Quote:
Speak for yourself. I wouldn't go to that extreme. There is no denying that AvP is nowhere NEAR as good as the first 2 Alien movies or the Predator movies but IMO, it's not as bad as you're making it out to be.
Stop trying to make it sound like EVERY SINGLE person who saw the movie hated it because that is not the case. I liked it.
|
Why speak for myself when I'm referring to the overall reception of the film? Go to any "AvP" forum and you'll see that the amount of people bashing is overwhelming compared to the small minority that supports it. When "AvP2" was announced, more people were horrified than excited, which you would know if you had actually read this thread. The webmaster of "AvP Galaxy", one of the most well-known "AvP" fansites, shut his site down after seeing the movie.
I've never denied that people liked the movie. Every movie that ever existed has people that like it. That's guaranteed when you're dealing with something that is exposed to millions of people. There were people that like "Gigli" and there are people that like "Batman & Robin" and there are people that like "Alien vs. Predator".
Quote:
| AVP is definitely NO "Batman & Robin". As much as people hate him, I don't think Paul W.S. Anderson set out to make a bad film. He generally seemed to be a huge fan of both series and tried to remain faithful. Whether he succeeded or not, his heart I'm sure was in the right place. It's not like he put nipples on the Predators or anything. |
For such a "huge fan" he sure bashes on several aspects of the previous movies on the "AvP" unrated DVD. It's funny, he claimed that he'd had the idea for "AvP" kicking around in his head for the better part of a decade but he never mentioned it prior to getting the gig. If you actually pay attention to the comments he's made about the previous films, you can gather that he holds "Alien" and "Aliens" in high regard, except for their special effects, which he'll openly bash. He also bashes the creature effects in "Predator" but he's also quick criticize the film and to dismiss the characters. He also apparantly thought that bashing on "Predator 2", "Alien3" and "Alien Resurrection" would fool people into thinking his movie was better but as I've pointed out before, the IMDB ratings and Tomatometer score indicates that most people found his film to be inferior to the films he thought he could easily improve upon.
The moral of the story? There's no evidence that Paul WS Anderson is a fan of "both series". The only evidence of that is the "good word" of the director himself, and this is a guy who's claimed that nearly every one of his films exists in a vastly superior "director's cut", even though no "director's cut" of any PWSA film has ever surfaced.