post #451 of 643
12/11/08 at 6:58am
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Originally Posted by jdee28
I wouldn't be suprised if after they released Season 3 as two separate volumes, that they'd offer it up as a single release in the future.
|
|
Originally Posted by michael_ks
If the replacement of Maharis by Corbett is a concern I would sooner think that S4 might be split. In S3, Corbett doesn't appear until episode 23 of 31.
|
|
Originally Posted by Stephen Bowie
I'm ambivalent about Infinity's handling of Route 66 at this point -- they haven't corrected all their mistakes or taken very good care of their earliest-adopter customers, but they've been responsive to complaints and that's more than any of the studios can say at this point. In any case I strongly encourage everyone to stick with the show as long as Infinity continues to deliver acceptable video transfers. Even if you're among the majority that strongly feels the absence of Maharis (I always stick up for Corbett as being brooding rather than wooden), the writing in the final two seasons remains very strong. The episodes that deal with Linc's stint in Vietnam are especially powerful.
|
| Whoever cast the women for this show had a remarkable eye for some seriously beautiful and often more exotic-looking women. Just in this first season we had the introduction of Joey Heatherton, as well as Ann Helm ("Sweet Thing"!), Joanne Moore ("Trinket"!), Inger Stevens, and the requisite appearance by Susan Oliver (what a showcase for acting they gave her with the story on burying her scandalous mother on "welcome to amity"). |
|
Originally Posted by michael_ks
Amen to that, Wayne. Beauty and talent both--such were the lovely small screen sirens of television's golden age. What amazes me still is how the more sensual these women appear as a result of Rodman's and Silliphant's penchant for subtlety and understatement.
|
|
Originally Posted by Hollywoodaholic
Okay, so I'm NOT seeing things. The Corvette in the 4th episode of the Second season ("birdcage on my foot" - where's Robert Duval's Emmy?) is NOT the same car as in the episodes before or immediately after ("first class mouliak" - Robert Redford, NO Emmy for you!).
I'm sure there's an explanation (they couldn't get the car to Boston in time; the episodes aired in a different order than production), but I'd like to hear the real one if someone knows. Maybe Buz and Tod inherited enough cash to buy some new wheels after tracking down the blues band in Episode 3, "goodnight sweet blues," for Ethel Waters (Emmy!). |
|
Originally Posted by Jeff Willis
Bob, thanks for the post. I had just looked at that at TSoD a minute ago.
I guess this release is sort of a "best of" or a sampler of the show? Are you going to get this one in addition to the series-set releases? I got R66 S2 from Santa but haven't viewed any of it yet. |
|
Originally Posted by Hollywoodaholic
This episode was scripted by Will Lorin. No doubt McCarthy would have gone after him as a lefty pinko.
|
|
Originally Posted by Stephen Bowie
Not McCarthy specifically, but Lorin was blacklisted during the fifties, so good guess. Lorin also wrote "Goodnight, Sweet Blues," one of the great ROUTE 66 episodes.
|
|
Originally Posted by Bert Greene
I'm not quite as keen on "To Walk With the Serpent," though. Visually it's great, but I always found the script too hamfistedly messagey for my tastes. One of the reasons I always loved "Route 66" (along with "Naked City") was its emphasis on character studies and slice-of-life reality. That's the style of narratives I love, and one of the reasons I'm so fond of tv-drama of that era. I only balk when I get the sense that the characters are not full-blooded individuals, but basically just mouthpieces for an offscreen writer's message or agenda. Then, I immediately feel I'm being lectured to, and it ruins the viewing for me. Sometimes it's a fine line, and certain adept screenwriters are able to navigate it better than others, but once that barrier is broken, I get pretty rebellious and ornery to the whole enterprise. Anyway, I recall "Serpent" taking that avenue, and leaving me a bit miffed, which is not something that occured often with that series.
|
|
Originally Posted by Hollywoodaholic
I haven't seen these shows in 20 years, so I'm marveling at how well they hold up - primarily because they are about the human condition, and not about passing trends, technology or gimmicks.
|


