Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › Track the Films You Watch (2005)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Track the Films You Watch (2005) - Page 14

post #391 of 2004
Haggai

I responded to your thread in software as it's more appropriate there.

First time viewings in Red
Out of

Coffy (1973) (7/10)
Pam Grier is a nurse by day and vigilante by night, out to get the pushers that cooked her little sister. Most of the acting is crude and this is a bit over-the-top but it’s a fun genre film.

Foxy Brown (1974) (5/10)
Another Pam Grier revenge flick. Didn’t care for this one as much as Coffy. Most of the raw energy seems missing.

The Beast With Five Fingers (1946) (6/10)
A dismembered hand terrorizes the inhabitants of a dead pianist’s estate. Above average horror flick for the era it was made in.
post #392 of 2004

I've given up on the dating. I can't make myself do daily updates and I can't keep the proper dates straight after the fact.


Yeah I know what you mean, I never did the dates because frankly I could care less what I watched on Jan 28th 2005 for example. But thats just me.


Ever since I got the X-Box it's pretty rare I watch more than one movie a day.


You do know that shit rots your brain don't you?
post #393 of 2004
Thanks, Jim.

I had never kept track of the movies I watched until this year's thread. I actually really like being able to see what movie I saw on a particular day.
post #394 of 2004
First time viewings in Red
Out of


Somebody Up There Likes Me (1956) (6/10)
Paul Newman stars as boxer Rocky Graziano in this bio-pic directed by Robert Wise. Above average but this is no Raging Bull.

Desk Set (1957) (5/10)
A very by-the-numbers Hepburn/Tracy romantic/comedy, this time in an office setting. Been there, done that.

If (1968) (5/10)
A precursor to A Clockwork Orange as Malcolm McDowell leads a revolt in an English boarding school. A product of it’s time & based on it’s reputation, a bit overrated.
post #395 of 2004
The Cat Returns (2002)

Viewed 3/3/2005 (first viewing)

Engaging animated fantasy produced by Hayao Miyazaki. An awkward young girl saves the life of a cat and discovers that he is the prince from the kingdom of cats. Then the grateful king shows up and insists that she marry his son! Short and sweet.

out of


Le Samourai (1967)

Viewed 3/3/2005 (first viewing)

Cold, calculating police procedural from Jean-Pierre Melville. A tight-lipped hitman (Alain Delon) is picked up by the police after killing a club owner but gets off after providing an alibi. He's then marked for death by his nervous employers and tailed by the still-suspicious cops. Tops of its kind.

out of
post #396 of 2004
Public Enemy - I must say I was surprised at how entertaining this was...I picked up the Warner Gangster set without ever having seen any of these films and just knowing their reputation. I feared that perhaps they would come across a bit too dated, but that wasn't the case. Oh sure, it's a somewhat different slice of gangster life than Goodfellas, but that doesn't mean it can't be an enjoyable experience watching the ups and downs of an old style gangster's career. Looking forward to the rest of the set (whenever I get to it).

The Red Shoes - I can't praise this film high enough. Absolutely stunning and gorgeous to look at. The centre piece is obviously the 20 minute ballet sequence that plays out not only the Red Shoes ballet, but the larger story of the movie as well. Though I've always been able to appreciate the artistry of ballet, I'd never have been mistaken for a fan of it. I was totally captivated during this sequence though and thought it was great that it wasn't just a filmed version of the ballet, but an extended and at times dream like view of what the dancer herself might be visualizing. The rest of the story was great fun as well. Grandly melodramatic, but I strangely didn't mind that and felt it worked to the film's advantage. This was a rental, but I now own this in the collection and can't wait to view it again...

Theremin: An Electronic Odyssey - I didn't quite go ga-ga over this doc as much as some others have (it's a little slow moving and scattered at times), but there are some great stories here. In particular, sections with theremin virtuoso Clara Rockmore...She wishes to be thought of as a classically trained musician instead of someone who plays a curiosity. You can see her point as she performs a few beautiful passages. There's some great interviews with Brian Wilson as well.

Blow-up - By the end of this film, I still wasn't sure whether I liked it or not...But as time went on, I noticed I kept thinking about it and what I had seen. So much, that I've ordered it and look forward to viewing it again. There's certainly some odd sections that don't work for me. Specifically the part where the photographer romps with the 2 young models. Though I can see how it fits in with the general concept of the film (what you perceive may not really be the truth), I felt annoyed through that whole sequence. Otherwise though, there's some beautiful shots and quite interesting scenes that play with the concept. I loved the editing of the entire section where he blows up his photos and thinks he has uncovered something.

Out Of The Past - Classic film noir. Robert Mitchum is the coolest. You can see him spiral down and you know he knows it. And yet whenever you see his femme fatale on screen, you fully understand why he can't do anything but stay on that downward path...Great film.

Night Of The Hunter - This one caught me by surprise a number of times...Mitchum again, but this time in a really off the wall performance. I felt he was a bit over the top sometimes, but then again he was playing a psycho serial killing priest - so I don't really have any concrete comparisons...B-) Though I need to see this again, I felt the ending let me down somewhat. After some great setups and stunning black and white cinematography (the childrens escape down the river and the discovery of what happened to their mother), I couldn't help feeling it fizzled a bit once the children meet up with the Lillian Gish character. Still an overall classic that deserves the rep I had heard about it.

The Yes Men - Documentary following a couple of stunts pulled by The Yes Men - a couple of guys and their friends who protest against big corporations by pretending to be members of the WTO. Amusing and very ballsy at times with a couple of "I can't believe they did that moments". I don't think they fully succeeded in framing their point terribly well, but you at least get the feeling they have one...

Infernal Affairs - Quite enjoyable cop/gangster thriller. Like with many of the Hong Kong films, I find it to be a mix of great action with occasional bouts of dramatic cheese (great big gooey globs of it). Cool story though - two moles pitted against each other (one cop mole, one gangster). I kind of felt it peaked early during the first tension filled bust of the drugs coming in off the boat, but it was still a fun ride throughout.

The Most Dangerous Game - Short and sweet version of the classic man hunting game on a remote island. It actually may have benefitted from being a bit longer if they could have played up the cat and mouse angle a bit more to prove the worth of both the hunter and the huntee.
post #397 of 2004
This will be my post. Need to track down all of what I've watched so far.
post #398 of 2004
nevermind, found the 2005 only (primarily) thread
post #399 of 2004
Thread Starter 
03/01/05

Tales from a Golden Age: Bob Dylan 1941-66 (2004)

Interesting documentary that follows Bob Dylan from his childhood up to his motorcycle wreck in 1966 just after the release of Blonde on Blonde. Dylan and his management had nothing to do with this project so there aren’t any historians or anything like that. The interesting thing is seeing the history told by his friends from childhood plus other musicians that were around at the time.

Guinea Pig: Devil’s Experiment (1985)

Infamous Guinea Pig entry has three men kidnap a young woman and slowly torture her. This is the film that Charlie Sheen reported to the FBI thinking it was a real snuff film. The reputation for these films are that they are very graphic and brutal and this was but I found it boring at the same time. The effects really aren’t anything decent so why Sheen thought this was real is beyond me. I’m sure some enjoy this stuff but not I.

Guinea Pig 2: Android of Notre Dame (19

First follow up has a scientist dwarf experimenting and a female’s body in hopes that he’ll discover a way to save his dying sister. Another boring, silly and graphic mess that’s only concern is showing gore no matter how fake it looks.

Craving, The (1980)

Werewolf Waldemar Daninsky (Paul Naschy) returns from the dead 200 years after being executed only to battle a vampire who was also executed at the same time. Like most Naschy films I’ve seen, this here contains some great moments but the dull, sluggish pace really kills the thing in the end. Naschy served as director and he does a remarkable job at creating some very nice atmosphere and the first attack from the grave is very well done. The music score fits the film very nicely and the look of the werewolf is top notch. This was a remake of Naschy’s earlier film, The Werewolf vs. the Vampire Woman.


03/02/05

Beach Picnic (1939) A-

Donald and Pluto are having a beach party when a group of ants show up to spoil things. Some very funny scenes include a glue trap plus Pluto messing around with a rubber floating toy.

03/03/05

Hoosiers (1986)

This was voted the greatest sports movie ever and I’ve gotta agree. If this wasn’t based on a true story the film would certainly lose a lot of its meaning and we’d probably call it cliché but everything really comes together here. I doubt anyone living outside IN or KY really knows the love towards basketball but this film captures that perfectly as does it capture the good/bad side of a small town. The performances by Gene Hackman and Dennis Hopper rank among the best of their careers and the newcomers do a nice job as well. A warm and uplifting film that gets better each passing year.

Life and Passion of Christ, The (1905)

Decent telling of the story of Jesus from his birth up to the resurrection. This early French feature is full of wonderful imagination and the use of color is a real added bonus. The visual are all very nice and the set decoration is among the best I’ve seen in any silent film of its era. The biggest problem is that the feature runs just over 40-minutes and it seems like a bunch of short films edited together. There’s really no consistent storytelling but instead just various segments from the Bible.

From the Manger to the Cross (1912)

Early Warner Bros. film is the typical telling of Jesus, as the title says, from the manger to the cross. This is a really boring, dull and pointless telling of the story but I guess the studio wanted to make a feature and stretched everything to the limit. The film uses quotes from the New Testament but this gets tiresome very quickly as well. The film was shot on location all around the world and from a historic standpoint, this here is interesting but the rest of the film isn’t.

Chickens Come Home (1931) A-

Hardy’s running for Mayor but a woman from his past tries to blackmail him over some racy photos. This is a very good short full of wonderful laughs including a hilarious ending where the boys try to sneak the woman out of a house. Other highlights include a cigarette joke as well as a fight between Laurel and the woman.

03/04/05

Toolbox Murders (2004)

Remake of the 1970’s cult classic has director Tobe Hooper trying to recapture his golden days but failing due to a horrible script that borrows loosely from the original but doesn’t improve anything. There’s plenty of gore to go around but the main character is way too annoying. I was really hoping Hooper would get his act together but sadly we’ll have to wait for his next film.
post #400 of 2004
Quote:
I doubt anyone living outside IN or KY really knows the love towards basketball but this film captures that perfectly as does it capture the good/bad side of a small town.


Native Kentuckian here, but I know that plenty of people from at least two other states would disagree with that--Kansas and North Carolina.
post #401 of 2004
Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore (1974)

Viewed 3/4/2005 (first viewing)

Interesting change of pace for Martin Scorsese. A widow strikes out on her own with her precocious son and ends up waiting tables at Mel's Diner (this was the basis for the long-running television show Alice). Solid drama that never gets too preachy with its theme of feminine independence.

out of


Time of the Wolf (2002)

Viewed 3/4/2005 (first viewing)

Apocalyptic drama from Michael Haneke. A mother and her children try to survive in the French countryside after a mysterious disaster. More of a piece with Tarkovsky's The Sacrifice than the Mad Max films.

out of


The Letter (1940)

Viewed 3/4/2005 (first viewing)

Beautifully photographed melodrama with Bette Davis as a wife who kills her lover and tries to weasel out of it. From a W. Somerset Maugham tale.

out of
post #402 of 2004
First time viewings in Red
Out of

The Clearing (2004) (6/10)
Slow paced languid thriller has Willem Dafoe kidnapping a successful business executive, Robert Redford. The story focuses on the Redford character’s past mistakes/regrets.

The Night of the Iguana (1964) (6/10)
A defrocked preacher (Richard Burton) goes on a wild bender in Mexico. Directed by John Huston & based on a Tennessee Williams play. Worth watching for the performances but I’ve never been a fan of William’s work.

How To Steal a Million (1966) (6/10)
Comedy/romance/caper flick starring Audrey Hepburn & Peter O’Toole as they attempt to steal a forged sculpture done by Hepburn’s father. Not bad but ultimately forgettable.

Exorcist: The Beginning (2004) (4/10)
This was an interesting concept for a prequel, based on a smidgeon of background information from the original film & based of Father Merrin’s first encounter with the demon/devil. Unfortunately what we get is a Exorcist film for the MTV generation directed by hack Renny Harlin. If you like cheap jump scares & a dumbed down plot this is the film for you. For those looking for the deeper emotional/psychological dread that the first film evoked, look elsewhere.
post #403 of 2004
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Kansas and North Carolina.


Roy Williams?

I think Kansas and NC are still "stars" schools while in IN and KY, you can be a hero just by playing high school basketball. Doesn't matter if you make college or the pros. Plus, how many other states has a father (KY fan) kill his son (Louisville fan) just because Louisville won the basketball game and was making fun of UK?
post #404 of 2004
Quote:
Unfortunately what we get is a Exorcist film for the MTV generation directed by hack Renny Harlin.

Oh, I don't know, Jim. I can't stand those "MTV generation" dumbed-down films of today and I liked EXORCIST: THE BEGINNING more than I ever thought I could possibly expect to. I thought it avoided a lot of that and concentrated on the psyche of the younger Father Merrin.
post #405 of 2004
Yesterday I watched Raging Bull. The first time I watched it, I felt mixed. I could appreciate it as a very well made movie, but I had no affection for it. It was just painful to watch. But I decided to rent the 2-disc SE from Netflix for the commentaries and extras. Unfortunately, Disc One, contrary to what is stated on the Netflix site, did not feature the commentaries. Instead, it was the barebones single disc release that came out the same day as the 2-Disc Set. I was outraged but after watching extras on Disc 2, I decided to watch the movie again. Anyway, I just approached it with a different feeling and though I dreaded many of the events of the last hour, knowing what happens really enhanced it for me. I just enjoyed watching everything unfold. It's a brilliantly crafted film and I can finally say I love it.
post #406 of 2004
Audition -
OARDVD
03/05/2005


Damn this movie was intense, it literally had me sweating by the end of the film. Brilliantly made, surreal and stunning. I love how throughout the mundane aspects of the film we have a gradual deterioration in the sanity of the filmmaking going on. Look at the scene between the two lead guys the day after he comes back from his weekend with her, the cutting, the camera work, the 180 degree continuity throughout this scene are all just going to shit in a very deliberate but subtle manner that is absolutely unnerving in the way a traditional scene such as this rarely is.

Not recommended for everyone, but damn is it an experience, if you do watch it, watch it with at least two others, part of the enjoyment of this film is the mutual reactions you share.

----
Forgotten Silver -
OARDVD
03/06/2005


Brilliant and charming mockumentary by Peter Jackson. This was incredibly well concieved and put together, and its so slick it makes a damn convincing argument even as the filmmakers keep upping the stakes of absurdity just another notch higher every five minutes. Highly recommended and very enjoyable, again a good one to watch with an audience.

Adam
post #407 of 2004
Joe,


I was kind of worried there for a moment when your film viewing kept decreasing of late but I see that it's picking up the pace once more...I hope.

Anyhow, I'm glad you liked both THE LETTER (1940) and THE HUSTLER (1961) - although, in my case, despite not being a fan of either "women's pictures" or "sports movies" in general, I'd give both the full **** rating. By the way, why no "IMDB comments" on either of these so far?

While I still need to pick up THE LETTER on DVD myself, I managed to score THE HUSTLER as part of a 3-Disc Paul Newman Collection also featuring BUTCH CASSIDY AND THE SUNDANCE KID (1969) - which I know is a favorite of yours - and THE VERDICT (1982) which, incidentally, I rewatched recently as part of a mini-Sidney Lumet tribute on my part (to coincide with his receipt of an Honorary Oscar at this year's Academy Awards) which also included EQUUS (1977), FAIL-SAFE (1964; featuring the recently-deceased Dan O'Herlihy in the nominal leading role), DEATHTRAP (1982), THE APPOINTMENT (1969) and SERPICO (1973).

I also see that you rewatched THE DARK EYES OF LONDON (1939) - featuring one of Bela Lugosi's finest performances, in my opinion - which, as you may recall, I purchased some time ago on DVD (via The Roan Group¡¦s disc entitled THE HUMAN MONSTER) based on your recommendation and for which, naturally, I'm grateful.


Michael,


I don't envy you the task of having to sit through Hallmark's Laurel & Hardy DVDs but, perhaps, your negative vibes about the disc apparently "clouded" your judgment on the films themselves.

Seriously, though, I'm surprised that your recent viewings of WAY OUT WEST (1937) and BLOCK-HEADS (1938) were your first and also that you happen to find the former not one of the amiable duo's greatest films; as a matter of fact, I find it to be second only to SONS OF THE DESERT (1933)...and only by hair at that! I'd go so far as to say that WEST is their most polished production and, as you rightly said, it does contain some of their most memorable sequences. Maybe it's because I've been enjoying this classic comedy since the late 80s but I have no qualms about giving it a fully-deserved ****.

As for BLOCK-HEADS, it follows closely on WEST's heels as L&H's third best (or funniest) and the only reason why I'd rate it below the other two is its lack of a basic plot-line which makes it feel more like a collection of admittedly side-splitting gags strung back to back than anything else. By the way, have you ever watched the equally hilarious OUR RELATIONS (1936) which, for me, is the next in line on the L&H "Order Of Merit" list?
post #408 of 2004

Oh, I don't know, Jim. I can't stand those "MTV generation" dumbed-down films of today and I liked EXORCIST: THE BEGINNING more than I ever thought I could possibly expect to. I thought it avoided a lot of that and concentrated on the psyche of the younger Father Merrin.


What can I say Joe, maybe my tolerance level is lower than yours, or maybe I'm getting a little crotchety as I grow older. All I know is that I wanted to hit my eject button and fling the disc across the room by the time that joke of an "exorcism" takes place, as Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
the possessed Isabella Scorupco runs towards Father Merrin in slow motion as Merrin chants his incantations just in time for God to throw up some kind of a force field between them & magically cure the possessed
. definitely "dumbed down" IMO, compared to the ordeals the priests went through in the first film.

On the positive side, it did have a few genuinely disturbing moments & it was far from the worst horror films I've seen. It wasn't even the worst of the Exorcist sequels as that honor goes to Part II.


First time viewings in Red
Out of



The Name of the Rose (1986) (8/10)
Top-notch murder mystery has Sean Connery as an ex-inquisitor trying to solve a group of murders in a European monastery circa the 14th century.

The Secret of Roan Inish (1994) (6/10)
This quiet unassuming film about an Irish fable is well made but like the other John Sayles features I’ve seen, I was more than a little bored at times.

The Odessa File (1974) (6/10)
Decent political thriller has Jon Voight investigating a secret society protecting former members of the SS.

Ruggles of Red Gap (1935) (5/10)
Charles Laughton is an English butler brought to the American old-west. Sounds like the plot of a TV sitcom. Laughton is excellent in everything he does but the direction is flat, the jokes stale & the laughs just weren’t there.

Days of Glory (1944) (5/10)
This bizarre almost propaganda-like WWII film has Gregory Peck leading a group of Soviet guerilla fighters against the invading Nazi’s.
post #409 of 2004
Thread Starter 
Quote:
I don't envy you the task of having to sit through Hallmark's Laurel & Hardy DVDs but, perhaps, your negative vibes about the disc apparently "clouded" your judgment on the films themselves


A very good point but.....no.

I'm still not at the point where I wouldn't watch a film just because it's on a bad DVD. The quality was very poor on CHICKENS COME HOME but the other two weren't as bad. I went into more detail about all the issues for a couple reasons. For starters, I haven't seen the R2 discs so I needed to be clear about the problems on the R1 so that people who own the R2 would know if these were different prints. Also, I wasn't too hard on Vol. 1, video wise, and a lot of people thought they were worse than I did. Looking back at Vol. 1, they were right so I needed to be clear on the issues. However, I own around 400 public domain films and the quality hasn't ever been an issue on me enjoying a film. THAT CERTAIN TASTE, the Franco movie, looked quite poor plus it was in Italian without subs yet I was still able to enjoy it. I received 8 Franco films this week and 5 are DVD-Rs and the quality will probably be low.

Quote:
Seriously, though, I'm surprised that your recent viewings of WAY OUT WEST (1937) and BLOCK-HEADS (1938) were your first and also that you happen to find the former not one of the amiable duo's greatest films;


Block-Heads was certainly a first viewing but I did recall many things in WOW so I'm thinking I had seen that one before. Outside the two recent DVDs, I haven't seen any L&H since I was around 8 or 9 when Hallmark released a lot of videos over here. Most of them were the shorts and I believe they were colorized so that's why Chicken got a "new view" as well. I have a list of everything I saw as a kid somewhere so I need to look the films up there to be certain.

As for which one I liked more, it's strange but I never fully enjoy any comedy duo's "best film". I thought BLOCK-HEADS, even with the lack of a plot, was still the funniest when compared to WEST and SONS. I personally didn't see too much plot in all three but BLOCK-HEADS was the first film that ever had tears running from my eyes. I actually had to pause the film twice and clear my eyes so that I could keep an eye on the video transfer. I was laughing that hard.

COUNTRY HOSPITAL is my personal favorite short from the duo. WEST OF HOT DOG is another silent, which (from memory) has Stan solo. I also enjoyed this a bit more than WOW.

I held off buying the box set because I was hoping Lions Gate would come through on this release but they didn't so I'll be picking up that foreign set in a few weeks.


Re: EXORCIST: THE BEGINNING

Gotta agree with Jim reguarding the MTV stuff. I'll post my notes later but I found the first hour slow and boring (hey, like the first 10 minutes of the original) but then at the one hour mark things got REALLY good and I started to enjoy the film a lot more before that horrible ending. As I've said countless times before, CGI is a lack of talent compared to the men who created these effects were their hands and MINDS. I gained a lot more respect for the original after seeing this film and the poor effects it used.
post #410 of 2004
Quote:
I thought BLOCK-HEADS, even with the lack of a plot, was still the funniest when compared to WEST and SONS.
Agreed, but I like Music Box even more.
post #411 of 2004
I just recently joined Netflix, and since they have a 5-star rating system, I switched from 4-stars in my list. Seemed kind of pointless to have two different star ratings for many of the same movies.

And now for some thoughts on three movies I saw in the theater this weekend. The AFI theater in Maryland is doing retrospectives for Wong Kar-Wai and Scorsese, so I went to one that I had seen before, and two that I hadn't.

In the Mood for Love (2000)
I saw this in a theater back when it was first released in the US. I remembered liking it, but for whatever reason I never got around to getting the Criterion DVD. That's about to change, as this film is absolutely a masterpiece. Everyone involved was quite clearly at the top of their game, as practically every scene in fascinating in some way. There are maybe a few things I could slightly criticize--the gorgeous main musical theme is perhaps overused, the "who made the first move" sequence is somewhat randomly done in a multiple-perspective Rashomon-style, and I couldn't quite keep track of all the location switches in the last 20 minutes (Cambodia? What does that have to do with anything?). But I almost feel silly for even bringing these things up--when everything is so gorgeous and emotionally involving, what's there to complain about?

Happy Together (1997)
Ever seen Chinese people speaking Spanish? That was a first for me, in this moody story of itinerant gay men struggling to find themselves--or something--in Buenos Aires. Some good scenes throughout with Tony Leung and Leslie Cheung, plus another character who ends up being important as well. I was enjoying it all the way through without being quite sure where it was all going, but I was so affected by the final sequence (not in a sad way, I found it quite hopeful) that Wong and company must have been doing something right the whole way through.

New York, New York (1977)
Interesting mis-fire for Scorsese, I'd probably characterize it as a compelling failure. The main story of the rise and fall of the main couple, played by De Niro and Liza Minelli, has some good moments, but doesn't add up to much in the end. A "so what?" factor kicks in, as it's not clear what the fuss was all about. Liza is tremendous, definitely easy to care about, but De Niro's character doesn't go much beyond an obnoxious double-talker (though his performance is good). There's a glossy old-MGM-style musical montage near the end, which I loved, and also some entertaining comedic bits from De Niro earlier on, as he tries to scam hotels out of paying his bills, while trying to hook Liza into getting involved with him. Had they just made it all into a straight-up musical, maybe a bittersweet comedy, instead of trying to blend the old musical formulas with brooding New Hollywood '70s character studies, it might have been great. Overall, it doesn't work, but it's still pretty interesting.
post #412 of 2004
Michael,


Our little Laurel & Hardy discussion has just pushed me into finally ordering that 21-Disc Box Set available in the UK - together with a childhood favorite of mine: the Robert Youngson compilation, THE FURTHER PERILS OF LAUREL & HARDY (1967) - for the princely sum of $187.10 (including shipping and VAT costs) from Amazon.co.uk!

I'll be off from work for a week around Easter time and, hopefully, this set will arrive in time for me to sample a couple of these discs. Now all I need to do is figure out a place where to put this elephantine purchase!!
post #413 of 2004
Quote:
I was kind of worried there for a moment when your film viewing kept decreasing of late but I see that it's picking up the pace once more...I hope.

Hi, Mario,
Yes, it's true that my rate of viewing has tapered off lately. The problem has been that I've gone back to work after being out a good portion of February, so I haven't really had the stamina very often to appreciate a film at night. At times like that I tend to re-watch something I'm already familiar with. Also, I've been watching a lot of TV discs, like I LOVE LUCY and the newly issued LOST IN SPACE SEASON 3.

Quote:
By the way, why no "IMDB comments" on either of these so far?

Sometimes I get backed up, as you can see. I tend to write when I'm fresh in the morning, and usually when I'm off from work and am not too prepoccupied. In the case of certain films, I just have more that I need to think about before committing to a proper set of comments (which was the case with THE LETTER and THE HUSTLER, among others) and then I fall into the trap of procrastinating to the point where nothing gets written!
post #414 of 2004
Quote:
I thought BLOCK-HEADS, even with the lack of a plot, was still the funniest when compared to WEST and SONS. I personally didn't see too much plot in all three but BLOCK-HEADS was the first film that ever had tears running from my eyes. I actually had to pause the film twice and clear my eyes so that I could keep an eye on the video transfer. I was laughing that hard.

I love BLOCK-HEADS! It's my second favorite L&H film, right after SONS OF THE DESERT. I was laughing my ass off too the very first time I ever saw it! I have never seen WAY OUT WEST in its entirety.

Quote:
Re: EXORCIST: THE BEGINNING
Gotta agree with Jim reguarding the MTV stuff. I'll post my notes later but I found the first hour slow and boring (hey, like the first 10 minutes of the original) but then at the one hour mark things got REALLY good and I started to enjoy the film a lot more before that horrible ending. As I've said countless times before, CGI is a lack of talent compared to the men who created these effects were their hands and MINDS. I gained a lot more respect for the original after seeing this film and the poor effects it used.

Don't get me wrong - I didn't like THE BEGINNING as much as THE EXORCIST or EXORCIST 3 (though it's better than Part 2), but I was just expecting ALL special effects with no attempt at any type of story or characters whatsoever. Like most fans, I went in with my arms folded and still sore at Warner Bros. for bumping Paul Schrader off the original project. I was ready to hate every frame of the Harlin film and I found I just couldn't; I definitely squirmed at the lousy CGI, and also the very silly exorcism sequence -- but I must admit I was taken with the tormented character of the priest, the whole Nazi thing, and also the atmosphere.
post #415 of 2004
Thread Starter 
The film eventually worked itself up to a rating but I took away a half due to the ending, which I was tempted to turn off after a minute. The Nazi part is the reason I started to like the film more so perhaps they should have started there and worked forward. The first hour dealing with the church just wasn't interesting to me.

I will agree this was better than E2 but I thought the ending here was a lot more laughable than the ending to ABBY, which I think was suppose to be funny anyways.
post #416 of 2004
IMO, these days it's hard to take possessed people very seriously in movies anymore, no matter what. Thanks to the various EXORCIST spoofs and imitators, it always comes across as silly now.
post #417 of 2004
Out of 4 s

Million Dollar Baby
One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest
American Psycho
post #418 of 2004
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Thanks to the various EXORCIST spoofs and imitators, it always comes across as silly now.


I wouldn't say that. The right director and screenplay can do anything. This just had a weak script, lousy effects and a director way over his head IMO.


Edit to add:

For you Boris Karloff fans, Turner Classic Movies will be showing some rare films (as well as some popular) on Friday, May 27th:

3:00 AM The Sea Bat (1930) Mexican fishermen enter a deadly competition to kill a sting ray. Charles Bickford, Raquel Torres, Boris Karloff. D: Wesley Ruggles. 69m.

4:30 AM Five Star Final (1931) An unscrupulous newspaper editor searches for headlines at any cost. Edward G. Robinson, H.B. Warner, Marian Marsh. D: Mervyn LeRoy. 89m.

6:15 AM The Venetian Affair (1967) A reporter investigates an American diplomat's murder in Venice. Robert Vaughn, Elke Sommer, Boris Karloff. D: Jerry Thorpe. C 89m. LBX

8:00 AM West Of Shanghai (1937) A Chinese warlord holds three fugitives prisoner. Boris Karloff, Beverly Roberts, Ricardo Cortez. D: John Farrow. 64m.

9:15 AM British Intelligence (1940) A lady spy uses a British nobleman's home in her undercover work for the Nazis. Boris Karloff, Margaret Lindsay, Maris Wrixon. D: Terry Morse. 61m.

10:30 AM Devil's Island (1940) A surgeon unjustly sent to Devil's Island fights to survive harsh treatment. Boris Karloff, James Stephenson, Nedda Harrigan. D: William Clemens. 62m.

11:45 AM The Walking Dead (1936) A framed man comes back from the dead to seek revenge. Boris Karloff, Edmund Gwenn, Marguerite Churchill. D: Michael Curtiz. 66m. CC

1:00 PM The Mask Of Fu Manchu (1932) A Chinese warlord threatens explorers in search of the key to global power. Boris Karloff, Lewis Stone, Myrna Loy. D: Charles Brabin. 68m. CC

2:15 PM The Body Snatcher (1945) To continue his medical experiments, a doctor must buy corpses from a grave robber. Boris Karloff, Henry Daniell, Bela Lugosi. D: Robert Wise. 77m.

3:45 PM Isle Of The Dead (1945) The inhabitants of a Balkans island under quarantine fear that one of their number is a vampire. Boris Karloff, Ellen Drew, Helene Thimig. D: Mark Robson. 72m.
post #419 of 2004
I've got a couple of those Karloff films I haven't seen lined up on my Tivo already.

For those who haven't seen it The Body Snatcher is probably (haven't seen em all) the best of the bunch.

The Mask of Fu Manchu is a fun film though it's so politically incorrect I could see people getting offended with it.

The one I want to see the most that I've never seen is Isle of the Dead, but I'm debating on whether to hold off until the Val Lewton Box set comes out. It might take the fun out of it when I do get the set if I've just recently watched the films.



First time viewings in Red
Out of


Heat (1995) (9/10)
Michael Mann’s masterpiece crime-drama. Upgraded to the new 2-disc set.

Evolution (2001) (5/10)
Seen Ghostbusters & or Men In Black? If so then you’ve seen this one, only done much better.

Sinbad the Sailor (1947) (5/10)
Lavish yet lifeless Technicolor adventure of the legendary Arabian rogue. Lacks the magic, wonder & charm of Harryhausen’s 7th Voyage of Sinbad or Powell’s Thief of Bagdad.

Rabid (1977) (4/10)
Early no-budget David Cronenberg feature has ex-porn star Marilyn Chambers the victim of a weird experimental skin-graft. For hard-core Cronenberg fans only.
post #420 of 2004
Quote:
"The Mask of Fu Manchu" is a fun film though it's so politically incorrect I could see people getting offended with it.

Only in the "uncut" version is it what's considered Politically Incorrect, which was the one issued on Laserdisc (the VHS tape was CUT). And frankly, I hope Warner (who owns this film now) one day releases it properly to DVD; those who don't like it don't have to watch it (as they say). I hope someone who watches the TCM presentation will tell us if it's cut or not.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movies (Theatrical)
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › Track the Films You Watch (2005)