Re: *** Official HTF HD Formats Industry/Retailer/Studio Support Thread
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MarekM
even the most expensive HT item will DROP price over the YEAR ! one simple reason, NEW PRODUCTS.....
Marek |
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Originally Posted by MarekM
even the most expensive HT item will DROP price over the YEAR ! one simple reason, NEW PRODUCTS.....
Marek |
|
Originally Posted by Pete-D
Why do people then also assume that Blu-Ray only equals Sony?
Panasonic, Samsung are big boys too. Lets face it, this is a recipe for a format quagmire if there ever was one, I would say it's practically unavoidable at this point. |
| Capitalism for the win. The better format will out, not based on exclusives, but based on the market. I like that. |
| The hypocrisy is almost astounding, especially at tdb, where Bill has well and truly gone a bit crazy. Moneysoft??? Are we in 7th grade? |
|
Originally Posted by Pete-D
And they would all be making more money if they could all stop acting like 5-year-olds and compromised on one format.
|
| it is truly amazing. Before I criticized him for unfair and biased slanting- but these last two days of editorials come across a seriously unhinged. the tone honestly sounds like something a 14 year old gamer would write. |
|
Originally Posted by Michael Boyd
And Spielberg is behind the restoration! No HD DVD for us!
|
|
Originally Posted by Chuck Mayer
I guess my post got eaten this morning. No biggie.
Several points (already made dozens of times, I am certain): 1) I have both players. I find a very interesting perspective from folks without a horse in the race. A more...reasonable...one, if I may 2) So Uni should go dual format and cede the "war" to Sony, but HD makes a power play and are lambasted for it? The hypocrisy is almost astounding, especially at tdb, where Bill has well and truly gone a bit crazy. Moneysoft??? Are we in 7th grade? 3) The first exclusive I remember being bought and paid for to win a format war. It'll sound small, but the point is germane. Sony PAID Midway to only allow Mortal Kombat III (a AAA title at the time) on the new Playstation. They did it to gain a leg up on the Sega Saturn. So spare me the moral high ground in this debate. Both sides want to win to make MONEY, like WB has on the DVD format. This war exists primarily due to greed from both parties early on. 4) The longer it goes, the cheaper the hardware will be when it's over. Maybe it'll drive down HDTV prices as well, since that is a bigger obstacle to high def home video than this format war. Capitalism for the win. The better format will out, not based on exclusives, but based on the market. I like that. As someone who owns both players, I find that concept awesome, in fact. Each format has two exclusive studios, so it's "fair". As for Bay not directing TF2 (which he already rescinded), who gives a shit I love this quote, and use it often: It's not show friends, it's show BUSINESS. |
|
Originally Posted by Cees Alons
It's very strange indeed.
At the same time, Ronald Epstein's new editorial, on the forums page, is balanced, calm and fair. Cees |
|
Originally Posted by Cees Alons
At the same time, Ronald Epstein's new editorial, on the forums page, is balanced, calm and fair.
Cees |
| dual-format sucks and the only reason it's here is because of corporate politics. |
|
Originally Posted by RobertR
I don't have a problem with the format war ending. What I DO have a problem with is trying to end it using the very corporate politics you decry, instead of allowing the best format to win via competition.
|
|
Originally Posted by Pete-D
Who here honestly believes that we would've been better off with two competing DVD formats instead of having one unified format? I'm sorry I just don't buy into this, dual-format sucks and the only reason it's here is because of corporate politics.
Initially even before DiVX there were two competing DVD specs one from Sony/Philips, the other from a group of Toshiba/Matsushita, etc. Eventually they were pursuaded to accept a single unified platform, which became the DVD spec. This is not show business. This is taking a product and alienating/confusing the mass market, probably now to the point where they're indifferent. Again I ask when has the mass market *ever* voted to support two competing formats released at the same time at once? |
|
Originally Posted by Douglas Monce
I think that so far the format war has been VERY good for consumers. I see no reason to think that it won't continue to be.
Doug |
| It's acceptable to me because my first two dvd players cost me over $1000 each and the first one wasn't even a progressive player. |
|
Originally Posted by Pete-D
Who here honestly believes that we would've been better off with two competing DVD formats instead of having one unified format? I'm sorry I just don't buy into this, dual-format sucks and the only reason it's here is because of corporate politics.
Initially even before DiVX there were two competing DVD specs one from Sony/Philips, the other from a group of Toshiba/Matsushita, etc. Eventually they were pursuaded to accept a single unified platform, which became the DVD spec. This is not show business. This is taking a product and alienating/confusing the mass market, probably now to the point where they're indifferent. Again I ask when has the mass market *ever* voted to support two competing formats released at the same time at once? |
|
Originally Posted by Paul Arnette
I put "acceptable" in quotes for a reason. The reason being it is entirely subjective.
However, a lot of people seem to view dual format players as some sort of "instant solution" to this format war. It won't be, in my opinion, until dual format players achieve the same mass-market pricing HD DVD players are aiming for. That being said, I'm not so sure spending a $1K on a dual format player that isn't, to my knowledge, even BD Profile 1.1 compliant is a good use of money, but to each his own. |
|
Originally Posted by justinslot
Forgive my newbieness--where is this exactly? If it's right on the front page I keep missing it.
|
|
Originally Posted by Pete-D
Coming from a guy who spent $400 on two players of lower quality when he could have spent that on one player that was higher quality ... again sorry, I think you got shafted.
If there was one format that was going to be the clear winner, you could have spent your money on that side, or at least spent the same amount on the player and had $200 extra left over to buy movies with. You should not have to compromise your spending dollars on two seperate players just to be able to play the movies you want. You didn't have to with DVD, and all these studios/electronic companies made a fortune off those, so it's not like that's an economic model that isn't highly lucrative. |
|
Originally Posted by Douglas Monce
Who says they were of lower quality? They were the players that were available at the time. There is absolutely nothing wrong with my Toshiba. It is one best upconverting DVD players out there and I have never had a problem with it. My Samsung has a problem because it was not designed with BDJ in mind, mainly because the Blu-ray specs weren't complete when the player was released. Other than that there is nothing at all wrong with it and it is a high quality piece of equipment.
Doug |
|
Originally Posted by Virgoan
Am I correct in reading many of the comments to this thread to mean "I" when someone refers to "we" and "they" in terms of "consumers"?
Or is there a poll somwhere that one can draw conclusions from about the consensus of U.S. opinion on the subject at hand? The key to everything, IMO, is for the U.S. to convert to uniform HDTV broadcasting. Once folks are forced to buy the HDTVs...and I'm talking in the range of 50-million to 100-million sets...maybe the issue of what format survives will ultimately be determined. And I'm guessing/betting a lot of it will be based on the biggest bang for the least amount of money. |