Re: "The Ropers" have disappeared from youtube
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by troy evans
You are not seriously comparing racism and persecution to copyright law are you? In any case, the two are not equal in comparision. I know you're just trying to make a point, but, don't let you're passion cloud your judgement.  Take it easy.
|
No. I am illustrating the fact that men often enact faulty and ridiculous laws, which are often contradictory to morality and logic- and which a moral person has an obligation to oppose rather than to uphold.
And while the copyright holder indeed chooses who may use their product- it has become the government who has authored what constitutes copyright infringement- and that definition has changed (I believe it was in the 90's that the rules were rewritten).
It used to be that a record company would distribute their records to radio stations, just hoping that they would get played. Now, a radio station must pay royalties for every song it dares to play. Some copyright holders may not even be in favor of the new rules- so those rules get selectively enforced in an uneven way- and often a person walks a fine line between compliance and transgression....but since no one wants to incurr liability, most people will err on the side of caution- and therefore the full thrust of the law is applied to all situations. (i.e. Joe Blow posts a vid on Youtube with an identifiable song as background music. Someone reports it for copyright infringement because of the song, and Youtube removes it to avoid liability, even though the copyright holder has not complained).
I am a staunch advocate of property rights- but it is because I am, that I can see that the legislators have erred in this matter, largely due to the influence of special-interest lobbying.
Again, where do you draw the line? If I read quotes to you from a book, or read that book to an audience, am I infringing on the author's copyright? Now if I zeroxed that book and offered it for sale, that'd be a different story.
I mean..what's it going to come to? Before long, we'll need a license to own a TV, like in the UK!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Robert13
Personally, I hate watching stuff on youtube. Not the same effect as watching it on your own tv.
|
Me too! It's a nice way to get the gist of something that you're not familiar with (I often use it to preview shows that I haven't seen in ages, or which I am not too familiar with, to help me decide if I want to purchse those shows on DVD...).
I have some Seinfeld eps on CD-ROM in MPEG format that I can watch on my omputer (someone made them for me years ago, because I like Seinfeld, but I do not have my TV hooked up to the outside world), and I really can't even enjoy watching those! (I'll be buying the Seinfeld complete series soon...).