Perhaps I've just not been here long enough to have detected the pattern - perhaps there is no pattern? - but I wanted to find out what the methodology is for determining which DVD disc releases get official HTF reviews and which don't.
Is it a question of too many discs and not enough reviewers or time? Are some releases deemed more important than others? Is it a question of which releases are given out promotionally by the studios?
Mind you, I'm not being critical of the powers that be here, but the reviews that ARE presented are done so well and with so much effort, that it's disappointing to NOT find a review for a particular title.
My question comes about because I never saw or read an official HTF review of the recent release of the TV series I waited an entire lifetime for, THE TIME TUNNEL. Yet, I've seen reviews for many other TV shows, including sister series LOST IN SPACE.
Is it possible that I'm just not looking in the right place? I see an archive forum for reviews, but the term "archive" implies "old", yet I see current replies in there. Are official reviews placed in their natural forums first and then moved to archives after a particular period of time?
Pardon me if all of this is covered in some kind of FAQ, but I really respect the members and reviewers opinions here and would hate to be missing anything.
Thanks in advance for any information you might provide.
Harry
Is it a question of too many discs and not enough reviewers or time? Are some releases deemed more important than others? Is it a question of which releases are given out promotionally by the studios?
Mind you, I'm not being critical of the powers that be here, but the reviews that ARE presented are done so well and with so much effort, that it's disappointing to NOT find a review for a particular title.
My question comes about because I never saw or read an official HTF review of the recent release of the TV series I waited an entire lifetime for, THE TIME TUNNEL. Yet, I've seen reviews for many other TV shows, including sister series LOST IN SPACE.
Is it possible that I'm just not looking in the right place? I see an archive forum for reviews, but the term "archive" implies "old", yet I see current replies in there. Are official reviews placed in their natural forums first and then moved to archives after a particular period of time?
Pardon me if all of this is covered in some kind of FAQ, but I really respect the members and reviewers opinions here and would hate to be missing anything.
Thanks in advance for any information you might provide.
Harry





