Re: *** Official HTF HD Formats Industry/Retailer/Studio Support Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertR
That clearly implies that the same result could be achieved by tweaking the CD (or the movie soundtrack), making 24 bits unnecessary.
You are kidding, right? My statement rests on a very big 'if' and there is certainly no proof of the same and I was certainly not implying what you have comprehended from my statement.
|
Actually, it's not such a big "if". The remastering of CDs to make them sound better (sometimes it fails, and they end up sounding worse, but that's a different issue) is not all that uncommon. And there's no "if" at all about the fact that the number of bits is hardly the only way to improve sound.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertR
It's pretty simple, really. Just go back to the CD source material, tweak it, and voila: better sound.
If it were as simple as that, why didn't they simply tweak the CDs when they weare first released. |
You may as well ask why ANY product that's rereleased as "new and/or improved" wasn't done so in the first place. Again, it simply isn't uncommon for people to rethink what they did previously or second guess what someone else did previously, or, ahem, simply want to sell you the same product over again.
I would add to Cees' post that an argument can be made for 24 bits during the mixing stage so as to avoid truncation losses, but he's absolutely right about the fact that it's
pointless to try to deliver 24 bits of dynamic range in the home.