This is the most basic of Questions: Why Hi-Def, and why two competing formats?
This is the question my customers would ask me. How do I essentially explain that the "Tide Detergent" they have been usuing was great, but now with "New and Improved Tide", their old detergent is lacking? it took many of them many years to convert to DVD, and there are still VHS only customers.
Some would say that the age of the customer is an impedence to adoption of DVD, because they believe that DVD is too complicated. would you believe it if I told you that I still get a question about rewinding a DVD every so ofetn?
The adoption and expense of going Hi-Def DVD is coupled with the need to buy a new HDTV, and should that be 720 or 1080, because of the analog Broadcast sunset in February 2009.
All advancements in home video have come in twos:VHS and Beta, Laser and CED, DVD and Hi-def DVD. Everyone has had a winner and a loser. The only different one, is really the revolutionary one, DVD. DVD had two competing companies and technologies, the one backed by Sony and Columbia, and the one backed by Warner. Thankfully, only one got to the marketplace, thanks to Warren Lieberfarb.
Now we have two Hi-Def formats, which are evolutionary in nature, becuase they are advancements on existing formats, competing in the marketplace, and I still believe only on survives, but how much confusion for the average customer will be created as they try to choose?
Adrian
This is the question my customers would ask me. How do I essentially explain that the "Tide Detergent" they have been usuing was great, but now with "New and Improved Tide", their old detergent is lacking? it took many of them many years to convert to DVD, and there are still VHS only customers.
Some would say that the age of the customer is an impedence to adoption of DVD, because they believe that DVD is too complicated. would you believe it if I told you that I still get a question about rewinding a DVD every so ofetn?
The adoption and expense of going Hi-Def DVD is coupled with the need to buy a new HDTV, and should that be 720 or 1080, because of the analog Broadcast sunset in February 2009.
All advancements in home video have come in twos:VHS and Beta, Laser and CED, DVD and Hi-def DVD. Everyone has had a winner and a loser. The only different one, is really the revolutionary one, DVD. DVD had two competing companies and technologies, the one backed by Sony and Columbia, and the one backed by Warner. Thankfully, only one got to the marketplace, thanks to Warren Lieberfarb.
Now we have two Hi-Def formats, which are evolutionary in nature, becuase they are advancements on existing formats, competing in the marketplace, and I still believe only on survives, but how much confusion for the average customer will be created as they try to choose?
Adrian





