Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › Michelle Yeoh, Gong Li and Zhang Ziyi land roles in Spielberg's GEISHA adaptation. World gets dumber
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Michelle Yeoh, Gong Li and Zhang Ziyi land roles in Spielberg's GEISHA adaptation. World gets dumber - Page 4  

post #91 of 187
Quote:
And by the by, the US has been accused of "cultural insensitivity" and "cultural imperialism" for decades now. This isn't a "new era", its the same old crap.

Very true.

If you go abroad you will find that anti-American and, more broadly, anti-western sentiments are increasing. If I were the PR agent for the producers I would have pointed out to them the necessity of considering how the film will play elsewhere for both cultural and financial reasons. Foreign boxoffice now accounts for more than half the revenue of major films. If there is a risk of offending some groups, even inadvertantly, then it is crucial to weight the risks in potential release markets. It is also equally important to not let your work become a propaganda tool of your critics or enemies.

Quote:
I just wish that didn't mean modern-day Westerners have to be crucified for the sins of their forebears.

We will be anyway. Much of the world operates on an extremely long historical memory that we, as a nation, have little concept of. Ethnic hatreds have resurfaced time and again amongst different groups since time immemorial and show no signs of stopping. Some causes of these hatreds go back hundreds or even thousands of years and those ancient events still cause distrust, even outright hatred and war up to these times.
post #92 of 187
Quote:
They can't control how the audience will react, and while they should be mindful of the potential reactions, they shouldn't be beholden to the viewers.

The investors, talent agents, and theater owners I'm sure would love to disagree with that.
post #93 of 187
Quote:
Does anyone really think we're going to come to some agreement here?


No.

Quote:
And frankly, going back to the movie, shouldn't we wait to see the film before we draw conclusions?

I thought pre-judging films before they are released was an HTF member policy!
post #94 of 187
I guess I seem to be saying the same things over and over again so I'll just compress all my arguments in one post:

TOP TEN REASONS WHY IT IS UNNECCESSARY TO CAST JAPANESE ACTRESSES:

1. As a big budget movie, it is important to protect your investment and as of right now, there are NO recognizable Japanese actresses of name value. So even if they wanted to cast Japanese actors, they have NO ONE TO CAST. The Last Samurai had Tom Cruise so it wasn't a risk casting Ken Watanabe.

2. Chinese can pass for Japanese. There are no significant physiognomical differences between them. Any Japanese person watching this movie WILL NOT be able to tell the actresses are not Japanese (until they see the end credits for their names). Anyone who think they can are full of shit. Hollywood makeup artists are really good.

3. Actors should be able to play roles of varying ethnicities. Limiting yourself to one is limiting your range. There is not ONE single good actor in America who has not played a different ethnicity other than their own.

4. Gong, Zhang, and Yeoh are amazing actors and they will get the job done. If you hire an employee, the only question you need ask is: will they get the job done? If they will, that's all that matters.

5. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS RACE. Every evolutionary biologist knows this. There is only one race: The human race.

6. If it takes away roles from REAL Japanese actresses, then TOUGH SHIT FOR THEM. If they are good enough actresses, they will find a way to succeed. There is no such thing as luck in Hollywood. Giving them roles just because they are Japanese is unfair to other actors (like Gong, Zhang, and Yeoh).

7. I have no problem with Mickey Rooney in Breakfast at Tiffanys or Peter Sellers is his Asian roles. If you cannot laugh at yourself, you cannot love yourself. Plus, there were simply no "name" Asian actors available back then.

It is not Hollywood's job to find actors. It is the actor's job to find Hollywood. If there are no Asian actors working in Hollywood, don't blame Hollywood, BLAME THE ASIAN ACTORS.

8. To answer a Tim's question,

Quote:
I will pose one more question out there to Mr. David Ren: If you were to find yourself at an audition for a character who is of Chinese-descent, and you did the best job you could and truly felt that you were just as good as anybody else there or better, but instead they gave the role to a Japanese person or a Korean person simply because they either felt that person "looked" more Chinese (in their eyes) or they had more box-office draw or film experience, would you not take offense to that in some way?


No, because if they didn't cast me, then I wasn't that good. Period. If I walked in and completely BLEW THEM AWAY, made them laugh, made them cry, made them COMPLETELY BELIEVE I AM THE CHARACTER, to the point where they are thinking "That was incredible!", I would get the role no matter WHAT I LOOKED LIKE.

9. Film is art. The director is painting the canvas. He needn't be sensitive to everybody's feelings. If he wants to offend you, that's okay. Lots of great art works are offensive. In fact, if you are offended, he has provoked you in some way, and he has succeeded. He can cast monkeys in the Japanese roles if he wants to. If you aren't happy, just don't attend the movie. Go to a Garry Marshall movie instead.

10. BECAUSE THIS IS A FREE COUNTRY.

David
post #95 of 187
Quote:
Just another case of Hollywood assuming the audience for this won't be able to tell the difference between a Chinese face and a Japanese face.
Wouldn't the role(s) require these three actresses to put on heavy makeup anyway as a Geisha?
post #96 of 187
I bet if they have to speak Japanese in the film, Japanese audiences will scoff much like they did through most of the Japanese speaking in KB Vol. 1 (Sonny Chiba's attempt at Japanese especially, was apparently impossible to understand for a native Japanese speaker!)

If there is no spoken Japanese by the 3 characters whatsoever, then I guess it won't matter at all if they're not Japanese.

-Dennis
post #97 of 187
Quote:
I guess I seem to be saying the same things over and over again so I'll just compress all my arguments in one post:


I think your views are clear; some of us just don't agree with all of them.
post #98 of 187
Quote:
Sonny Chiba's attempt at Japanese especially, was apparently impossible to understand for a native Japanese speaker!


That's odd considering that Sonny Chiba IS Japanese and has been in many Japanese movies.

David
post #99 of 187
Quote:
Sonny Chiba's attempt at Japanese especially, was apparently impossible to understand for a native Japanese speaker!


Native speakers of Mandarin also had problems with Michelle Yeoh and Chow Yun Fat's ability to speak the dialect in Crouching Tiger.
post #100 of 187
Quote:
No you can't. You're just generalizing.

Wanna bet?

Quote:
That's like saying everybody with big lips and broad noses are black.

No it's not.

Quite frankly, I'm not sold on David's definition of racism.
post #101 of 187
Saying that's it's impossible to tell the precise ethnicity of an Asian by looking at them isn't the same as saying all Asians look alike. Somewhat the opposite, in fact.
post #102 of 187
Quote:
As a big budget movie, it is important to protect your investment and as of right now, there are NO recognizable Japanese actresses of name value.
And there never will be if they don't start casting them in major Hollywood film productions.
Quote:
I would get the role no matter WHAT I LOOKED LIKE.
You seem to have a pretty high opinion of Hollywood.
Quote:
Any Japanese person watching this movie WILL NOT be able to tell the actresses are not Japanese
I seriously, highly doubt this is true.
Quote:
I have no problem with Mickey Rooney in Breakfast at Tiffanys or Peter Sellers is his Asian roles.
Good, well then, I will be sending you a box of Charlie Chan DVDs in the morning, because I sure as hell don't want them.
Quote:
Sonny Chiba's attempt at Japanese especially, was apparently impossible to understand for a native Japanese speaker!
I believe he was possibly speaking in a Okinawan dialect which is very different from standard Japanese.
Quote:
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS RACE.
Yes, and there will soon be no such thing as unique cultures if there are many more people with views like you, because it's just all the same to you apparently.
post #103 of 187
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Wouldn't the role(s) require these three actresses to put on heavy makeup anyway as a Geisha?


Geishas don’t always wear the heavy makeup, just when they’re working.

Quote:
2. Chinese can pass for Japanese. There are no significant physiognomical differences between them. Any Japanese person watching this movie WILL NOT be able to tell the actresses are not Japanese (until they see the end credits for their names). Anyone who think they can are full of shit. Hollywood makeup artists are really good.


Some people can tell the differences, and will, and are not going to be full of shit. Isn’t it high time we actually STARTED educating middle America (or “caucasian" America) about these things? I see no harm in educating people. As I said somewhere in the first page, there are people in all ethnic groups that could pass for people in the ethnic group next door. But there are also some physical appearances that are specific enough to each culture, and to make casting choices without regards to such obvious differences (like the one someone earlier mentioned about the Korean actress on the ENTERPRISE TV show), especially when the worst case scenario is a change of character (again, as in the ENTERPRISE show), only perptuates the already large body of ignorance that exists in our mixed culture.

Quote:
7. I have no problem with Mickey Rooney in Breakfast at Tiffanys or Peter Sellers is his Asian roles. If you cannot laugh at yourself, you cannot love yourself. Plus, there were simply no "name" Asian actors available back then.


Tim RH already addressed this more succinctly than I could, but there were, however, Asian actors available for Mickey Rooney's part. I'd bet even money that the filmmakers knew even then that the part was SO grossly stereotypical that no Asian actor, even one desperate for work, would stoop so low. In the case of Sellers, his Asian characters were sometimes disguises, which is bad enough but tolerable, except in THE FIENDISH PLOT OF DR. FU MANCHU, where he was PLAYING a Chinese character. Of course we should all be able to laugh at ourselves, but do you honestly believe all Chinese people will have a good chuckle at the sight of a British man (indeed a product of a culture known for it’s high-minded imperialistic history and, unfortunately, the widespread cultural ignorance that went along with it) taping back his eyes, sticking in buck teeth, glueing on a fu manchu moustache, tinting his skin and giving credence to the myth of the inscrutible Asian? Christ, even I felt bad for Asians when I finally saw that film, although it tanked so badly I doubt many Asians gave it so much as a glance. As a cultural artifact, it’s fascinating, but it’s not necessarily as harmless as you might think. It keeps people thinking apart. And what about Benny Hill for that matter, who used to wear thick glasses, buck teeth, a bowl-cut wig and get plenty of mileage out of the double entendres created by mixing up r’s and l’s. This material should NEVER be swept under the rug, for I think people of all cultures SHOULD be reminded of the cultural ignorance of their forebears (and one of the reasons SONG OF THE SOUTH should be released one day) and even made to feel uncomfortable about it. But that doesn’t mean everyone is going to find it funny, nor did they even then. These may just be two examples, but the entertainment world is FULL of many such examples, so this is hardly anecdotal evidence.

Quote:
There is indeed a history of cultural insensitivity towards foreign cultures in Western society. I just wish that didn't mean modern-day Westerners have to be crucified for the sins of their forebears. If political correctness is supposed to pave the way for more enlightened discourse, shouldn't that also include the perspective of the cultural majority?

Quote:
True, but I don't think those sins should be ignored either. I don't think much of official apologies or monetary compensation, but I do appreciate an awareness of what happened in the past and an effort to be sensitive to the issues.


I think my own comments in various posts on the first page of this thread have at least something to do with what I call the “kitchen table ignorance” practised by my own forebears and those of people I’ve known (and not just white people, I might add), including my own parents, bless ‘em. The kind of ignorance perptuated at the dinner table in countless homes across North America in regards to “the others,” when we see stories about "them" on TV, in the paper, the neighbors next door. Seeminly harmless cracks that rarely, if ever, leave the confines of the family home, yet to which I often found myself playing moderator, or at least trying to suggest a more enlightened approach to viewing people from other cultures (often to my own frustration).

Again, this kind of old school ignorance is, sadly, not just the domain of the “white” majority, if such a thing even exists anymore. I can only go by what Asian acquaintances have told me over the years (and yes, I’ve come right out and asked them), but they’ve told me that their own parents, people who are themselves products of an even less enlightened time (and often a more homogenous culture) will indulge in the "tolerable" slander of races they don’t understand, or make no effort to understand. The least I can say for myself is I'm trying to move away from the thinking that bound my ancestors to their cultural imperialism and insensitivity. To do that, I need to be reminded of it, as ugly as it might be.

Quote:
As far as the argument that this discussion is only apropos in discussing Asians, and not various White or Black actors, I disagree. However, if you do want to limit it to only Asians, are we to conclude that only Koreans appeared in MASH as Koreans, and only Japanese appeared as Japanese (when they visited Tokyo), and only mixed-raced kids portrayed the mixed-raced kids in those episodes? And if not, should we be offended?


I don't know if we should be offended at the portrayals of Asians on MASH (a most un-Korean looking Sylvia Chang played the bartender in later episodes, for heaven's sake), but we should at least be aware that they frequently catered to the ignorance of masses by having Asians of many ethnic stripes play Koreans, even in the speaking parts. For the sake of getting a 22-minute dramedy on the air, I guess they had little choice but to choose from the available pool of Asian-American actors while knowing that few would really notice since (and according to even some of our Asian posters here) "you can't tell the difference," and those who did would most likely be a minority.

I'm reaching back a ways on these next ones, but since David Ren and Kwang Suh addressed them directly to me, I'll give them a shot:

Quote:
Brian,

Do you not see how your posts are incredibly offensive to both Asians and actors? Just because you have an Asian girlfriend doesn't mean you're Asian so don't act like you're one of us. If the Asians on this board have a problem with this casting, we'll speak up. This is not your issue.


I think if my posts were even remotely offensive to Asians this thread would not have grown to 4 pages in the two days I've been away. It probably would've been locked. Obviously, I don't think I'm Asian, nor do I believe having an Asian girlfriend gives me any special right to speak my mind on such a topic. I've had this problem with largely-white Hollywood long before I ever met her or knew about Home Theatre Forum. As others pointed out not long after you posted this remark, it's everyone's issue. Not just yours because you're Asian. "One of us" speaks to the kind of high-minded cultural superiority I've tried to address and live down within my own culture. Mind you, I was not shocked to see it come from another culture for, as I mentioned earlier in this post, virtually ALL ethinicities indulge in a certain amount of "kitchen table" cultural protectionism, no matter how much they swear they're above it.

Quote:
Ah yes. Limited anecdotal experience == must be true of all cases.

My mother looks Caucasian. You'd never be able to tell that she's Korean. She doesn't even have the "Asian" eyelid. I myself have been mistaken for Chinese, Japanese, Hawaiian, Mexican, Spanish, Philipino, African (!).


Quote:
I know a Korean lady that looks EXACTLY like Michelle Yeoh. Whoops, there goes your theory.

Shooting down my admittedly anecdotal evidence with more of your own does not negate my argument. I admited my comments had only anecdotal value. You make interesting points, though, but I've already said there are many people in all cultures who could be mistaken for the culture next door, so to speak. Perhaps your mom and the Korean lady are within that group. Then again, I'll never meet them, so you can't exactly tell me I WOULDN"T be able to guess their cultural heritage.

Quote:
Being grouped based on your physical appearances is RACISM!!


This quote, too , was addressed by others, but the context of my early comments with regards to this issue is far from racist. There's a big difference between, and perhaps even an understanding from, recognizing physical as well as cultural differences from one country to the next and UTILIZING that knowledge to openly slander or hurt those very same people, or treat them like they're inferior to oneself. The latter I have not done. At best, the only people truly getting slandered here were the Hollywood types (regardless of race) who are putting this film into production.

Kirk Tsai and Dome Vongvises said it best:

Quote:
Whether a person can tell if another Asian person's cultural heritage is quite subjective; I happen to believe that most of the time, I can, as well as my family. But this varies from person to person.


Quote:
It depends. I can tell Southeast Asian from Japanese and Chinese.

I agree with these statements wholeheartedly, even though I'm clearly not Asian. Most of the time, I can spot differences as well. Beautiful differences. Not all the time, and I don't SPEND all my time playing guessing games over every Asian or Black or White person that I pass. And no, I'm not Asian. I'm Euro-descended white. But that makes me no less willing to at least try to see the physical, as well as cultural, differences that set us all apart.

Kirk was also one of the one's who pointed out my own ignorant mistaking of Gong Li's "last" name. I hope a mod might be able to fix that error in my thread header. The mistake was, however, an honest one. I've only seen a few Gong Li movies, and the credits listed her name in English without the Chinese script, which I often use to decipher Chinese actor names like hers where both parts COULD reasonably be the family name.

Still, all these pages later, I still think this casting was ignorant. I wouldn't be surprised if it comes out down the road that Japanese actresses weren't even auditioned for the roles. Sompeone mentioned earlier that on a big budget movie "you have to protect your investment and as of right now, there are NO recognizable Japanese actresses of name value," to which Tim RH responded that "there never will be if they don't start casting them in major Hollywood film productions." This is a BIG part of the SUBTEXT of my original argument, and it bears repeating.

Finally, I have to say that though I expected this thread to expand exponentially while I was away, I'm absolutely stunned by how intelligent the conversation has stayed. I though for sure the moderators would have to step in at some point, but to go four pages on a topic like this without such intervention is testament to the cultural diversity and intelligence-in-debate of people who use this service.

Quote:
Anthony Hopkins played a black man in The Human Stain.


I did not know that. Should be worth a chuckle.
post #104 of 187
Quote:
I think if my posts were even remotely offensive to Asians this thread would not have grown to 4 pages in the two days I've been away. It probably would've been locked.

The fact that the thread hasn't been locked should not be deemed to support or refute any characterization in the thread or any argument advanced therein.

M.
post #105 of 187
Quote:
I don't know if we should be offended at the portrayals of Asians on MASH (a most un-Korean looking Sylvia Chang played the bartender in later episodes, for heaven's sake), but we should at least be aware that they frequently catered to the ignorance of masses by having Asians of many ethnic stripes play Koreans, even in the speaking parts. For the sake of getting a 22-minute dramedy on the air, I guess they had little choice but to choose from the available pool of Asian-American actors while knowing that few would really notice since (and according to even some of our Asian posters here) "you can't tell the difference," and those who did would most likely be a minority.

Watching the old episodes (and the film), it's painfully obvious to me that the actors are not Korean at all (horrible accents). I do however also agree that the producers most likely had very little choice in the casting, due to the limited pool.
post #106 of 187
Thread Starter 
Quote:
The fact that the thread hasn't been locked should not be deemed to support or refute any characterization in the thread or any argument advanced therein.


Nor did I believe the moderators or HTF in general particularly supported my views (or the views of those who took my side) or opposed them, just that, hopefully, they didn't find the thread overtly racist in any way, since that was never my intention. Surely at least one of the reasons the thread has remained active is because this is a sensitive, important topic that has, for the most part, been discussed in a fair and rational way, with valid arguments made on both sides of the issue.

P.S. Still any chance of changing "Li" to "Gong" in the thread title?
post #107 of 187
I'm just still shaking my head that this thread continues on, not that it should be locked, but that some people are making such a big deal out of this. If it were Caucasians we were talking about, I could understand, but we are talking about Chinese women playing Japanese characters. For me, that's close enough. There has been plenty of discussion about wether or not people can tell the difference. Put me in the camp of not being able to tell. There is enough similarities between Chinese/Japanese/Korean people that they could pass for each other to most people.

Now, there are other issues, like if the characters need to speak Japanese. Obviously, a native speaker will tell that it is false in some way. Maybe, tho, this is a good argument for a homogenious cast, since at least you can be consistant.

While it would be nice to have a Japanese cast, I don't see it being practical from a marketing perspective. I also don't see it as a requirement to tell the story, if you have actors who can be believable in those roles. As long as it is well acted, I don't have a problem with any of these actors.

Jason
post #108 of 187
"You seem to have a pretty high opinion of Hollywood."

No, he just has common sense and practical first-hand experience of Hollywood and is familiar with the plight of Asian actors. He is informed on how the casting process works, and why. He knows that the film's intended audience isn't a teeny tiny fraction of people who are hyper-sensitive to racial representation on the screen. He knows the audience for this film is the giant, enourmous mass audience spanning all demographics all across the globe, an audience that understands the common-sense fact that all theater and all fiction film is make-believe, and so they don't get their panties in a knot when a Chinese woman *acts the part* of a Japanese woman. These masses also don't get upset when an Australian named Gibson *acts the part* of Hamlet the Dane, they don't get upset when a Texan actress named Zellwegger *acts the part* of a boozing Britsh wanna-be floozy -- in point of fact, people usually acclaim these performances as great examples of acting.

Isn’t it high time we actually STARTED educating middle America (or “caucasian" America) about these things? I see no harm in educating people. As I said somewhere in the first page, there are people in all ethnic groups that could pass for people in the ethnic group next door. But there are also some physical appearances that are specific enough to each culture, and to make casting choices without regards to such obvious differences (like the one someone earlier mentioned about the Korean actress on the ENTERPRISE TV show), especially when the worst case scenario is a change of character (again, as in the ENTERPRISE show), only perptuates the already large body of ignorance that exists in our mixed culture.

Out of all the gazillion things that it might be important for all people to learn, it is important for white middle-class Americans to learn how to tell a chinese woman apart from a Japanese woman based on racial facial features? This is what I'm talking about when I say that good-hearted people have the best intentions, but instead, all they do is create more segregation and division.

To be honest, I don't want to be educated as to the racial distinctions between a Chinese woman and a Japanese woman. I want to just see the woman. Why do I need to be trained to be able to see everyone's ethnic differences, when all I want is to see people for who they are, not the folds of their skin or skin color or eye color or hair color. "Oh, but we must be sensitive to race. Therefore, you must be trained to see how we are all different. Now in this slide, you'll see what a typical Japanese woman looks like. Notice that blah blah blah...In this slide, you'll see a typical Chinese woman. She differs because blah blah blah..."

This material should NEVER be swept under the rug, for I think people of all cultures SHOULD be reminded of the cultural ignorance of their forebears (and one of the reasons SONG OF THE SOUTH should be released one day) and even made to feel uncomfortable about it.

And that is PRECISELY the attitutde and rhetoric that guarantees Song of the South will not receive a mass home video release in America anytime soon. "Song of the South should be released so that people can be made to feel uncomfortable. Song of the South should be released so we can educate people to the cultural ignorance of their grandparents and great-grandparents." More likely than not, people with racial axes to grind will just use the occasion of the home video release of SOTS to bash Disney in the press to promote their own groups and racial agendas.
post #109 of 187
Quite an interesting thread—and a subject on which I have some views, even though I imagine that the energy level has about died out.

Basically I fall into the, ‘it is not necessary to cast strictly along ethnic lines’ camp. Even though I think that to cast a non-Asian today, as Charlie Chan would not be well-received.

There are two main reasons for my feeling: artistic and political (I hasten to add that I don’t mean political in the sense that prohibits discussion according to HTF rules).

Taking the later first, as one defines what constitutes ethnic, cultural, national or racial boundaries on which actors can rightly be allowed to play what parts, I think that it becomes incredibly difficult to determine who can be deemed suitable for what part.

Dome claims to be able to distinguish between Southeast Asians and Chinese and Japanese. And I think that I can as well, but I am not truly sure that I could pass a ‘double-blind’ test. Indeed I think that I can tell the difference between peninsular Malaysians and those who come from the island of Borneo. No doubt there are differences between Thai and Cambodians. And probably there are differences between various Vietnamese (some of the hill tribes don’t look like they should live in the Mekong delta) groups.

In South Asia it is quite easy for almost anyone to tell the difference between the ethnic types of north India and the Indians from Tamil Nadu. But perhaps not so easy to distinguish between ethnic Tamils from Sri Lanka and from India. Here it is pretty easy to get into a situation where it would be better to have an Indian play a part of an ethnic Tamil, native Sri Lankan than most Sri Lankans. And better casting to have an ethnic Aryan from Germany play the part of a North Indian than an Indian from the south of India.

I could go on, but my point is that national and ethnic boundaries make it too hard to accurately determine which actor (by ethnic and nationality) should be cast in which part. There are just too many variables.

Put another way, there may be a set of people who can distinguish ethnically accurate casting for any particular region of the world—but the rest of the world will have a very difficult time making those fine distinctions. No one (or at least very few) is equally aware of all the world to be able to do this—if it can be done at all.

As to the artistic side of filmmaking—it is that. It is art. And commerce. The filmmakers try to make money and present their artistic vision at the same time, and with varying emphasis on which is the more important depending on the filmmaker, the film and the backers. While it is important to be aware of the political standards of the day, both in order to not offend people and to be able to make money--standards change and are not usually global—but it would not seem to be the responsibility of the artist to parrot those standards (nor even to advance those standards according to the criteria of some people).

Quote:
The margin of error in identifying people from nearly any culture of the world (based on facial feature, lanuage, accents, etc.) is only as narrow as the worldview of the beholder.
I’m not sure what to say about this, but I’m pretty sure I have a reasonably wide worldview and I am pretty sure that my margin of error is pretty high, even in areas where I have lived and worked extensively. I think that I can tell some differences, but I’d miss a lot of the time.

It will be too bad if the casting of the film results in some poorly accented Japanese. I can only say that I won’t be as put off as listening to any number of ‘Southern’ accents from non-Southern actors or Australian accents from non-Australians. And on and on.
post #110 of 187
Quote:
If it were Caucasians we were talking about, I could understand, but we are talking about Chinese women playing Japanese characters. For me, that's close enough.
Close enough?!? Does that make it any more right, just because they are "close enough", according to you? I am utterly dumbfounded by some of the comments on this forum, I really must say.
Quote:
they don't get upset when a Texan actress named Zellwegger *acts the part* of a boozing Britsh wanna-be floozy
Clearly, some people have short-term memory loss, as a lot of British press talked about how angry they were that an American actress had been cast in the role of the beloved English character.
Furthermore, do we not recall that the roles in Harry Potter were cast almost exclusively to British people, both in order to maintain the authenticity of the picture (and this is a fantasy film by the way) as well as to not offend anybody who would laugh at seeing Americans try to do British accents. The major leading roles in these films were not "big names" in Hollywood before they starred in the first picture, but that did not stop it from becoming one of the highest-grossing films in recent history. The book "Memoirs of a Geisha" is sufficiently famous enough, I believe, to be a big hit (if they do it well enough), even if they cast unknown Japanese actresses in the leading roles.
post #111 of 187
Quote:
Close enough?!? Does that make it any more right, just because they are "close enough", according to you?

It's not right or wrong. It's an artistic choice.
post #112 of 187
Quote:
Clearly, some people have short-term memory loss, as a lot of British press talked about how angry they were that an American actress had been cast in the role of the beloved English character.

I can’t speak for Ernest’s memory, long or short term, but I can observe that my memory was sufficient to remember that he was talking about the global, mass audience, not a reasonably small, subset of critics from the UK.
Quote:
He knows the audience for this film is the giant, enourmous mass audience spanning all demographics all across the globe, an audience that understands the common-sense fact that all theater and all fiction film is make-believe, and so they don't get their panties in a knot when a Chinese woman *acts the part* of a Japanese woman. These masses also don't get upset when an Australian named Gibson *acts the part* of Hamlet the Dane, they don't get upset when a Texan actress named Zellwegger *acts the part* of a boozing Britsh wanna-be floozy -- in point of fact, people usually acclaim these performances as great examples of acting.
Plus I would observe that you sort of missed the larger point of his post, where he does not think it so important to be educated in the facial differences between Japanese and Chinese.

And have completely ignored his overarching point that this is art—not politics.
Quote:
Close enough?!? Does that make it any more right, just because they are "close enough",
I’m not sure that it makes it wrong.
post #113 of 187
Quote:
It's an artistic choice.
Do you have any proof of this? It could very well be a financially-based decision (or simple laziness on the part of the casting director).
Quote:
Plus I would observe that you sort of missed the larger point of his post, where he does not think it so important to be educated in the facial differences between Japanese and Chinese.

And have completely ignored his overarching point that this is art—not politics.
That's because I so disagree with his points that it's not even worth responding to them.
post #114 of 187
Quote:
Do you have any proof of this? It could very well be a financially-based decision (or simple laziness on the part of the casting director).

OK then, it is a combination of artistic and commercial considerations. I would have thought that there was exhaustive discussion of the commercial considerations already in this thread.

And Tim, since you seem to be concentrating on political correctness, you might consider that in making such distinctions, you are likely critiquing someone whose first language is not English (though I find Ricardo’s English to be of a high order).

Plus you might consider that you have no proof at all to support your implication that the casting director might be just plain lazy. And the further implication that such laziness would be tolerated on a multi-million dollar project. Hollywood may be many things, and making movies may be filled with ineptitude, but I’ve never seen anything to suggest that making movies was anything other than very hard work.

Very hard work.

I don’t really think that laziness would be tolerated.
post #115 of 187
Quote:
That's because I so disagree with his points that it's not even worth responding to them.

How can you disagree with the point that it is a movie—fantasy, not reality?

This is not opinion, it is fact.
post #116 of 187
Quote:
I don’t really think that laziness would be tolerated.
I suppose I should have been more clear. What I meant by "laziness" was that they seemed to have just gone for well-known Chinese actresses right off the bat, without trying anything so [sarcasm]far-fetched as maybe a casting call in Japan![/sarcasm]
post #117 of 187
"Clearly, some people have short-term memory loss, as a lot of British press talked about how angry they were that an American actress had been cast in the role of the beloved English character."

Yes, and then the film was released and was a sizable hit in the UK, and then this Texan was nominated for a BAFTA Film Award as Best Actress in the role. Despite some angry pre-release chatter in the British press, the proof was in the pudding, not in her racial profile nor her country of origin. After the film was actually released and seen by a wide British audience, Zellwegger received great acclaim from the British press and public and was nominated by the British version of the Oscars for Best Actress.

The sequel to the film is underway, and I haven't heard a peep of protest from the British press. Have you?

Maybe this is another one of my points that isn't worth responding to.
post #118 of 187
Quote:
To be honest, I don't want to be educated as to the racial distinctions between a Chinese woman and a Japanese woman. I want to just see the woman. Why do I need to be trained to be able to see everyone's ethnic differences, when all I want is to see people for who they are, not the folds of their skin or skin color or eye color or hair color.

Checking back on my own posts, I can honestly say I never said anybody had to be educated. I made the claim I could tell the difference between Southeast Asian and Chinese/ Japanese. What I take exception to (and others I assume) is having my actions called rascist which they're not. Otherwise, I agree with Ernest on this part.

I did say Zhang Ziyi would be wrong for the part. Yes, she does have name recognition, but aside from the cinematic elite who knows who she is with her body.....of work, does she constitute that big of a box office draw? I'd hardly think so. She easily overcame physical barriers (trained in dance according to IMDB) to learn martial arts (which is a dance of sort, but I'm too sober to make that argument), but whether she has any mastery of the Japanese language is another issue which I hope IMDB (or some overzealous fan site with her bio and pics) could clear up.

But man I'd be pissed if the geishas spoke in English (unless they did that Hunt for Red October trick) with other Japanese characters.
post #119 of 187
Quote:
I suppose I should have been more clear. What I meant by "laziness" was that they seemed to have just gone for well-known Chinese actresses right off the bat, without trying anything so [sarcasm]far-fetched as maybe a casting call in Japan![/sarcasm]

And again I ask the question that you asked Ricardo: ‘how do you know that they did not audition Japanese actors’?

What proof do you have?
post #120 of 187
This reminds me of one of my big pet-peeves..

If it's a no-name part ("shady villian #3"), hell, even a minor character, why not get a person who can actually speak the language of the country they're supposed to be from??

I HATE hearing painfully garbled Russian in the movies!! Why not just hire a %$#@ Russian!?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movies (Theatrical)
This thread is locked  
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › Michelle Yeoh, Gong Li and Zhang Ziyi land roles in Spielberg's GEISHA adaptation. World gets dumber