Re: DVD releases where you prefer the older transfer.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jim_falconer
I'm not sure yet, but the new version of 'The Searchers' is somewhat jarring to look at. The differences in colors between the old-and-the-new DVD releases are somewhat unsettling. I have only watched the first 30 minutes of the latest Ultimate edition, so I don't want to say this will be my final answer...I could come around to everyone's point of view.
|
I'm waiting to see what a corrected edition looks like, but the old DVD looks horrible. The colors are poorly handled (it's like they just turned up the saturation knob to get it more "colorful") and it has too much of a pink tint to skies and sand (a la the Lawrence of Arabia LE). The image is so shockingly cropped and soft, too.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sammy-G
All of the Image releases of Chaplin films. I have the mk2 ones but I only keep them for the extras.
|
City Lights is the best example of this. The old DVD used a 1992 transfer, but it's still quite impressive. I usually watch it with contrast adjusted a bit to fix the greyish contrast, but it's sharper and better framed than the MK2. Not to mention it has the PCM stereo score.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sergio
1- Ben-Hur: Special Edition (Better colors IMHO than Collector's Edition)
2- Wizard Of Oz: Special Edition (Better colors IMHO than Collector's Edition)
|
I don't know... the old DVDs had really flat contrast. I love how black levels are finally deep enough to make the witch's cloak pure black instead of dark grey as seen on the old DVD. The other problem is that there's a lot of compression artifacting blurring fine detail. The new DVD looks identical to the dye-transfer print I saw, too.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Greg Black
Rear Window (2001 release)
|
How so? The Masterpiece Collection is vastly sharper. In the shot with Jeffries writing the letter, you can see that the stripes on his shirt are razor sharp. They're blurry on the old DVD.