Re: HD-DVD audio formats question
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BrettisMckinney
Thanks Pete, lots to take in there. The part I dont fully understand though is that it seems weird for a 'new' technology to need 5.1 analog for optimal usage. I would have thought optical or digital coax is the preference for DD or DTS connections?
|
It is, but due to bandwidth and copy protection, the newest formats (DD+,DDTHD,DTS-HD) can only be output via analog 5.1 or HDMI 1.3 digital output. Also, since current receivers don't support DD+/DDTHD/DTS-HD, outputting them via optical/coax would do no one any good anyway. The Toshiba has very good DACs which means the quality of the decoding is excellent.
Since your receiver doesn't have HDMI digital input, using the analog 5.1 outputs on the Toshiba HD-A1 is what you'd need to do - and the quality of the DACs in the Toshiba is excellent so you need not worry about quality loss.
Quote:
| Now, you say that Dolby Digital Plus has the potential for 3mps, but currently is either around 614 or 1.5 using analog...and that using a digital connection makes the A1 send it via DTS at 1.4 Well wouldnt using digital be preferable then? |
No, the analog should give you the best quality since the
source is 640/1.5/3.0/whatever DD+ and that is exactly what you get with analog 5.1. With optical/coax you are getting that
same source decoded and then
re-encoded at 1.5mbps DTS. This doesn't mean it can make the bitrate of the soundtrack on the HD-DVD higher, it just means that you are getting a decent representation of that soundtrack at whatever bitrate because 1.5mbps DTS sounds pretty good. In other words, a 640kbps DD+ soundtrack can only get worse, not better, by being decoded then re-encoded at DTS 1.5mbps.
Some analogies
To draw a parallel, if you took an 128kbps MP3 file on the computer, decoded it to a WAV file and then re-encoded the resulting WAV file to a 320kbps MP3 (i.e. created a 320kbps mp3 using a 128kbps mp3 as the source), you would not have a 320kbps quality MP3 - instead you'd have an MP3 that played back at 320kbps but was similar in quality to a 128kbps MP3 because the 128kbps mp3 was essentially the original source it was made from. Yet another way to think of it is if you take a 16 color picture and resave it as a 256 color picture, the picture will still look like a 16 color picture since that is what the source was; so if you took a 640kbps DD+ soundtrack and converted it to DTS 1.5mbps for optical/coax output, it could not possibly sound any better than the original 640kbps DD+ soundtrack since that was the source for the DTS track. Likewise, if you take a 65,536 color picture and saved it as a 256 color picture, it may look noticably worse; similarly, if you take a 3.0mbps DD+ soundtrack and convert it to 1.5mbps DTS for optical/coax output, it could sound
worse than the original DD+ soundtrack because the DTS soundtrack uses half the bitrate. With the optical/coax out on the HD-A1 you are still using the DD+ soundtrack as the source, its just converted to DTS so receivers without 5.1 analog input can decode it. Therefore you can't really lose with the analog 5.1 output, because you get the actual original source directly rather than a never better quality and possibly lower quality re-encoded version of the original source as you would with optical/coax.
Think of it this way. You can either have:
Option A:
ORIGINAL DD+ SOUNDTRACK (640kbps/1.5mbps/3.0mbps) -> DECODED -> output via analog 5.1 or digital HDMI.
Option B:
ORIGINAL SOUNDTRACK (640kbps/1.5mbps/3.0mbps) -> DECODED -> RE-ENCODE DECODED RESULT to 1.5mbps DTS -> output via digital coax/optical.
In other words with the HD-A1, you can have Option A for the best quality signal or you can have Option B if your receiver doesn't have a 5.1 analog input. The optical/coax DTS option does not increase quality, it only increases compatibility for cheaper/older receivers.
Quote:
| Well now i understand that its up to the dvd player to do the decoding atm..rather than receivers. |
Yep, the Toshiba HD-A1 essentially has higher quality innards for high definition audio than any receiver currently available and can decode formats that no receiver can - so you are right, its left up to the HD DVD player to do the decoding at least until Spring 2007 likely.
Quote:
I hope this is ok as im considering buying a Yamaha RX2600...and im sure that doesnt decode.
Thanks for your help, I love buying new gear  |
No prob, but I'd
definitely hold off on a new receiver until next spring if possible, because that is likely when receivers that support HDMI 1.3, Dolby Digital Plus, Dolby Digital TrueHD, DTS-HD will come out. Until then the Toshiba HD-A1 paired with your RX-V496 5.1 analog input will do you just fine
