post #3721 of 3878
3/10/08 at 2:56pm
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Originally Posted by Nick Graham
You were making your points well (though I'm not in agreement with them) until that line, which falls in with all the Microsoft and Toshiba "evil corporation" hate from the Blu-only folks. Kinda showed your cards there, IMHO.
|
| If you have placed yourself on a would-be boycott of HDM, why are you participating in a discussion forum focused on just that? |
| This thread has kinda outlived its usefulness now that the focus is debating a war that has come and gone. |
|
Originally Posted by David Wilkins
I probably shouldn't have responded to this issue anyway. How will it ever die, if gimps like me keep getting suckered in?
It's OVER. It's not worth grousing about. Nobody's life is on the line here... |
|
Originally Posted by Mark Talmadge
Even the Standard Definition format isn't totally compatible with Blu Ray technology. Sony has even admitted to the fact that a majority of 'standard DVD's are compatible for Blu Ray.' This couldn't be further from the truth since only about 80% of DVD's produced now or previously are compatible with Blu Ray players.
|
|
Originally Posted by bigluigi
Sometimes I get the impression that you staunch Blu-ray supporters feel that Blu-ray is the "be all...and end all" of the human entertainment experience and it just isn't.
|
|
Originally Posted by bigluigi
I miss it!!! I miss the price cuts. I miss the BOGO sales. I miss the competitive dynamic spirit when two huge CE manufacturers were out doing themselves competing for our dollar. I miss the title announcements, even from Fox. I just miss it.
|
| It's not resentment that I have over the High Def format it's resentment over Sony for not giving the SD format time to adjust to the market. |
| Even the Standard Definition format isn't totally compatible with Blu Ray technology. Sony has even admitted to the fact that a majority of 'standard DVD's are compatible for Blu Ray.' This couldn't be further from the truth since only about 80% of DVD's produced now or previously are compatible with Blu Ray players. |
| And there weren't a ton of fingers in the DVD pie? Francis, you're accusing Sony and the BDA of taking the very same approach as was taken with DVD. Shouldn't that model by an omen of good things? After all, DVD was a hit the last time I checked... |
| Similarly, I don't think seeing a movie like War of the Worlds in HD is going to make it "worse". I just saw that on film a month ago, and it still holds up pretty well - and if it looks good on film, it probably looks good in HD. In almost all cases, the benefits of getting as close to the original film presentation as possible greatly outweigh once again being exposed to the flaws that DVD's relatively low resolution had covered up. |
| So why in the world would any BD-hardware company want to "pick up where HD DVD left off" and continue to push a product that can't actually earn them any return? |
| In case you hadn't been following the trends, DVD sales have been dropping... and I'm sure DVD's feelings won't be hurt if Blu-ray comes in along side it to offer 1080p to videophiles and the growing population of consumers equipped with HDTVs. |
| There were 3 fees associated with dvd and they were much lower than bluray. Several small content owners have looked at bluray licensing fees and say it makes it almost impossible for small companies to release titles on bluray. Other formats have lower licensing fees. Hd-Vmd cost less than a dollar more than sd and ch-dvd has 1 mandatory licensing fee. Smaller companies have titles that I would like to see on hd. |
| Maybe you need to take a look at the cleaned up version that Paramount released on dvd. In the scene where the Martian warships first appear, the wires are so evident that the scene is laughable. It's obvious they changed something. I am sure that if the wires had shown up in theaters, the movie would have been laughed out of the theatres. I don't trust Paramount to fix it and if they use the same transfer for hd, it'll be an even bigger fiasco. |
| I'm sure blu-ray's feelings won't be hurt if another hd format comes in along side to to offer 1080p and competition to videophiles and the growing population of consumers equipped with HDTVs. |
|
Originally Posted by FrancisP
There were 3 fees associated with dvd and they were much lower than bluray. Several small content owners have looked at bluray licensing fees and say it makes it almost impossible for small companies to release titles on bluray. Other formats have lower licensing fees. Hd-Vmd cost less than a dollar more than sd and ch-dvd has 1 mandatory licensing fee. Smaller companies have titles that I would like to see on hd.
|
|
Originally Posted by Brandon Conway
And yet the small companies are starting to move to Blu-ray. Blue Underground, Starz, Image, Tartan, etc.
|
|
Originally Posted by Alfonso_M
Really , thanks for those pearls of wisdom.
|
|
Originally Posted by Mark Talmadge
Since the I.E., "Format War" is over there remains one problem.
|
|
Originally Posted by Mark Talmadge
It's not resentment that I have over the High Def format it's resentment over Sony for not giving the SD format time to adjust to the market. Even the Standard Definition format isn't totally compatible with Blu Ray technology. Sony has even admitted to the fact that a majority of 'standard DVD's are compatible for Blu Ray.' This couldn't be further from the truth since only about 80% of DVD's produced now or previously are compatible with Blu Ray players.
|
|
Originally Posted by Robert Crawford
What in the world are you talking about????????????
|
|
Originally Posted by FrancisP
Actually the hd-dvd/bluray battle will be fought in China except ch-dvd, a cousin of hd-dvd, will be filling in for hd-dvd.
|
|
Originally Posted by Dave H
In some cases, up to 55% off.....which is equivalent to a BOGO in many cases..
|
|
Originally Posted by Nick Graham
In all seriousness, I actually just ordered one final HD DVD, the German T2 Ultimate Edition.
|
|
Originally Posted by Jari K
I actually ordered that also. I´m not really sure why (since it still cost me around 45$ or something!), I guess it was just one of those "heat of the moment"-things. I probably thought that it´s one release I want to own for the extras etc, even if some super-SE will be released on Blu-ray later on..
Then again, perhaps it´s just some PR-hype and I won´t ever bother to watch those extras.. But yes, last HD DVD for me too. I even skip the sales from now on.. |
|
Originally Posted by Mark Talmadge
If I can remember where I read those articles from I'll be glad to post them but as I stated before, Blu Ray Players don't play all SD DVD's and Blu Ray isn't the successor to the DVD format, it's just a high definition media format.
|
|
Originally Posted by Mark Talmadge
If I can remember where I read those articles from I'll be glad to post them but as I stated before, Blu Ray Players don't play all SD DVD's.
|
|
Originally Posted by Mark Talmadge
..and Blu Ray isn't the successor to the DVD format, it's just a high definition media format..
|
| 1. The prices for Blu Ray hardware have consistantly gone up since HD-DVD bowed out of the race even when Sony stated that prices on Blu Ray would be more affordable if there were only one competing format. Sony has managed to snag a monopoly on the High Def market. |
| 2. Later this year, when the new BD Profiles come out, those new players will render current models obsolete, making certain features installed on new BD Disks unable to be used on previous models. |
| Until Sony wises up, |
|
Originally Posted by DaViD Boulet
Blu-ray is not Sony.
|