New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

M&K vs. SVS - Page 2

post #31 of 36
9/11/06 at 5:31pm

Re: M&K vs. SVS

Thanks Arthur for the info on the room corrections.

My MX-2000 was M&K's very first push pull design sub,circa 1990.Unlike most of M&K's line up,my subwoofers are in each side of the cabinet(no sub facing downward as in all the rest of M&K's push pull designs..

When I took it to M&K for a refurb,they nick named it the air conditioner,due to its vent on the side for the amp and its size
Reply
post #32 of 36
9/12/06 at 12:49am

Re: M&K vs. SVS

Seth... I'll sell you my 20" Sanyo...
Reply
post #33 of 36
9/12/06 at 7:09am

Re: M&K vs. SVS

Seth,
While you may not be getting the lowest of the lows with your MX-100,you still have a great sub.One of the better consumer subs in the market place.
I would agree,put your money into other upgrades,and enjoy your sub.
Reply
post #34 of 36
9/12/06 at 7:18am
Thread Starter 

Re: M&K vs. SVS

How much would the MX-2000 have been new?
Reply
post #35 of 36
9/12/06 at 7:28am

Re: M&K vs. SVS

"How much would the MX-2000 have been new?"

According to M&K,in 1989,the sub retail was $1895.00.I picked it up for a the cost of a good lunch Even with the refurb cost figured in,it was still a bargain.
You can see the MX-2000 on the M&K site,if you look at their timeline.Notice the driver,thats a 12" driver ,then look at the size of the rest of the cabinet
Reply
post #36 of 36
9/12/06 at 7:32am
Thread Starter 

Re: M&K vs. SVS

I have seen one before, it is pretty darn big. For the original retail that was still a pretty good deal.
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers and Subwoofers