in this month. I was going to watch some of the Universal Sci-Fi titles over the next few days but I'll hold off on them.
post #500 of 639
Thread Starter 

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

Freaks (1932)

Last year's review:

Until last year's viewing, this Tod Browning film never really worked with me because I felt is was exploitation trash but I'm shocked to see it working better with each new viewing. Unless my first couple of viewings I can now see the love/revenge story and not just simply see the "freaks" that are on screen. To say the film is a tad bit bizarre would be an understatement but the film has a heart and soul to it and seems to be a warning from the director to those who would typically pick on these sorts of people. The performances by all are very good, although it's sometimes hard to understand what the little people are saying. This film was originally banned all over the world and it's easy to see why as the film still has the power to shock even today's jaded viewers. The ending, 70+ years old, still packs one hell of punch.

Added comments: My girlfriend makes another appearance in this challenge as she took time to watch this one with me. She liked this one and was actually caught up in the story, which I didn't think she would. As for myself, this film continue to grow on me and I'd currently put it as the third greatest horror film of the decade. I'm also willing to cut Browning some slack when it comes to his direction as I found myself enjoying his visual style a lot more on this go around. The final revelation as to what happened to the money hungry woman also worked wonders on me this time. I knew what was coming yet the thing really grabbed a hold of me.

Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer (1986)

Incredibly disturbing and vile film takes a look at a fictional serial killer. I still remember all the buzz this film created when it was first released. Various horror magazines were hyping this up as one of the greatest films of the genre. When I first saw the film it was with a group of friends. We’d always watch horror movies together, laugh at them and just have a good time. When we all viewed this I remember quite well that only one another guy and I made it to the end. Three others left the screening with another puking halfway through the film. The hype that this wasn’t your casual 80’s horror film was certainly right and nearly 20 years after its making the thing still holds up quite well. The wonderful music score and sound effects give the film a lot of jolts. Michael Rooker, Tracy Arnold and Tom Towles all give brilliant performances especially Rooker.



2007 Scary Movie Totals:

1. Frankenstein (1910)
2. Dr. Chopper (2005)
3. Beast of Yucca Flats, The (1961)
4. Grizzly Rage (2007)
5. Earth Dies Screaming, The (1962)
6. Raven, The (1935)
7. Evil Breed: The Legend of Samhain (2003)
8. Murders in the Rue Morgue (1932)
9. Tomb, The (2003)
10. Sealed Room, The (1909)
11. Land of Death (2003)
12. Borderline Cult (2007)
13. Invisible Ghost (1941)
14. Corpse Vanishes, The (1942)
15. Giant Gila Monster, The (1959)
16. Man Made Monster (1941)
17. Maniac (1980)
18. Attack of the 50 Foot Woman (1958)
19. Ghost Wanted (1940)
20. Earth vs. the Spider (2001)
21. Murder By Numbers (2002)
22. My Son the Vampire (1952)
23. Return of the Vampire, The (1943)
24. Scooby-Doo and the Legend of the Vampire (2003)
25. Scooby-Doo and the Loch Ness Monster (2004)
26. All Work and No Play (1942)
27. Spook to Me (1945)
28. One Spooky Night (1955)
29. Pardon My Nightshirt (1956)
30. Ghost of Slumber Mountain, The (1917)
31. Scooby-Doo: Where's My Mummy (2005)
32. Adoration (1987)
33. Hollywood Babylon (2000)
34. Le Poeme (1986)
35. Maneater (2007)
36. Strangler of the Swamp (1946)
37. Tomb, The (2007)
38. Blue Demon (2004)
39. Corruption (1968)
40. House on Bare Mountain (1962)
41. Kiss Me Quick! (1964)
42. Vampyros Lesbos (1970)
43. Venom (2005)
44. Body Snatcher, The (1945)
45. She Creature (2001)
46. Vampire, The (1957)
47. Maniac (1934)
48. Zodiac Killer (2005)
49. Curse of the Zodiac (2007)
50. London After Midnight (1927)
51. Teenage Monster (1958)
52. Lycantropus (1996)
53. Sister Lulu (2001)
54. Chambre Jaune (2002)
55. Miss Greeny (1997)
56. Tea Break (2004)
57. Bad Moon (1996)
58. Zombie Island Massacre (1984)
59. Cannibal Campout (1988)
60. Watch the Skies (2005)
61. Unknown, The (1927)
62. Masters of Horror: Pick Me Up (2006)
63. Demons of Lust (1999)
64. Return of Dracula, The (1958)
65. Purei (2005)
66. To Heir is Human (1944)
67. Raven, The (2006)
68. Wolf Man, The (1941)
69. Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man (1943)
70. Homicidal (1961)
71. Ghosts (1915)
72. Savage Man...Savage Beast (1975)
73. Women's Camp 119 (1977)
74. Strike of the Tortured Angels (1982)
75. MOH: Dreams in the Witch-House (2005)
76. Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1912)
77. Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1920) Lewis version
78. Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1931)
79. Horror Island (1941)
80. Living Coffin, The (1959)
81. Man and the Monster, The (1958)
82. Last Warning, The (1929)
83. House of Fear, The (1939)
84. Freaks (1932)
85: Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer (1986)
post #501 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
I'd certainly be interested in a Sci-Fi one. Even if only a few people jump in it'll be nice to break up what I try to cram in this month. I was going to watch some of the Universal Sci-Fi titles over the next few days but I'll hold off on them.

I had intended to include some half-a-dozen Sci-Fi titles for this Halloween Challenge but since my film-viewing pace slackened throughout the month, I had to let some proposed titles (a lot of them) fall by the wayside. But, yes, I'd definitely be interested in participating in this Challenge...provided it''s not done immediately.

Frankly, I'm a little burned out from watching Horror exclusively and I am itching to be "free" to watch anything and not be constrained by the subject-matter! However, there are still a dozen or more Horror titles on the way to me as we speak - the Fox Horror Classics collection, several of the latest batch of Midnite Movies, Mario Bava Box Set Vol. 2, etc. - and I still intend to watch them as soon as they arrive just because some of them I've been wanting to watch for a long time - THE UNDYING MONSTER (1942), THE EARTH DIES SCREAMING (1964), BARON BLOOD (1972), the KOLCHAK TV series, etc. - or simply sound too intriguing to pass by - MALABIMBA: THE MALICIOUS WHORE (1979) and its remake, SATAN'S BABY DOLL (1982)!!


P.S. Your review for THE LAST WARNING (1929) was my tonic for the day and I hope I'll get a chance to watch the film for myself some time soon...
post #502 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

I'm not really into this challenge this year, though I was last October. I actually needed to get on the "overtime list" at work through the rest of 2007, so as a result I am working more hours than ever before - which is something I'm never a big fan of doing - and I'm just way too exhausted to watch as many films as I'd like. But on Halloween Day I'll actually be off, so I am thinking of dedicating that entire day and night to one huge marathon of movie-watching. It's something I've never done before, and I seriously doubt I'll have the stamina to do it. But even if I watch 10 films throughout that day, it'll be something. I hope I can crack 50 movies for the month, at least.

As for the sci-fi (and other genres) challenge, I don't know. I'm still trying to put into effect a "theme week" schedule for myself where I watch movies at least from Monday through Thursday nights which have a common thread (same director, actor, sequels in a series, etc...). Yes, I am a huge horror movie fan, but I am also toying with the idea of saving horror viewings for the weekends, to sort of recapture my youth when Friday or Saturday nights meant it was time for CHILLER THEATER, CREATURE FEATURES, or FRIGHT NIGHT.
post #503 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

UPDATE:


SCARY MOVIE CHALLENGE 2007
01) The Phantom of the Opera (1925) ***
02) The Black Cat (1941) **1/2
03) Horror Island (1941) *1/2
04) Man Made Monster (1941) ***
05) Dracula (1931) ***
06) The Monster and the Girl (1941) *
07) The Lodger (1944) ***1/2
08) Hangover Square (1945) ***
09) The Undying Monster (1942) **1/2
10) Cat People (1942) ***
11) Cry of the Werewolf (1944) **
12) Night Monster (1942) **1/2
13) Captive Wild Woman (1943) **1/2
14) The Invisible Man Returns (1940) ***
15) The Invisible Man's Revenge (1944) **1/2
16) The Return of the Vampire (1943) ***
17) The Werewolf (1956) **1/2
18) Creature with the Atom Brain (1955) **1/2
19) The Giant Claw (1957) **
20) The Mummy (1932) **1/2
21) The Mummy's Hand (1940) ***
22) The Mummy's Tomb (1942) **1/2
23) The Mummy's Ghost (1944) ***
24) The Mummy's Curse (1944) **
25) Count Dracula (BBC 1977) ***
26) Frankenstein (1931) ****
27) The Old Dark House (1932) ***1/2
28) Bride of Frankenstein (1935) ****
29) 28 Weeks Later (2007) ***1/2
30) Corridors of Blood (1958) ***
post #504 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

Meatball Machine (2005)

Viewed 10/27/2007 (first viewing)

Boy meets girl. Girl gets infected with an alien that transforms her
body into a gooey cybernetic weapon. Girl/alien then does gory battle
with other alien-infected humans. Boy tries to save girl by letting
himself get infected. Another human/machine bonding fetish film in
the vein of Tetsuo.

out of


Also revisited Universal's Frankenstein and Dracula, both of which rate *** out of ****

While both are a bit creaky around the edges, I played a little game and watched them from the perspective of a filmgoer of the period (someone unaccustomed to onscreen horror) and found them much more effective.

"Now I know what it feels like to BE God!!!"
post #505 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

Saw IV (2007) - BOMB

Okay, that's the end of the line for me with this series. I loved the first one and found it quite interesting and original (****) and I thought the second was 'good', and the third one kind of 'so-so'.... but the new chapter is an absolute mess. And I don't just mean in the sense that there's the usual blood, guts, and slime everywhere you look... I'm talking about it being incoherent and impossible to follow to the point of it hurting your head. There is no longer anything fresh here, it's now just completely repetitious and dull. It's okay in my book if a film is jumbled in the way it tries to tell its story, just as long as if you get lost, the movie is able to bring you back. No such luck here -- I didn't know who the characters were, who was doing what or why, and the camera never sat still for a second. Just a really frustrating experience, and I am personally content to let my personal SAW library end at the three DVDs currently sitting on my shelves.


SCARY MOVIE CHALLENGE 2007
01) The Phantom of the Opera (1925) ***
02) The Black Cat (1941) **1/2
03) Horror Island (1941) *1/2
04) Man Made Monster (1941) ***
05) Dracula (1931) ***
06) The Monster and the Girl (1941) *
07) The Lodger (1944) ***1/2
08) Hangover Square (1945) ***
09) The Undying Monster (1942) **1/2
10) Cat People (1942) ***
11) Cry of the Werewolf (1944) **
12) Night Monster (1942) **1/2
13) Captive Wild Woman (1943) **1/2
14) The Invisible Man Returns (1940) ***
15) The Invisible Man's Revenge (1944) **1/2
16) The Return of the Vampire (1943) ***
17) The Werewolf (1956) **1/2
18) Creature with the Atom Brain (1955) **1/2
19) The Giant Claw (1957) **
20) The Mummy (1932) **1/2
21) The Mummy's Hand (1940) ***
22) The Mummy's Tomb (1942) **1/2
23) The Mummy's Ghost (1944) ***
24) The Mummy's Curse (1944) **
25) Count Dracula (BBC 1977) ***
26) Frankenstein (1931) ****
27) The Old Dark House (1932) ***1/2
28) Bride of Frankenstein (1935) ****
29) 28 Weeks Later (2007) ***1/2
30) Corridors of Blood (1958) ***
31) Saw IV (2007) BOMB
post #506 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

Scale: 1=awful 2=bad 3=average 4=good 5=excellent. 1st viewings in red.

Hostel Part 2 (1996)Bunch of stuff.

the butcher's bill...
1. Monster Squad
2. Call of the Cthulhu
3. Mimic
4. The Omen
5. The Descent
6. Manos: The Hands Of Fate
7. Isolation
8. Insatiable
9. The Changeling
10. Perfect Creature
11. The Ninth Gate
12. The Nightmare Before Christmas
13. Nekromantik
14. Nekromantik 2
15. Bride Of The Monster
16. Saw 3
17. Plan 9 From Outer Space
18. Primeval
19. Slither
20. Bug
21. 28 Weeks Later
22. Fright Night
23. Feast
24. Dead Silence
25. C.H.U.D.
26. The Abandoned
27. Unrest
28. The Gravedancers
29. The Hamiltons
30. The Tripper
31. Penny Dreadful
32. The Fly
33. The Fly 2
34. Panic In Year Zero!
35. The Last Man On Earth
36. Poltergeist 2
37. Poltergeist 3
38. The Terminator
39. Hostel Part 2
40. The Craft
post #507 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

#26 Invisible Ray: Pretty silly premise and even sillier special effects keep this one from getting very interesting. Lugosi and Karloff are fine, but they don't have a great story to work with. 1.5/5

#27 Revenge of the Creature: Re-watching this was a bit of a chore. I used to think it was a pretty good sequel, but the "love story" takes up a big chunk of the movie and not a whole lot else happens. But the Creature is still cool as hell---and STILL doesn't get listed in the credits! 2/5
post #508 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

BLACK CHRISTMAS (2006)

I was never a slavish disciple to the original 1974 film, so when the remake was announced, I was pretty much "Meh..." while fans of the original shrieked bloody murder. But I still think I'd give the edge to the original film over the remake. The older film seemed to build up better atmosphere and scares, while the new film is mostly concerned with gore. I also didn't find Billy's backstory about his family and offspring all that compelling, preferring the original film where the killer's background and motives were more ambiguous. Call me obtuse, but I also didn't get the fixation with eyes? Eyes are gouged, eaten, mutilated, seen peeking through cracks, and used as decoration. I assume there's a reason for it. Also, why did...
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
adult Agnes seem like a transexual with a hormone problem when she seemed perfectly normal as a young girl? I realize the character was played by a male actor and they were probably trying to emphasize her in-bred origin. But if that's what they were going for, why wouldn't they make the younger version of Agnes look a little more odd?


THE CARNAGE SO FAR...
post #509 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

As always, I'm not a critic- I just know what I like but I'm not very good at articulating it.

10/28/07
101. Friday The 13th Part VI: Jason Lives
This a pretty decent F13 sequel. It's got a sense of humor but doesn't it go overboard with it either. Thom Matthews (of Return Of The Living Dead fame) makes for a good hero. Plus, Alice Cooper does most of the songs in the movie.

102. Friday The 13th Part VII: The New Blood
This is a pretty popular entry amongst F13 fans but I think it's lousy. Introducing a telekinetic girl who can battle Jason is a bit of a stretch. The characters are just stereotypes (there's nerd, ugly girl, stoner, black guy, black girl, bitch, yuppie, slut) and while I realize F13 isn't known for its characterization, it's much worse in this one than most others.

103. Friday The 13th Part VIII: Jason Takes Manhattan
There's about four and a half minutes of footage shot in New York and the rest is on soundstages and in the sleazier parts of Vancouver.

104. Jason Goes To Hell: The Final Friday (Unrated)
The opening with Jason getting blown apart by the FBI is kinda cool but then his spirit body jumps for the next 80 minutes. In other words, this movie needed alot more of Jason and less of Jason possessing people.

105. Jason X
The movie looks like a made for cable or a direct to video movie. There's some fun kills like the liquid nitrogen head smash. David Cronenberg plays a scientist at the beginning of the movie.

106. Freddy Vs. Jason
One of the better sequels from both the NOES and F13 series. Once the battle between Freddy and Jason happens, the movie pays off.

My full list is in post #389.
post #510 of 639

Re: ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***

I'd be up to a sci-fi month, I can save my Godzilla movies for it.

I DRINK YOUR BLOOD 2.5/5 : A group of satanic hippies terrorize a town, so a local kid spikes their meat pies with rabies to turn them into satanic hippies with rabies. Pretty good grindhouse flick, decent gore and a lot of fun.

BLOODSUCKING FREAKS 3/5 : This ones been discussed before. This is my first time seeing "The Directors Cut", and didn't notice any difference from the old version I saw ages ago on VHS. Such an oddball mix of gore and S&M, none of it with much of a point. Yet, you can't stop watching it.

DREAM CRUISE 2/5 : The J-Horror entry in season 2 Masters Of Horror. Bored me. Had all the clichés, ghost kids, blah blah. Not badly done just seen it all before.

THE NEW YORK RIPPER 2.5/5 : I was half way through this when I realized that I watched it last year. Says about all you need to know.

MANIAC 3.5/5 : Incredibly dark slasher, and calling it a slasher doesn't really do it justice. The "TAXI DRIVER" of slasher films probably best describes it, as it totally focuses on the killer. Savini was in top form with the effects to. This is the type of film people complain that the current horror films are, gruesome and disturbing.

THE DEVILS 3.5/5 : Not a true horror film in the traditional sense, but like "THE WICKER MAN", it's one that so draws you in that you can't help but get freaked out and spooked. Oliver Reed is fantastic as always, and after finally seeing it, it's worth the fuss that's been made over it. I have no idea how this got green lit, there's no way a film like it would get made today.

RAGDOLL 1/5 : A guy in a lame ass R&B band uses his grammy's hoodoo to make a ragdoll kill the gangsters who... don't worry about the plot, it was a piece of shit. Only distinguishable for having an all black cast, yet managing to not come of exploitational.

The tally that's close to the bitter end, only a few days to go folks
http://www.hometheaterforum.com/htf/...70&postcount=7
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movies (Theatrical)
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › ***Official 8th Annual HTF October Scary Movie Challenge***