Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › Track the Films You Watch (2005)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Track the Films You Watch (2005) - Page 19

post #541 of 2004
Quote:
I actually prefer the 1913 and 1920 DR. JEKYLL's compared to the 1931 version. I also didn't care too much for March, although he's certainly brilliant compared to Spencer Tracy, IMO.

I never saw the 1913 version. I didn't care for the Barrymore film, but the Fredric March version of JEKYLL is one of the absolute greatest early horror pictures for me personally. I think March is sensational, especially as Mr. Hyde.
post #542 of 2004
Cube Zero (2004)

Viewed 3/29/2005 (first viewing)

Okay prequel to the previous two Cube films takes us outside the Cube and into the lives of two Cube technicians, one of whom has begun to question the motives of his employers. Gets a bit silly with the introduction of mad scientist Jax, who is played too broadly. Several cool new deathtraps are introduced.

out of


The Yes Men (2003)

Viewed 3/29/2005 (first viewing)

Documentary on the Yes Men, two pranksters who traveled the world posing as representatives of the World Trade Organization. Eventually the pranks give way to attempts to expose the WTO's cynical greed. Some hilariously absurd moments, but the film could have used a little more meat on its bones.

out of


The I Inside (2003)

Viewed 3/29/2005 (first viewing)

Psychological thriller about a man who wakes up after a mysterious accident with no memories of the last two years. One thing he CAN remember is that he may have murdered his brother! Decent of its type, but nothing special. Guess I'm a sucker for Sarah Polley.

out of


Finding Neverland (2004)

Viewed 3/29/2005 (first viewing)

Pretty good biopic of J.M. Barrie, the creator of Peter Pan. The film centers on Barrie's relationship with a young widow and her four sons and how they inspired his classic fantasy tale.

out of


Closer (2004)

Viewed 3/29/2005 (first viewing)

Well-acted drama about sex and relationships in London. Ultimately seems pointless, but engaging enough.

out of
post #543 of 2004
Mario -- I see you've given Lugosi's INVISIBLE GHOST , but I'd be curious if you could go into more detail about what you thought of it. I've always thought Joseph Lewis' direction was quite good on this, considering the type of film it is. And Lugosi actually turned in a sympathetic yet dual-natured performance. I ask your opinion because I know you've said that you often rate the films on technicality, and that you may actually enjoy them more than the star rating would suggest.
post #544 of 2004
Joe,


Even before you asked me, I still intended to do a little write-up on the 2 Bela Lugosi films I've watched yesterday because I knew you wouldn't be satisfied with a mere ** rating for them!


So, on with INVISIBLE GHOST (1941): you're right about many things in your last post - I did find Joseph H. Lewis' direction better than usual for this type of film (especially his flair for shooting at a low angle from inside fireplaces, his constant and logic-defying panning from one room to the next as if there were no walls, the pan down following the butler's look, going under a table, to where the gardener's body was found, etc.), but, in truth, having watched 4 other films directed by Lewis, I kind of expected this - and I do hope that you get to rent GUN CRAZY (1949) and THE BIG COMBO (1955) one of these days just to make sure INVISIBLE GHOST was no fluke; Bela was indeed sympatethic in this one and impressively restrained most of the time; and, finally, I did enjoy it quite a bit and perhaps more than that ** rating would suggest.

However - and this always annoys me and eventually affects my rating - the plot is very weak and the dialogue pretty banal: how come Mrs. Kessler had the power to hypnotize her husband into committing those murders (such ability was never brought to bear in the film) and would one little look really provoke such a hynotized murder rampage?; what motive was there at all for the murders (wouldn't bumping off your staff, not to mention family members, create a SLIGHT inconvenience in having to look for new cooks, butlers, gardeners practically every other day)?; shouldn't the police have done something about this whole affair long ago given the regularity of these murders, instead of waiting for the butler's call averting them to the latest one every time (or even give in to an emininent personality's sentimental attachment to his dear departed darling's abode)?

I realize that we're talking about an unassuming, low-budget programmer here and one isn't supposed to analyse ANYTHING in detail let alone the plot contrivances but I have to say that the sight of a hynotized Bela making his way to his intended victims' rooms did provoke some unintentional laughter! By the way, in the "DVD Drive-in" review of this film, it is suggested that Bela is not actually "hypnotized" but merely that his mind "snaps" every so often but then, why those he walk around so S-L-O-W-L-Y with outstretched arms (this should perhaps have alerted Universal to the fact that, physically, he was just wrong for the role of the Frankenstein monster) and fails to remember anything of his little misdemeanors the next day?


As I've said before, I had watched THE CORPSE VANISHES (1942) a couple of years ago but I have to say that I was pleasantly surprised as to how watchable and engaging it was the second time around. Who'd have thought that such fare was worth a second look? If anything, I found CORPSE to be even livelier than GHOST (which did get to be repetitious and feel constrained by its one setting): although it is never explained why Lugosi is married to an 80-year old woman (except maybe to get into high society given that she's a "Countess") or why she needs to be youthful (it's not like she's parading her "look" anywhere except at the Lorenz household), the film offers an amusing throwback to those 30s hard-boiled reporter movies and predates such rejuvenation-themed horror movies as I VAMPIRI (1956).

I found the film to be quite atmospheric and enjoyable: it was nice to watch Lugosi surrounded by such familiar faces as Elizabeth Russell (from several Val Lewton films), Angelo Rossitto (one of Tod Browning's FREAKS [1932]) and Vince Barnett (who had a memorable supporting role in Hawks' SCARFACE [1932]) among others. That said, the campier elements of the film were sometimes too silly for words: Lugosi whipping his moronic assistant, the proverbial funereal organ-playing, the even more hilarious sight of Lugosi and Russell sleeping in coffins and the final shoot-out with the police in which, of all people, it's Lugosi's dwarfish henchman who gets it!


In the end, I guess I wouldn't mind watching Lugosi's other stuff from this period but I doubt if it will make me enough of a fan to go out and purchase them in their best available prints on DVD - not to mention those 48 Bowery Boys titles Warners have promised us in the future!!
post #545 of 2004
Thanks for the reply, Mario. I'm glad you had some fun with the movies, even if part of the reason was due to the unintended laughs

Quote:
I realize that we're talking about an unassuming, low-budget programmer here and one isn't supposed to analyse ANYTHING in detail let alone the plot contrivances

You took the words right out of my keyboard!

P.S. - I'm very happy to see your link to the IMDB; now I just hope you write more reviews there
post #546 of 2004
[b]The Man With Nine Lives (1940)
An enjoyable Boris Karloff film, where he's a doctor experimenting with frozen therapy for curing patients of cancer. In the midst of his work he disappears and is found 10 years later, mysteriously frozen in ice. Once revived he continues his experiments with an unwilling group of human subjects as his new guinea pigs. This is part of the Columbia Pictures series of "Mad Doctor Films" Boris made, and Columbia really needs to wake up and release all of them; they've only issued THE DEVIL COMMANDS thus far, but it was too high priced to generate much interest.

The Passion of the Christ (2004)
A very strong and powerful film from Mel Gibson, and far more than just the "gore show" many detractors claim it is. Yes, we experience the vivid pain and suffering that Jesus endured on his journey to the cross, but we also sense the impact of his life and teachings through well-done flashbacks between the tragedy. Jim Caviezel is very good, and I personally don't find the film anti-Jewish; the story adheres very faithfully to the written word in the New Testament. People's mileage for the film may vary depending on their personal religious beliefs.

The Robe (1953) 1/2
One of the earliest Cinemascope films (some say HOW TO MARRY A MILIONAIRE was made first, though THE ROBE was released ahead of it). An occasionally interesting story that's helped along by its actors: Richard Burton is sometimes effective, sometimes ineffective as the soldier who crucified Christ and is haunted by the robe Jesus wore; Victor Mature is good as his slave Demetrius who followed in Christ's footsteps; Michael Rennie makes a perfect Peter the disciple, though he was sadly under-used. Jay Robinson is a delight as the overly theatrical Caligula. I actually like the sequel, DEMETRIUS AND THE GLADIATORS, better.

Ruby Gentry (1952)
Jennifer Jones plays a feisty tomboy with a sadistic streak who's in love with young masochistic Charlton Heston and will do anything to have him - or to reject and ruin him at varying times, it seems - in this slight and silly offering from director King Vidor. Jones and Heston aren't bad, and Karl Malden is also a welcome asset to the cast in a supporting role. The ending is interesting amidst a well-photographed swamp background. But overall this is a dressed up and rather tacky melodrama that's much better directed than it probably had any right to be.
post #547 of 2004
Fireworks - Though otherwise unrelated, my first viewing of this Takeshi Kitano film was a similar experience to my first viewing of Antonioni's Blowup (from about a month ago). In other words - initial delight at the visuals overtaken by slight confusion and thoughts of a thumbs down review subsequently replaced by a positive view by the end and then increased thoughts of actually purchasing the disk the more I think about it after the fact (I've bought Blowup since). It's the story of cop who is dealing with the death of an old partner (possibly due to his negligence) and the terminal cancer his wife has. While visiting her, he is replaced by another cop who becomes paralyzed after being shot. Bursts of violence spring forth amidst the slow realization for several characters of the wonders of life.

Suicide Club - A wholly unsuccessful attempt at bringing forth a Buddhist philosophy into modern day Japan. As people realize they are unsatisfied with their daily lives, they commit suicide in hopes of finding a better life in the next one (I admit I didn't catch on to the Buddhist leanings until reading further about the film after viewing it). Doesn't work either as a plain old horror tale or one that delves into the "deeper" issues. Partially this is due to the portrayal of some of the suicides (in particular the opening scene where 50 schoolgirls jump in front of a train), but also due to the kitchen sink approach of the ending (bringing in ghosts, an insane cult leader and an all-girl Japan pop group).

Boiling Point - Another Kitano film which was more immediately enjoyable than Fireworks. More sudden bursts of violence and odd characters (in particular Kitano himself who plays a yakuza gangster). It strikes me as something Tarantino would quite enjoy as there is style galore to this film. The ending was a bit of a letdown, though I admit it was initially somewhat amusing.

Samurai III: Duel At Ganryu Island - The finale of the trilogy. Mifune once again gives it his all. I've come to accept the sudden change of heart of the character Otsu at the end of part 2, but she was REALLY getting on my nerves by the end of this film. I know it's a different time and place, but I just wish she'd stop whining!

Happy Together - Wong Kar-Wai's lovely telling of the up and down relationship of two gay men in South America. Starting out with a very monochromatic palette, the film explodes in bright oranges and blues for most of its running time. Not only does the film capture a disintegrating relationship, but also really gets across the sense of isolation these Japanese Hong Kong men must feel in a wholly different culture.

Bob The Flambeur - Noirish story of an old time gambler looking for one last big score. Great character sketches, mood and buildup to the heist.

Youth Of The Beast - More fun from one of my favourite directors Seijun Suzuki. I watched this with my Dad and as much as he enjoyed it, he kept mentioning how it borrowed heavily from the American films of the 50s. Indeed it does, but it molds and meshes all these things together and totally spins them on their heads. Suzuki's films seem to be more about creating impressions and feelings rather than completely clear narrative, but when they are this much fun to experience I can't argue with that approach.

The Incredibles - I can't add much more to most of the discussion already presented for this movie. Just that this was my second time viewing it and immediately after it finished, I would've been more than glad to watch it all over again.

Man With The Movie Camera - Gorgeous silent film from the late 20's documenting a day in the life of a Russian city and its people. It's really a series of beautifully composed visuals that (combined with the great Michael Nyman score I watched it with) appears to have been a great influence on Koyaanisqatsi. I believe there's a couple of other scores for this film out on DVD, so I may have to track the others down as well.

The Bird People In China - A gentle story of a Japanese businessman and a yakuza gangster trekking through the mountains of China in search of a valuable Jade deposit. They run across an old village that has old tales of people flying with hand made wings. Their discovery of the history of these tales proves to be life changing for them both. Definitely not the kind of film Takashi Miike is known for, but it's quite engaging.

Pepe Le Moko - Film noir before there was film noir...A French criminal is holding up in the Casbah district of Algiers to avoid capture from police. The maze of passages and crowded streets of the Casbah are really captured well and the sense of impending doom for our hero is prevalent.
post #548 of 2004
Pssst, Bob...the guys in Happy Together are from Hong Kong, not Japan.

I saw Bob le Flambeur when the DVD came out, and I wasn't all that into it, aside from the outstanding lead performance of Roger Duchesne as Bob. I might be in the minority around here in preferring The Good Thief, which, while being more slick and less gritty, has a good lead performance from Nolte, and (this is where it clearly outdistances the original) a really good Euro supporting cast.

I have Pepe Le Moko inching near the top of my Netflix queue, looking forward to it. Definitely a Gabin fan.
post #549 of 2004
thanks for the TCM reminder Michael.


Pepe Le Moko is one of my favorite french films from the 30's. It plays very good as a double feature with Casablanca with Gabin's Pepe as almost a prototype of Bogart's Rick. It was also remade twice by Hollywood (Algiers 1938 & Casbah 1948).


First time viewings in Red
Out of

The Last Man on Earth (1964) (7/10)
Vincent Price stars as the last human survivor of a plague that turned the world’s population into vampires.
This low budget adaptation of Richard Mattheson’s “I Am Legend” is the most faithful version put on screen (it’s much better than bland The Omega Man –IMO).

Death Takes A Holiday (1934) (7/10)
The dark fantasy has Death taking human form so he can interact with a vacationing family and of course - find love. Very good film, and like Michael stated the f/x Horror elements are quite impressive for it's time.

The Man I Love (1947) (6/10)
Ida Lupino is a Nightclub performer who romances the lowly piano player while fighting off the unwanted advances of hood Robert Alda. Raoul Walsh directs.
post #550 of 2004
Pssst, Bob...the guys in Happy Together are from Hong Kong, not Japan.

Well, in my defense Haggai, I'm not very bright sometimes...

Damn, it's not like I didn't know that...Think I've just been watching too many Japanese films of late. Thanks for not exposing my error publicly though...

Aside from there being a whole slew of Japanese films available these days, one of the main reasons I've been delving into them is The Midnight Eye Guide To New Japanese Film. I'm only half way through it, but it's an excellent read. It has 20 chapters devoted to specific filmmakers and reviews of their films, along with separate reviews of other individual films.

I saw Bob le Flambeur when the DVD came out, and I wasn't all that into it, aside from the outstanding lead performance of Roger Duchesne as Bob. I might be in the minority around here in preferring The Good Thief, which, while being more slick and less gritty, has a good lead performance from Nolte, and (this is where it clearly outdistances the original) a really good Euro supporting cast

Duchesne is great isn't he? I actually thought the rest of the cast was fine as well, but I think I was clouded by the gorgeous young blonde who played the main female. Her relatively blank and occasionally stunned look seemed to fit well with the completely self-centered character she played.

It was also remade twice by Hollywood (Algiers 1938 & Casbah 1948).

How are the remakes?

It took me until about half way through to realize that I'd recently seen Gabin in The Lower Depths. Damn, he's good...
post #551 of 2004
Re: The Bird People in China and Suicide Club

Glad you liked TBPIC. It is a different kind of film than Miike is known for and reminded me of the films of Werner Herzog and the Icelandic director Fridrik Thor Fridrikson (check out his films Children of Nature and Cold Fever; the latter is available on R2 DVD, and the former features a touching cameo by a character from a certain Wim Wenders film...). SC started out with a bang but then got too off the wall for its own good.
post #552 of 2004
Thread Starter 
03/28/05

Baadasssss Cinema (2002)

Issac Julien’s documentary on the rise and fall of the blaxploitation genre, which caused more controversy than anything else. The documentary does a good job at showing off the high points but it really skips everything from 1975 through Jackie Brown, which was a dark period for the genre. The bad films of this period aren’t mentioned or discussed either. Still, the interviews with Melvin Van Peebles, Pam Grier, Quentin Tarantino and others are entertaining.

03/29/05

Decade Under the Influence Part 3, A (2002)

Final chapter in the series takes a look at Jaws and Star Wars and how these films killed everything else that was made earlier in the decade. Overall I enjoyed this series a lot and fans of this decade should certainly check this out but I preferred Easy Riders, Raging Bulls.

El Hotel de los Ligues (1981)

Jess Franco remakes his own 1978 film That Certain Taste and does it pretty much a direct scene for scene remake. As before, three couples are having sexual problems until a porn star (Lina Romay) shows up and teaches them a few lessons. The first film was a pure hardcore movie but this one here is a lot cleaner, ala softcore. The pacing here is really sluggish and all the supporting characters are a real drag, which wasn’t the case with the original. Lina Romay is full of energy and is the only reason to seek this one out.

03/30/05

In Bad Taste (2000)

Decent documentary on the career of John Waters features interviews with the man himself as well as Johnny Depp, Traci Lords, Rikki Lake and others. The documentary really doesn’t go into much detail about anything and it’s all over the map so there isn’t much to learn. It’s entertaining hearing Waters talk about his films but outside of that there isn’t much here.

Badlands (1973)

Terrence Malick’s cult classic about a garbage man (Martin Sheen) and his girlfriend (Sissy Spacek) who go on a cross country murdering spree. This was a big influence on True Romance, which is a film I like a lot but this one here is certainly better due in large part to the terrific performances and the beautiful music score, which was also used in TR. This is another film of the 70’s that doesn’t have any point but instead simply tells a story, which is why this is my favorite decade for film.

03/31/05

Rated X (2000)

Filmmakers Artie and Jim Mitchell (Charlie Sheen/Emilio Estevez) find fame with Behind the Green Door, one of the few porn titles to hit the mainstream. The first half dealing with the porn business in the early 70’s is very interesting but sadly the second half of the film goes downhill as we see the two men fall from grace. Estevez directs very nicely but we’ve seen this countless times and nothing new is really done here. Sheen gives the performance of his career and Estevez the actor does a nice job as well.

Errand Boy, The (1961)

Paramutuel Studios is losing money so they hire an errand boy (Jerry Lewis) to investigate but he ends up causing the studio even more money. To date this is the best of the Lewis solo films I’ve seen, although even this one doesn’t come out too good. There are some very funny moments but even more of the jokes just don’t come through. I think a better director than Lewis could have done more with the film.

post #553 of 2004
The Heiress (1949)

This is a not very good movie, improved, though not saved, by a very strong ending. But what sticks out is how unattractive Olivia De Havilland is in it (which is what the character is supposed to be). I'll admit I can't figure it out. Either a remarkable job was done of hiding this woman's beauty via makeup, lighting, etc., or a remarkable job is done in her other films of making a plain woman look beautiful through makeup, lighting, etc. I suspect it's more of the former, but I really can't tell.
post #554 of 2004
Summarizing my list

January 2005:

Films watched: 60

: 38
: 22

1930s: 2
1940s: 12
1950s: 4
1960s: 4
1970s: 8
1980s: 4
1990s: 12
2000s: 14

February 2005:

Films watched: 42

: 26
: 16

1930s: 2
1940s: 5
1950s: 4
1960s: 5
1970s: 4
1980s: 4
1990s: 6
2000s: 12

March 2005:

Films watched: 72

: 37
: 35

1920s: 3
1930s: 2
1940s: 14
1950s: 3
1960s: 8
1970s: 6
1980s: 15
1990s: 7
2000s: 14

Totals for Year (through March):

Films watched: 174

: 101
: 73

1920s: 3
1930s: 6
1940s: 31
1950s: 11
1960s: 17
1970s: 18
1980s: 23
1990s: 25
2000s: 40
post #555 of 2004
Jeremiah Johnson -
03/31/2005
OAR Broadcast


Interesting western with Robert Redford and a terrible script, makes you realize how good some westerns, like The Wild Bunch, are.

The dialogue was incredibly clunky throughout, despite that though, the film was well enough made that it was compellingly watchable despite the script/story/characters/narrative.

------
Agree on Suicide Club, I don't think too highly of Pépé le moko a film that drug on and on for me. Wish I'd been able to catch Death Takes a Holiday but I guess that will have to wait until May.
post #556 of 2004

How are the remakes?


Haven’t seen it in a long time but I thought Algiers with Charles Boyer as Pepe was pretty good. Not as good as the original IMO, but very much worth a look if you enjoy other Hollywood classics from that era. Casbah is a later musical version & I’ve never seen it so I can’t comment.

First time viewings in Red
Out of

Dillinger (1945) (8/10)
Lurid & brisk paced crime noir stars real-life silver screen bad-boy Lawrence Tierney in the title role of Public Enemy No 1. A definite keeper when Warner’s Noir set Volume 2 rolls out in July.

The Private Lives of Elizabeth and Essex (1939) (8/10)
Michael Curtiz’s Technicolor costume drama with Bette Davis as a spot-on Queen Elizabeth I & Errol Flynn as the dashing yet arrogant Earl of Essex. Fine supporting cast includes Vincent Price, Donald Crisp & Olivia De Havilland. Excellent film with energetic direction, top-notch performances & production values make this a very fun ride.
post #557 of 2004
Sex is Comedy (2002)

Viewed 3/30/2005 (first viewing)

French comedy about a film director beset by that nightmare of nightmares: the sex scene. Can she get her nervous and recalcitrant actors to give it their all?

out of


The Dinner Game (1998)

Viewed 3/31/2005 (first viewing)

More French comedy. A group of uppercrust men hold weekly "dinner games" to which each must bring an idiot. One of them is delighted to discover the moron to end all morons, until the too-friendly fool begins systematically (and inadvertently) destroying his life!

out of


Dolls (2002)

Viewed 3/31/2005 (first viewing)

A different sort of film from Takeshi Kitano, telling three stories of tragic love inspired by Bunraku doll theater. A young man consigns himself to caring for the ex-fiancee he's unintentionally driven insane, an aging yakuza mulls over the girl he left behind years ago, and a disfigured pop star meets a fan who would do anything for her. Beautifully shot.

out of
post #558 of 2004
[c]March Recap[/c]


Ratings range from "bomb" to four stars.

First viewings are bolded.


After Hours ***
Alexander Nevsky ***1/2
Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore ***1/2
The Bird People in China ***1/2
Bunny Lake is Missing **
Call Northside 777 ***
The Cat Returns ***
Cesar ***
Chimes at Midnight ***
Closer ***
Cube Zero **1/2
Dawn of the Dead (2004) ***
Dead End ***1/2
Dinner at Eight ***1/2
The Dinner Game ***1/2
Dolls ***1/2
Don Q: Son of Zorro ***1/2
Electra Glide in Blue ***
Fanny ***1/2
Finding Neverland ***1/2
A Fistful of Dynamite ***
Freeze Frame ***
The Gaucho ***
The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1957) **1/2
The I Inside **1/2
Incident at Loch Ness ***
The Incredibles ***1/2
The Invisible Woman ***
The Iron Mask ***1/2
Ivan the Terrible Part I ***1/2
Ivan the Terrible Part II ***
Laura ***1/2
Leave Her to Heaven ***1/2
Le Samourai ***1/2
The Letter ***1/2
Libeled Lady ****
The Lower Depths (1936) ***
The Lower Depths (1957) ***
Marius ***
The Mark of Zorro (1920) ***
The Mystery of the Leaping Fish ***
The Naked Kiss ***
Panic in the Streets ***
Samurai I: Musashi Miyamoto ***
Samurai II: Duel at Ichijoji Temple ***
Samurai III: Duel at Ganryu Island ***
The Satan Bug ***
Satan's Brew ***
Shock Corridor ***
Svengali ***1/2
10 Rillington Place ***1/2
The 10th Victim ***
That Uncertain Feeling ***1/2
Thirty Two Short Films About Glenn Gould ***1/2
Time of the Wolf ***1/2
To Be or Not to Be (1942) ****
With a Friend Like Harry ***1/2
The Yes Men ***



Total films viewed: 58 (I have no life)

New views: 42
post #559 of 2004
RE: Michael Elliott's reviews

DEATH TAKES A HOLIDAY

I've never understood your apparent dislike of Fredric March's 'definitive' JEKYLL & HYDE but your extremely favorable reaction to DEATH TAKES A HOLIDAY (1934) has REALLY made me want to see it! It sucks that the only way it's currently available is as part of a 2-Disc Set from Universal, coupled with its overblown (and completely unappetizing) remake, MEET JOE BLACK (1998) - a fate shared by Howard Hawks' magnificent SCARFACE (1932), although in that case Brian De Palma's remake (albeit grossly self-indulgent and undeniably inferior) is tolerable enough...

BADLANDS

I'm glad you liked this one so much, Mike! Terrence Malick's filmography is sparse but very impressive; unfortunately, his work has not been treated all that well on DVD, although there is a sort of a BADLANDS (1973) SE on R2 - certainly one of the most confident among the many great debuts the 1970s offered us - which I've considered getting (actually, I know the local outlet from where I rent DVDs has a copy of it but I'm not sure which edition he has!).

THE ERRAND BOY

I can't say I agree with your assessment of this one: I only caught up with it last year and found it to be a very resistible star vehicle. To me, Lewis' best solo efforts remain THE BELLBOY (1960) and THE NUTTY PROFESSOR (1963), both of which I'm interested in acquiring via Paramount's SE DVDs.


RE: Joe Karlosi's reviews

THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST

You are perfectly right when you say that "people's mileage for the film may vary depending on their personal religious beliefs"; I don't recall ever having discussed this film with you, Joe, but here are my thoughts (which I had written last year after my sole viewing of it):

"Its many controversial elements aside, I found it undeniably harrowing in its violence but somewhat lacking in character development (Christ, especially, is presented as one-dimensional which doesn't allow him much empathy from the viewers, despite one's knowledge of how the 'story' went - surely not what Gibson intended!) though it does have unmistakable artistic merit, notably a number of striking images: the putrefied donkey whose rope Judas uses to hang himself, and the raven which comes to sit on the ledge of the cross and starts pecking at the bad thief's face (immediately after the latter 'provokes' Christ into doing one last miracle) were unexpectedly surreal touches; a bloodied Christ looking up at a white dove flying into the scene just after the scourging was almost poetic in its incongruity; God's tear falling from Heaven, and the recurring presence of an androgynous Satan, etc. In the end, it's not quite the definitive statement on the subject one would have expected (given the director's sometimes punishing fussiness over getting the details right above all else), and certainly not as challenging as Martin Scorsese's equally notorious THE LAST TEMPTATION OF CHRIST (1988)...or Robert Bresson's DIARY OF A COUNTRY PRIEST (1950), for that matter, which I rewatched the very next day - courtesy of Criterion's SE DVD - as a means of comparison, and which I found infinitely more absorbing, and moving, in its depiction of one (misunderstood) man's 'calvary' with its simple yet beautiful images and thought-provoking scenes of quiet despair, confirmation of faith, and the agony of impending death; another film I would say is a far better representation of Christian sentiment/assertion than Gibson's film is Carl Theodor Dreyer's masterpiece THE PASSION OF JOAN OF ARC (1928; whose very title indicates that it too eschews Joan's 'history' for a thorough account of her final hours on Earth)."

I know you should be watching THE KING OF KINGS (1927) soon and, in light of this and the fact that I caught up with it only recently myself, I'm really looking forward to reading your take on it.

RUBY GENTRY

I suppose that the main reason why you watched this is Charlton Heston's participation but I'm glad that you appreciated King Vidor's direction. While I haven't watched it myself, I've seen enough of Vidor's work to know what he's capable of. In any case, I hope that you will seek out Vidor's other film with Jennifer Jones, DUEL IN THE SUN (1946) - available on DVD from MGM - which was quite a notorious production when released and remains full of interest to this day. I haven't yet had the time to comment on the recent Warners chat but I was disappointed that, despite many rumors, nothing tangible was said about upcoming DVD releases of several major King Vidor films like THE BIG PARADE (1925), THE CROWD (1928), SHOW PEOPLE (1928), HALLELUJAH (1929), THE CHAMP (1931), THE CITADEL (1938) and NORTHWEST PASSAGE (1940); the good news is that THE FOUNTAINHEAD (1949) is apparently coming in 2006.

DR. JEKYLL AND MR. HYDE

As you know, I completely agree with your opinion of the 1931 Fredric March version (I like the John Barrymore JEKYLL better than you, however) but I am really curious to watch this earlier Silent version, mainly because of Michael's high regard for it.
post #560 of 2004
Total films viewed: 58 (I have no life)
Jeez, what does that say about me?
Films watched: 72
post #561 of 2004
Thread Starter 
Actually, I don't care too much for the 1912 version of JEKYLL. It's the 1913 version with King Baggott that I'm always talking about. I also don't dislike the March version, although I think the performance is overblown and the Oscar unworthy. Colin Clive was better as Dr. Frankenstein in FRANKENSTEIN and I thought Edward Van Sloan was better in his role. My first viewing of the 1931 version had me rate it at but my second viewing last year saw it rise to a I'm not sure if I'll enjoy it any more than that but I don't feel it's one of the greatest horror films ever made. I don't see anyone, outside of fans, calling it one of the greatest ever made.

As far as Lewis solo, that was a goldmine considering my opinion on other films of his, including THE BELLBOY, which I hated. I finally realized it's not really the "actor" Lewis but the director Lewis who should have been fired and never allowed to work again. I laughed a lot during THE ERRAND BOY but not enough to where I'd watch it again. The only one, so far, that I'd watch again is THE STOOGE but I'll check the rest out anyways. I also remember liking TNP but prefer the remake.

Quote:
Christ, especially, is presented as one-dimensional


I can't agree with this. I think the reason THE PASSION and LAST TEMPTATION were so controversial is because the character wasn't one-dimensional. We were use to seeing surfers play Jesus but in these two films we were given humans. However, I think it was the violence that sold the story and it's a shame some people simply missed the point of its use. If they thought this was simply a gore feast then I'll GLADLY recommend them some real gore movies.
post #562 of 2004
Quote:
I don't feel it's one of the greatest horror films ever made. I don't see anyone, outside of fans, calling it one of the greatest ever made.

For me,not only do I feel it's one of the greatest horror films ever made, I even think it rivals FRANKENSTEIN and other 1930's Universal Classics in its potency. There's just too much intriguing direction from Mamoulian and a chillingly schizophrenic performance from March to dismiss it so easily. Unlike just about all early horror efforts, it still feels horrific and risque today.
post #563 of 2004
Quote (originally posted by Michael Elliott):

"Actually, I don't care too much for the 1912 version of JEKYLL. It's the 1913 version with King Baggott that I'm always talking about."


I'm always confusing the 1912 and 1913 versions of DR. JEKYLL AND MR. HYDE and which one of them is your favorite - thanks for clearing that up for good, Mike!
post #564 of 2004
The 1912 version was 11 minutes or so, and it was interesting for its day, that's about all I can say for it. I'm glad to have had the chance to check it out.
post #565 of 2004
Thread Starter 
I would have given thumbs up to the 1941 version had it ran 11 minutes so....


Just a reminder for those silent fans here but TCM will have a Charley Chase, Fatty Arbuckle and Harold Lloyd festival will be on Monday:

6:00 AM April Fool (1924) In this silent short, a cub reporter endures a string of practical jokes on April Fool's Day. Charley Chase, Blanche Mehaffey, Noah Young. D: Ralph Ceder. 12m.

6:15 AM Fraidy Cat (1924) In this silent short, a doctor's negative prognosis turns a shy man into an assertive hero. Charley Chase, Joe Cobb, Mickey Daniels. D: Leo McCarey. 12m.

6:30 AM Bad Boy (1925) In this silent short, a young man tries to impress his parents, despite the fact that they disagree on everything. Charley Chase, Olive Borden, Noah Young. D: Leo McCarey 19m.

7:00 AM Isn't Life Terrible (1925) In this silent short, a family camping trip turns into a disaster. Charley Chase, Oliver Hardy, Fay Wray. D: Leo McCarey. 22m.

7:30 AM Caretaker's Daughter, The (1925) In this silent short, a man with a jealous wife gets mixed up with his boss's girlfriend. Charley Chase, Katherine Grant, George Siegmann. D: Leo McCarey. 20m.

8:00 AM The Uneasy Three (1925) In this silent short, three would-be crooks try to crash a society party. Charley Chase, Katherine Grant, Bull Montana. D: Leo McCarey. 22m.

8:30 AM What Price Goofy? (1925) In this silent short, a man tries to keep his jealous wife from discovering a ladies' undergarment innocently left in their home. Charley Chase, Katherine Grant, Lucien Littlefield. D: Leo McCarey. 23m.

9:00 AM Innocent Husbands (1925) In this silent short, an honest husband has to keep his suspicious wife from finding the woman who's passed out in his bedroom. Charley Chase, Katherine Grant, Lucien Littlefield. D: Leo McCarey. 21m.

9:30 AM Long Fliv the King (1926) In this silent short, a princess marries a wrongly condemned man to guarantee that she inherits her father's throne, only to learn he's been pardoned. Charley Chase, Martha Sleeper, Max Davidson. D: Leo McCarey. 23m.

10:00 AM Mighty Like a Moose (1926) In this silent short, plastic surgery and dentistry transform a plain couple so they don't recognize each other. Charley Chase, Vivien Oakland, Ann Howe. D: Leo McCarey. 23m.

10:30 AM Bromo and Juliet (1926) To win the girl he loves, a young man must first play Romeo to her Juliet -- on stage. Charley Chase, Corliss Palmer, Oliver Hardy. D: Leo McCarey. 23m. LBX

11:00 AM Be Your Age (1926) In this silent short, a young man in need considers marrying a wealthy widow. Charley Chase, Gladys Hulette, Oliver Hardy. D: Leo McCarey. 22m.

11:30 AM Mama Behave (1926) 22m. LBX

12:00 PM Mums the Word (1926) In this silent short, a widow forgets to tell her rich new husband she has a grown son. Charley Chase, Virginia Pearson, Martha Sleeper. D: Leo McCarey. 21m.

12:30 PM Dog Shy (1926) In this silent short, a man tries to rescue a young beauty from marrying a rich man she doesn't love. Charley Chase, Stuart Holmes, Mildred June. D: Leo McCarey. 22m.

1:00 PM Fatty Joins the Force (1913) In this silent short, a young man's heroism lands him a job as a policeman, but he comes to regret it. Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle, Edgar Kennedy, Mack Swain. D: George Nichols. 13m.

1:15 PM A Flirt's Mistake (1914) Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle, Minta Durfee, Virginia Kirtley. D: George Nichols. 8m.

1:30 PM The Knockout (1914) In this silent short, a young man tries to impress his girlfriend by signing on for a boxing match. Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle, Edgar Kennedy, Charles Chaplin. D: Charles Avery. 27m.

2:00 PM The Rounders (1914) In this silent short, two drunks go on a bender together. Charles Chaplin, Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle, Minta Durfee. D: Charles Chaplin. 11m.

2:15 PM Leading Lizzie Astray (1914) Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle, Slim Summerville, Mack Swain. D: Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle. 12m.

2:30 PM Mabel and Fatty's Wash Day (1915) In this silent short, a henpecked husband's innocent friendship with a married woman leads to chaos. Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle, Mabel Normand, Alice Davenport. D: Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle. 13m.

2:45 PM Fatty and Mabel at the San Diego Exposition (1915) In this silent short, a young husband at the San Diego Exposition can't restrain his wandering eye. Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle, Mabel Normand, Minta Durfee. D: Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle. 14m.

3:00 PM Wished on Mabel (1915) In this silent short, a thief causes complications for a woman, her boyfriend and her over-protective mother. Mabel Normand, Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle, Edgar Kennedy. D: Mabel Normand. 13m.

3:15 PM Fatty's Tintype Tangle (1915) In this silent short, a henpecked husband is mistaken for a beautiful woman's jealous husband. Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle, Louise Fazenda, Edgar Kennedy. D: Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle. 28m.

3:45 PM He Did and He Didn't (1916) In this silent short, when a doctor eats too much, he dreams that his wife is unfaithful. Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle, Mabel Normand, Ben Turpin. D: Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle. 21m.

4:15 PM The Waiters' Ball (1916) In this silent short, two waiters fight over a tuxedo and a girl. Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle, Al St. John, Corinne Parquet. D: Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle. 16m.

4:45 PM Coney Island (1917) In this silent short, a vacationing man tries to evade his wife until another man goes after her. Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle, Al St. John, Buster Keaton. D: Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle. 26m.

5:15 PM Love (1919) Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle, Al St. John, Winifred Westover. D: Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle. 24m.

5:45 PM Leap Year (1921) A young man causes a raft of trouble by giving romantic advice to his female friends. Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle, Mary Thurman, Lucien Littlefield. D: James Cruze. 56m.

6:45 PM Seven Years Bad Luck (1921) In this silent film, a man's attempts to avoid bad luck after he breaks a mirror, lead straight to it. Max Linder, Thelma Percy, Alta Allen. D: Max Linder. 62m.

8:00 PM The Kid Brother (1927) In this silent film, the weakling in a family of he-men tries to prove his mettle. Harold Lloyd, Jobyna Ralston, Walter James. D: Ted Wilde, J.A. Howe. 82m.

9:30 PM Safety Last! (1923) In this silent film, a small-town boy out to impress his girlfriend scales a skyscraper in the big city. Harold Lloyd, Mildred Davis, Noah Young. D: Fred C. Newmeyer, Sam Taylor. 73m.

11:00 PM The Freshman (1925) In this silent film, a naive college boy tries to join the football team after making a fool out of himself. Harold Lloyd, Jobyna Ralston, Brooks Benedict. D: Fred C. Newmeyer. 76m.

12:15 AM Speedy (1928) In this silent film, a young man helps his girlfriend save the family trolley business. Harold Lloyd, Ann Christy, Babe Ruth. D: Ted Wilde. 86m.

1:45 AM Get Out and Get Under (1920) In this silent short, a young actor races to get to the theatre on time despite a string of disasters. Harold Lloyd, Mildred Davis, Fred McPherson. D: Fred C. Newmeyer. 25m.

2:15 AM Welcome Danger (1929) A gentle botany student has to toughen up to replace his father as chief of police. Harold Lloyd, Barbara Kent, Noah Young D: Clyde Bruckman, Malcolm St. Clair. 115m.

4:15 AM Harold Lloyd's World of Comedy (1962) Classic clips reveal the genius of the silent screen comic noted for his daredevil stunts. Harold Lloyd, Mildred Davis, Bebe Daniels. D: Harold Lloyd. 97m.
post #566 of 2004
EXORCIST: THE BEGINNING **


I've just watched EXORCIST: THE BEGINNING (2004) and, while I can say that it wasn't as totally worthless as I had been led to believe - or had fully expected, this being a Renny Harlin film after all - (certainly not so outrageously bonkers as Boorman's EXORCIST II: THE HERETIC [1977], thankfully) it still wasn't anything to write home about. The plotline sounded promising enough and the slow build-up during the first hour or so (echoing the original film to a certain degree) kept the interest going...that is, until the special effects took over - and what little psychology there had been got thrown out the window!

The cinematography, unsurprisingly, is the best of it and particularly the scenes shot in the buried church. The CGI effects and obligatory 'demon-on-a-rampage' climax were laughable, however, and the overall epic/blockbuster 'look' (as opposed to the more intimate settings of, at least, the first and third entries in the series) made it feel closer in style and effect to those despicable 'revisionist' MUMMY films made by another multiplex-catering hack (and a studio which, like Warner Bros. in this case, ought to treat its horror legacy with far greater respect)!!

One thing I feel that this entry lacked above all else (beside the inherent craftsmaship and intelligent writing) when compared to Friedkin's 1973 original and Blatty's remarkable-but-compromised THE EXORCIST III (1990) is the mixture of awe and dread which they inspired in the viewers - enabling in this way a genuine 'shaking' of the faith, whatever their disposition. As for Stellan Skarsgard, I never for a moment believed him as a younger version of Fr. Merrin as personified by Max von Sydow in the earlier film: he simply came off as too aloof, even in his cynicism, and by the end there's little sign of his subsequent authority and experience, virtues supposedly acquired through his clash with evil here...though the less-than-memorable, not to mention all-too-brief, 'confrontation' offered by the film, I guess, is mostly to blame for that deficiency!

In any case, I'm really curious to watch Paul Schrader's alternate version and I hope it gets a theatrical release over here too in the near future...
post #567 of 2004
March Movie Madness!

Favorites of March:
Ravenous 4/5 / B-
Talk Radio 4/5 / 5 / B
Ice Princess 4/5 / 5 / B+
Mallrats 4.5/ 5 / B+
Edward Scissorhands 5/5 / A
Bride and Prejudice 4.5/ 5 / B+
Hostage 4.5/ 5 / B+
Incredibles, The 5/5 / A+
Jacket, The 5/5 / 5 / A
Billy Madison 5/5 / A
Happy Gilmore 5/5 / A
Shaolin Soccer 4.5/5 / B
City by the Sea 4.5/5 / B

Worst of March

Ocean's Twelve 2.5/5 / D


Watched 40 films in 31 days!

ry
post #568 of 2004
Joe,


I've read your review of UNFORGIVEN (1992) on the IMDB and, of course, I'm glad that you gave it a ***1/2 (9/10) rating. However, I don't understand why, if you thought so highly of it, you still say it was a "dubious" Best Picture Oscar winner. Is it because it was too violent, because it belonged to a "dying" breed of film or because you actually think that there were better (and, consequently, more deserving) contenders among the nominees? THE CRYING GAME (1992) and HOWARD'S END (1992) are both very good films but I wouldn't say that they topped Eastwood's masterpiece in any incontestable way.

I've watched the film three times so far and I still have that 2-Disc SE DVD to watch but, in my opinion, it is not only one of the finest Westerns ever made but also, together with L.A. CONFIDENTIAL (1997), the best American film of the 1990s. As good a film as MILLION DOLLAR BABY (2004) is on its own terms, it falls short of Clint's towering achievement as actor-director in UNFORGIVEN.


I guess now is as good a time as any for us to discuss the Western genre; I was going to bring this up after your "objection" at setting Laurel & Hardy's WAY OUT WEST (1937) away from the amiable comic duo's usual urban milieu but I think this is even more appropriate. Actually, I'm quoting from a post I wrote on another online Forum about two years ago...so please bear with me if there are any anachronisms within the following text:


"I’ve just come from my second viewing of Andrew V. McLaglen’s large-scale, old-fashioned Western THE WAY WEST (1967) with three great movie stars: Kirk Douglas, Robert Mitchum and Richard Widmark. It’s a decent and incident-packed film but I wouldn’t be too surprised if it didn’t cut the mustard with movie-going audiences in the age of ultra-stylish films like Arthur Penn’s BONNIE AND CLYDE and John Boorman’s POINT BLANK (both released that same year), dismissing it as an old relic of a bygone era of film-making.

My first encounters with the Western genre were through a series of films shown on two Italian TV channels all Summer long in the mid-Eighties on Saturday nights and Sunday mornings. The prime time spot was given to the higher profile titles like THE SEARCHERS (1956), THE BIG COUNTRY (1958) and LITTLE BIG MAN (1970); on Sunday mornings, then, smaller scale Westerns like THE HANGING TREE (1958), THE LEFT-HANDED GUN (1958) and LAST TRAIN FROM GUN HILL (1959) kept me glued to the TV screen every week. Nowadays, having watched over 250 of them (I swear - I have a list of all of them at hand in case anyone’s incredulous!), I can safely say that Westerns are my second favorite genre of films...after Horror/Sci-Fi, of course!

Anyway, to answer the question posed by this thread: if I were asked this same question a decade ago, I would have been pretty conservative and answered with probably the three most popularly perceived to be the best Westerns of all time (or, if you will, the most famous Westerns ever made): STAGECOACH (1939) HIGH NOON (1952) and SHANE (1953), in that order. Nowadays, however, my thoughts tend to stray more often towards THE WILD BUNCH (1969), THE SEARCHERS and RED RIVER (1948) when thinking on this particular subject.

Taking a look at the titles listed by other fellow Forum members as being “the best Western (they) have ever seen”, one cannot but note an egregious preference for Spaghetti Westerns. This is perhaps unsurprising since this Forum is concerned with “cult” movies after all; however, one would have thought that the Western being the “national” genre i.e. purely American, as it were, more of you would have enjoyed a more varied diet of its many delicacies over the years. I can understand that one would naturally progress from enjoying “mindless” John Wayne action Westerns to the later and more “thoughtful” Clint Eastwood fare, but to say outright that one has little or no interest in watching a pre-1960s Western simply because it’s in black and white or else offers a “romanticized” view of things is to miss out on a lot of beautifully made movies which have stood the test of time admirably.

The Western genre has made its mark on popular culture from the earliest days of Silent cinema. The one which spawned the whole gnere, THE GREAT TRAIN ROBBERY (1903), was a sensation in its day. The three most notable Silent Westerns, however, were THE COVERED WAGON (1923), THE IRON HORSE (1924) and TUMBLEWEEDS (1925), all of which showed that the American West was an ideal setting in which to stage spectacular sequences – such as the still impressive “Land Rush” of the latter.

The Thirties started well enough with another “spectacular” – Raoul Walsh’s THE BIG TRAIL (1930), the first Widescreen Western in which John Wayne played his first important starring role - but the genre was soon overtaken by innumerable low-budget oaters churned out quickly to appease audiences who were clamoring for more. Henry Hathaway tried to restore some respectability to the genre filming the first Technicolor Western, THE TRAIL OF THE LONESOME PINE in 1936, but the genre truly kicked into high gear towards the end of the decade, specifically in 1939, with such marvelous films like DESTRY RIDES AGAIN, STAGECOACH, UNION PACIFIC and the Technicolor productions of DODGE CITY, DRUMS ALONG THE MOHAWK and JESSE JAMES!

The Forties saw the jovial mood of many of the earlier Westerns turn sour to reflect America’s entry into WWII. Notable examples of the genre during this period were THE OX-BOW INCIDENT (1943), Ford’s magnificent retelling of the Earp/Clanton feud - MY DARLING CLEMENTINE (1946) and the first “psychological” Western – Raoul Walsh’s noir-ish PURSUED (1947), a precursor of the maturity and sensitivity with which several major directors would start treating the Western genre in the following decade. The Forties ended strongly with two masterworks in the genre and their film-makers’ respective careers: Howard Hawks’ RED RIVER (1948) and John Ford’s SHE WORE A YELLOW RIBBON (1949) – both of which proved that John Wayne was a wonderful actor when provided with the right script!

The Fifties may be considered as being the Golden Age of the Western. During this decade the genre truly came into its own with a series of bold, stylish and imaginative films which eschewed the apparent simplicity which had been the order of the day in the earlier days of the format in favor of a growing maturity and intelligence. We not only had the series of five splendid Anthony Mann Westerns with James Stewart – WINCHESTER ’73 (1950), BEND OF THE RIVER (1952), THE NAKED SPUR (1953), THE FAR COUNTRY (1954) and THE MAN FROM LARAMIE (1955) – and “The Ranown Cycle”, a series of six low-budget Westerns starring Randolph Scott and directed by Budd Boetticher - SEVEN MEN FROM NOW (1956), THE TALL T (1957; often cited as being the best B-movie ever made), DECISION AT SUNDOWN (1957), BUCHANAN RIDES ALONE (1958; allegedly an inspiration for both YOJIMBO [1961] and A FISTFUL OF DOLLARS [1964]), RIDE LONESOME (1959) and COMANCHE STATION (1960) – but also several key works by major directors, like Fritz Lang’s RANCHO NOTORIOUS (1952), Nicholas Ray’s JOHNNY GUITAR (1954), John Ford’s THE SEARCHERS (1956), Anthony Mann’s MAN OF THE WEST (1958) and Howard Hawks’ RIO BRAVO (1959).

The Sixties could not hope to sustain such a momentum of continuing excellence and many bought into “the bigger the better” argument to counter the audiences’ desertion of theaters to TV. We therefore saw the release of overblown, overlong if still watchable movies like THE ALAMO (1960), CIMARRON (1960), HOW THE WEST WAS WON (1962), CHEYENNE AUTUMN (1964) and THE HALLELUJAH TRAIL (1965). Nevertheless, the odd masterpiece still managed to make its way towards cinema screens with Ford’s THE MAN WHO SHOT LIBERTY VALANCE (1962) and Sam Peckinpah’s RIDE THE HIGH COUNTRY (1962) being the most notable examples. Still, the emphasis was once again starting to drift towards spectaclular action and light-hearted fun with a seemingly never-ending stream of Westerns starring that living legend and embodiment of the genre – John Wayne. Even such masters as Howard Hawks were reduced to making lazy if still entertaining rehashes of earlier successes: both EL DORADO (1966) and RIO LOBO (1970) – his last film - were reworkings of the much better RIO BRAVO.

The unexpected arrival of a new myth from the European continent was like a sweet breath of fresh air to the stale Western genre: the highly irreverent and original style with which Sergio Leone infused his vision of the Western would not only have a revitaliszing effect on the genre, but also a more profound and lasting one on up-and-coming film-makers the world over. It created a new star in Clint Eastwood and ushered in an unexpected realism in the depiction of screen violence which would reach its zenith with Sam Peckinpah’s masterpiece THE WILD BUNCH (1969). However, the Spaghetti Western craze spawned only a handful of genuinely great films and a few good ones as well but the majority of them were low-budget oaters the likes of which had not been seen since the Thirties. This ensured that this subgenre bit the dust a little more than a decade after it started.

The Seventies are known to be the twilight years of the Western genre due to the continuing decline in the quality of the films themselves as well as the increasingly indifferent public reaction and hostile attitude from film studios towards them. Nevertheless, a bunch of excellent Westerns (albeit mostly revisionist in nature) came out during this moribund period: Arthur Penn’s LITTLE BIG MAN (1970), Robert Altman’s McCABE AND MRS. MILLER (1971), Sam Peckinpah’s PAT GARRETT AND BILLY THE KID (1973), Clint Eastwood’s THE OUTLAW JOSEY WALES (1976) and Don Siegel’s THE SHOOTIST (1976; John Wayne’s last film), not to mention some genuine oddities like Alexandro Jodorowsky’s EL TOPO (1971) and Arthur Penn’s THE MISSOURI BREAKS (1976; which was a notorious flop in its day despite starring Marlon Brando and Jack Nicholson).

Apart from a couple of interesting excursions out West during the Eighties, the Westerns made during this decade were mainly notable for their absence; perhaps the studio-breaking financial disaster of Michael Cimino’s HEAVEN’S GATE (1980) had something to do with this as well. The genre had to wait until the unexpected triumph at the Oscars of Kevin Costner’s DANCES WITH WOLVES (1990) and Clint Eastwood’s magnificent UNFORGIVEN (1992) to attain a long-denied payback with both audiences and critics alike. Still, in the ten-year interim since then, very few Westerns of any merit have reached our screens and I fear that this beloved genre is once again, if not extinct, decidedly dormant!

And now after such a long-winded lecture, the Professor will retire from the stage, catch the next stagecoach out of town and head straight towards the nearest saloon for a well-deserved alcoholic refreshment!"


I don't know how extensive your knowledge of the Western genre is, Joe - apart from THE OX-BOW INCIDENT, THE SEARCHERS, THE MAN WHO SHOT LIBERTY VALANCE, BUTCH CASSIDY AND THE SUNDANCE KID (1969; I can't believe I failed to mention this iconic film), LITTLE BIG MAN and UNFORGIVEN - but I hope that my (hardly definitive) "essay" will prompt you to seek out on DVD some of the titles mentioned and put them on your Netflix queue.
post #569 of 2004
I realize your post wasn't addressed to me, but

Nowadays, however, my thoughts tend to stray more often towards THE WILD BUNCH (1969), THE SEARCHERS and RED RIVER (1948)
one cannot but note an egregious preference for Spaghetti Westerns. This is perhaps unsurprising since this Forum is concerned with “cult” movies after all; however, one would have thought that the Western being the “national” genre i.e. purely American
I can only speak for myself, but I find at least some spaghetti westerns (e.g., the man with no name trilogy) far better westerns than any of those three, all of which are tremendously overrated in my opinion. The fact that they weren't made by an American is irrelevant.

On the other hand, that's not because I don't think highly of American westerns, just not ones like the 3 you mentioned. I'm much more impressed with films like High Noon, My Darling Clementine, The Magnificent Seven, Butch Cassidy & the Sundance Kid, Unforgiven (the 2nd best picture of 1992 IMO, second only to Aladdin), and The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance, all of which are much better IMO, than the three you named.
post #570 of 2004
Anyway, to answer the question posed by this thread: if I were asked this same question a decade ago, I would have been pretty conservative and answered with probably the three most popularly perceived to be the best Westerns of all time (or, if you will, the most famous Westerns ever made): STAGECOACH (1939) HIGH NOON (1952) and SHANE (1953), in that order. Nowadays, however, my thoughts tend to stray more often towards THE WILD BUNCH (1969), THE SEARCHERS and RED RIVER (1948) when thinking on this particular subject.

You have great taste in westerns, no matter which of those six titles you prefer.





Crawdaddy
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movies (Theatrical)
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › Track the Films You Watch (2005)