Quote:
| Well, to a certain extent, I don't know as there's anything wrong with being style over substance. |
I agree and thought that when writing it. Perhaps I could ammend that to say a lack of substance OF style.
Just style for style's sake rather than for an intended affect, and not neccessarily a narrative one. You can make mood films, including hip-moods, moods of overt violence, etc. To some degree Pulp did this of course. But Kill Bill, IMO only I realize, simply had no focused vision of mood or style. It didn't feel like the style existed for any consistent reason at all.
And that was why I was strongly let down by QTs effort, though at times the film was just what I hoped for. As I said in my top 10 list post, the film felt like QT referencing himself (and I've heard others say that).
So I think you and I just disagree on the effectiveness of his use of style in KB, not that using style is inherently wrong. I'm totally with you on the idea that it is about how you feel for the 90-180 minutes in the theater. It doesn't matter WHICH emotion you feel, just that the film can engage you strongly. Comedies make you laugh a lot, thrillers scare the shit out of you, dramas send you into tears or introspection, and kung-fu revenge flicks keep you wanting to see the next fight.
QT at times made me think "boring, you are going too long with this" or "gee, is this a reference of a reference".
However, I would agree whole-heartedly that the film showed a great deal of creative ambition in trying to be something interesting to watch, reference or otherwise.