Re: AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2
Long Day's Journey Into Night - 8 of 10
Stars list - Katharine Hepburn
Katherine Hepburn gives a very mannered and scenery chewing performance that is at once very hammy and extraordinarily believable, it's all in her eyes, really she really believes in the character, and the character lives through her eyes. It's worth watching simply for the remarkable fragility and tenacity of this character and her multiudinous ways of expressing different degrees of negative emotions and false positivities that occulde a desperate depression behind the words.
I must say, though, that Night was long gone and it was day again before I finished the film (I had gotten it a couple years ago from netflix and eventually sent it back unwatched after three weeks or so because I could not work up the muster to watch a three hour melodrama, even if it did have my favorite actress of all time).
It is tremendously clear that this film is a play, not a movie, it is a play about four souls trapped in purgatory together, they were a family once, when they were alive, but now that they are dead they are condemned to each other for the harms they inflicted upon each other in their prior life. I make this claim of purgatory because we never leave the house, there are only four characters and they are surrounded by a dense impenetrable fog. characters claim to leave the house but we never accompany them and the family is very careful to talk around certain subjects of suicide, drug abuse, depression and death (though by hour three we are rewarded by the writer allowing the characters to talk about these things directly for the first time, rather than the ever more maddening obliqueness). The whole result is a very Henry James esque effect, and indeed, the film is set in the same era in which he was writing, so I feel the nod is deliberate.
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)Mother is addicted to morphine and has attempted suicide and is ever more depressed. eldest brother is a drunken layabout failure on all counts bitter and resentful. younger brother is a sailor now dying of consumption and father is a drunkard miserly tyrant who is blamed for the origins of most of the family's problems by his niggardly actions. all four characters deny their problems, eventually the men are able to acknowledge and confront their deficiencies and regrets, but the woman is only allowed to descend completely into senility and madness, there is no hope for her taking responsibility for her actions, after all she is a woman (yes I think there is an interesting mysogeny to this, but it is also a fact of the era that women were often denied the self identity that mother lacks so tragically in this film, so it may be a deliberately rather than a typical stereotype). in particular the father tells a tale of working for fifty cents a week when he was ten and how his mother received a dollar bonus from one of her employers for christmas, "she went and spent it all on food. that was how I learned the value of a dollar." unfortunately, the core tragedy of the story is tied up in this parable. Because while his mother took all that she had of her excess and gave it to her family selflessly, sharing it amongst themselves, the lesson he took away was that money could buy a better meal and excess should therefore be hoarded and guarded and protected. I'm sure he never saw the dissonance between his philosophy of money and his mothers gift, which is even more depressing and tragic.