Quote:
| Except that many of those films from the 40s and 50s were good films, whereas Pearl Harbor is an appalling disaster. Pearl Harbor may have borrowed the basic formula (although its real model is Titanic), but it couldn't borrow the good writing, good acting, and good direction of those early pictures. |
I will never see the difference there to me its the same style of writing and melodramatic acting. Also many of the same things were said by critics about Tora! Tora! Tora! that many people here seem to think is some masterpiece. I will usually take an older film anyday but I'm not so sure here. Tora! Tora! Tora! film was ripped on for having bad pacing, scripting and mediocre acting. Typical reviews were: Roger Ebert: * out of ****. Leonard Maltin: **1/2 out of ****. It is certainly more acurate but is still not a very good film. I'm convinced that peoples dislike of Pearl Harbor stems more from their hatred of Michael Bay more than anything else.




