Thinking about movie quotes, the interesting thing is that there are very few pure great quotes - quotes that make you think "What a great line", even if you haven't seen the film. One example of what I would regard as a pure great quote would be the "cuckoo clock" speech from The Third Man. Looking over the Quotes nominee list, it did have a few really excellent "pure" quotes - the "Tannhauser gate" speech from Blade Runner, or "I don't like your manners" from The Big Sleep, or the "greatest trick the Devil ever pulled" from The Usual Suspects. But the final quotes list contains very few great quotes that stand by themselves as great lines outside of the original movie.
Instead, the final Quotes list is made up of lines thathave very little significance outside of the direct context of the film. "Well, nobody's perfect" is a very funny line, but only because it's the punchline to an entire movie. Read by itself, by someone that doesn't know Some Like It Hot, it's not that impressive. Nor is "Who's on first?". Or "Show Me The Money!" (which I didn't understand, even while watching the film). Or most of the quotes in the list. They rely on the context of the movie itself to become great lines, rather than being a line that impresses in and of itself.
I make this comment, because today I watched my first Quotes film since the list was released.
Beyond the Forest
The quote for the film is "What a dump", delivered by Rosa Maline (Bette Davis) as she surveys the house owned by her husband, a struggling country GP. The house isn't a dump, it seemed pretty nice to me. But Rosa is a woman that wants more, she wants to live in a big city like Chicago, not a small country town like Loyalton. She wants a millionaire for a husband, not a poor doctor who delivers his services for free to those that can't pay. And so the house begins to represent the life that she despises.
But the thing about this quote is that it's not very memorable. I was listening out for the line, so I recognised it as "the quote", but if I had watched the film before, I wouldn't remember her saying the line. It certainly wouldn't have meant anything to me if, a week later, I had heard someone else say "What a dump". As a quote, it definitely isn't a line that stands out as a great quote outside of the films context, but nor is it especially memorable in context, either. I don't really know why it is listed.
I enjoyed the film - or most of it, anyway. It falls apart completely in the last 15 minutes. But the first 75 minutes were most enjoyable. Bette Davis gives a wonderful performance as a woman stifled by her lifestyle, moved to extremes of jealousy whenever thinks her dream life with her millionaire lover is threatened. Joseph Cotton as her husband, completely unaware of her infidelities, was appealing as the man who became a doctor because he really wanted to help people. It all culminates in a death (not a spoiler - the film opens on the day of the inquest).
But the last 15 minutes suddenly become awful. The opening scrolled text talks about how the film examines evil in all its naked ugliness, so that we may understand how people that deliver themselves over to it can become like the scorpion, stinging themselves into eternal oblivion (or something like that). And the ending is just as awful as that text sounded.
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)1. After the inquest, she all of a sudden decides to tell her husband about the affair? Why? OK, I can accept that her lover wanted her to wait, and would therefore find out about the baby, but what would telling the husband achieve?
2. What happened to her then? Did she suddenly go insane? Or was she sane, but just suicidal at losing her last chance at the life that she wanted? Or was she sane, calculating, and trying to induce a miscarriage so she can lose the baby? Or was she just vaguely sick in some way? I think it's supposed to be the first, but who really knows.
3. The idea of the death scene probably sounded poetic, dying by the train to Chicago that carried all her dreams, but really, it was just silly. It came across as a moralistic "See what-happens-to-bad-people ending (and the opening scrolled text reveals that as the intention), and was completely inconsistent with the tone of the rest of the film. Just awful.
I enjoyed watching the film, and feel reasonably positive about it, but the last 15 minutes came so close to losing me. Over in my
list of films watched in 2005, I think I'll post it as a

, but it's a very marginal decision.