Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › Track the Films You Watch (2007)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Track the Films You Watch (2007) - Page 11

post #301 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

The Great Moment

To watch the trailer of this, you'd think you have another Preston Sturges comedy, but it's anything but. It's a biopic about one of the pioneer's of surgical anesthesia, though even in the film it's unclear who did what exactly. Not bad for what it is, but stick with what Sturges does best - comedy.

American Madness

Interesting early Capra film mostly due to the fact that it focuses almost entirely on two key aspects that would later show up in It's a Wonderful Life, though they play smaller roles in that film, which is much more fleshed out. Namely a run on a bank, and grateful customers coming to the rescue. Not a biography, but apparently largely based on the founder of Bank of America.

A Fish Called Wanda

A wonderful comedy classic rewatched with many a smile and laugh.
post #302 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

You were paying attention whenever William Demarest was onscreen right George? The Great Moment has a good deal of comedy. There's even a signature Preston Sturges Pratfall or two and Joel McCrea has a number of comic scenes.

Bob, Go, Go 2nd Time Virgin is not for the faint of heart. His Ecstacy of the Angels is a little more rewarding. Plays like a hyper J-Pop version of Godard's Le Petit Soldat

Yes, I enjoyed C.R.A.Z.Y. quite a bit. Killer soundtrack that I understand the director had to take a pay cut because the music rights took up so much of the budget.

As for the Paradise docs, the 1st leaves some important information out that keeps me from giving it a higher rating, while the 2nd doesn't have enough substance and gives too much screen time to allowing the father to play to the camera. I don't get a creepy vibe from them, perhaps because I grew up in a similar small town community where we went driving around on weekends looking for "Satanic Churches" for fun and I once sat in a church meeting where the chief of police came out and talked about the existence of satanic churches in the county. But the first is certainly moving and thought-provoking.

Bill, only 3-5 for Rules of the Game? and one of my favorite Westerns, The Big Country?

Looking forward to 13 Tzameti. Hope I get a chance to see the new Von Trier and Sokurov films.
post #303 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

You were paying attention whenever William Demarest was onscreen right George? The Great Moment has a good deal of comedy. There's even a signature Preston Sturges Pratfall or two and Joel McCrea has a number of comic scenes.
Nope, I dozed off every time Demarest was on screen. Of course I was paying attention. Have you seen the trailer? All of the supposedly funny scenes in the film are in the trailer, hence leading one to believe it's a comedy. But, in the context of the film, I didn't find any of those funny at all. It's a semi-decent dramatic biopic with admittedly a few attempts at humor, but there are more actual laughs in Cries & Whispers than in this film.
post #304 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
[re: Clerks 2] I personally thought this was one of the best film's of the year. Are you a fan of Smith's or do you dislike most of his films? It certainly wasn't as good as CHASING AMY but I doubt Smith ever tops that film. CLERKS 2 certainly went over the top in some of the humor but it also had a very big heart about people who are preceived as losers.

I guess I can answer this by simply pasting my review:

I hated the first movie, but for some reason I let the internet fanboys get my hopes up for this. What a fucking abomination of a movie. Brian O'Halloran is a horrible, HORRIBLE actor. And, big surprise, he's done almost nothing with his career except work with Kevin Smith. And all the other actors (with the exception of Rosario Dawson) in here are dreadful, too. Smith casting his own talentless, butt ugly wife as a supposedly desirable woman is a joke. If it was just bad acting, though, this movie might get a pass. But that's only the tip of the iceberg. The dialogue is obviously written to be natural and conversational, but sounds almost nothing like real human beings talking. There ARE a few funny bits, I'll give him that much. The porch monkey bit, the "pillowpants" bit, a couple of Randal's lines... okay, I laughed. But it was not worth sitting through the rest of the terrible dialogue just for a few chuckles. Most of the humor was retarded. Honestly, the best part is Jay's "Silence of the Lambs" routine, and you can get most of that from the trailer.

So what else? The plotting is entirely predictable. The hopeless Jesus freak virgin character was far too broad. The cheesy dance scene that's supposed to be tongue-in-cheek instead feels like a desperate plea for affection. My stomach clenched when I was subjected to one of the most awful movie clichés: the "fixin' it up" montage. As for the soundtrack, even though I like most of the songs, I didn't think they were very interesting choices. And last but not least, the movie's "lessons" are enlightening only to someone completely stunted in his emotional development. A truly painful experience. Rating: 2


Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
[re: Gojira]After hearing fans talk about how "serious" this film was, I watched it and found it just as stupid as any of the other's in the series. It was certainly better made than follow up films but it still looked silly to me. I can enjoy bad "B" movies and I enjoyed this one on that level but I have to agree with Roger Ebert's review about pretty much everything else.

I'm not a work of genius or anything. It's pretty ham-fisted. But the action is entertaining and the anti-war/anti-nuke message hits some very solemn notes. I also think the acting isn't bad at all for a monster movie (it's got Takashi Shimura!) and the effects hold up well, IMO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
[re: Children of Men]I'm almost tempted to go see this at the theater due to all the good reviews but I'm very cautious when it comes to great reviews and sci-fi. I see the thing is almost done at the box office so I'll probably end up waiting for DVD.

Here's my review of it:

The internet is going ga-ga for this movie, I think primarily because of its "gritty" feel and the fact that a lot of it plays out like a videogame. Whatever. What Cuaron does perfectly here is bring the dystopian near-future to life. You could probably study certain scenes for hours and continue to pick out revealing tidbits. This painstaking attention to detail is what elevated Azkaban over the other Harry Potter movies as well. There's also some elaborate camerawork, decent enough acting, and some genuine surprises.

Overall I liked it, but I wasn't all THAT impressed. The story was neither as moving nor thought-provoking as it could have been. Too much of it was action scenes and chase scenes. Also the whole "HOMELAND SECURITY" thing (among other not-so-subtle political messages) made me roll my eyes, and this is coming from a staunch Bush-hater. Rating: 8


Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
[re: Sweet Smell of Success]I've never understood why this film seems to get overlooked so much. I'm not sure if people would call this a noir or not but I thought Lancaster was perfect playing the villain and Curtis is Curtis as usual (but entertaining).

No, I wouldn't call it noir. I'm not sure why it hasn't been elevated to the status of, say, Casablanca or Double Indemnity. Maybe there's just only so much room at the top.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
[re: Night and the City]I saw the DeNiro remake when it was released in theaters but I've yet to catch up with the original even though I own the DVD. I've got so many unwatched noirs around here that I plan on just making a noir month and going through all of them.

I've been plowing through a lot of noir in the past few months, thanks mostly to the flood of DVD releases. I was really pleased to see Francis Sullivan in this one, I love him.
post #305 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

I just find it amazing that some people manage to watch 3, 4, 5 films a day. Even on weekends, I find it hard to fit in more than 3 max. Two in one evening during the work week is pretty rare, too.

Saw III

The third in the Saw franchise continues to find interesting "games" for Jigsaw to play, though this time the plot focuses on just four characters with some ancillary "fodder" after Saw II which had a huge cast. The counter guy at blockbuster said he couldn't make it all the way through Saw III. I think he's a wuss. The film's edited so fast that you seldom see much anyway. After the ending, I'm very interested where they're going to take this series with Saw IV.

Open Season

I think the Blockbuster guy nearly did a spit take when I walked up to the counter with the double feature of "Saw III" and "Open Season." Decent animated feature from Sony Animation that was in a similar vein as "Over the Hedge" but not quite as amusing or inventive as that film. Highlights were Billy Connolly as McSquizzy the squirrel and the running jokes with the rabbits.
post #306 of 2529
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

Quote:
I hated the first movie, but for some reason I let the internet fanboys get my hopes up for this. What a fucking abomination of a movie. Brian O'Halloran is a horrible, HORRIBLE actor. And, big surprise, he's done almost nothing with his career except work with Kevin Smith. And all the other actors (with the exception of Rosario Dawson) in here are dreadful, too. Smith casting his own talentless, butt ugly wife as a supposedly desirable woman is a joke. If it was just bad acting, though, this movie might get a pass. But that's only the tip of the iceberg. The dialogue is obviously written to be natural and conversational, but sounds almost nothing like real human beings talking. There ARE a few funny bits, I'll give him that much. The porch monkey bit, the "pillowpants" bit, a couple of Randal's lines... okay, I laughed. But it was not worth sitting through the rest of the terrible dialogue just for a few chuckles. Most of the humor was retarded. Honestly, the best part is Jay's "Silence of the Lambs" routine, and you can get most of that from the trailer.

The two parts of your review that I put in bold is probably why you didn't like the film. I don't think ANYONE except for the die-hard fanboys were asking for a sequel and it seems Smith was basically making of movie for them. I can't say I visit his message board but apparently the "jokes" in the movie have been jokes posted their for years. All of these jokes were new to me so I found myself laughing at them.

As for the bad acting, I wouldn't call it "good" acting but I think the actors fill their roles very well. In other words, I think the two films seems like a documentary look at the life of real people so I think that's why the performances work for me. God knows these guys couldn't play Hamlet but I think they fit into the roles in these two films.

Quote:
I just find it amazing that some people manage to watch 3, 4, 5 films a day. Even on weekends, I find it hard to fit in more than 3 max. Two in one evening during the work week is pretty rare, too.

Just do what I do and watch five films from the 1890s, which will only take up about 10-20 seconds.
post #307 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malcolm R
I just find it amazing that some people manage to watch 3, 4, 5 films a day. Even on weekends, I find it hard to fit in more than 3 max. Two in one evening during the work week is pretty rare, too.

Same here. I was home a lot in January with some time off, which is the only reason I was able to watch 30 for the whole month. Most work nights, forget it.
post #308 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

2/2: A View to a Kill (1985) out of

Sure, the plot is a ripoff of Goldfinger, but when a movie is this much fun, I really don't care. I think it is a fitting swan song for Moore as James Bond, and I enjoy it every time I see it.

Pros:

-Christopher Walken
-A main villain trio that is interesting to watch and has both a cunning plan and an air of menace
-John Barry's score, especially the action cues with the electric guitar interspersed with Bond's theme
-Patrick MacNee's performance as Tibbett
-Christopher Walken
-The stud farm sequence
-The mine sequence
-The battle on and over the Golden Gate Bridge
-Christopher Walken (When you're as good as he is, you get mentioned more)

Cons:

-Stacy Sutton's screaming
-California Girls
-Inept San Francisco law enforcement
-The Paris car chase
post #309 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

Desert Rats (1953)

Entertaining drama about a British captain played by Richard Burton put in charge of Aussie soldiers during WW2. James Mason was cast in the part of Rommel and even though he seems an unlikely choice he inhabits the role and manages the accent quite well. I always admired Richard Burton especially pre- Taylor and he does quite well in his part. I'm not really a big lover of war movies but this one I did like.
post #310 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tarkin The Ewok
Cons:

-Stacy Sutton's screaming
-California Girls
-Inept San Francisco law enforcement
-The Paris car chase

-A 58 year-old Roger Moore getting it on with possible man Grace Jones
post #311 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

Quote:
As for the Paradise docs, the 1st leaves some important information out that keeps me from giving it a higher rating

Such as?

I know that there were a few aspects of the police investigation that were not covered in the film (or perhaps never investigated, period!) that I would liked to have known (was Mark Byers's 'killfloor' ever searched for human blood, more info about the 'sudden death' of his wife, surely Byers had dental X-rays before having ALL of his teeth removed...were these looked at?)

Quote:
while the 2nd doesn't have enough substance and gives too much screen time to allowing the father to play to the camera.

All the better for him to incriminate himself.

Quote:
Bill, only 3-5 for Rules of the Game? and one of my favorite Westerns, The Big Country?

I don't find the lives of the bourgeoisie and idle rich to be all that compelling viewing material, I think that I saw one human being in the entire film, everyone else was a self-important prancing fool. The extended hunting sequence didn't help matters either. I found The Big Country to be a strictly standard Hollywood 'star' vehicle.

Quote:
Looking forward to 13 Tzameti. Hope I get a chance to see the new Von Trier and Sokurov films.

13 Tzameti has been in release in the US for a while, it just opened here and will be out on DVD in February. Try to know as little about the film as possible before watching it.
The Boss of It All is a hilarious, straight-up comedy and it opens in May.

Also opening in May is Sarah Polley's directorial debut, Away From Her (which I just saw tonight).
Much, much better than the sappy, disease-of-the-week Lifetime Network TV movie that I was expecting it to be.
Julie Christie remains luminous!

Martin, is there a link to that personal website of yours, or is it private?
post #312 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill McA
Martin, is there a link to that personal website of yours, or is it private?

I prefer to keep it private for now, but I'll think about it.
post #313 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tarkin The Ewok
2/2: A View to a Kill (1985) out of

I've recently watched this one again and enjoyed it more than I had previously.
post #314 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

Love Me Tender (1956)

Finally got around to seeing Elvis Presley's debut film in its entirety and in widescreen, and I think it's a good deal better than it's usually given credit for. Richard Egan plays Vance Reno, who is serving in the Civil War and returns home after the war ends to join his family and reunite with his lover (Debra Paget). But a tragedy ensues when it's learned that while he was away, his young brother Clint (Elvis) fell in love with and married his girl, after hearing that Vance had died. Also factoring into the trouble is that Vance has kept some Union cash which he never delivered to its destination when he found out the war had ended in the interim.

This turned out to be a good, solid story with fine performances, especially by Richard Egan. But again, Elvis is amazing as a completely first-time novice actor. He always wanted to be on the big screen from youth, after admiring James Dean, Marlon Brando and Tony Curtis. For a film fan who never had any professional acting training or experience, he's really quite good as Clint Reno. Though he didn't want to sing in this film, Presley was already a big recording star so of course there had to be songs in the movie. The title tune is a classic and it's very emotional within the context of the film. I also like the singalong ditty "We're Gonna Move", which is performed by Elvis on the front porch "1950s-style" with his family in 1865. Other songs include the unremarkable "Let Me" and "Poor Boy".
post #315 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

Groundhog Day

Annual viewing of this classic. First time introduction to Buddhist philosophy for my 6 year old son.

The World's Fastest Indian

Had a few moments, but mostly a by the book film in which he goes from one encounter to the next, and in the end, it's all predictable and unmemorable.
post #316 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

2/2: Moulin Rouge (2001) out of

This movie has zany comedy, a tragic love story, and big production numbers, and it combines the three into a beautiful, magical movie.
post #317 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

2/2- The Skeleton Key

For some reason it has taken me until now to view this film in a genre that I love. I was very pleasantly surprised at how well the story flowed, with some nice twists and turns. I am also officially infatuated with Kate Hudson. The perfect combination of cute and sexy imo.

Glad I finally gave this one a try, and it's already been added to my collection.

JC
post #318 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

Imaginary Heroes (2004)

Family members deal with the death of a favored son in their own way. I found myself nodding off a couple of times while watching this but nevertheless it's a great story. I felt for the younger son and the only member of the family that seemed to understand him was his mother. I didn't buy the resolution between the father and younger son towards the end but still a satisfying movie.
post #319 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

My recent 17-day trip to London could hardly fail to induce me to keep adding recklessly to my DVD collection and, in fact, I ended up purchasing some 28 discs! Anyway, I started watching them off now with, appropriately enough, some British films, namely:


02/01/07: IT ALWAYS RAINS ON SUNDAY (Robert Hamer, 1947)

Ealing Studios are chiefly remembered nowadays for their string of classic comedies made between 1946-55 but they also put out several notable pictures in other genres – including the justly celebrated horror portmanteau DEAD OF NIGHT (1945) – and this noir-ish melodrama is definitely one of their hidden gems. Although the plot per se is no great shakes – an escaped convict hides out in his by-now-married ex-flame’s household – the idea was still fresh at the time and the film’s marrying of the realistic and evocative recreation of daily life and surroundings (here being the seamier side of London’s East End) with the exciting chase thriller format was much admired in its day and, in hindsight, very influential.

The good cast is headed by the formidable Googie Withers as the embittered housewife whose life of drab domesticity comes crashing down around her with the sudden reappearance of her lover (John McCallum, and Withers’ own real-life husband-to-be) who demands food and shelter until he can skip the country; her much older, unassuming husband is played by frequent Norman Wisdom sidekick Edward Chapman and the pursuing police detective by the ubiquitous Jack Warner who cornered such roles in British films of the era, most notably in Basil Dearden’s THE BLUE LAMP (1950); Chapman’s three children are each having problems of their own and their frequent comings-and-goings in the house during this particular Sunday (the film is set all in one day) brings long-suppressed tensions to the fore.

Even without the eye-catching use of the medium of somebody like Carol Reed, the film is beautifully handled by the talented but ill-fated Robert Hamer – who, among other things, would later direct that which is undoubtedly Ealing’s most famous comedy, KIND HEARTS AND CORONETS (1949) – and the climactic sequence (expertly lit, as always, by Douglas Slocombe) in which all the various strands of plot and secondary characters are seamlessly woven together is simply exquisite.

Optimum Releasing also included a featurette with film historian George Perry – who, incidentally, introduced THE BIG SLEEP (1946) at the recent National Film Theatre screening in London I attended; unfortunately, I encountered some playback problems on my Pioneer DVD player even before the start of the main feature but the R2 disc played without a hitch on my cheap HB model.


02/02/07: THE MAGGIE (Alexander Mackendrick, 1954)

I’ve watched and enjoyed most of Ealing’s classic comedies several times over the years but, along with THE MAGNET (1950), the film under review was one which had eluded me thus far. The main reason for this, perhaps, is the fact that THE MAGGIE is hardly ever discussed when the studio’s golden age is mentioned which is even more remarkable when one realizes that the film was nominated for 3 major British Film Awards in its day; having now caught up with it, all I can say is that it has been unjustly neglected for far too long.

This amiably droll little film, full of the typically wry but gentle humor found in British comedies of its time, deals with a wealthy American businessman (an ideally-cast Paul Douglas) who is tricked by a group of old Scottish seamen (headed by a terrific Alex Mackenzie, whose first film this was, as the skipper) into chartering their ramshackle boat to carry a cargo of valuable furniture to his new summer residence in the British isles which he purchased as a surprise to his wife.

The trouble is that Douglas, forever expecting promptness and efficiency from his subordinates, is hardly equipped to cope with the devious plans of the wily Scots who treasure their own jolly company and a good stiff drink above everything else…as the various detours they take along the way – poaching, pub-hopping, a 100-year birthday party, visits to nearby cousins, etc. – prove only too well to the increasingly exasperated Yankee. The cast is rounded out by some old reliables like Geoffrey Keen and an unrecognizably young Andrew Keir and valuable contributions are also provided by Hubert Clegg (as Douglas’ befuddled secretary) and the child Tommy Kearins (as Mackenzie’s fiercely loyal cabin boy).

Ultimately, while perhaps not among Ealing’s or director Alexander Mackendrick’s very best, THE MAGGIE is certainly very enjoyable in itself and can now be seen as not only a worthy companion piece to Ealing’s WHISKY GALORE! (1949) – also directed by Mackendrick and dealing with the crafty Sots, not to mention my own personal favorite among the Ealing comedies – but also another of those fondly-remembered British comedies dealing with motor vehicles of some kind like Ealing’s own THE TITFIELD THUNDERBOLT (1953; trains) and GENEVIEVE (1953; motor cars).

Once more, Optimum Releasing included a short featurette with film historian George Perry and, unfortunately, as had been the case with IT ALWAYS RAINS ON SUNDAY (1947), I again encountered some playback problems during the course of the film on my Pioneer DVD player but, as usual, my cheap HB model came to the rescue.


02/02/07: SAW III (Darren Lynn Bousman, 2006)

The first film was compelling and highly original; the second was below par and forgettable; this third entry is among the most repulsive I’ve ever watched: its relentless gloating (in glorious close-up) on pain and flesh ripping is positively insulting; I’ve yet to catch up with several recent horror titles but there’s no clearer indication than this of how low the genre has sunk – it has literally gone down the drain! The plot itself is mildly intriguing and even features a nice final twist – but the film’s parade of gore, creative torture devices (God only knows where the moribund ‘avenger’ picks up the various parts, not to mention the energy to build them!) and self-pitying characters makes for unintentional hilarity all the way through!


02/02/07: THE THIRTEENTH GUEST (Albert Ray, 1932)

Routine but likeable ‘old dark house’ mystery thriller with numerous familiar but enjoyable trappings (a family reunion for the reading of a will is followed by multiple murders committed by a hooded figure). There’s also comic relief from an inept policeman, while romantic interest for potential heiress Ginger Rogers is provided by the dashing detective on the case (Lyle Talbot); an interesting plot point involves a girl who undergoes plastic surgery in an attempt to replace Rogers. Unsurprisingly, the Alpha print is extremely poor but I’m glad I had this opportunity to watch the film. Director Ray and Rogers later collaborated on the similar A SHRIEK IN THE NIGHT (1933), which I watched a couple of years back (thanks to Michael Elliott).


02/03/07: ON OUR MERRY WAY (King Vidor, Leslie Fenton and, uncredited, John Huston and George Stevens, 1948)

This odd, freewheeling, independently-made compendium film emerges as little more than a glorified home movie (despite the considerable talent involved) but is certainly watchable and entertaining in itself. The linking narrative revolves around married couple Burgess Meredith and Paulette Goddard (at the time hitched in real life): she’s an artist and he a lowly employee with a newspaper aspiring to be a journalist; while attempting to flee a creditor, he meets and interviews a number of people about the influence of children in their lives.

The three ‘stories’ are quite nice with all the various performers contributing generous and relaxed cameos: the first concerns down-and-out musicians Henry Fonda and James Stewart and their involvement in an instrumental contest taking place in a small town (they’re all too ready to appease the mayor who has promised them a lot of money if his son is allowed to win but, thanks to the intervention of trumpeter Harry James, a multi-talented girl emerges the clear winner and eventually becomes the owner of Fonda and Stewart’s band!); the second finds Dorothy Lamour parodying her former image of a sarong girl (she’s a bit player whose opportunity for stardom finally arises out of a disastrous stint in a vehicle for a spoilt child star); the last story, reminiscent of O. Henry’s “The Ransom Of Red Chief” (later filmed by Howard Hawks), involves ex-con magician Fred MacMurray and how he and his partner William Demarest stumble upon a boy in the woods and are continually outwitted by him (he’s actually fleeing from his eccentric banker uncle but MacMurray eventually discovers his true identity and, in the end, the boy and his elder sister join in on the magic act).
post #320 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

Legally Blonde (2001)

A ditsy blonde enters Harvard law school in persuit of an ex-boyfriend. This is the type of movie that I should despise but dispite myself, I've given this a mild passing grade due mostly to the engaging lead actress.

Superman Returns (2006)

A worthy entry into the superhero category. Not much to say about this one, but only that
I liked it alot.
post #321 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

Gentleman's Agreement (1947)

Elia Kazan's classic with Gregory Peck as a journalist who decides to assume the identify of a Jewish man to enhance his ability to write an article about anti-Semitism. Unfortunately, he learns more than he really wants to know about the issue when after only a few short weeks it has affected nearly every aspect of his life including his young son and his honeymoon plans. A very daring film for its time, or perhaps any time, as it casts a spotlight not just on those who actively practice discrimination and bigotry, but also upon those otherwise good people who tolerate it and passively allow it to continue.

Night After Night (1932)

George Raft as gangster Joe Anton, owner of a speakeasy with dreams of movin' on up to high society. He has even hired a tutor to give him lessons on improving his diction and topics of conversation. Includes the memorable debut of Mae West as Joe's wise-cracking ex-girlfriend, Maudie Triplett. A decent little film with good performances from everyone except Wynne Gibson who was hilariously OTT as Joe's soon-to-be-dumped current girlfriend, Iris. The film drags a bit until nearly half-way thru the picture when Mae West arrives, whereupon she injects huge amounts of humor and sass into the action and launches one of her many memorable lines:

Coatcheck Girl: Goodness, what beautiful diamonds!
Maudie (West): Goodness had nothing to do with it, my dear.
post #322 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

Coatcheck Girl: Goodness, what beautiful diamonds!
Maudie (West): Goodness had nothing to do with it, my dear.

I would say that qualifies as a classic line.





Crawdaddy
post #323 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

I'm pretty sure there were several other things that bothered me at the time about Paradise Lost, but the 2 that I remember clearly are:

A. We're told the boys had alibis. Were these alibis disproved or was there some specific reason the alibis were disregarded?

B. The lawyer tells the victim's families that they have pieces of fiber evidence linking the accused to the victims. This is the only time in either of the docs that this fiber evidence is mentioned. Seems pretty incredible that we never hear about the only bits of hard evidence that could link the defendants to the victims again.

As for P2, I saw the father grandstanding for the camera and milking up all the fame he was ever going to get in his sad life. Not incriminating himself. If the whole idea of the docs is these young men got a raw deal based on flimsy evidence, it seems rather hypocritical to turn around and shade the father as the likely murderer when the evidence linking him to the crime is even more circumstantial and featherweight.

What they really should be doing is blaming their lawyers. The defendant (ach, I'm terrible with names) should never have been put on the stand and allowed to talk about being a wiccan, etc. or face questions about Satanic materials etc. Blew the whole case right there. His 2nd legal team should have sought a new trial based on the previous lawyer's incompetence rather than on the flimsy argument that the HBO doc compromised the defense.
post #324 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

Detective Story

Average drama about a coldhearted, intolerant, conservative asshole of a cop, the type who believes that everyone accused of a crime is guilty until proven innocent, and that beating confessions out of people is not only acceptable, but desirable.
post #325 of 2529
Thread Starter 

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

Quote:
Average drama about a coldhearted, intolerant, conservative asshole of a cop, the type who believes that everyone accused of a crime is guilty until proven innocent, and that beating confessions out of people is not only acceptable, but desirable.

I guess if the cop had been a good guy and nicely asked rapists to confess then you would have enjoyed the film? I think this is the perfect example of what was being discussed in the S&S thread. It seems you don't enjoy films with any flawed human beings. I personally found the film great but to bash a film because of a cop with issues just strikes me as you not liking films with flawed characters.


02/01/07

Paris on Parade (1938)

MGM TravelTalk short showing the history of Paris. I guess these shorts proved entertaining back in the day for people who hadn't visited Paris but it's a little dull and rather pointless.

Goofy Movie No. 6, A (1934)

Pete Smith narrates this "comedy", which takes clips from various silent movies and adds Smith's jokes. Smith's voice is just too laid back to have much comic timing and even the jokes are pretty stupid.


Touring Northern England (1950)

Another TravelTalk short, this one (as you can see) discussing the history of Northern England. Again, I'm sure this served a purpose back in the day but it's quite boring.

Frankenstein 2000 (1991) BOMB

Joe D'Amato's last horror film is among the worst films I've seen from him. A woman is raped by two thugs but the police put the blame on her homeless friend. The friend is eventually murdered in jail but the woman, while in a coma, uses her brain power to bring him back to life so he can seek vengeance. This film runs 93-minutes but I could have sworn it went on for nearly four or five hours. Every second of the film is a complete bore with horrible performances, bad dialogue and incredibly bad special effects. For some reason the woman keeps seeing her son get his head chopped off, which leads to countless scenes of his incredibly fake looking head rolling on the ground. There are a few gory scenes but all of them are poorly done. Most Euro films like this are dubbed but this one here features the German actors doing their own English, which leads to a large amount of flubbed lines. Original title: Return From Death: Frankenstein 2000.

02/02/07

Gang War (1958)

A school teacher (Charles Bronson) witnesses a gang killing and turns the gangsters over to the police. In return, the gangsters kill the teacher's pregnant girlfriend, so he goes out for revenge. It was rather funny seeing this film because you can't help but think of Death Wish while watching it. Bronson is rather bland in the lead and the direction by Gene Fowler, Jr. doesn't add much to the mix. The ending really doesn't work and comes of a letdown as well.

Guilty Generation, The (1931)

Warner had The Public Enemy, Universal had Scarface and Columbia had this little gem from director Rowland V. Lee. A young couple (Robert Young & Constance Cummings) fall in love even though their fathers (Leo Carrillo & Boris Karloff) are rivals of opposite gangs. There's no doubt this lifts the story of Romeo and Juliet and while it starts off a bit shaky there's no denying the final twenty minutes are extremely good as the girl's father finally finds out who the boy's father is. Everyone gives a very good performance but Cummings is the real standout with her delightful charm. Karloff is also very good in his few moments at the start of the film. It's really great that TCM is showing all these rare Columbia films and I can't wait to see what else they have from this period.

Justine and the Whip (1975)

A real bastard of a movie with Jess Franco and Joe D'Amato sharing directing credit. In 1975 Franco started shooting a version of de Sade's Justine, which was to be a remake of his 1968 film. The production ran out of money with only a handful of scenes shot so the production company brought in D'Amato to edit together this footage with two other Franco films (Midnight Party and Shining Sex). The end result is a real mixed bag because it really doesn't work as a film but it does work as a "greatest hits" of various sex scenes with Lina Romay. Romay was certainly in her prime while these three films were shot so she's easy on the eyes and Franco, as usual, captures her sexual nature quite well making for some very erotic scenes. D'Amato added a music score from his Black Emanuelle films, which was a nice touch.

Monster Shark (1984)

Another Italian cash-in on Jaws with this one being directed by Lamberto Bava. A group of scientists are investigating several strange deaths and learn that it's a half shark, half octopus creature that was believed to have been extinct sixty-million years ago. There are a few nice moments in this film but it becomes very dull of boring by the forty-five minute mark. The performances are decent but none of the characters are very interesting with the exception of one who disappears half way through the movie with no explanation. The death scenes are very generic as is the creature.

02/03/07

San Francisco Disaster (1906)

Leave it to Biograph (future home of Griffith) to make the first film based on the SF earthquake of 1906. From what I've read, the producer's tried to sell this off as actual footage but if you've seen the films dealing with the real thing then it's easy to see the fire here is a fake. Mildly entertaining but it can't touch the actual films of the destruction. G.W. Bitzer was the cinematographer.

Scenes in San Francisco, No. 1 (1906)

Here's another film with actual footage from the 1906 earthquake. Once again the footage is quite striking as the destruction seems like the city would have been dead for a lot longer than it actually was. An interesting note is that in this film you see another man with a movie camera and he was actually making another film on this subject (San Francisco: Aftermath of an Earthquake). From American Mutoscope and Biograph, which makes you wonder why the above film was faked.

Scenes in San Francisco, No. 2 (1906)

More footage from the earthquake but this film also includes footage from a refugee camp, which is quite striking.

Men Who Tread on the Tiger's Tail, The (1945)

Early film from Akira Kurosawa about a fugitive Lord and his followers who must travel through a forest trying to avoid capture. Apparently this is based on some Japanese fable and Kurosawa does a good job at creating a fairy tale like atmosphere but the story pretty much left me uninvolved. I could never get caught up in the story, which seemed to bounce around quite a bit considering the film only runs sixty-minutes. I really wasn't taken with any of the performances either and the comic relief from the "coward" seemed pretty forced to me. The scenery was very nice and you can still see the talent within Kurosawa.

36 Hours to Kill (1936)

I had never heard of this film before seeing it but I noticed it had Brian Donlevy and Gloria Stuart so I decided to record it off FMC. A fugitive thief (Douglas Fowley) boards a train in L.A. so that he can get to Kansas City to collect $150,000 that he won in a jackpot. Hoping to evade the police who are looking for him, he gets to know a reporter (Donlevy) and a woman (Stuart) who is also running from the police. To say anything else would ruin a few surprises the film has to offer. This is a pretty good little thriller that has plenty of turns in the screenplay but all of this is ruined by some incredibly bad comic relief in the form of a retarded (or just plain stupid) black operator on the train. I'm not sure if this guy was suppose to be retarded or if its a black stereotype of a really dumb guy but this humor really kills the mystery of the film. The three leads are in very good form and director Eugene Forde, who also did some Chan films for Fox, keeps things moving nicely.

American Haunting, An (2005) unrated

Here's another film I've been meaning to watch and was happy when my girlfriend brought it over. Set in rural Tennessee in the early 1800's, this film tells the story of a young girl (Rachel Hurd-Wood) who begins to be haunted by a spirit or demon, which also curses her father (Donald Sutherland). The girl's mother (Sissy Spacek) doesn't know what to believe but the it could be a "witch" neighbor who the father ripped off. I'm a sucker for ghost films and I'm a major sucker for ghost films, which are based on true stories. I had never heard of this legend but after viewing the movie I went and did a little research and realized the movie's ending, which came out of left field, was just one of many possible explanations for the haunting. As a film, I was mildly entertained by the thing as the mystery surrounding the haunting kept me entertained from start to finish. There were some creepy moments, including one point of view shot of the spirit/demon floating through a room looking at the family. Another thing I enjoyed was Sutherland and Spacek, two older people, which is something missing from current horror films, which seem to be filled with teens. Hurd-Wood was also very good as the girl. The film could have lost several of its fast editing, fast camera movement moments as well. The film has plenty of flaws but overall I found it entertaining. My girlfriend enjoyed it a bit more than I did and I've got the bruises on my arm to prove it.
post #326 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

02/01/07: A VIRGIN NAMED MARY (Sergio Nasca, 1975)

I had never heard of this religious satire before but the blasphemous subject matter – worthy of Luis Bunuel and actually anticipating Jean-Luc Godard’s HAIL MARY (1985) by a good 10 years – was enough to entice me. As it happens, the film itself wasn’t half bad: indeed, it proved very interesting and quite entertaining (despite its inescapably low-brow nature).

As the title suggests, the film deals with a supposed Immaculate Conception in a remote and neglected Italian village peopled mainly by immigrants. The teenage girl in question (the actress herself, Cinzia De Carolis, actually ended up making pornos!) is prone to epileptic convulsions, during which she seems to be able to make predictions. Her poor but irresponsible mother turns this condition to her advantage by holding meetings in their house where the girl ‘helps out’ – through systematic electrocution! – anyone in the community who can afford to pay (the girl is asked to ‘intercede’ for the accomplishment of various needs such as marriage and housing, though occasionally her requests include murder and abortion).

The largely ungodly yet superstitious populace is turned upside down when the girl first ends up dead (she’s actually only a victim of catalepsy) and then pregnant (which can’t be explained initially as she never leaves her house). At this stage, the girl is revered as something of a saint and is even carried around on a pedestal – all of which confounds the flustered parish priest (who suddenly finds his previously empty church flourishing with ‘customers’) and angers an eccentric charlatan/bum – played by Leopoldo Trieste – who specializes in churning out love potions to the needy (who, conversely, sees his trade floundering and so opts to sell the village secret to the media for a measly sum). The latter is all too willing to partake in any momentary fad (unsurprisingly, the names of the companies involved are those of the 3 Magi); similarly, all the men in the village seem to be named after one of the apostles – and the girl is even married off to an old carpenter named Joseph!

Still, the girl comes up with quirks of her own – even wanting the people to start worshipping her rather than the other Mary! Called upon to explain the whole affair by his irate and patronizing superiors, the priest seeks advice from his former tutor (who no longer recognizes him, having become senile). In the end, it’s discovered that an altar boy (the priest’s mute and retarded nephew, who resorts to cracking nuts by means of a sacred cross utilized during mass) is the true father of the child, having taken advantage of the girl while comatose. The villagers, inflamed, stone her – with only a prostitute, aptly named Magdalene and played by Andrea Ferreol, standing up for the girl – and cause her to have a miscarriage. Soon, everyone goes back to their former lives, except for the priest who opts to abandon his vocation!


02/03/07: THE GHOST TRAIN(Walter Forde, 1941)

This is a classic British comedy-thriller I had always wanted to check out but no opportunity had arisen for that until now. It’s based on a popular stage play which had already been filmed a number of times previously (most notably in 1931 by the same director but, unfortunately, this version seems not to have survived in its entirety!); for the remake under review, the plot has been updated to the then-current wartime situation.

Anyway, I was mainly familiar with early British comedians through the films of Will Hay: given that this one features a similar plot of legendary hauntings, smuggling and enemy agents, it’s very much in that vein (it was actually scripted by Hay’s regular writing team of Marriott Edgar, Val Guest and J.O.C. Orton); the stranded travelers element, then, was an equally tried-and-true formula. The star this time around is Arthur Askey (abetted by Richard Murdoch) – none of whose films I had watched before – who is as unlikely a hero as Hay himself and whose personality proves to be just as potentially irritating…but one soon warms up to him, and Askey certainly comes up with a number of witty lines and amusing bits of business throughout to justify the fact that the lead character of the play (and the 1931 film version) was split into two here, with Murdoch acting as the star’s straight partner.

The remote single setting (the events of the film largely take place during one stormy night) provides for some wonderful atmosphere; the last half-hour – with the sudden appearance of a mysterious couple (Raymond Huntley and Linden Travers) and eventually the arrival of the titular vehicle itself – is especially gripping and well handled. Especially worth mentioning in the remaining cast list is Kathleen Harrison as the stereotypical frightened spinster, with a parrot as her constant companion and who is driven by all the excitement to take her very first drink.


02/03/07: THE PANIC IN NEEDLE PARK(Jerry Schatzberg, 1971)

Until the mid-Fifties, the taboo theme of drug addiction in films was either fleetingly mentioned – as in MYSTERY OF THE WAX MUSEUM (1933) – or ridiculously overblown as in the REEFER MADNESS (1936) school of movies but, with the appearance of films like Otto Preminger’s THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN ARM (1955) and Nicholas Ray’s BIGGER THAN LIFE (1956), Hollywood producers showed that they had learned to treat it in an objective, mature and sensitive way. But, with the the runaway box office success of EASY RIDER (1969), the subject got its own unexpected little niche and the general public was for the first time allowed to wallow in a no-holds-barred view of the junkie lifestyle; of course, I am discounting films like Shirley Clarke’s THE CONNECTION (1961; which I’ve never watched myself) and the Andy Warhol Factory movies which are anything but mainstream Hollywood products.

I can’t say I’ve watched many of those 1970s drug-related movies and, off hand, only John G. Avildsen’s JOE (1970; with Peter Boyle and Susan Sarandon) and Ivan Passer’s BORN TO WIN (1971; with George Segal and a young Robert De Niro) come to mind. Even so, I’d say that THE PANIC IN NEEDLE PARK is arguably the bleakest, grittiest and most realistic screen portrayal of drug addiction I’ve ever watched – at least, until Darren Aronofsky’s REQUIEM FOR A DREAM (2000); for one thing, while most films of the era made extensive use of the contemporaneous rock scene, this one has no musical underscoring at all.

Frankly, I’ve had the film on VHS recorded off Cable TV for over 10 years and only now managed to catch up with it because my father rented it on DVD (and, subsequently, turned it off before long)! Indeed, the scrappy first half-hour is rather off-putting and dreary and it wasn’t until the main protagonists – Al Pacino (already superb in just his second movie) and Kitty Winn (who would go on to win the Best Actress Award at the Cannes Film festival for her work here) – really got together that I started to genuinely care about their plight; perhaps the most moving scene they share is their short-lived idyll in the country where the couple even purchase a dog with the little money they have (but lose it almost immediately through negligence when the urge for the drug habit kicks in once again). Subsequently reduced to prostitution, Winn is watched over by a sympathetic young cop but soon he’s demanding that she turn Pacino over to the law. At the end of the film the couple are reuinited, but it looks like their relationship has nowhere to go.
post #327 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

title: transamerica
rating: b
comments: if it wasn't for huffman's performance, i think i would have rated this a c. she made it almost ... mesmerizing to watch. as for the road trip part of the movie ... nothing really special ... but i was entertained.
post #328 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

Quote:
Originally Posted by george kaplan
Detective Story

Average drama about a coldhearted, intolerant, conservative asshole of a cop, the type who believes that everyone accused of a crime is guilty until proven innocent, and that beating confessions out of people is not only acceptable, but desirable.

You've sold me on this film! I've gotta see it!
post #329 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

It seems you don't enjoy films with any flawed human beings.
Then you haven't been paying attention. Leaving aside the fact that all human beings are flawed, I'll list just a few of the many films I enjoy that have extremely flawed characters in them:

Aguirre: The Wrath of God
L.A. Confidential
12 Angry Men
Anatomy of a Murder
Unforgiven
Die Hard
Chinatown
The Silence of the Lambs
Rebecca
Time after Time
The Killer
Diabolique
M
Dark City
Deliverance
The Seventh Seal
The Godfather
Citizen Kane
Psycho
The Apartment
Memento
Closely Watched Trains
Rififi
Bad Day at Black Rock
Throne of Blood
Rope
Frenzy
Leon
The Dirty Dozen
Amelie
Double Indemnity
The Dinner Game

If Detective Story were a tenth as good as any of those, then I'd like it a lot better.

To be clear, I didn't say I didn't like the film because of the character's flaws. I didn't like it cause of what they did with the character (an average melodrama, sometimes well acted, often overacted, sometimes pushing the 50s social envelope, often just presenting cardboard 50s stereotypes). But when describing what the film is about, well it's about a a coldhearted, intolerant, conservative asshole of a cop...
post #330 of 2529

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2007)

Return of the Jedi

Finished rewatching the original trilogy.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movies (Theatrical)
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › Track the Films You Watch (2007)