Re: HTF Review: Death Proof - Extended and Unrated
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rich_d
John:
I think what I'm hearing is filmmaker's spin that you're repeating.
Did Tarantino release Death Proof anywhere at the same time of Grindhouse? Or did he just release Death Proof as an extended film when Grindhouse had a disappointing gate?
I was in France in July when Death Proof played in Paris. That's a long time from March.
Either way, the DVD is typical marketing response ... release as many versions as there are fools that will buy it. I don't blame anyone, that's just the way it is.
They could have:
A. Released one release with Grindhouse plus the two extended films.
B. Released two releases, both extended with Grindhouse on both.
C. Three releases. Two extended plus a separate Grindhouse release.
They chose 'C', 'If you build it, they will buy it' wins again.
|
Hi Rich, I know what you're saying, but in actuality this is "consumer nonsense", not "filmmaker spin".
Firstly, I actually have reasons to believe what I'm saying and have evidence to back it up. Your argument however (and everyone who is saying the same, it's not just you), relies solely on speculation and suspicion... and nothing else.
Secondly, I believe Tarantino because I heard him talk about it in the context of lots of other stuff. He was very honest and candid, and there was no reason to believe he was lying, at all. Having once been married to an actress (yes, a famous one), I can honestly tell you that the people you suspect of "spinning" are actually being, more often than not, completely honest. The same way you and I are.
Do you honestly believe that Tarantino just happened to make a film that was precisely 90 minutes long? Or do you think, possibly, after putting all this time and effort into shooting a script that was *easily* 30 thirty pages longer than necessary, he might maybe have planned to release a longer cut? His cut. The cut that he actually wrote?
Thirdly, do you recall the all consumer nonsense that surrounded the release of Kill Bill? Hmm. If memory serves we were all going to get six versions of Kill Bill in a year. Remember that? Still waiting...
Tarantino even talked about Kill Bill and how the reason we haven't seen the longer cut until now is simply because, after all was said and done, he prefers it in two films. As far as he's concerned, it worked brilliantly as two films and he's very happy with what was released.
If that's just "spin", why haven't we seen the longer cut sooner?
Considering he spent *years of his life* working on Death Proof and Kill Bill, why on earth would he lie? He's not a marketing department, he's an artist.
Fourthly, nowhere else in the world (outside of the UK and Australia, and possibly Japan) were ever going to get Grindhouse. What were they going to release there, can you tell me, if not the individual films?
Fifthy, your A, B and C options are, I'm sorry, ludicrous. A) would be too costly, who, but your die-hard Tarantino/Rodriguez fan would buy over six hours of their films in one go??
B) Doesn't make any sense either. You would be forced to pay extra for Grindhouse whether you liked it or not. Who's happy with that? Not only that, but you'd have to pay the extra cost twice if you wanted both films.
C) Is the only sensible option, and if you think about it, the one that was clearly planned from the start.
If these companies are all about ripping off consumers, and Tarantino and Rodriguez are just their dancing marketing monkeys, why did they release Grindhouse at all? Why not just split them up from
day one?
I'm sorry but I'll take my evidence, knowledge and experience over doubt, cynicism and suspicion. This isn't all directed at you Rich, sorry, but rather at the general moaning masses that seem to follow this film around wherever I look.