Re: A few words about...™ Top Gun -- in HD
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ed St. Clair
Yes...
butt should there be an expectation of ANY extras?
Or, new content from this new release?
|
In my DVD reviews (and the one HD DVD I've reviewed so far), I mention the extras that are included with the movie. It's disappointing to me when the disc doesn't contain the trailer, since nearly every movie made in the last, what, 50 years, has had at least one trailer produced for it. I like to watch the trailer because it gives me an idea of how the movie was marketed at the time.
But, as far as other extras go, no I don't expect to see lots of (or any) extras on a disc that is not labeled as a Special Edition, Collector's Edition, or some other marketing tag that sets an expectation of additional content in the movie, commentary, extras, etc. The Sony Superbit releases actually bragged about the fact that they didn't have any extras, so they could devote as much space as possible to the movie itself.
Do I like the extras? Definitely! While some are pretty bland and not worth the time, every once in a while I run across a movie that is enhanced by its extras. A recent example is Deliverance (
see my review). I thought that the little featurettes with the main actors looking back on the production of the movie was a great way to appreciate the movie more than could be had by watching the movie only.
I'm a little torn as to how I would like to see the studios release movies on HD.
Part of me wants them to concentrate on doing an excellent job on the picture and audio and release the movie without a lot of extra features, especially if it means that the sticker price will be lower and/or it means that they can release the title more quickly. They can be upfront about the fact that this is the initial release, and that there will be another release that will include more content. Think of the theatrical releases of the LOTR movies as an example of this done well on DVD.
The other part of me wants the extended super-duper limited collector's edition, with everything but the kitchen sink thrown on the disc. The problem with this is that it will take longer for the title to be produced, they will likely want to charge more money for it, and if it's a popular title, it's going to be replaced at some point with another limited collector's edition with the unrated extended director's cut and one additional documentary previously unseen.
If I had to pick between the two, I guess I'd pick the first one. That gives the first release a low sticker price, gets it out into the market so that we can enjoy the movie in its HD glory. Then, when the next version comes out, we get to benefit from the advances in encoding and the extra time they will have had to put together all those cool extras.
Some movies don't warrant a double-dip, and that second release may never happen. In those cases, I guess it's better for the studio to do as much as they can for the one release that movie will have. (Can you imagine something like Evan Almighty coming back for a second dip?)
Also, in many cases, the extras for home video are being produced at the same time the movie is being produced, so those extras are ready by the time the movie is ready for home video release. If the stuff is ready, and its presence doesn't compromise the picture quality and audio quality, bring it on!
But don't expect all those extra features to come out on HD DVD or Blu-ray at a $19.95 price point any time soon.
Give me the movie in the best picture quality possible and the best audio possible, throw in the trailer in HD 5.1, and I'm a happy camper. If the studio is planning a special edition down the road, they should own up to the fact and tell us straight out.
Make us feel good about owning both editions, like New Line did with the LOTR movies, and it's a win-win situation!