Re: Harry Potter & The Half-Blood Prince discussion...
My understanding is that in the movie threads, the books are considered spoiler material, so I am going to spoiler tag some things from the novel. I've always had a love for characters that weren't exactly all good or all evil, but that their actions were thought provoking. Magneto from X-Men, Al Swearingen from Deadwood, et al. Harry Potter has been nearly a 100% good guy in the movies. Maybe at most a little bit moody, whereas in the books, he can be a pretty big prick at times. On the flip side, Malfoy has always been annoying and a troublemaker, but never really evil. I guess this is ok for movies, especially the ones geared for kids where you have a defined hero and antagonist. In book 6:
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)Malfoy gets a lot of depth to his character. He is doing something truly evil in trying to work up the nerve and the ability to kill Dumbledore, but his motivation is to protect his family and serve his family's interests. Meanwhile, his mother is working so hard to save Draco from Voldemort. I really liked how JKR made Malfoy compelling there. On the flip side, Harry is working so hard to fight Voldemort and as usual ignoring Hermione's words of caution about being seduced by the HBP's potions and spells. When he uses the sectum sempra (sp?) curse on Malfoy, he's done something extremely destructive, based on his own ignorance, stupidity and bravado. What I'm wondering is how they'll treat it in the movie? Because they haven't really portrayed Harry's more annoying (and realistic) qualities, these scenes may seem to come out of left field. Or maybe they make Malfoy about to use avada kedavra in a sort of Greedo shot first revision. Come to think of it, I don't remember what Malfoy was about to do to Harry. Anyway, I'm hoping they give it the depth it deserves.