Re: Blade Runner (Beware: SPOILERS!) About Deckard
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MatthewLouwrens
Well, if you want to go with a non-replicant interpretation of the unicorn origami, you could argue that Gaff is saying that Deckard's hope for a life with Rachel is just a fantasy?
|
That's a good interpretation/explanation, IMHO.
[quote=rich_d]In the last page or so, I think things have heated up a bit much. May I suggest that it's been an interesting discussion? So let's keep it that way. [/QUOTE/]
Very true. I think that's why some of us have felt the need to chime in against 42nd Street Freak, not because we disagree and support the Deck-is-a-rep theory, but it's the vitriol poured on what is in our mind still a vaid interpretation.
Like it or not, it's in the movie. Even if its genesis was via a mistake on the part of Sir Ridley, it's there, deal with it. No one is saying "Deckard is absolutely definitely 100% positively a replicant and if you think he's human you're an idiot". So likewise, please don't take the attitude that those who feel he is a replicant are.
