Re: Harry Potter & The Half-Blood Prince discussion...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Yee-Ming
In retrospect now, the call for McKellen as Dumbledore (after Harris passed away) was even more appropriate.
|
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Originally Posted by Yee-Ming
In retrospect now, the call for McKellen as Dumbledore (after Harris passed away) was even more appropriate.
|
|
Originally Posted by Yee-Ming
In retrospect now, the call for McKellen as Dumbledore (after Harris passed away) was even more appropriate.
|
|
Originally Posted by Adam_S
Just seems like more of the same from this director, sacrificing character building sequences to horn in more inane action, I wish Mike Newell were handling this film.
|
|
Originally Posted by Cory S.
Based on that list I provided, it seems that three Pensieve scenes are cut from the film...which, if you think about it, the information within those three scenes can be achieved another way...especially towards the end of the story when Dumbledore really explains to Harry why they took the journery they've taken.
|
|
Originally Posted by Chuck Mayer
It's not like it's a long segment...maybe 5-10 minutes total for the entire Gaunt story.
|

|
Originally Posted by Sam Davatchi
Well this is a still picture, not from the actual movie. They can make the movie all blue later in post. So don't get excited!
|
|
Originally Posted by JonZ
"First official still released by Warner Bros."
I still liked and miss the longer, messier hair from GOF. |
| The same director/editing team are going to be at the editing bay, though, and one of the worst offenses of OOTP is that it had no flow. I don't really see any reason that will change for this one. |
|
Originally Posted by Kevin Grey
I think the Pensieve sequences should help give the film a bit more structure that will help with pacing just like the Tasks did for Goblet.
|
|
Originally Posted by Claire Panke
Hmmm...well...I'm a book fan...and I liked OOTP much more than I thought I would. I think the book was unwieldy as all get out and Yates did a fine job with it considering the problems with structure and length. He's very good with the actors too. Given the contraints of the avaerage modern attention span, I thought OOP was very good, second only to PoA, and the closing sequence in the MOM was wonderful.
|
| I didn't like GoF particularly - despite good individual moments, I didn't care for the way Newell shaped the film as a whole and I thought many of the performances were pitched way too high (Gambon's in particualr). |
| I have to confess that I did miss John Williams - something I'd never thought I'd say. I thought the score to PoA was brilliant. |
| And I do wish Harry's hair was a bit messier, although I didn't think the long length in GoF was flattering to him at all. |
|
Originally Posted by Claire Panke
Hmmm...well...I'm a book fan...and I liked OOTP much more than I thought I would. I think the book was unwieldy as all get out and Yates did a fine job with it considering the problems with structure and length. He's very good with the actors too. Given the contraints of the avaerage modern attention span, I thought OOP was very good, second only to PoA, and the closing sequence in the MOM was wonderful.
I didn't like GoF particularly - despite good individual moments, I didn't care for the way Newell shaped the film as a whole and I thought many of the performances were pitched way too high (Gambon's in particualr). If I can't have Cuaron I'll take Yates any day. I have to confess that I did miss John Williams - something I'd never thought I'd say. I thought the score to PoA was brilliant. And I do wish Harry's hair was a bit messier, although I didn't think the long length in GoF was flattering to him at all. Small quibbles. I was a big fan of Yates work on the brilliant BBC series The Way We Live Now. I suspect, having survived OOTP, he will be even more confident with the more adaptable HBP. I'm looking foward to it. |