Quote (originally posted by Joe Karlosi):
"Dominion: Prequel to The Exorcist (2005)
Oh, brother. I had my hopes up with everyone else that Paul Schrader's vision of this film would be good, but it stank up my living room this afternoon. Talky, uninteresting and insipid. I was one of those who expected to hate Renny Harlin's BEGINNING because I was annoyed that Warner switched to him after dumping Schrader's version because it wasn't "scary enough". Well, Harlin's version turned out to be a pleasant surprise for me - not a great film, but an interesting take on a priest's loss of faith which was more serious than I expected. Stellan Skarsgard was terrific in Harlin's film; I thought he was less so in Schrader's, and his character less intriguing. While the silly ending of Harlin's version sinks that film, this one's not a hell of a lot less lame. Just as there were "annoying CGI effects" in Harlin's version, they're here too. Though it was far from perfect, I'll take the Harlin film over this."
Joe, it's weird how we both ended up watching this almost simultaneously!
Anyway, I'm kind of ambivalent towards it: while undeniably superior to Renny Harlin's version, in my opinion, it still felt underwhelming when stacked up against Friedkin's original or the 1990 entry in the "Exorcist" saga. Of course, the film differs (for the better) in several ways from Harlin's EXORCIST: THE BEGINNING (2004; my review of which, by the way, appears on Page 19 of the "2005 Track The Films You Watch" thread
) and, while I had found the plotline of that one intermittently intriguing, DOMINION is definitely interesting in the way Christianity is shown as paradoxical rather than reassuring but also in how Fr. Merrin's dilemma, which shook his faith to be begin with, resurfaces (in a very similar context) just as the demon makes his presence felt for the first time. This latter aspect, however, is actually where the film disappoints: Schrader's demon is nowhere near as impressive - for lack of a better word - as the one concocted by William Peter Blatty in the first and third films in the series; one almost feels that it was included, against the director's wishes, simply because it was a prerequisite - especially when considering that most of the "evil" perpetrated in the film is committed not by the "possessed" boy but by ostensibly normal people (albeit with a misguided sense of civil authority and moral justice)! The two brief dream sequences with a bandaged-up Merrin confronting the demon add a welcome touch of strangeness to the film but - as was the case with the Harlin version - the CGI effects are truly pathetic, sad to say. As a final note, I can't say that I blame Warners much for panicking and wanting to re-shoot the whole thing with a new director
...except that what they ended up with was more commercial, yes, but even less worthwhile in the long run
!
P.S. Mike, I've been trying to find some time to reply to some of your latest "reviews" but, hang on in there, tomorrow's my last day at work THANK GOD and I'll be free for the next 3 days before departing for the U.S.A.
"Dominion: Prequel to The Exorcist (2005)
Oh, brother. I had my hopes up with everyone else that Paul Schrader's vision of this film would be good, but it stank up my living room this afternoon. Talky, uninteresting and insipid. I was one of those who expected to hate Renny Harlin's BEGINNING because I was annoyed that Warner switched to him after dumping Schrader's version because it wasn't "scary enough". Well, Harlin's version turned out to be a pleasant surprise for me - not a great film, but an interesting take on a priest's loss of faith which was more serious than I expected. Stellan Skarsgard was terrific in Harlin's film; I thought he was less so in Schrader's, and his character less intriguing. While the silly ending of Harlin's version sinks that film, this one's not a hell of a lot less lame. Just as there were "annoying CGI effects" in Harlin's version, they're here too. Though it was far from perfect, I'll take the Harlin film over this."
Joe, it's weird how we both ended up watching this almost simultaneously!
Anyway, I'm kind of ambivalent towards it: while undeniably superior to Renny Harlin's version, in my opinion, it still felt underwhelming when stacked up against Friedkin's original or the 1990 entry in the "Exorcist" saga. Of course, the film differs (for the better) in several ways from Harlin's EXORCIST: THE BEGINNING (2004; my review of which, by the way, appears on Page 19 of the "2005 Track The Films You Watch" thread
P.S. Mike, I've been trying to find some time to reply to some of your latest "reviews" but, hang on in there, tomorrow's my last day at work THANK GOD and I'll be free for the next 3 days before departing for the U.S.A.




