I think that it is impossible to review this movie without its content impacting the review. I have *never* seen a dispassionate review of JFK in any DVD forum that manages to stay confined to the matter of its picture quality, sound quality, extras etc. without the reviewer making some kind of editorial comment endorsing the movie's arguments about the real events it purports to depict. The review in this thread was but the latest example of that tradition.
I respect the positions of the moderators on this matter, but I should note that it was only because I saw an editorial endorsement of the film's content in the initial review that I felt warranted a response and not the desire to start an argument for the sake of it.
I respect the positions of the moderators on this matter, but I should note that it was only because I saw an editorial endorsement of the film's content in the initial review that I felt warranted a response and not the desire to start an argument for the sake of it.







