Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › TV Programming › Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread - Page 56

post #1651 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick_S
I'm not really excited by the news because I don't want anything to take resources away from the current show.
Well, it sounds like it wouldn't use any of the existing actors or the sets they're currently using. If Ron Moore is involved, I'm optimistic, otherwise...
post #1652 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

Neat pitch. I just hope it doesn't dilute the writing talent from the original. (Yes, I called Moore's version "the original.") I heard an interview with Marg Helgenberger (sp?) talking about how the actors have noticed a huge dropoff in the CSI writing once the writers split to three shows. I'll have to take her word for it since I don't watch CSI as much as I used to ... hmm. Anyway, Caprica seems like a very good story to tell and they are differentiating it from BSG quite a bit with the "technology has changed everybody's lives for the better" theme. Should be very cool with a sense of foreboding as we all know the technology will eventually be their downfall.
post #1653 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Hewell
What I read was SciFi wanted to try out some new shows in the summer slots.
Let's hope they are better than those Sci Fi original movies they crank out. I would like to see them develop some more really good Sci Fi shows like Galactica.
post #1654 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

stargate didn't suffer when it split. it's all about hiring new bl00d =).
post #1655 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

When I mentioned resources I mainly was concerned about money. I don't want SciFi to rob Peter to pay Paul. I would rather have them pour all of the money into what is now a proven product.

Also the more I think about it I’m not really that interested in a back story show. I’m fine with going forward and not looking back.
post #1656 of 1702
Thread Starter 

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

Quote:
Well, it sounds like it wouldn't use any of the existing actors or the sets they're currently using. If Ron Moore is involved, I'm optimistic, otherwise...
Some might say that Moore and Eick are the greatest resources "Battlestar" has.
Quote:
Anyway, Caprica seems like a very good story to tell and they are differentiating it from BSG quite a bit with the "technology has changed everybody's lives for the better" theme. Should be very cool with a sense of foreboding as we all know the technology will eventually be their downfall.
I'm just afraid of "Smallville" syndrome — further complicated by the fact that the future is still evolving. I feel like this show will really limit the backstory that can evolve for the Admiral on the real show.

Having one show as good as "Battlestar" is hard enough. Trying to manage two would be damn near impossible.
post #1657 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

I think its a great idea.

50 years would put it 10 years before the first war, right?

I would hope they would do an entire arc covering the time from then to the war, and even until the first settlement.
post #1658 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric_Connelly
I think its a great idea.

50 years would put it 10 years before the first war, right?

I would hope they would do an entire arc covering the time from then to the war, and even until the first settlement.
Wouldn't it 10 years be until the end of the war? How long before that was the first Cylon war supposed to be happening? Maybe it's going on at the time of the new series.
post #1659 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

I guess they could make a good show out of it, but I can't say the idea interests me at all right now.
post #1660 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

I'm in the camp that would rather not see this. They stilll have so much to do and so much to explore with the show, (characters and stories), they have. We really don't need another whole series to see the old glory days of the colonies.
post #1661 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

I think I'd rather see this after the current series has run its course.
post #1662 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

I think it's a great idea. There's obviously a lot of fertile ground for stories showing not only Caprican life prior to the First Cylon War, but the steps and actions that led to the first Cylon achieving sentience and deciding to turn against humanity. Putting it fifty years back places us squarely in the distant back story for the BG universe, not any specific characters, which *would* be limiting for the BG series.

I also think this is an even better idea because it's SciFi doing what fans have been wondering why they haven't done more of long before now; creating and airing *original* series content. Not to start a flame war (probably impossible with this comment, but oh well), but Stargate is pretty schlock SF and is definitely not in BG's league, and Stargate was merely a series they lifted off Showtime when that channel was washing its hands of it. If a Caprican centered BG series gives us more BG stories, great. If it puts the SciFi executives even more firmly on the path of thinking about and funding original series content, even better for us.

We all know there are tons of known properties, either former series or straight from novels, an executive could likely be talked into funding. And if they do enough successful shows that they kick off, they’ll probably get to the point where they’re asking the creative people involved with those shows (such as Moore) “hey, do you have any dream ideas we could do a show out of?” That would give us more truly original properties to enjoy, adding more icing.

Fans should be happy about this. After all, it’s not like there’s an overabundance of SF on tv the last five or ten years. I haven’t counted, but I’d bet there are more of the stupid CSI and Law and Order shows just in the last two years vs the amount of SF on tv over the last *ten*. We should be cheering SciFi for doing what their damn name says, showing SF!

Lots of farsighted thinking here, but it doesn’t seem to be any real stretch to see things like this happening if BG and Caprica continue making SciFi happy with ratings and ad dollars. Honestly, if Caprica hits, I could easily see another one or two original series showing up to further fill out SciFi’s schedule within a few years at most.
post #1663 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

So, Enterprise.

I'm in the camp that would prefer to see it when BSG2K3 is done.
post #1664 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

Quote:
Honestly, if Caprica hits, I could easily see another one or two original series showing up to further fill out SciFi’s schedule within a few years at most.

"AfterBSG."

and

"Desperate Geminon Wives"
post #1665 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

I'm afraid they'll put the "r" in Caprica after the "C" instead of the "p".
(While I like SG1, I detest Atlantis. Give me a break, "Space Vampires" as a long term plot point?)
post #1666 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Berger
I'm afraid they'll put the "r" in Caprica after the "C" instead of the "p".
(While I like SG1, I detest Atlantis. Give me a break, "Space Vampires" as a long term plot point?)

Well I like Atlantis, (although they have worn out the Wraith, IMHO). But that was a show they spun-off well after they had just about done it all with SG-1, (especially with the original team). So it gave them new ground, new stories, new characters. But we just barely finished 2 seasons of BSG. We still don't know much about the Cylon's "plan", there is still a lot to cover in the series we already have.
post #1667 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

Back to BSG for a second. The s2 Finale was on in HD tonight with pretty impressive results. It gives a very different feeling to some of the scenes to be certain. It's not quite like watching the first time, but the battle scenes on Caprica, Nuke detonation, and most of the space shots seem to benefit greatly. I'm assuming many of the indoor scenes were intentionally left a bit grainy, but gave it more of an upconverted look rather than supersharp HD like some of the others.

I think it's the 4th time I've watched this 2 hour block and the last half hour actually seems to be improving wiht each viewing. The Cylon March down Main St is about as scary as it gets for me.
post #1668 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

It was nice to finally see the last minute of the epsiode in something other than a 3-inch picture on my computer monitor (thanks to the DVR timing fiasco). It certainly has a much bigger impact in HD.
post #1669 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

SF is on HD? where? i didn't know.
post #1670 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by YiFeng
SF is on HD? where? i didn't know.
Not Sci Fi, but Universal has it's own HD channel which shows BSG.
post #1671 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

is it available through Comcast (my local cable provider)? is it called "Universal HD"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul McElligott
Not Sci Fi, but Universal has it's own HD channel which shows BSG.
post #1672 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

Well I finally caught up. After seeing the finale in HD last night and reading all of your remarks, I am anxious for next year when ever it starts on Universal HD. Although now that Cox (in my area) is remapping all of the analogs to digital channels, SciFi which had terrible PQ is now pretty good.

Watching the finale in HD without commercial interruption was a treat. I think my constraint was worth it and I'll try the same thing again next year.

I admit I don't know where they are taking this show. I hope that there won't be a reset, but a few things need to be resolved and you guys have discussed them thoroughly. I just can't help thinking that Baltar will somehow be subsumed into the Cylon empire much like he was in the original show. They have him in custody, he is a genius and six (it is six isn't it) has a strong emotional connection with him. He also has so many weaknesses that he could easily be subverted. After all he immediately surrendered without attempting any negotiation.
post #1673 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

I watched it too today, the last 2 episodes.

It still amazes me how good of a show this is and it put alot more things together having watching the last 3-4 hours of the season in a day.

I still think its a better show than the Sopranos or anything else on TV.
post #1674 of 1702
Robert A. Willis Jr. wrote (post #1672):

Quote:
. . . and six (it is six isn't it) . . . .

I like to think of her as "Number Sex".


David Rogers wrote (post #1662):

Quote:
If it puts the SciFi executives even more firmly on the path of thinking about and funding original series content, even better for us.

. . . . And if they do enough successful shows that they kick off, they’ll probably get to the point where they’re asking the creative people involved with those shows (such as Moore) "hey, do you have any dream ideas we could do a show out of?" That would give us more truly original properties to enjoy, adding more icing.

Fans should be happy about this. . . . We should be cheering SciFi for doing what their damn name says, showing SF!

Lots of farsighted thinking here, . . . . Honestly, if Caprica hits, I could easily see another one or two original series showing up to further fill out SciFi's schedule within a few years at most.

Geez, and just when they were trying to get away from all those "outer space shows nobody wants to watch anymore".

It is to laugh.


Greg Kettell wrote (post #1664):

Quote:
"AfterBSG."

and

"Desperate Geminon Wives"


Steve Berger wrote (post #1665):

Quote:
. . . they'll put the "r" in Caprica after the "C" instead of the "p".


And that, ladies and gents, is the sound of the hammer hitting the nail squarely on the head.
post #1675 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

BSG characters if they were on "The Simpsons".

http://community.livejournal.com/pantsketch/99256.html
post #1676 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by YiFeng
is it available through Comcast (my local cable provider)? is it called "Universal HD"?
Yes, it's called Universal HD or just "UHD"

You can use this page to see if it's available from Comcast in your area.
post #1677 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

it is available paul, THANK YOU!!!!

i swear that's new =).
post #1678 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by YiFeng
it is available paul, THANK YOU!!!!

i swear that's new =).

I was flipping through the HD channels one day about a month ago and found Universal HD. No notice from my cable company. If only I could get a full FSN package.
post #1679 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

Very big, but vague: Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
TV Guide reports in its latest issue that a major character on the show will not last beyond the third episode of season 3. David Eick is quoted as saying (paraphrasing) that the show presents a war and the repurcussions of that have to be felt, and that won't happen by just killing off supporting characters or extras. Frankly, between this show and Lost and the other shows that kill off characters, I'm really tired of the killing. Let the speculation begin as to who it is. My money is on Roslin.
post #1680 of 1702

Re: Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Favate
Very big, but vague: Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
TV Guide reports in its latest issue that a major character on the show will not last beyond the third episode of season 3. David Eick is quoted as saying (paraphrasing) that the show presents a war and the repurcussions of that have to be felt, and that won't happen by just killing off supporting characters or extras. Frankly, between this show and Lost and the other shows that kill off characters, I'm really tired of the killing. Let the speculation begin as to who it is. My money is on Roslin.

It makes sense on the types of shows we have on the tube now.

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
If in a cast like "Lost", the same characters made it through the entire show's run, it would be suspicious. BSG, Lost, 24, ER and most other dramas try to bring a sense of reality to their shows.
People die in real life all the time and that should be no different than in a TV show. If Ana Lucia, Libby, Boone and Shannon (along with the rest) all made it safely to the end of "Lost", we would all feel there was no true sense of danger. Same thing goes here. "BSG" is at war, basically, and people are going to die.

I just hope it's not Roslin.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: TV Programming
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › TV Programming › Battlestar Galactica: Season 2 - SciFi US broadcast thread