post #31 of 46
6/22/07 at 1:20am
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Originally Posted by ChrisWiggles
I certainly never said it was perfectly good, and I agree with you, but that being said, I think your characterization of the "worst-looking DVD" is really quite inaccurate. Aside from the EE and some compression noise during some of the more frantic higher entropy sequences at the end of the film, it's a par transfer or better for a DVD of this vintage. To be fair, I haven't watched this DVD in a while, but I certainly don't recollent it looking poor, and numerous times I've used portions of it to show of low APL performance of displays, and for these purposes it certainly looks more than decent. I would not even characterize the transfer as "poor." Mediocre given current benchmarks, sure, but it certainly was one of the better transfers of its time, perhaps even despite the EE, and it is also accurate to the film print at least as far as I can recall (though again it has been quite a long time for that).
|
|
Originally Posted by ChrisWiggles
If this is the worst DVD you've seen, then I'm not sure what you're watching, you must not be watching very many DVDs.
|
|
Originally Posted by TonyD
dark city is not bad at all.
you said yourself that you have nt watched alot of old dvds. what does that mean anyway. there are a good number of new dvds that look very bad. especially compared dark city |
|
Originally Posted by Lord Dalek
Dark City has some very light strobing (an issue that happens on a lot of older New Line discs including LOTR) but is otherwise pretty good.
|
|
Originally Posted by Lord Dalek
Yeah, I can only imagine how bad some dvds that look bad (and I mean BAAAAD) on my display appear on yours, Aaron. Dark City has some very light strobing (an issue that happens on a lot of older New Line discs including LOTR) but is otherwise pretty good. This is compared to some other discs in my collection like Star Wars Episode I and the first two releases of Terminator 2 which still look pretty ghastly on a standard PC monitor like mine.
|
|
Originally Posted by Aaron Reynolds
I didn't say otherwise. I didn't say it was the worst DVD ever made. I said that it looks really bad on a projector and it was the worst that I'd watched on it in the two months that I've owned the projector. It looks significantly worse than this non-anamorphic Rounders disc a friend loaned me that I just watched.
I have no complaints about strobing, just about the ridiculous aperture correction (which surely makes it look sharper on a standard definition set). It looks really bad blown up -- guys, when you're disputing this, how big are you watching it and what's the resolution of your display? |