New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

1933 King Kong in November - Page 5

post #121 of 542
Wow exiting and entering rumours abound! Peter Jackson CG's the classic missing spider scene from Kong, maybe. Kong purists are probably contemplating Hara-kiri at this defilement of a cinema treasure, but I for one can't wait to see what they've done with it. If it is true I hope they have a seamless branching option so we can also view the King of Kongs without the modern age tinkerings.
post #122 of 542
Wow exiting and entering rumours abound!


Thanks Steve!
After a good night's sleep I am very much looking to enjoying my weekend off from work and that comment got me laughing out loud!

AND the thought of the Spider sequence on DVD is awesome news too! I have an old issue of Famous Monsters (tucked away somewhere) with the still that is mentioned. There just have been so many conflicting stories as to whether or not the footage ever survived that I had lost hope of ever seeing it!
post #123 of 542
I have an old issue of Famous Monsters (tucked away somewhere) with the still that is mentioned.


I remember that picture in Famous Monsters. It wasn't very detailed or clear, but was very interesting just the same. What a coup that would be if the footage really was located.
post #124 of 542
As long as the sequence isn't inserted into the film, they can do whatever they like with it.

Can't wait to see whatever they've turned up, although why a sequence cut before the film was scored & finished would turn up on a *print* in France is an even bigger mystery. Be wary of some of Bill Warren's sources, one of them also told him back in April that the new "Pendragon Films" version of War of the Worlds didn't exist - of course it was released a week ago.
post #125 of 542
Think I'll enter this thread again, so the new "plug-in" to the Found Spider Sequence rumor is that PJ is helping to complete the missing parts to the partially found scene?
You know.....I would REEEEALLY like to buy all of this but my InternetFanboy-bullshit meter is going off like crazy. It would be great if it were true but it is starting to sound an awful lot like the persistent "A Forbidden Planet SE is coming any day now" rumors that have been circulating for around five years now.....I'll believe it when I see it, nothing would make me happier mind you but I'll believe it when I see it.

And now I will make my excite from the thread.
post #126 of 542
Quote:
You know.....I would REEEEALLY like to buy all of this but my InternetFanboy-bullshit meter is going off like crazy.


Hmmm ... What if the Spider Sequence is being restored by Jackson with the cooperation of Harryhausen as a consultant?!

Nah ..... (Although I *did* hear this rumor about three years ago ... and then forgot all about it until now!)
post #127 of 542
Quote:
Can't wait to see whatever they've turned up, although why a sequence cut before the film was scored & finished would turn up on a *print* in France is an even bigger mystery.

My impression was that the sequence was cut after the film was previewed. Was the film scored and finished at the preview?
post #128 of 542
For those interested in the original King Kong you may want to track down a little magazine called "Monsters from the Vault" issues 18 and 19. They are running a two-part article on the movie with recollections from interviews with Marcel Delgado, Fay Wray and Merian C. Cooper via Tom Weaver and Bob Burns. Seventeen pages in issue 19 with EXCELLENT pics. I gotta order issue 18. Info is here.
post #129 of 542
Quote:
My impression was that the sequence was cut after the film was previewed. Was the film scored and finished at the preview?
I recall reading that it was excised after an early preview, prior to it being scored. Max Steiner expert Ray Faiola has stated that Steiner's cue sheets do not indicate the sequence anywhere (Ray, please correct me if I'm wrong here). I believe this early preview also did not have the elevated train sequence in it.
post #130 of 542
The 2 books, "Girl In the Hairy Paw" and "The Making of King Kong," one states that it was only shown to producers to get funding to get it made and disappeared. The other one says that it was cut after a preview because it slowed the pacing of the film and then disappeared.

Who knows what became of it.
post #131 of 542
In the thread for Peter Jackson's remake, there was speculation many months ago that a certain creature was going to in this film and it was going to attack Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
Lumpy
. This now seems untrue since a preview of upcoming SideShow/Weta statue shows that character getting attacked by a Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
raptor
.

I cannot imagine Jackson taking the time right now to CGI the spider scene for the 1933 King Kong no matter how big of a fan of it he is. I would be thrilled if it is included via seemless branching, but I just cannot imagine this being anything other than wishful thinking.

Here's hoping I'm wrong.
post #132 of 542
As much as I'd love to see the spider scene, assuming this "rumor" is on the level, I don't want this title DELAYED any longer.
post #133 of 542
I am loosing sleep over this title. I just cannot wait. I have the universal region 2 version. I also have the french Kong 76 2 Disc set with DTS and a new transfer. It sounds amazing and the picture is far better than the paramount region 1 release wich i also have.
post #134 of 542
I seriously hope this is more than just some rumor some fans started up… myself and many friends have been waiting for a few decades hoping that something, anything from this sequence would show up.

Just to refresh your memories of this sequence:

[c]
This is a still from the actual pit sequence from the film


A close-up of one of the spider models, from the personal collection of Willis O'Brien[/c]

However, if there is even the slightest bit of truth to this (or even if there isn't), I really have to put one very close friend in touch with Warner Bros., because he has a certain specific exclusive item relating to the spider pit sequence that would make for a fascinating photo gallery or a mini-featurette… he has the one main spider stop motion model from the missing pit sequence! Absolutely no joke…

My buddy Josh has always been a huge fan of stop motion animation (especially Harryhausen, who sparked his love of this), and over the years has built up a nice collection of original stop motion models and armatures. Back around 1981/1982, he got an excellent lead that one of the stop motion "Kong" spider models still existed, and eventually managed to track it down to it's current whereabouts. It apparently was once a part of the collection of the former Movie World Museum in Buena Park, CA -- this fantastic museum mainly consisted of famous movie cars, but they also had a huge collection of props and other items, most of which were never placed on display. Movie World closed down sometime in the very late 70's (or early 80's at the latest. What remained of their enormous collection -- which consisted of tens of thousands of pieces minimum -- were stored inside their enormous, three-story tall, football-field length warehouse in Ventura County (located about 20 minutes northwest of Magic Mountain).

Josh made an appointment, and we spent much of the day there, trying to locate the spider as well as having a blast just poking around and examing their amazing collection of movie props and cars. The custodians there had a "general" idea of where certain items were "likely located" -- supposedly the spider in question was somewhere on the second floor, west side -- which was still an enormous area to cover. So we spent hours looking through displays, pulling tarps off of items, opening boxes, and we finally found… it. I was a very large spider stop-motion model (at least 2-feet across), and in very good shape for being nearly 50 years old. From the research Josh did and the photos he located, the spider matched perfectly, and from all appearances WAS the actual spider from "King Kong" and not from some other movie -- like the various "original" Kong models/armatures that were actually from "Mighty Joe Young" or elsewhere.

Josh was thrilled more than I could ever say -- not only because his leads were correct, and we actually managed to find it in the warehouse, but that it did in fact seem to be the real mccoy. Don't even ask what he had to pay for this thing -- back then it was an enormous amount (especially for an 18 year old), although now, 23 years later, it would be considered a miniscule amount to pay for such a prize. Needless to say, the spider is one of the gems of his collection!

Just as an FYI, it was later confirmed/authenticated to be THE spider from the sequence -- it's the main one seen in the actual film still up top (it's not the the O'Brien one with the face & fangs). I'll see if I can get Josh to provide me with a recent picture, and if so, I'll post it up here for you folks.

Another cool item we discovered nearby was the King Kong stop motion model that David Allen created for the 1974 Volkswagen commercials. It was in it's own display care, and has Kong standing on top of the miniature top part of the Empire State Building… oh, just look at the picture below. This was an outstanding piece -- but with what the spider cost, there was no way Josh could also afford to purchase this (nor, for that matter, could I, since it was waaay out of my range!) … not that it mattered, since it was already on hold for someone else. At least we now know that it did find a good home, because it's a part of Bob Burns' amazing collection. Just for the hell of it, here's a copy of the VW Kong as it now exists:

[c]][/c]

Lastly, my one major thrill for the day was poking around inside the "Movie Cars" section, and finding both the "Leslie Special" and the "Hannibal 8" (the two cars from "The Great Race") sitting in a corner. Wow!!! Let's just say that I wasted no time sitting inside the "Hannibal 8" and instructing Josh to "Push the button, Max!" Unfortunately, the cannon didn't pop out of the hood, since the keys were obviously not in the ignition, which means we also couldn't have it go up on its hydraulic jacks. (In a strange twist of fate, a large close/small room was located next to this car room, and it was filled with what looked like hundreds of thousands of different keys, piled up in huge, er, piles everywhere. It's possible the Hannibal keys were in there somewhere, but it wasn't worth the effort of finding, obviously. I guess this was the remain of some "key" museum display they had at some point… Even the custodian we asked didn't know why there was a roomful of keys. It was just "there" and something they had. Very strange… ) Still, great fun and a dream come true for me. Oh, and if anyone cares, both the Hannibal 8 and Leslie Special are now on display at the Petersen Auto Museum in Los Angeles… but I doubt they'll let you sit in it and play around. I could kick myself for not bringing along a camera at the time, but who knew what I'd find there.) Here some old postcard pics from the museum of the cars:

[c]**[/c]

After spending most of the day at this warehouse, we were famished and stopped into a local small restaurant for a late lunch. After finally finding the spider, Josh wasn't going to let it out of his sight for a single moment, so we took it into the restaurant with us. We got some very surprised looks, but the best reaction was from the waitress when we placed our order, and asked for a plate of flies for our pet spider. She didn't actually see if at first on the chair, and said "Flies?"… but then noticed it, and without a hitch, said she's see if she could find some extra mosquitos as a tasty garnish. Ah, teenage fun… (The manager did have an initial issue with our bringing in this giant, um, spider, to his establishment, but after a quick explanation of its history and rarity, and not wanting to chance it being stolen from the car, he understood perfectly.)

Anyway, that's the end of my tale, and I hope you found the spider pit story interesting… or at the very least, at least being able to see a picture of the pit sequence being discussed here. I'm not sure if Josh has heard the rumor yet regarding the supposedly-found footage (I myself only heard this yesterday), but if this turns out to be true, he'd definitely know about it or be able to find out what's up through various connections.

I'll give him a call later and see if he can provide any additional information on the subject (and to make sure he contacts Warner about his spider so they can get hopefully get some shots of it onto the set if it's not too late).

Regards to all,

Jeff
post #135 of 542
Jeff,

even if it turns out to be a false rumor, we know they're doing a whole featurette just on that scene. I'd get your friend in touch with them regardless.
post #136 of 542
Quote:
my InternetFanboy-bullshit meter is going off like crazy.


Mine, too. And, frankly, I hope it's NOT true. (The Jackson recreation part, not the "footage found" part). Such would be interesting to see as an extra, but, barring the resurfacing of the original footage, I don't want a single frame of newly created material stuck into this classic film.

...even IF Harryhausen's involved. Ray was inspired by Kong but was just a lad when it opened and had nothing to do with its production. And "emulating" stop-motion with CG? Ugh. Either shoot stop-motion or don't! Trying to make one medium look like another is never convincing.
post #137 of 542
Quote:
I don't want a single frame of newly created material stuck into this classic film.


Well, if it IS true, there is only one scenario I can imagine.

Say the missing part of the scene is actually only PART OF A SHOT. Say a three-second shot is missing 20 frames due to film damage. In that case, using the existing frames to digitally INTERPOLATE the missing 20 frames would not be very different, IMO, than digital "clean-up" to remove scratches and dirt. I'm not talking about creating a shot from scratch using 3D CGI, but rather digital "tweening" to reconstruct the shot.

Of course, if it's true, there is no way Warners would release it inserted into the actual movie unless it was a BRANCHING option.
post #138 of 542
Quote:
in that case, using the existing frames to digitally INTERPOLATE the missing 20 frames would not be very different, IMO, than digital "clean-up" to remove scratches and dirt.

True, but why would WB need PJ to do that? I'm sure that there are countless houses out there in the USA that could do quite a good job at this sort of digital fix without needing to "outsource" all the way to New Zealand.

The whole PJ addition to the already difficult to believe "found spider sequence" rumor just smacks of fanboy wish-fulfilment to me....He, he, wouldn't it be coool if...etc. etc.
post #139 of 542
Two comments:

1) If the sequence exists I don't see why Peter Jackson would even show up on a list of all the people qualified to restore it.

2) I also don't see why Warner Bros. would give a s**t about handing work to PJ or cross-promoting his new movie. He's never worked with WB that I can think of and the new King Kong is a Universal picture.

That's all I have to say. Thanks for reading.
post #140 of 542
Quote:
2) I also don't see why Warner Bros. would give a s**t about handing work to PJ or cross-promoting his new movie. He's never worked with WB that I can think of and the new King Kong is a Universal picture.

And yet he IS featured prominently on the WB DVD. This subject has come up before, as I'm sure you'll find on earlier pages of this thread.
post #141 of 542
Quote:
2) I also don't see why Warner Bros. would give a s**t about handing work to PJ or cross-promoting his new movie. He's never worked with WB that I can think of and the new King Kong is a Universal picture.


Nevermind the billions that he made for them when he directed that little independent trilogy known as Lord of the Rings.
post #142 of 542
Yeah, there is kind of a relationship there....

Almost certainly in the realm of pure bullshit, but the RKO archives are reportedly in complete chaos, so the spider scene could very well have been sitting in a canister next to the trims from The Magnificent Ambersons for the last 60 years and no one stumbled across them despite decades of organized searching....
post #143 of 542
Quote:
1) If the sequence exists I don't see why Peter Jackson would even show up on a list of all the people qualified to restore it.
An Opinion on Peter Jackson's Qualifications

Quote:
2) I also don't see why Warner Bros. would give a s**t about handing work to PJ or cross-promoting his new movie. He's never worked with WB that I can think of and the new King Kong is a Universal picture.
See Eric's response above. In addition, cross promotion is just that - it promotes BOTH products. I have little doubt that the remake will get a great deal of attention thus Warner stands to benefit by releasing the DVD the same time as the film.
post #144 of 542



I don't know folks, if you want to believe in something bad enough you will find a way to make it plausible.
(holds up hands) BUT HEY, to each their own, I'll be waiting for a great DVD of Kong & if this is somehow truthful then great....and if not then it's great to have the DVD anyway.

I'll tell you what though...the second they find the complete uncut version of The Magnificent Ambersons you let me know, ok?
post #145 of 542
This is one of the most anticipated remaining titles for me. Aside from The Jazz Singer and The African Queen (both 'rumored' to be under restoration for upcoming releases) I only have a handful of anticipated titles, such as The Sting and Reds (if that one ever sees the light of day). DVD classic releases are dwindling from A title must haves to more eclectic ones.

Joel
post #146 of 542
DVD Times has a rumoured release date of November 21 for the R2; R1 must be around then. See here.
post #147 of 542
As long as someone cares enough about the Spider Sequence to attempt a reconstruction, I don't care who does it. But I do trust Peter Jackson's judgment calls.
post #148 of 542
Tom Weaver, the monster movie historian who was quoted in the original DVDTalk story about the supposedly found spider sequence, posted this on another forum

Quote:
NOW Warners honchos are telling folks on the q.t. that NO original Spider Pit scene has been found, but that the DVD will feature a *recreation* by an Oscar-winning animator named Randy Cook.

Is this to squelch the "Spider Pit sequence found!" rumors, or is THIS the truth? Or... ??? Anyway, different Warners people are telling different participants on the project different things. It's all very weird ... but now I'm starting to get a bad feeling.

Another *rumor* is that KONG will be part of a set that also includes THE SON OF KONG and THE LAST DAYS OF POMPEII but all will also be available individually. MIGHTY JOE YOUNG will follow later.


Either way I see this turning out badly. If the sequence was in fact found, Warners was probably working on an elaborate way of announcing this only to have the cat let out of the bag by people who shouldn't have been talking.

If it never was found, then this release is going to seem "a letdown" to some people no matter how spectacular it is.

My view is that spider or no spider I'm confident Warners will supply a DVD surpassing what anyone had the right to expect.

Steve

PS - I hope the rumor about the box is wrong and that MIGHTY JOE YOUNG is in fact included.
post #149 of 542
Why do you have a bad feeling? If they do the recreation I think Warner wouldn't stick it in the movie. Probably a bonus feature. Warner has a pretty good record of not messing with a classic film.
post #150 of 542
Ain't It Cool News says it ain't gonna happen:

http://www.aintitcoolnews.com/display.cgi?id=20484
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: DVD