New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Hostel 2

post #1 of 6
Thread Starter 
**SPOILERS**
The horror genre continues to be hijacked by the torture/snuff aficionados who seem to mistake art with "reality." More than once I’ve heard movies like Saw, Hostel, and Henry defended by fans saying, "these films have real people as monsters, and that’s more scary than -," and then go on to name Freddy or Dracula etc. The plot identical to the first film with the genders switched and a less interesting supporting cast (one of the first's few virtues.) So while watching Hostel 2 we are only left to ponder how each victim will die and just how far director Eli Roth will go in portraying their deaths. Pretty far if one were to go by the first death (not counting the opening Friday the 13th riff,) where Roth has poor Heather Mattarazzo hung upside down completely naked while being slowly sliced to death by an array of scythes! Watching it I was reminded of Roger Ebert's criticism of Lynch's Blue Velvet, wherein Ebert wished Isabella Rossellini was given a movie to fit the power of her performance. We then get filmed castrations, child murder, and complete moral ineptitude, is this the new summer movie? While I might prefer the monsters in Candyman or a Val Lewton film, in this instance I have to admit that the monsters in Hostel 2 are scarier than those more traditional baddies...its just that since they seem to be behind the camera one shouldn’t count them as film monsters.
post #2 of 6

Re: Hostel 2

Warning: This Review contains some spoilers. I will try and keep them to a minimum, but the majority of the spoilers are at the beginning of the film.

Hostel Part II takes place only moments after the first film - a survivor's life is still at stake even outside of the dilaptated building that was to be his final place of life, and outside of the city of Slovakia, where apparently anything goes.

The feeling that I got from Hostel Part II is that it's not a location in a building that is the bad place; it's the center of a human or several humans, corrupted by money who find people who have a lot of money who are corrupted by hate. This film focus more so on the would-be killers themselves, on their lives, their families, and their golf-swing. They are not all bottom-feeders without passion and a place in society, but upper crest, high-powered lawyers and top positioned businessmen with top-tear roles in society and the top of the line PDAs to boot.

While in the first film we are left to wonder who these people are. Who would do such a thing? Why are they doing it and who organized it?, etc. We are shown almost everything there is to know about the goings-on in this underground business deal. That’s precisely what it is – a business deal, done in auction form. It’s eerily creepy to think it would be so easy to do, as shown in a hilarious montage with the would-be buyers happily and then aggressively plucking away at the keys on their computers, PDAs, cellular phones and laptops, to enter into the bidding war for a human life. The two main successful buyers are Todd played by Richard Burgi, an in-shape, take life by the horns successful business man who treats himself and his shy and passive best friend Stuart, Roger Bart, to the most shocking of a “guys night out.” It’s implied as if these friends have roved the world in search of the next big thrill and have spoken of each other’s desire to kill. It just so happens that one finally took the initiative and did it. While my short description of these two fine young gentlemen may not be all that flattering, I can assure you that they are made likeable. Well, as likeable as possible.

There are also the would-be victims. Similar to the backpackers we grew to love in the first installment of Hostel, three college age fresh faced Americans are visiting European countries but for a more admirable reason this time, for art! That's about where the complexity and character back-story ends but its okay. We want to get attached to the characters, but not all the much, right? I mean, they are inevitably going to die or at least be mangled. We want to feel compassion for the characters - at first but be able to move on the next scene as well. The three women are all studying abroad for art, Lauren German plays Beth, the starlet of the film – she comes from a rich line but does not throw that in anyone’s face. There’s also the atypical sexified Girls-Gone-Wild based Whitney, played by Bijou Philips and the shy and sweet Lorna – a girl who just wants to be loved, played by Heather Matarazzo.

With the persuasion of an art-model in Axelle, Vera Jordnova, who may have a thing for Beth, the girls take a detour from their original trip to you guessed it – Slovakia. And then the fun begins.

Is this film a sequel? I’d say no, it’s more of further installment in a potentially never-ending series. I enjoyed the film’s slick style in its no holds barred violence against anyone, at any age. It’s inventive carnage, shown in various previously unimaginable ways. It is literally shocking the ways some of these people are tortured. There are some ways I was just perplexed by. This may sound weird, but there is a sort of art to how Eli Roth stages the grisly deaths in these films, most notably the one in which, over a bathtub, blood is seen dripping and sloshing down onto an eager women’s body. It’s disturbing and hard to try and get into the person’s mindset. While not followed by an immediate death scene, the hot springs scene looks great – the smokey water showing the never-ending water. It’s really breathtaking.

I enjoyed the film from start to finish. For a horror film, the acting was actually pretty good, the film was shot well, and the scenes were staged as good as you could hope for. If you liked the first movie, I think you would like this one even more, if you couldn’t stand the first’s gore amount, than this may not be the movie for you.

Bring the kids! “Bubble gum!”

3/4 – B

I hope you enjoyed my review - I'm open to critism and love!

Ryan Anderson
post #3 of 6

Re: Hostel 2

I didn't like Hostel very much but I loved Cabin Fever and the Thanksgiving trailer so I wanted to see what Eli Roth would do with Hostel Part II and I liked it. In the original, the characters were (deliberately) ugly American frat boy assholes or whiners that you wanted to see die but this one replaces them with reasonably likable characters and it made all the difference in the world for me. I thought this one wallowed less in gore and nudity than the original. The movie is defintiely graphic but it comes when it's appropriate. Whereas in the original, I felt like they relied on the violence to 'shock' the audience. Like Ryan said, you get to meet the bad guys in this one and that helps the movie too.

They seemed to want the humor to be more overt in this one. The bit inspired by Desperate Living where the Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
dog eats the guy's weiner after it's cut off
was a hysterical and disgusting highlight.

While I enjoyed it, I can completely understand how some people will not like it at all.
post #4 of 6

Re: Hostel 2

I was underwhelmed by this followup of the Hostel "franchise", mainly because it was pretty boring and predictable. It felt like a lazy cash-grab after the first Hostel film, and had me laughing at the film, not with it.

I give it 2 stars, or a grade of C.
post #5 of 6

Re: Hostel 2

Checking this out this week, don't want to read any spoilers, but I saw a commercial today that said the movie had the most shocking ending of any horror movie ever where they showed some kind of sheet being taken off of someone's head but cut away before they showed who was under it. Don't need to know what the scene is about, but does it live up to the claim? how shocking was it?

thanks
post #6 of 6

Re: Hostel 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Milillo
Don't need to know what the scene is about, but does it live up to the claim? how shocking was it?
It's hard to describe without ruining it for you but the short answer is no.

I won't talk about specifics but I may go into more detail than you want to know so I'll spoilerize it. Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
The stuff you saw in the commercial isn't the surprise. It builds up to an ending that isn't really what I expected but it's not really designed as a Sixth Sense-style shock either. It's only marketed that way.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movies (Theatrical)