Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2 - Page 17

post #481 of 501

Re: AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2

I don't need no Okie from Muskogee—I can get that right here.


An Officer and a Gentleman is a finely crafted movie, on the surface about love, but the arc is about growth, especially of Officer Candidate Zack Mayo (Richard Gere) the class insubordinate loner. The 13 weeks of training under the tutelage of Gunnery Sergeant Foley (Louis Grossett Jr.) is quite a bit more compelling than the off-base romances of Mayo and his best (and only) friend with two local girls bent on marrying a future officer and flyer who will take them away.

But finely crafted does not equal real passion. Worth watching for some of the acting, but early on, we know the formula—and the movie needs more than craft to make us root for the formula.
post #482 of 501

Re: AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2

Why do you hate me when all I ever did was like you?


Tony (John Travolta) struggles with girls and life in Saturday Night Fever a fairly routine dance, trouble teen movie that is lifted above the ordinary by Travolta’s extraordinary performance. Plenty of flaws, but some of the scenes, notably in the disco, make this a must-watch movie.
post #483 of 501

Re: AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2

You're the only one who ever took me seriously, Pete.


Pete’s accidental death provides the motivation for Rudy (Sean Austin) to leave his job at the steel mill, move to South Bend and preserve his lack of physical stature and high school grades to the point that he is both accepted at Notre Dame and after (as a walk-on) filling a spot on the practice squad, dresses for the last game of the season (and manages to get in for one play).

A classic underdog story that is very well-made and Austin is a perfect, never give up, underdog guy.

A much better movie than a plot outline would suggest.
post #484 of 501

Re: AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2

Goodnight, Mister Roberts


The best-selling novel, smash-hit Broadway play and award-winning movie, Mister Roberts is as funny (and as sad) today as it was 50 years ago. This time watch James Cagney, perfect in the role of the self-important, crazed captain.
post #485 of 501

Re: AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2

I’ve never been as good as I was with you.


The Big Chill is full of nostalgia of that type—remembrances of those better days, when everyone was close, full of optimism and love and when the future was open and clear. Seven close college friends meet at the funeral of an eight, who though absent dominates their present lives, as he apparently did in the past.

The old friends spend a weekend reconnecting and considering how their lives have changed since their days in Ann Arbor. We have seen this movie many times, but rarely with such style and panache. I probably like this movie more than it deserves, but the music is so perfectly integrated into the script and the acting is so uniformly superb that I think this is an absolute must-see.
post #486 of 501

Re: AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2

Warms my black heart to see you so concerned about us minority folks.


John Shaft (Richard Roundtree) is as smart-mouthed and cynical as any PI from any movie about Private Eyes, the main difference is that the early 70s saw an explosion of genre movies, now populated by blacks. Unfortunately the movie now seems not to have the impact that it did when it first hit the screens. Much of the acting (Roundtree being a notable exception) is substandard and the script is no better than average for this type of movie. Director Gordon Parks shows off Harlem, especially in the night scenes and the Isaac Hayes score is worth the price of admission.
post #487 of 501

Re: AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2

Once upon a time, in a faraway land, a young prince lived in a shining castle.


The beginning of fairy tales and also of Beauty and the Beast, the Disney animated film of the familiar story and the one that returned Disney animation to that level that adults will enjoy as well as children.

A magical movie to be sure, but for me, the music does not quite hold up to ‘musical’ standards (nor to the music of the classic Disney movies). Otherwise a must-watch.
post #488 of 501

Re: AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2

Ratings for the AFI musical list where 4=masterpiece, 3=must-see, 2=worth seeing, 1=has redeeming features.



My Fair Lady
Show Boat
Singin' in the Rain
West Side Story
Wizard of Oz, The


Top Hat
All That Jazz
Beauty and the Beast
Cabaret
Mary Poppins
Moulin Rouge
On the Town
Star is Born, A
Yankee Doodle Dandy


42nd Street
American in Paris, An
Band Wagon, The
Chicago
Grease
Guys and Dolls
King and I, The
Meet Me in St. Louis
Seven Brides for Seven Brothers
Sound of Music, The


Funny Girl
post #489 of 501

Re: AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2

Run


Scar’s advice to his nephew, Simba in The Lion King, Disney’s animated tale of despair, guilt, growth and return. The music in this feature is alone worth the price of admission, making the animation, story and humor just icing on the cake.
post #490 of 501

Re: AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2

Young man, are you sure you're trying it on the right foot?



The evil stepmother in Cinderella tries in vain to get one of her daughters married to the prince. But virtue (and with help from the various animals) wins the day and the prince for Cinderella. An absolutely charming animated movie from Disney while he and the studio were at the top of their game.

For me, Lucifer (the cat) steals every scene.
post #491 of 501

Re: AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2

Ratings for the AFI top 10 animated movies:



Fantasia
Shrek
Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs


Bambi
Beauty and the Beast
Cinderella
Finding Nemo
Lion King, The
Pinocchio
Toy Story
post #492 of 501
Thread Starter 

Re: AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lew Crippen
Dingo took my baby!


This is the famous cry of the baby’s mother, Lindy Chamberlain in A Cry in the Dark, titled Evil Angels in Australia and based on the book of the same name. Even twenty years after the fact, the topic of Lindy’s guilt or innocence is still a part of Australian dinner party conversations and hotel arguments. But what sets the film apart from popular discourse is its dead-accurate portrayal of Australia and Australians. Meryl Streep as the accused mother is perfect as Lindy and the restraint shown in the cinematography in not painting Ayer’s Rock in glowing beauty is admirable.

Even with some of the expected changes from real life to the screen, the movie is a must-see.

Enjoying your posts, and going back through the most recent ones ran across this again. I think the issue of the guilt or innocence is fascinating in terms of our own psychology, both as individuals and as communities and cultures. So many of us find it easier or even preferable to fit her into the more comfortable narrative of murderess (killing your own child is something most of us could never imagine doing) which allows us to blame her than taking her story at face value (a random act of nature is something we can too easily imagine happening to us and it challenges deeply ingrained perceptions of nature as pre-lapsarian and inherently good) which forces an individual to take more responsibility and change their own behavior or mindset in some ways. I think it's significant that we strongly resist these changes. It is so much easier to deny that, and put all the responsibility on her, even if it means a great injustice, our mind prefers the easier route.

Actually the movie is quite similar to Doubt in the ways it raises questions of how individuals perceive situations where they don't have all the facts. The pastor's decision at the end of the film is guilty behavior. However it's also 'turn the other cheek' christian behavior in the best interest of the child and community. Interesting, I hadn't thought of these two films as being similar before, but it's an intriguing comparison.
post #493 of 501

Re: AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2

They came home. And with them, my life of details.

And that is the problem with The Bridges of Madison County: despite Meryl Streeo’s subtle and outstanding performance, the audience must listen to the dialogue. The last 30–45 minutes where Streep and Clint Eastwood discuss the meaning of love and live is so poorly written that it made me forget some of the excellence in the first part of the movie, where the two are getting to know one another.

My wife commented as I began to watch this movie, “Even I’m not enough of a girl to watch this.” She was right, but the movie is still worth watching because of Streep’s performance and some of the scenes in the first part of the movie.
post #494 of 501

Re: AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2

Thanks, Adam—good point on Doubt—which is on my re-watch list. I’ll consider the similarities and differences at the time.
post #495 of 501

Re: AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2

… tell them to go out there with all they've got and win just one for the Gipper.


That quote is one reason to watch Knute Rockne All American. The Notre Dame Victory March and some of the film clips are two others.
post #496 of 501

Re: AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2

I've met a lot of hard-boiled eggs in my life, but you? You're 20 minutes.


An assessment of Chuck Tatum (Kirk Douglas) in Billy Wilder’s Ace in the Hole/The Big Carnival. Tatum is a down and out, big city, big newspaper reporter, reduced to working in Albuquerque, where big news is a rattlesnake roundup. Looking for his chance to make it back to the big time and bright lights, Tatum deliberately lengthens the rescue operation of a man trapped in an old Indian burial site, in order to get more copy and regain his reputation.

Douglas is outstanding, as is Jan Sterling as the non-grieving wife of the trapped man. Both the cinematography and editing are outstanding, but writing takes first prize.

This is one of Wilder’s finest films, if one of his most unknown.
post #497 of 501

Re: AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2

Where’s my radium?



Asks Madame Curie after long years of work in the movie of the same name. An above average, but typical bio of the 40s, the movie never seems to decide if it is a romance or the story of an obsession to discover scientific truth—or both or neither. Even with somewhat of a lack of focus, this is worth seeing for the sets and some of the acting. Look for Van Johnson towards the end as a young reporter.
post #498 of 501

Re: AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2

Do not awake a sleeping tiger.



Doctor Han Suyin (Jennifer Jones) warns correspondent Mark Elliott (William Holden) about developing their (then) difficult, interracial relationship in 1950s Hong Kong in Love is a Many Splendored Thing. While the theme and its treatment seems dated today and the screenplay is a bit stilted at times, the shots of colonial Hong Kong alone, make the movie worth watching.
post #499 of 501

Re: AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2

Miss Dashwood.

Mr. Ferrars.



Ah how romance blooms in 18th century England, especially as depicted by Jane Austin in her novel and by Ang Lee in the movie of the same name: Sense and Sensibility. As befits a major costume drama this production has an all star cast with Emma Thompson (Elinor Dashwood) depicting sense, Kate Winslet (Marianne Dashwood) filled with sensibility, Gemma Jones as their mother and Hugh Grant as one of the suitors.

All-in-all a very enjoyable movie, well acted and directed and England and the 18th century never looked better—but in the end there is no reason to watch this one, except for fervent Austin fans.
post #500 of 501

Re: AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2

England expects that every man will do his duty


The famous words of Lord Nelson just before the Battle of Traflager—and also in the movie depicting the affair and romance between Nelson and Lady Hamilton, That Hamilton Woman. Laurence Olivier (Lord Nelson) strikes many a pose as England’s greatest hero of the time and utters many a speech designed to rally the Empire during England’s darkest hour (1941), but the movie belongs to Vvvien Leigh as the charming and charismatic Lady Hamilton.

Alexander Korda produced and directed this, mostly accurate, telling of the intertwined lives of the pair—and it worth watching today for Leigh’s performance and for the sets (assuming one can ignore the miniatures
post #501 of 501
Thread Starter 

Re: AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2

a couple revisits and some thoughts:

Bringing Up Baby, in some ways it tries too hard, but it's that very element of trying too hard that makes the inspired lunacy of it all click so very well. in some ways Cary Grant in this movie is almost like time travel, as though Howard Hawks could see into the future to see Tony Curtis' Cary Grant impression in Some Like it Hot and decided to have Grant really ham up his own persona. The script is so very tight though, I feel in some ways the construction of this script is an inspiration for the Coen Brothers because all their original comedies play off this sort of structure. Everything feeds into everything else because the world of the film is so very tiny. This really rewards repeat viewings as you find there are more jokes layered into all the intertwinings of the cast.

Oh, and after watching the Broadway Melody of 193x films, which featured the guy who made snoring sounds or other funny sounds in a long scene I appreciated for the first time the 'contemporary' context that makes the demonstration of animal calls all the funnier.

Stage Door has some of the most terrific and ferocious and fast dialogue on the 1930s side of Citizen Kane. The film is out and out vicious and catty in a way I'd sort of glossed over in my mind. This time around I thought that Ginger Rogers' role was more one dimensional than I remembered, Hepburn is very good because her role has to evolve, she looks pretty bad at first (and no, not in her on stage rehearsals) but as her character is developed her performance keeps perfect pace with it and we get a richer work as the film goes on, very nice. This may be my favorite Menjou role.

Gone With the Wind is far better an experience than I ever gave it credit for before, but I must confess that my newfound love for the film has a lot to do with being part of a wildly enthusiastic audience of 1000 people on one of the biggest and best screens in the world with a very good print that maintains the look of the original technicolor prints. It was, in a word, breathtaking. or magical. Take your pick.

Stagecoach is both not as good and slightly better than I remembered. Wayne is superb in this role, but some of the filmmaking seems almost untoward in the film's beginning and in some of the lull scenes, lacking the grace and precision found in the film's more interesting cinematic and dramatic moments. I sort of felt that Ford liked the idea of the film and the story more than he liked the actual full script of the film, as it did seem a bit lazy at times. It is much funnier than I remembered, and the banker character is delightfully contemporary all of a sudden.

Gunga Din, on the other hand, is truly spectacular, and far better than I gave it credit for before. It is also hilarious and brilliant in a way that very few action films manage to pull off today, but in a manner that recalls the Indiana Jones films and Pirates of the Caribbean. To tell the truth I think I slept through about a half hour of the film last time I watched it.

Wuthering Heights is just as I remembered it. Pretty, but dull and good god I loath the story and hate every one of the repulsive characters. I think I would have comitted suicide if I had to live in that world. Give me Jane Eyre (the book) anyday.

Dark Victory was an immense improvement from my last viewing of it. Knowing the story helped a great deal and this time I was able to appreciate Davis' performance more. It's showy, but then her character is obvious and showy, so its not a problem, still not a favorite of mine, but a solid film. Humphrey Bogart is very good here even if he was saddled with an unfortunate brogue, which he smartly keeps somewhat muted and only really loses in one scene.

Philadelphia Story, as always, was a delight, I like this more than Bringing up Baby.

What struck me this time around was that Dinah is one of the all time great supporting characters. I liken her to the Nurse in Romeo and Juliet, or Puck in A Midsummer Night's Dream, she has many of the funniest lines and gets to do a great deal. The real genius of the writing, though, is that Dinah cannot really fathom the game that Dexter is playing but thinks that she is orchestrating her own, similar game to try to break up her sister's impending marraige. More than anything, coming away from this film, I remember Dinah.

The other thing that always suprises me when I go back to Philadelphia Story is how modern it is. It's akin to The Awful Truth here, but the back and forth about divorce, infidelity and sexual indescretions is really quite remarkable for a film of 1940. The father's nasty attempt to hurt his daughter always takes me aback, saying that it is her fault he cheated on her mother because she was not a loving enough daughter. I remember that kate apologizes to him for not being good enough (though at first she castigates him for abandoning personal responsibility by attempting to lay the blame on her) but I can never seem to remember if he apologizes to her or tells her what he said was not true. it's such a vile thing to say, I think I always get distracted by the fact that she is big enough to apologize that I forget to notice if he does.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movies (Theatrical)
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2