I have both versions. I have to admit to liking the color timing on the original a little better, but I am not familiar enough with the film to know which one is more accurate.
I don't think the difference in detail is really that great. The new one looks soft at first glance due to the differences in contrast and color, but if you look closely at the usual suspects for detail like highlights of eyes and textures of detailed surfaces, it's really not that different. Also, a slight bit of edge ringing from the original gives it a "faux sharpness".
The extras are great, and having both a 3.0 original mix and 5.1 remix audio track is unquestionably an upgrade over the original's 2.0, not just based on the specs, but based on what my ears are telling me, too. If you don't already own the film, I would definitely recommed spending an extra $5 for the SE. If you are happy with the original and have no interest in the extras or an audio upgrade, then you may want to stand pat.
Regards,
I don't think the difference in detail is really that great. The new one looks soft at first glance due to the differences in contrast and color, but if you look closely at the usual suspects for detail like highlights of eyes and textures of detailed surfaces, it's really not that different. Also, a slight bit of edge ringing from the original gives it a "faux sharpness".
The extras are great, and having both a 3.0 original mix and 5.1 remix audio track is unquestionably an upgrade over the original's 2.0, not just based on the specs, but based on what my ears are telling me, too. If you don't already own the film, I would definitely recommed spending an extra $5 for the SE. If you are happy with the original and have no interest in the extras or an audio upgrade, then you may want to stand pat.
Regards,





