Re: What is Michelle Wie trying to accomplish?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JeremyErwin
I noticed you neglected to name any LPGA legends. Are there any?
|
Are there any that would roll off my tongue like from the men's league.....no. The ones that come immediately to mind are Se Ri Pak and Annika Sorenstam. But when I go over to the LPGA website and look at their hall of fame this is what I see
LPGA.com
and it demonstrates the point I was getting at. Are any of the women on that list household names like Norman or Nicholson? No. But when I pick a name off that list (e.x. Patty Berg) I can see she had sixty career victories. If I look up her stats I find out that she won 9 women's majors during her career. Amongst the hardcore golfing community I'm sure Patty Berg's name would be instantly recognized. The casually interested can meander over to the LPGA site, and boom there she is, Patty Berg, on the Hall of Fame list. Is Michelle Wie going to end up on that list? At the rate she is going I doubt it. Is she going to end up on the PGA Hall of Fame list? No, because the last time I looked they didn't induct you for signing endorsement contracts.
If I was a pro golfer I would want to be remembered for winning golf tournaments. Even if the golf tournaments are not as famous as the U.S or British Opens. I feel sorry for Wie. From what I have heard she is a talented golfer, but her talent is going to be wasted if she stays on the PGA tour. She is liable to end up being remembered as the "woman who couldn't cut it on the PGA and didn't have the smarts to realize it".
Sorry to say but, IMO, women will never be competitive on the PGA tour as it is presently incarnated. Not because they are less talented, but due to the fact that the PGA is long ball orientated. You have to be able to hit a long ball accurately in order to be competitive on that tour. That means being able to generate power without overhitting the ball. In a forum like that men will always be more competitive than women, because women are not going to be able to generate the power required to hit long without losing some accuracy.
Maybe what is required is more courses that are shorter but more technically difficult if the intent is for more women to transition to the PGA tour. That way the short game becomes much more important. Reducing the need for long ball striking would go a long way to evening up the playing field between men and women golfers. Maybe then we would see more women golfers become household names.