Casey, as I pointed out last year (and was generally laughed off for) the Pacers have probably the deepest bench in the league. Fred Jones does play a game similar to Artest's and can easily suck up the minutes. He is not as strong, but he is a bit quicker and more athletic. His defense, like Ron's, is based in footwork and position.
The Pacers lose something, but not much. In my mind they remain a 60 game winner when at full strength, minus Ron. Especially in light of how well rounded James Jones' game is and with the surprising talent of David Harrison (think Dampier in his first year).
Add to this that these guys are getting great playing time experience up front to complement their natural talent (like Jones facing and best Paul Pierce).
And then add to that giving JO and Jackson more than a month off of rest, but with practice.
Also, Artest remains part of the team in practice which means that the Pacers have an ace in the hole that many teams don't have - an All-Star calliber defender to hone their skills against. What can another team bring that Fred Jones or S Jackson won't have seen in practice?
I still expect some floundering early on as this roster faces the road (though they were within 1 of Seattle late when Harrison fouled out and Pollard out due to injury) and some fatigue. Plus, I don't expect the introduction of the recovered vets (Reggie, Foster, AJ) to be seemless.
However, the reality is that the Pacers are about to be as on-paper talented as they were before the suspension, and moreso in another month.
This current run is definitely a feel-good situation, but by FEB this will be THE Pacers, not some team just hanging on. To think otherwise is to ignore the depth that has been proven now with results.
I consider TINSLEY more valuable to the Pacers than ARTEST, and I think that was a big part of the East Finals last year. J Jones replacing Artest is better than Gill replacing Tinsley.
Don't get me wrong - Miami and Detroit are also, at full strength, very formidible teams and IMO just as capable of winning it all. However, MIA does have depth issues while DET, well I just can't figure it yet.
When I said bizarro whet I was getting at more than early results is that so much of these early results must now be tempered by the fact that circumstances just aren't normal. Larry Brown's injury seems to be affecting DET, INDY has serious issues, Wallace out for suspension, Brown's sudden retirement. Utah now gets a big injury for a month.
To me it makes these first few months a little invaluable in truly evaluating the situation. We are really still waiting for the real NBA season to show up now, once things return to normal.
All that we get right now is some jockying for early advantages in the final seeding. Plus, I've always felt that it wasn't until after XMas that you could read the real trends in the league, like the Pacers big post-AS collapse under Isiah or Miami's turnaround last year.
CLE looks nice, but James continues to struggle somewhat on the road. For the playoffs he'll need to resolve that obviously.
BOS might still get it together under Doc. As I said before, Ricky Davis is playing much more disciplined (more than I would have imagined he could).
The Pacers lose something, but not much. In my mind they remain a 60 game winner when at full strength, minus Ron. Especially in light of how well rounded James Jones' game is and with the surprising talent of David Harrison (think Dampier in his first year).
Add to this that these guys are getting great playing time experience up front to complement their natural talent (like Jones facing and best Paul Pierce).
And then add to that giving JO and Jackson more than a month off of rest, but with practice.
Also, Artest remains part of the team in practice which means that the Pacers have an ace in the hole that many teams don't have - an All-Star calliber defender to hone their skills against. What can another team bring that Fred Jones or S Jackson won't have seen in practice?
I still expect some floundering early on as this roster faces the road (though they were within 1 of Seattle late when Harrison fouled out and Pollard out due to injury) and some fatigue. Plus, I don't expect the introduction of the recovered vets (Reggie, Foster, AJ) to be seemless.
However, the reality is that the Pacers are about to be as on-paper talented as they were before the suspension, and moreso in another month.
This current run is definitely a feel-good situation, but by FEB this will be THE Pacers, not some team just hanging on. To think otherwise is to ignore the depth that has been proven now with results.
I consider TINSLEY more valuable to the Pacers than ARTEST, and I think that was a big part of the East Finals last year. J Jones replacing Artest is better than Gill replacing Tinsley.
Don't get me wrong - Miami and Detroit are also, at full strength, very formidible teams and IMO just as capable of winning it all. However, MIA does have depth issues while DET, well I just can't figure it yet.
When I said bizarro whet I was getting at more than early results is that so much of these early results must now be tempered by the fact that circumstances just aren't normal. Larry Brown's injury seems to be affecting DET, INDY has serious issues, Wallace out for suspension, Brown's sudden retirement. Utah now gets a big injury for a month.
To me it makes these first few months a little invaluable in truly evaluating the situation. We are really still waiting for the real NBA season to show up now, once things return to normal.
All that we get right now is some jockying for early advantages in the final seeding. Plus, I've always felt that it wasn't until after XMas that you could read the real trends in the league, like the Pacers big post-AS collapse under Isiah or Miami's turnaround last year.
CLE looks nice, but James continues to struggle somewhat on the road. For the playoffs he'll need to resolve that obviously.
BOS might still get it together under Doc. As I said before, Ricky Davis is playing much more disciplined (more than I would have imagined he could).




