Re: Bronston epics and Land of the Pharaohs coming at last!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mark Anthony
I'm confused, the whole purpose of the 1993 restoration by Scorsese's film foundation was that the Negative was in really bad shape, are you saying they didn't create a new 8 perf 35mm/65mm dupe neg at that time following the preservational work? If so what did they create?
|
Everything they created was in the standard 35mm format and as far as I know they made it from existing prints but I could be wrong.
To the best of my knowledge there was no preservational work done on the OCN during the course fo this restoration, from the numbers tossed around the budget was very small by film restoration standards.
In the end it is important that they did not go back to the OCN.
Robert A. Harris also confirmed that there are no elements created for El Cid.
Regarding the intent: I think it was more the intent to preserve El Cid as a movie that could be witnessed theatrically for future generations, obviously it was deemed sufficient that they could only watch it in standard 35mm

Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mark Anthony
I'm aware of what equipment is available, it just seem's for whatever reason that the studio's haven't used it to date.
|
Fotokem is doing work now in 8k and in the past has done 4k scans of Cleopatra, South Pacific, The King and I and Carousel. For the first two the scan was done from a 65mm IP. Fotokem also did 70mm prints for the first two and they look VERY nice

Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mark Anthony
For example the new 65mm transfer of ben-hur is less-sharp than the 35mm of a few years before as it used an older 65mm telecine machine.
|
The 1080i TV version based on the new master of Ben Hur is much better than the DVD. It is also much better than the older DVD-version, there is a splitscreen in this thread where you can see this. The reason the movie is softer than the earlier version on DVD is not the master.
Still you are right that a 65mm telecine is not the way to go and probably inferior than a 4k scan from a 35mm IP.
Regarding the use of a standard telecine with 65mm: People that work at companies like Fotokem will tell you that it is much cheaper than high-rez scans and that is why many studios use it. Still a bit shocking to hear that Warner even used it on Ben Hur which is probably their second biggest 70mm title.